As a matter of fact, I have a friend who did exactly that; some years ago he bought 1 BTC for his kid (who was toddler back then) and he plans to give him BTC when he reaches 18. How situation is developing, kid might get a million dollar gift when he turns 18

Now it's of course impossible for many of us to do something like that, but I dont think that's a bad idea to buy a little bit when you can and set it a side for your kid.

I used to see Doge as a funny meme coin, but after Elon Musk got involved, it's nothing but a pump and dump coin. At this point, I honestly wouldn't touch Doge with a ten-foot pole. So no, I don't think that Doge will force or bring any kind of improvement to either BTC or crypto market in general. If anything, it's one step backward.

Yep. Its so easy to recognize TG group that is using services OP is advertising. Worst of all, all these boths and inflated number of members in Telegram groups lead to the situation that if some group has only few thousands of members, people are suspicious and think that there is something wrong with it.  In the end, even legit groups inflate the numbers just to appear as any any other groups.

At first, I used to try to always have at least 5-10 merit to share just in case I stumble upon some really good posts, but later on I gave up on that so now I just spend as I get them so now I generally don't have merits to share for more than a day or two. Just see no reason to keep them.

I used to bookmark good posts too and merited them after I got some, but also kinda stopped with that practice as it's pretty easy to find merit worthy posts if you are active enough.

I honestly don't know with with kind of people you interact, but the ones I know  that are talking about financial freedom etc are not scared to pay something using crypto, and are perfectly aware of all the risks  of not having safety net when you are sending crypto to someone.


Damn that's crazy. What happened in the end, did they manage to catch the thief?

As everything in crypto happens in cycles, so its the same case with this ETH and other altcoins price increase. Back in early 2018 BTC dominance fell to 38%, and eventually it went up above 70% again. Now we are seeing the same thing, BTC price is going sideways for some time, that gives alts more room to breathe, therefore decreasing BTC dominance which is currently approximately 48%.

So, even if BTC dominance falls below 40%, it doesn't mean that BTC is not relevant anymore, it is just a cycle and sooner or later people will take the profits from their alcoins and put it back into BTC, which is much safer in the long run.


Exactly this, ETH and BTC can perfectly coexist as you said they are trying to do different things.

Good find, both of those threads are shilled by sock puppet accounts, no question about it. While checking their post activity, I found at least two more announcement threads that are doing the same:

[ANN][MORA] Meliora Finance Official Thread!!
[ANN] [$FREN] Frenchie Official Thread!!!
[ANN] YFDAI |DEFI|Revolution in Decentralised Finance | Launchpad 🔥🔥


Yep, you can pretty much expect that his future ANN threads will be shilled the same way, as that's the way they usually operate.

For me, Roma was without the doubt much better film than Green Book, and it was the best movie of the year. I think that bigger problem than being Netflix movie was the fact that is non-English speaking movie, and Academy was reluctant to award such movie with Best Picture award, so they waited for the  next year and gave it to Parasite, therefore making the precedent.

You have to remember that Oscar is first and foremost award for American cinema, so its only natural that they want to protect their own film industry, but it is a good thing that they are changing, and with Parasite making that precedent it will be much easier for foreign movies to win he same award.


Yep, just wanted to write that directors are those who decide who will get nomination, and they obviously weren't impressed with Farrely and his work on Green Book. When it comes to award itself then everyone votes for every category.

Yeah, they won't give up easily once they found a new trick, and especially if they see that its working. They gonna keep milking it for some time.


Yeah, maybe someone actually got scammed for 0.15 BTC and if thats the case, then their little trick really paid off, as 0.015 BTC is decent amount of money. What scammers sometimes do is that they send some BTC by themselves, in order to trick those that wants to check explorer. At least ETH address is completely empty, with no transactions.

That's nothing new really, I remember that in the late 90s when I started betting, Oscar was already included along with all other similar stuff like. Regarding where you can bet on Oscar, basically all top gambling sites offer that, so it won't be hard to find it next year, if you decide to bet on it.

Hah yeah, they made website looking like a twitter page.Scammers are always figuring out new ways to scam. Worst of all, even though this is not very good scam attempt, some will probably fall for this.  By the way, you stumbled upon this scam attempt on Twitter, or it showed up in Google?

Out of curiosity, I checked BTC and ETH address they are using, and so far on BTC address there is 0.015 BTC from 1 transaction , while ETH is still empty.

Here are addresses if anyone else wanna check it out occasionally.
BTC

ETH

So what if its Netflix documentary, does it make any automatically bad?  Netflix spent 15 billion dollars on original content in 2019 and 17 billion dollars in 2020. So yeah, they mean business and every year they keep getting better. For me, paying Netflix subscription is a no brainer as I know that money will be spent on quality stuff.

Regarding your nonsense about "Netflix taking advantage and won in less important category", just a reminder for you that in 2019 Netflix's Roma won 3 Oscars; Alfonso Cuaron for best director, Best Foreign Language Film and best Cinematography. Are those also irrelevant categories too? In Best Documentary category this is their 3rd win for now, so no surprise either. And no, Best Documentary is not an irrelevant category.

So yeah, you should really check your facts before writing nonsense.



Kudos for the the win, bookies really underestimated Frances McDormand!

What you basically get is 25% of the trading fees that you paid. Doesn't make any sense to do it, especially not doing it on that dodgy exchange. The only time when this is worth trying to do it after they finish with the KICK dump. As the price goes lower, so is the amount of KSD needed. But still, you have to be crazy to go for it, and hodl those shitcoins hoping that hey might get pumped again in the future. Unless you are very experienced trader, you will probably loose more money while trading than those tokens are worth, no matter the current price.

As I said before, system is built around tricking greedy and naive ones, and luckily for Kickico, there is abundance of those in crypto.

Age of Rust graficki dosta dobro, tako da ne sumnjam da ce biti i hardverski zahtjevna ali koliko vidim to je neki FPS, a to nekako i nije bas moj zanr igre. Zadnje od takvog tipa sto sam igrao je bio Unreal nekad 1999-2000 kad se jos islo u igraone igrat sa ekipom. A i  nisam obnovio komp vec jedno 4-5 godina a sada kupovat GPU je dosta skup sport.


E ovo je bas igra po mom ukusu, tako nesto i trazim u biti, a i stvarno dobro izgleda. Steta onda sto  NFT itema vise nema a i sto je tako skupo da se opremi lika. Ali budem malo bacio oko i probao, bas da vidim.

You forgot the crucial thing here, and that is if the price of KICK goes up significantly so 888,888 KICK is worth $5-6k, that means unlocking of those tokens will become much harder too.

Remember, their unlock (or "unfreeze" as they like to call it) system is tied to the value of KICK, so as KICK price goes up, so the amount of KSD needed. So, if aidropped KICK tokens are suddenly worth 5,000 USD, you will have to get 5,000 KSD, and to get 1 KSD you have to spend 4 USD in trading fees,meaning 20,000 USD spent in trading fees. Unless you are whale, it will be impossible for you to reach that. And if you are whale, you won't bother with these shitcoins. Catch 22.

Once again, you have to be either insane or completely clueless  to try doing something like that, and that's exactly their target audience. God knows how many greedy noobs swallowed the bait, sent the money to their exchange, did KYC and then realized that unlocking is much harder than it looked at first.

Cannes and Oscar are two completely different things. First of all, Cannes is a film festival and as any other film festival, it's not so much focused on movies from the one country, whereas Oscar is mainly award for US movies, despite the fact that they have "Best International Feature Film" and other non American movies can be found there.

I would compare Oscars to Cesar awards in France, which gives wards for best French movies, and similar thing have other countries. Thing with the Oscars is that United States cinema is so dominant around the world that it's no wonder that it's influence is huge.

Regarding that in Cannes always the best film wins Palme d'Or, looking at the previous winner I wouldn't agree with that. Majority of them are fine movies, but in the end it's all about personal preference. Another thing. Palme d'Or  winner is chosen by a jury of only 12 people. One interesting piece of trivia, Parasite was only the 3rd movie to win both Best Picture Oscar and Palme d'Or , and the first one since 1955.

---

The father is without the doubt an excellent movie, and by far the best depiction of dementia that I saw. But it is also demanding movie, so I can understand why some (and especially younger and less experienced viewers) might not like it.

You can, but it's still extremely rare to see something priced in crypto and it will take some time before this goes into mainstream, probably until some big store like Amazon or Alibaba starts showing the prices like that, and lead the way for others.

All in due time though, I still think that current usage of cryptocurrencies surpassed the wildest dreams of those early supporters. And it all started with the two pizzas

If you are investing money that you don't need and don't mind waiting for a couple of years, I would say that buying BTC at these levels is hardly risky at all, but if you are into it for a quick profit, then it's very risky.

In my opinion, best way to invest in BTC is to use dollar cost average method, so that you don't have to think about timing the market because as newbie chances that you will do that properly are slim.

Yep, I think that it's very much possible. Just remember that around the same time back in 2017 BTC was below 3k, if I can recall correctly, and we all know at what price it ended by the end of the year. Since BTC is at approximately 55k, it needs less than 100% increase to reach 100k which is not that much really, when you think that we have 7 months ahead of us.

Even if 100k by the end of 2021 doesn't happen I would say that BTC had a very good year.

I'm sorry to hear that you are your funds are held by Freewallet for so long, but unfortunately noone on this forum can really force them to do anything. They have been tagged and flagged by senior members already and as you can see that didn't help much.

But who knows, maybe they decide to do something after they see your post..
.