Link: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71BBAFBE7D789D3FFingerprint: E4C0 014A FBC9 0816 E388 7FE5 71BB AFBE 7D78 9D3F -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=S6AV
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Quoted, in case you ever need to refer to your public key in the future  |
|
|
|
bump  If nobody else speaks up with better reasons to get an invite by tomorrow morning, i'd probably give the the keys to MagicIsMe and letyouearn2 since they had the best reasons so far  |
|
|
|
|
I do think this is a valid concern...
If you waited untill the blocks were pretty full for a while, then sent coins to your steam wallet with very low fees (so on average, you reasonably assume be sure they would take hours, if not days, to confirm), buy a game, sell that game for BTC, then double-spend one of the inputs => you might have found a way to scam the buyer of your steam game...
Offcourse, it'll depend on the policy steam has around this problem... Will they block a game that has been bought if the inputs are double spent, or will they take legal action agains the initial buyer, but let the second buyer keep his game. Also using an escrow to hold the funds for 1-2 games might make the risk a bit more acceptable for the second buyer.
I'm pretty sure they'll leave their zero-confirm policy once this has happened a couple of times tough.
|
|
|
|
I am also wondering about that. till today on one share their experience here about cryptomixer affiliate program.
any one here who working as affiliate worker, please share his experience and thought here. is he get payment or not?
I am using my affiliate link but I am not sure if anyone used it since there is really no way of knowing it in the site. I linked it in a link shortener so I can know how many clicks it gets and it did get clicks but I'm unsure whether they mixed some coins usin my coins or not. So far I have not received any from the affiliate. It depends upon to whom you are refering to cryptomixer as most of the bitcoin users even some elite members don't know or think it is nessary to mix their coins. So all those number of clicks will not be converted. I think only 0.1% of clicks may get converted or may be 1% max if you promote your link in darknet or in some crypto related blogs and social groups. Sure, but the question still remains: without any statistics, it's simply impossible to tell if you'll get payed... Unless somebody can show us a tx from an affiliate payment, i'm hesistating to start pushing traffic towards their service. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, i'm going to wait another 2-3 days and then give the invites to the people that seemed to have the best reason for needing an invite |
|
|
|
My bitcoin adress
1MNCoEX16wxtyaUAshtpnmpGkxCpyP4MLp
please Quote
Here you go in case you ever need it! |
|
|
|
Hi guys, Got 2 more keybase.io invites... Since i got my invite for free (thanks defcon23) i'm paying it foreward and give my invites away for free to Like last time, i'd prefer to give the invites to members that have an actual use for them... If you think you have a practical use for a keybase.io invite, share it with me and i'll see if i can give my invite to you! I'd prefer to give away the invites to people that actually do business on this forum (so they actually have a big benefit from being able to have a keybase.io account), and have a little bit an established account (full member or over, neutral trust or over), but i can always make an exception if you have a really good reason! |
|
|
|
in my opinion the only good bot is the one that you code yourself but since that is not an option for everybody, you should first try open source bots if you can find them so you can twerk it if you want.
two suggestions: qutaloo (it is kind of a free bot you only have to hold a balance of their alt)
C.A.T (expensive but it seems good, haven't tried it myself)
you're right about coding one yourself, but i doubt there are a lot of people out there who have intimate knowledge of trading, combined with an intimate knowledge of the ALTcoin scene, combined with very good coding skills. I'm pretty sure most people that have a combination of those 3 skills are already trying to sell their bot |
|
|
|
This program is running for 1 month and 11 days now. I've just read the 4 pages of this thread, but couldn't find any proof of payment.
Since they pay out once a week, there should have been 5 paydays already, can anybody confirm the affiliate program actually pays out its members?
there was a testing concept ran by cryptomixer in service section. the owner gave away 0.01 btc to everyone to test the service and review about it. and almost every one confirmed after testing that the mixer is paying to everyone. I think there is no doubt about that. Edit: this is the link of CryptoMixer Testers Reviews: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1375491.0Thanks for the link . I was actually more concerned about their affiliate program (i don't really have a lot to hide, so i seldom use a mixer. However, i do have some sites on which i could potentially promote cryptomixer, but only if their payout is confirmed)... Without showing any stats and stuff, i just wondered if there were affiliates that got payed |
|
|
|
It's a very nice idear, but at this moment, it seems the site is filled with videos i can find for free in a legal way... I guess it would be more interesting if you started featuring unique, high quality or copyrighted videos (offcourse, licenced to you). I do love the layout and the simplicity of this site, and i encourage any new bitcoin startup, so i wish you good luck in your project! |
|
|
|
I always feel rather sad when a high ranking member starts talking about "yoshit" or "shitmixer" because they think all people pick these campaigns because they seem to have a lower standard for accepting participants while there must be more people like me: people that only post when they want to/have time to post and picked a campaign accordingly.
I tought those words seemed a bit to familiar to me, maybe next time try not to copy/paste text and use it in the same thread?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1466065.msg14804405#msg14804405 |
|
|
|
|
This program is running for 1 month and 11 days now. I've just read the 4 pages of this thread, but couldn't find any proof of payment.
Since they pay out once a week, there should have been 5 paydays already, can anybody confirm the affiliate program actually pays out its members?
|
|
|
|
there is more signature campaign with no minimum post require aka 0 minimum post. at least [banned mixer] is. oh i see why you didn't mention [banned mixer], maybe you make your list from here: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0and pick up the wrong campaign crypto-games.net that right below [banned mixer]. [banned mixer] is the one with 0 minimum post, not crypto-games.net. That is correct, i must have mislooked I only knew bit-x and bitmixer, so out of curiosity, i looked up if there were more 0-minimum campaigns out there, and i must have made an error... Thanks for notifying me! |
|
|
|
ok i found out if i right click save the page, and i disconnect from the internet, i am still able to use this website,
So i can put in my password on the paper wallet with a computer that is not connected to the internet.
So once i have made the paper wallet, i can transfer all my bitcoins to the paper wallet, and even if someone steals my private key, they are not able to spend it because it is encrypted,
So after that, i take a screenshot of my paper wallet,
So really, in cold storage i will have:
1. 5 copies of = my paper wallet(laminated physical paper)
2. 5 usb sticks of = a .png picture screenshot of my paper wallet
i don't need any wallet.dat file anymore!
that's it!
and the password to decry-pt my paper wallet is in my head
am i right?
you are completely correct, and maybe even over-doing it (i mean, 10 copys might be a bit over the top? Altough it's completely up to you... whatever makes you feel safe...). I think the more important question is: where do you save your 10 copys.... If you put them all in your floorsafe, and you get robbed or your house burns down, you still lose everything. It might be a good idear to keep a copy with the notary, or in a bank safe, or with your parents/siblings/... BTW: you do know not to use the paper wallet you posted earlyer, yes? It is compromised, so it's a throw-away now! |
|
|
|
there is no best signature campaign for everybody, you have to choose the one that suits your posting habits. for example signature campaigns like bitmixer and bit-x are automated weekly payments that has 0 minimum post requirement which IMO is one of the best features.
I think it is not a good feature, because if we had joined the signature campaign we automatically have to work and make a post, otherwise it would be detrimental to the owner of the signature campaign. therefore if you do not make a post in one week is better to kicked out of the signature campaign, because there are still a lot of members who want to join. best features of bitmixer and bit-x are using bots and automatic payments are always on time. I actually think the owner of a campaign might benefit from 0 minimum posts: If somebody makes 0 posts/week, the owner of the campaign owes them nothing, but the member might still have a couple hundred posts he made earlyer. Each of these posts carries an advertisement for the campaign owner. So somebody with 200 historical posts, making only 2-3 posts/month at the moment might actually be a really good deal for the campaign owner: very little costs but a big ammount of advertisement space. |
|
|
|
Like a couple others said: it looks like you're a bit confused about the technology. What i would propose is the following: Go to https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com/bitcoinpaperwallet/generate-wallet.html?design=alt-testnetCreate a TESTNET paper wallet Go to a TESTNET faucet (can easily be found in google), claim some FREE TESTNET coins Install a TESTNET wallet on your android phone and on your desktop (you can use bitcoin core and run it on testnet to) Experiment with these TESTNET coins untill you understand what you're doing Send the TESTNET coins back to the faucet once you know what you're doing, no need to keep them, they don't have any value anyways |
|
|
|
there is no best signature campaign for everybody, you have to choose the one that suits your posting habits. for example signature campaigns like bitmixer and bit-x are automated weekly payments that has 0 minimum post requirement which IMO is one of the best features.
^^ this is in fact the first reason why i picked bitmixer... For me, i think it's important i only post when i want to post... So i really don't like sig campaigns that have a fixed minimum quota. Such a quota can only lead to "forced posting" in my opinion... At the moment, there are a couple campaigns that have 0 minimum posts: - yobit.net
- betbtc
- bit-x
- bitmixer
- cryptogames
- btc2bid
I always feel rather sad when a high ranking member starts talking about "yoshit" or "shitmixer" because they think all people pick these campaigns because they seem to have a lower standard for accepting participants while there must be more people like me: people that only post when they want to/have time to post and picked a campaign accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure you'll get a completely different result if you would run the same test several times spread over a couple of weeks.
As said before, i think it depends on how many transactions are in the mempool, how big they are, which fees they have, which pool mined the blocks, how big the blocks were,.... From time to time, you also see allmost full blocks for 3-4 consecutive blocks. I'm pretty sure that your very low fee transactions wouldn't have been included in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been running the demo of leonArdo for a couple days now, i'm not affiliated, but i do like the way it works, and i also like the fact the dev is really active.
I asked him for a 32-bit linux binary, and got one trough PM just a couple hours later...
That being said: it's the only trading bot i've ever tested, so i cannot compare it to, for example, C.A.T.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
