I guess the moral of the story is to aspire to be the worst shitposter in forum history because then you might get promoted to staff?? Good example.
No. The moral of the story is that you aren't smart enough to understand it; i.e. you are just a butthurt shill.  If you add someone to SMAS without informing them how are they "cheating"?
That is not cheating, and I have never said that it was. In fact, even if they know they are on SMAS, how are they "cheating"? Its the campaign managers prerogative to accept an applicant or not on the merits of their posts.
Wrong. If the campaign explicitly states that people on the SMAS list are disallowed, and it links the very same list in the OP of the post then it is up to the potential applicants to check whether they meet this requirement or not (the same goes for any other requirement). Trying to get into the campaign knowing that you are banned is equal to attempting to cheat and thus it gets handled appropriately. Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past
I have not. will the 8 people that you tagged yesterday with negative trust and the following for feedback be offered a second chance?? "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming."
Maybe in 3-4 years.  Right so you engage in account trading
That is a lie. And everyone who is a liar and deserves negative trust for lying
FTFY.
If you were a honest member with actual concerns, you'd be trying to do something beneficial to this forum and not go on vendettas out of spite. Poisoning the well. |
|
|
|
Why do I doubt this? You won't, when i will reveal my original account. I really Respect you. Is that a real "when I will" or did you make a mistake and intended an "if i"? If not, when will you reveal this? Well that's what i don't want. I may in future move into a campaign which is managed by them. So i don't want to shut my doors.
If you're a good poster, there's always room for you somewhere else. However, I wouldn't expect a good campaign manager to deny entry to a good poster just because said poster criticized them (given that the criticism is objectively valid(!) and not some butthurt nonsense). Now Reply Honestly Lauda, If a person is caught in a shady behavior, where its clear that they were after gaining trust, Should they be red painted or not? it's that simple. I will leave this issue alone if you respond to this.
These things aren't bipolar, i.e. they aren't just either shady or not shady. They get increasingly complex and have multiple categories as soon as you add more variables, e.g. malicious or not. Therefore, that needs a bit more context, but the general answer is "yes". Also i am not blaming you for not red painting them. its just that these users have did something which they should have not. I would like to hear your opinion on why they aren't getting red painted?
You aren't properly categorizing behavior. You claim that they were trust farming, right? However, you can categorize such behavior as: 1) Blatantly trying to buy trust. An example of this would be users that made posts stating they'd pay others for trust. 2) Admitted to buying or attempting to buy trust after suspicions were raised (or similar) without a post as described above. 3) People that might or might have not done that (but have not admitted to such nor is there any post which would confirm said behavior), but some people think/feel they they have done that/are trying to do that. 4) Other.
IMO we are dealing with the 3rd case here. While you may be inclined to believe that, I am inclined to believe others. Generally I'm really doubtful of people, especially those that I've had next to no interactions with. My interactions with aTriz and Aventhe so far were brief and all of them very recent. I do not believe that: a) They are alts (as some have previous claimed). b) Their intention was to farm up trust. In case of doubt, the best that you can do here is just keep a closer eye on them. |
|
|
|
Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too.
Why are you repeating something that is well known and irrelevant? I became a staff member as a result of my ban(s). Without them, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign.
Both of which are my right. If you try to cheat, then you are not trustworthy and you get tagged. You think those people get a second chance??
Depends on each individual case. Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.
That is a lie. This connection is just a butthurt and weak attempt at discrediting me. The "second chance" regarding Xanis and myself happened during and post the ban. |
|
|
|
I don't think Quickseller denied having other alts. Did he?
He has denied at lot of stuff that turned out to be true. There is a very good reason for which anyone rational considers him the scum of this forum. Especially as you stand here refusing to take responsibility for your alt's account trading----proven, archived and tied to your bitcoin wallet!!
That is a lie and you wonder why you got tagged, hypocrite. |
|
|
|
Like I said above, theymos is more likely to fulfill this request when coming from the person themselves, rather than from a third party.
Like I said above, I'm asking you to do this for your own account/alts. Is there a statement of mine that you are questing that could be proven/disproven if I did this? There is a statement of yours that could be proven/disproven if you consented to this kind of disclosure. Whether there is a statement or not is completely irrelevant. You're deflecting. Why does this not surprise me given that you're a scammer and sell accounts to other scammers? |
|
|
|
LMAO, I have Huge Respect for you lauda,
Why do I doubt this? Please stay out of this. Just a hint I am in one of the top paying Signature campaigns here  I just don't want to get my original account in trouble that's all. When you have demons roaming around, people have to take precautions.  Neither aTriz nor Aventhe can't literally do anything to you other than kick you out of their campaigns or put you on their personal blacklists. Therefore, you have no reason to hide behind an alt(?). |
|
|
|
Like I said above, theymos is more likely to fulfill this request when coming from the person themselves, rather than from a third party.
Like I said above, I'm asking you to do this for your own account/alts. If you are telling the truth, then you should have no reason asking for this information to be posted? right?
I'm waiting for you to do this. You are stooping to new lows of pathetic reasoning. |
|
|
|
I have been open about having many alts in the past, so it would be of no surprise to anyone when he posts many accounts associated with my owning them at one point.
Is that supposed to be some kind of joke? You on the other hand just said that that you used one additional account to post from, and implied that you did not purchase any accounts from said account or otherwise ("to your knowledge"). You asking theymos to post every account that you currently or in the past have owned would help you verify this statement.....or more likely disprove this statement, and confirm you are in fact lying.
This sounds a lot like you're giving yourself an out. Why don't you really ask theymos to do this? It is likely that you're trying to prevent more of your accounts from being tagged by me. |
|
|
|
|
TheButterZone, here's a word of advice: Ignore that shill account and save yourself the time. It is likely someone that got denied entry to a campaign or got booted out of one since both aTriz and Aventhe are campaign managers. Therefore, their concern is not legitimate but rather just a vendetta out of spite.
|
|
|
|
This sounds a lot like you are giving yourself an out from being accused of lying when someone finds proof of an actual transaction with an account buyer/seller.
This sounds a lot like you're a biased baboon. Anyone with higher education should know that memories can not be trusted in any way or form, especially not old ones. Don't ask me about the past. QED. Why don't you create a thread asking theymos to post all of your alts that he believes you have currently and ever have had?
Why don't you? When someone is asking for themselves, theymos is more likely to give up this information because this person is giving up their privacy themselves, rather than someone else requesting that theymos violate the privacy of a third party. "Why don't you create a thread asking theymos to post all of your alts that he believes you have currently and ever have had?" is what I meant with "why don't you". I didn't ask why you don't do that for my accounts. Do you have a reason to not want to ask theymos to provide this information? Would you have a problem with theymos publicly posting all of your current and previous alts?
Do you? If you don't, then do the same for your own alts. If you don't plan on doing that, then stop wasting my time with your hypocritical bullshit. |
|
|
|
You were placing bids on accounts listed for sale. You asked for a quote for 10 accounts. What would you call that?
Something that was very fitting with my behavior at the time: post padding. Also, to your knowledge. You have either purchased accounts or you haven't. There is absolutely no way you purchased (or tried to purchase) an account without your own knowledge.
There are most certainly multiple ways of something like that happening: 1) Temporary loss of control of the account due to whatever reason (e.g. hacking). 2) Simply not remembering, which I don't and which is why you are asking for bullshit "statements". There are probably more. Why don't you create a thread asking theymos to post all of your alts that he believes you have currently and ever have had?
Why don't you? |
|
|
|
Yes there's a subject: I'm a butthurt liar with shill accounts
FTFY. Playing ? Sometimes you deny that Xanis is involved in accounts trading, and sometimes that Xanis is not your alt.
Nope. My responses are consistent. That's absurd too.
Nobody believes you other than QS and your own alts. Therefore, no. |
|
|
|
You're trying to go out the subject
There is no subject. and not involved in account trading?
That account was not involved in account trading, but was legitimately making posts to up its post count (aka post padding). You mean you stopped account trading 4 years ago ? No. There is absolutely zero evidence of any such behavior despite your absurd claims. I have double checked now, and the account has not been used since the end of 2014 thus it has been dead for 3 full years (not 4). I acknowledge that I stopped two years ago  ! Nope, just as QS didn't stop. |
|
|
|
OP is a liar, similar to QS. You said you had left the forum, but you didn't. In addition to that, you are now stating that I have sold accounts(?). Now you wake up with an army of shills, which is exactly why you were tagged. Pathetically ironic. Not really. Things change over time. What was acceptable then is no longer acceptable now.
This is something he did over at least two years, including a time when this activity was considered scammy behavior. He was trying to buy at least 10 accounts as part of a single transaction at one point. The only thing I did for is post from a second account for a period of time. I have not tried nor purchased any accounts to my knowledge. As always, everything that you and your moppets are saying is a lie. Would you find it unusual/strange that the person leading the crusade personally engaged in similar behavior not long before the crusade started?
4 years ago is "not long ago". |
|
|
|
 Nearing ATH levels: Bitstamp | Total bids: 112280264 USD. Total asks: 2670 BTC. Ratio: 42049.54378 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0206 seconds
|
|
|
|
Why you remove bonuses for posting on your official forum?  Unnecessary campaign complexity. That bonus was very rarely used by members anyways. Yes, you're right, but i'm new in this campaign and want more bsd coins, so i'm ready to talk in bitsend forum  Irrelevant. Please do not post about this anymore as I am not reinstating that time wasteful part of this campaign. Find other ways to earn more coins or just buy them. |
|
|
|
Is it not quite obvoius that Bitcoin is in dire need of a update?
As i understand it bitcoin can only handle 2000 transactions every 10minutes, Globaly. This sounds like a very low amount. I imagine a future where i got a Visa card with bitcoins. In that future there must be like 1 miljon transactions every 10mintues.
Already now we have a problem with transactions, if segwit2x where implementet, it would only raise the cap to 4000, which only would of solved the problem for a short period.
What's the plan to fix this? How could there be a future for bitcoin if this is not fixed? Im currently invested with 2BTC, and for me this is the biggest worry for bitcoin.
The plan is LN https://lightning.network/ Which will be ready soon™ It will make big blockers look like relics of a forgotten past. Changes like these take time and testing you don't want to rush things when you're dealing with something that hold billions of people's dollars. That is not the plan. This is the plan: a) Signature aggregation + Schnorr. b) Sidechains. c) Lightning Network d) Minor block size increase coupled with a hard fork that fixes some old bugs and makes optimizations where possible. e) Weak blocks. f) Other various improvements to come. A normal block size before any of these is just a bad joke and a huge sign of incompetence. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone as Gavin, Jeff, Thomas nor Peter do not even have comparable skills to the Bitcoin Core developers and could never come up with something as sig. aggregation (note: This will give us more transactions per block using the same resources).
Bitcoin can already process a lot more than it is doing. Whilst the recommended fee-rate was 500-750 satoshi/byte for normal transaction, my Segwit transactions went into the next block with a fee-rate of 150 satoshi/byte or lower. |
|
|
|
Please update this thread to the proper format: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Where did you find this website? Do they have an account on Bitcointalk? |
|
|
|
Why you remove bonuses for posting on your official forum? Unnecessary campaign complexity. That bonus was very rarely used by members anyways. |
|
|
|
I speculate that some individuals bought large volumes of these in order to abuse the market and this "community". It will be interesting to watch the 2nd version of the Genesis race. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
