`
I think the presence of Cristiano Ronaldo with Al Nassr is an opening door for all of us to know and wonder about the Arab Pro League. With his fame, Ronaldo has had a huge impact on the League. After that there were lots of former European players who went there. Most recently Steven Gerrad has officially coached the Al Ettifaq Club. As for the quality of the League, I agree with you, indeed for the Asian region, the Arab Pro League is better than the Chinese Super League according to several sources, below it are the J-League Japan, Star League Qatar and Thai League. it is possible that in the future the Arab Pro League will be more competitive and develop even better, what is impossible to build if the club has a lot of wealth. Yes. Indirectly, the country through their football club can boost and improve their image on the world sports stage. introducing their culture and the tourism sector is an advantage and an achievement that should be appreciated. After Cristiano Ronaldo's arrival, the Arab Pro League is now recognized around the world. Ronaldo's prominence has attracted a lot of interest and additional European players to the league, much like a magnet attracts metal shavings. Steven Gerrad's domino impact as Al Ettifaq Club coach is obvious. For football fans in the area, this is a thrilling time. Moreover, it is exciting to see the Arab Pro League outclass the Chinese Super League. If they keep going in this direction, who knows how far they can go in Asian football. Positive signs include the league's expansion and increased level of competition. In addition, the worldwide focus is beneficial for the country's image as a whole, as it draws more attention to the country's cultural offerings and tourism industry |
|
|
|
when your tokens leave your wallet, it definitely is not yours anymore and this is required when you are yield farming and staking. something that we always want to avoid so the saying goes "not your keys, not your coins". yielding using the stablecoin has been scary since the time of luna.
but we are still interested to send out coins though all for the money we can make when apy is attractive.
You make a crucial point that cuts to the heart of one of crypto's biggest problems. Its like being trapped. APYs are tempting, but you risk losing token control. Financial markets face this dilemma regularly. Banks and financial corporations are trusted to double our money. Yield farming offers great returns at significant risk. Purists prefer control over yield, thus "not your keys, not your coins" makes sense. Yield farming with stablecoins - or any token - may not be as dangerous as some claim. Many DeFi platforms feature strong security. While mistrust is warranted, would it be wise to miss out on prospective advantages owing to an overblown fear of loss? |
|
|
|
`
Timing and with some mix of luck when it comes on choosing the project that you are engaging into because if you arent really that able to to have these things then it wont really be giving out that kind of success rate on the time that you do deal up with projects or investments here on this space. There are indeed coins which can give out thousands of multipliers on which making your money been folded for how many times if we do speak about profits but getting yourself in into such bottom would really be that not that simple at all. Most of the time we do really like on entering those presales and public sales on the time that you've been aware on such project because getting in this early would really be giving out that kind of opportunity for you to earn that huge on the time that the price or value would really be that able to climb up that high. Your view of investing timing and luck is mostly correct, but it lacks intelligent decision-making. If you only rely on timing and luck, investment becomes a gamble. Luck has a role in financial performance, but study, insight, and strategy do more. Early pre-sales and public sales offer large rewards, but they're risky. If it fails, it might cause major losses. Many such projects fail to deliver, resulting in investment losses. Cryptocurrencies are not a quick way to make money. It requires project evaluation, risk assessment, market dynamics, and a balanced portfolio approach. High multipliers are misleading because they underestimate the dangers and overestimate the potential advantages. |
|
|
|
An investor should be optimistic about his investment, which is why he needs very in-depth research on the type of investment that will be chosen before finally buying it, as well as investing in crypto, if an investor is not optimistic it is very possible that he chooses crypto only based on other people's suggestions, and does not research first.
Investing in crypto is not easy because there are so many choices, especially if the investor is a typical investor who really likes risk because the profits will be very large, then research must also determine profit targets and don't use the news that is circulating as a benchmark because often it is the only news that made by speculators to create big movements in the market either so that there is panic selling or panic buying for fear of missing the train.
I see your point and agree with it to a significant extent. A confident investor is essential. I disagree with you, however, that hopeful investors won't be swayed by the advice of others. Optimists might be led astray by the herd if they are not given all the facts. However, a gloomy investor is not necessarily going to skip out on research. Investors that are willing to challenge everything often end up with the highest success. In fact, their natural skepticism may make them stronger researchers and more adept at recognizing possibilities. For this reason, I believe it is crucial that we dispel this misunderstanding. While it's true that there are plenty of high-risk investments to be found in the cryptocurrency market, there are also plenty of potential payoffs. All it takes is a little more research, a few more pointed inquiries, and a willingness to feel a little uneasy. |
|
|
|
In cryptocurrency world, once the trust has been broken, it's very hard for it to be regained thus, those projects who often failed for some reasons are just getting abandoned. For some reasons, the old developers of this project rebranded. Now the question is will they be as successful as what it was when it's still on the top 10? I don't think so especially if the trust has been broken already.
Those who saw what happened, and those who experienced losing tons of money because of this project, for sure they will not even touch or they don't even want to heard anything connected to them anymore. On the other hand, there are these newbies who might not know what happen in the past, and they might invest into it because they didn't do any research at all, and they just invested into it. Poor newbies.
What are the chances of the project to be a successful one "again"? Pretty low TBH, and even they will be rebranding, there will be some who will attach them to Terra Luna. The incident that happened months ago has been already written as one of the worst scams in crypto history. As for me, Nahhh I will not touch that project at all. For me, a failed project will always be a failure no matter what they will do with it.
Once trust has been broken, its true that rebuilding it is a difficult uphill battle. Rebranding efforts remind me of a phoenix trying to emerge from the ashes of a doomed undertaking. Does it eventually rise again? Skepticism, on the other hand, helps keep me rooted in reality. It's like developing a new version of a low-rated film and wondering whether people would still go see it. This latter option is the one I like. Let us not, however, write off all hope for development and alteration. Even though the odds are stacked against you, you should never give up hope. Newcomers to the crypto space, however, may not be as wary since they have never been hacked before. This might give the renamed enterprise a false sense of legitimacy, but eventually the reality will come out. The likelihood of a successful return seems about the same to me as that of a poor romantic comedy. Keep in mind that, in crypto as in life, it is essential to grow from your experiences. If the stove has ever burnt you, don't use it again no matter how much you think it has been improved. |
|
|
|
|
Indeed, Bitcoin Cash, a cryptocurrency designed for the public, is now the darling of large financial institutions due to regulatory sanction.
I would contend, however, that this is not inherently a violation of its intended purpose. Ultimately, isnt the primary objective of any cryptocurrency to achieve widespread adoption and usage? If institutional investors begin trading Bitcoin Cash, this could result in increased liquidity, greater stability, and perhaps a rise in its use for everyday transactions.
While it is true that the ethos of cryptocurrencies is to challenge the central banking system, we must keep in mind that these financial institutions still exert considerable sway over the economy. The fact that their advent into the world of cryptocurrencies can cause such market fluctuations speaks volumes about their significance.
|
|
|
|
I think that even though a verified Twitter account signifies a higher level of trust and authenticity than an unverified account doesn't mean it has to be a strong point for a new project. Verification only shows that the account owner is a valid person or entity, but does not provide any indication of whether they have expertise, success or credibility in a particular project area.
In order to assess whether a verified Twitter account is a strong point for a new project, it is important to look at the content and reputation of the account. Consider followers, engagement, the type of content posted, and the degree to which the account has proven expertise or success in areas relevant to the project.
Like a brand name on a product, Twitter's blue checkmark does not ensure the product's quality. While the verified badge is a good indicator of legitimacy, it is by no means a guarantee of skill or achievement. It's analogous to the possession of a valid driver's license. It doesn't say anything about their driving skills, just that they're legally authorized to drive. The rise of "cancel culture" and the proliferation of fake news via verified accounts have further eroded people's faith in the internet. Therefore, it is risky to rely only on this as a strength. Careful analysis is required to determine the viability of a new Twitter-based venture. Its a lot like detective work; you have to piece together the pieces (content quality, audience engagement, quantity of followers, track record, etc.). These factors are significantly more telling of a project's potential than a simple green checkmark |
|
|
|
`
A way for the developers to enrich themselves and gain access to the KYC documents of millions of users for free by making them fool with some coins that are worth nothing at all. They've never mentioned anything about a roadmap or any KYC or transferring the tokens from testnet to mainnet by completing certain tasks, they came up with all these when they've already got millions of users from all around the globe signed up and mining the shitcoin. I don't really understand how people actually believe in such projects to the extent that they compare it with Bitcoin which is literally the king of cryptocurrencies and is the ruler of the market, when it moves, the whole market moves with it, and they are comparing it with a shitcoin, lol. Your suspicion is reasonable. Opportunistic developers exploit people's hope and curiosity in this crypto world. KYC for access to a large user database might be troublesome for data gathering and misuse. Not all KYC-required projects are scams. Distinguishing enterprises with real-world potential from those seeking a fast buck is difficult. Comparing new projects to Bitcoin is premature and uninformed. Time, resilience, and a commitment to decentralization have won Bitcoin its unmatched place in the cryptocurrency industry. I appreciate your warning against naive faith in new projects, and I encourage people to do the same. |
|
|
|
Op is right. As an investor, i bought lots of altcoins. But due to my busy schedule, i can spend less time to maintain my portfolio. After checking those altcoins, i found some get scammed. And some change their contract address. Some project send me their new token automatically in my wallet but many of them, want us to claimed within a certain time. I miss that and lost to take those token back. Then i realise, how important it is to always keep eyes on their Social media channels specially Twitter and telegram. Otherwise it is possible to loss a huge worth capital that is invested with a altcoin
Yes, there are instances where projects got updated and need to use other chains or some create new development and new coins got introduced. You need to follow their updates as if you missed the information you'll lose your investment. And one good thing when you are following the social media, the chance that you can anticipate some good runs when good updates are provided. You can position yourself and make some good use of those positive information. Good news most of the time also created good market run. Every bit of data now has the potential to flip the script on your investment, much like a piece of a jigsaw puzzle. When it comes to the importance of social media in this lightning-fast competition, I couldn't agree more. In the ever-changing world of cryptography, staying abreast of developments can be crucial. It's Darwinism with cryptographic twists: evolve or die We must not lose sight of the fact that the cryptocurrency market is quite volatile. Even if the news is good today, the market could drop tomorrow. There is no foolproof method or pattern that can ensure achievement. Isn't that the beauty of it all though? The unpredictability, the unknown, the ever-changing nature of things? This is the thrill of Bitcoin |
|
|
|
I gave up on airdrops ever since the altcoin bubble burst , and we moved from ICOs to IEOs...of course IEOs are better but the higher risk ICOs offered lucrative tokens and airdrops were generous too.
Not forgetting the fact that too many people out there know how to mint their own coins means we have too many shitcoins on the market that have given airdrops and altcoins a bad reputation because of selfish devs trying to get rich quick!
But of course we still have good airdrops out there just a matter of knowing good platforms to get them..
The change in tone from ICOs to IEOs, from naive hope to jaded pessimism, is a familiar one. There's no doubting that the collapse of the altcoin market was a devastating blow to many of us. You are also correct in saying that the airdrop scene has become more complicated because to the influx of new tokens, many of which are of questionable quality. Nonetheless, Im confident that even within this mayhem, chances can be found. Unfortunately, airdrops have gotten a terrible rap thanks to the "get rich quick" crowd. Still, there are legitimate initiatives that employ airdrops to expand their supporter base. Doing your homework is the most important step. Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, is the benchmark by which all others are measured as we navigate the murky waters of the cryptocurrency market. We need to keep our sights on that lighthouse while we fly through the airdrop world |
|
|
|
I'm not an altcoin holder, and I don't like them much personally.
However, I do recognize their quality in attracting new investors to the market, and for some of them, in trying to solve real-life problems.
But the question is, have altcoins done more good than harm to the crypto ecosystem? For every thousand investors and new crypto enthusiasts that altcoins have brought in, how many have they disgusted with scams, rug pulls and other shenanigans?
They're important, because they represent a huge financial volume. But for me, their greatest quality is to demonstrate day after day how solid, useful and self-sufficient Bitcoin is.
I can't even count the number of messages I've read on the internet saying: "I got into cryptos for a get-rich-quick scheme with some altcoins, after failures and disappointments I'm now all-in BTC". Many don't understand how altcoins work. Those who make money, make altcoins useful because they earn profit with them, those who lose money, make them useful because sometimes it directs them to BTC.
It's nuanced, as always, ETH is not a stupid memecoin, and don't offer the same possibilities. So I think some alts can be important, while others are just losses for everyone (except for their dubious developers who get rich on the backs of investors, examples are numerous on the BSC chain).
Altcoins have brought variety and confused the crypto environment. They've attracted investors, but at what cost? Scams and broken dreams might occasionally overshadow the initial interest and financial influx. Bitcoin, in its quiet strength, has weathered criticism and upheavals. It's the digital gold standard, whereas cryptocurrencies are volatile, risky derivatives. Still, grouping altcoins is unfair. ETH and others are helping blockchain development. In altcoins, the visionary-voracious line is thin. Educated investors should follow the Bitcoin beacon through this muddy terrain. |
|
|
|
 After repeatedly failing to coach teams in Europe, there are now rumors that Steven Gerrard will be Al-Ittifaq's coach in the Saudi league next season. According to The Athletic, Gerrard previously turned down the offer and is now confident he will be Al-Ittifaq's coach. Indeed, at this time there are still no offers from other European teams after the last time Gerrard handled Aston Villa and was sacked in October last year and I think there is nothing wrong if he accepts the offer from Al-Ittifaq first to fill the void as well as to make a lot of money. Gerrard achievement as a manager is not so impressive that last time he was train Aston Villa but he was sacked and Arabian team Al Ettifaq indeed officially want Gerrard to be their next manager and actually this rumour was appears since few weeks ago and Gerrard even was invited went to Saudi Arabia to see the condition of Al Ettifaq stadium and the players but last time i have read the news related to this rumour is Gerrard himself has been rejected the offer from Al Ettifaq because although Al Ettifaq will offering fantastic salary for him but Gerrard doesn't interested to spend his managerial career on Saudi Pro League this becauae he still want to train european teams The rise and fall of Steven Gerrard's managing career has made for intriguing reading, wouldn't you agree? The Rangers went undefeated throughout his time there and went on to win the championship. Nonetheless, his eleven months with Aston Villa were cut tragically short, when he was fired. The arrival of Al Ettifaq to the Saudi league presents a fresh chance. Even if it's not quite as esteemed as the English Premier League, maybe Gerrard might use it to hone his managing talents after his loss at Aston Villa. I consider this when I read that Gerrard has turned down Al Ettifaq's offer, despite the enticing pay. His choice for European teams may reflect his desire to continue competing at a high level. What type of effect do you think a choice like that would have on his career? |
|
|
|
Sri Lanka Women vs New Zealand Women 3rd ODI match has already started today. New Zealand Women won the toss and went to bat. Scored 55 runs in 16.3 overs. So far New Zealand Women have lost 2 wickets. Bernadine Bezuidenhout scored 4 runs off 15 balls. Run out. Melie Kerr got out with 19 runs from 36 balls. 2 batsmen of New Zealand Women team batted very badly. For which now New Zealand Women are under a lot of pressure. Sri Lanka Women started to perform very well in bowling.
This seems to be a challenging time for the New Zealand women's cricket squad. The Kiwis have been making solid progress despite the early departure of two important players. Sophie Devine and Suzie Bates' ability to boost the run rate and put their side in a good position is now crucial to the outcome of the contest. To put serious pressure on Sri Lanka, they must accomplish the Herculean challenge of getting their team score closer to 300 runs. Will they be able to handle the pressure? |
|
|
|
unless those spectators are professional gamblers or experienced gamblers. when an experienced gambler, when they see a video shared by an influencer, they will never assume that it really happened in real life because experienced gamblers know that all of that is just a way for influencers to attract the attention of their fans to believe and immediately register and bet immediately.
this is a stark warning to novice gamblers not to get too greedy after seeing any gambling video shared on social media as it will only make matters worse.
for me, any video shared by influencers on social media, I consider it just entertainment that is only to be watched but doesn't need to be an example.
We must always look beyond the surface, it is obvious that an influencer which is sharing a video of themselves gambling has the intention of not only entertaining their fans, but they are also trying to create an incentive for their fans to gamble and earn some money with the referrals they may get. Once you acknowledge that obvious truth then whatever results the influencer may get during the video will not affect you, as you will know that whatever profits they are getting cannot be gotten by you, as you cannot replicate their methods due to your lack of a casino sponsorship. Indeed, influencers who share videos of themselves gambling are doing more than just entertaining their audiences. By using their popularity to promote the casinos that sponsor them, they hope to increase foot traffic and revenue. In the corporate world, this is a very standard method of promotion. By keeping that in mind, we can analyze these videos more objectively. Since they are in the privileged position of receiving a sponsorship, we recognize that the outcomes they are exhibiting may not be indicative of the experience of the typical individual. Always keep in mind that there is a degree of risk involved with gambling. A successful outcome for an influencer does not necessarily translate to success for their audience. Therefore, we should approach gambling with prudence, keeping in mind that there is a significant range of possible outcomes and the distinct risk of incurring losses. |
|
|
|
|
Possible psychological phenomena explaining your experience. The brain is wired to look for patterns even if they don't exist. Because your mind associates losing with balances reaching multiples of 100, it's possible that this fear is impacting your performance.
One useful piece of advice is to stop worrying about specific numbers and instead concentrate on developing sound betting habits and managing your money. Keep in mind that the results of one roll should have no bearing on the results of another, as dice are statistically independent.
I cant claim I've been in the same situation as you when gaming, but I can say that I've been trapped in cycles before. The trick is to not allow these assumptions govern how we play. Maintaining a level head is crucial, rather than losing sight of the big picture in favor of arbitrary numerical goals.
|
|
|
|
I still haven't found anyone using AI like this but I'm sure people must be doing it. Is anyone aware of any reddit posts or other places that people may be discussing different prompts they are using to try and do this sort of gambling? I'm very tempted to do some sort of thread documenting the success of AI in gambling decisions, but so far I haven't found a good method to do so. Hopefully I get it figured out before the NBA season starts again. It would be cool to start doing some fun stuff with AI when that time rolls around again.
The thing is that, at least with OpenAI, the models are trained with old data, years old sometimes. So, you can't realistically use the ready models to ask for a prediction of a game that is happening soon. The most important data, recent one, is not available in the model yet. Maybe there are other models trained specifically to do this, including the latest results, and news, etc, but I haven't seen them yet. Maybe people are using them privately, which would make sense. The most important criteria about "open"AI is that it's open source, well at least a lot of it. It means that you could build your own AI with a good foundation. A lot of people built a lot of AI products by simply getting the base code of openAI and then improved on it or shifted it to whatever they want. With that regard, we could have a company or just some people who will end up downloading that, and then they will end up doing something much better with it as well. They could put all the information in there and they will do very well. I am not saying that it will be easy setup, but it will certainly be a good period for sure. I think it will be a sad moment to see when AI is used for risky stuff that may end up making you lose money, but it's still good to see it improve at least. OpenAI's openness enables for endless invention and enhancement, limited only by the user's creativity. OpenAI's base code has enabled many innovative and effective AI applications. Its wonderful to think of people or organizations improving this technology to solve big problems. It's like giving someone the keys to knowledge and seeing them discover new possibilities. AI, like any strong technology, may be abused. AI's potential losses in hazardous operations might be worrisome. However, it's development. As we progress, AI ethics need to be strengthened. |
|
|
|
I think it is safe to say that we've heard about some professional gamblers, right? The ones who does gambling for a living but I will not be advising anybody to do that as that is a very risky job and surely it is not right to do it without anything on the sidelines like investments and other businesses as if you rely solely in gambling activities, things will turn upside down for you because it is not everyday where you can have some good moments in this kind of job.
I'm sure getting daily income is difficult at gambling, let alone making it a source of income, it's obviously very difficult, even if it's done by professionals, no one is really rich and has great success at gambling, all of them will experience defeat from time to time, so it's never recommended to make gambling as a place to make a living. Working and trading are the right solutions to get a source of income let alone make a living, in the past I also had a friend who thought that gambling could be a steady income for him it turned out that for the first week he got lucky winning streak after that he suffered a big defeat because of greed so all his money and assets his family's property sold out only to make up for his previous losses and make up the money he had lost before. but never came back again. he became a frustrated and poor man now. Because luck is random, even the most astute gamblers can't guarantee a certain result. This randomness makes it hard to win consistently while gambling. Its upsetting that your buddy saw gambling as a way to make money and lost everything. Obviously, the potential harm from gambling outweighs any short-term gain from winning. Working and trading, which are grounded in tangible skills and information, are better, more long-term options for generating revenue. It's critical that we disseminate experiences like this so that others can learn from them and avoid making the same mistakes we did. This is a serious problem that requires our immediate attention and preventative measures. |
|
|
|
Even I'm a hard core lover of gambling, I don't really gamble a lot, but when I do, prefer the time when I'm free from everything else, so it's probably weekend that I prefer for gambling.
I'm not much into sports betting because I don't get enough time to watch any matches, so I don't really have much idea of which sport and which team is doing how, so I prefer playing some slots or other gambling games whenever I feel like gambling for a while.
I don't visit casinos because we don't have any around the country, I might do it if I go somewhere where land-based casinos are available.
As I said I don't gamble a lot, so it's not difficult for me to remember how much I've spent, so I don't really keep a record anymore, I used to but I don't now. When I used to do so, I used excel for the records.
Im glad you gamble responsibly. You seem to have time and expenditures under control. Gambling on weekends is smart-balance, right? Slots and other casino games may be entertaining without having to follow sports trends. Simply spin the wheel of fortune Without a land-based casino nearby, one can't just walk in for a game, and there's no commute. But you may end yourself in Vegas. If you don't gamble much, keep track of your spending. It may seem tedious, but it helps track those odd splurges. If you prefer something simpler, try Excel again or a note-taking software. |
|
|
|
`
And this would be a never ending cycle on which there would be that someone who would really be that believing that these kind of strategies does really exist and believe that it would really be giving out advantage for them against the house without even trying to realize on how does reality works. Never ever consider that there's some strategy or ways on beating up the house or taking up advantage on having that sure win on gambling because this one cant really be that possible.For those people who do make out such claims then they are simply lying. It is how lucky you are is always the main reason on why someone do win up on gambling because its true that we might be using up on the same strategy but if you arent that lucky enough then you would definitely use. You shouldnt really that instill into your mind that there's a working strategy because once you do have this kind of mindset then it would really be creating out that kind of impression and beliefs on mind that might really be putting you up on big trouble on the time that you would trying out to push or pursue this one. The idea that one can consistently outsmart the casino is a hazardous myth. There is an inherent disadvantage for the player in every casino game. This indicates that the house has a statistical edge over the player at all times, no matter what tactics are used. Its possible for someone to have temporary success, but this is more likely the result of chance than of any deliberate plan. Keep in mind that casinos are simply companies. If there were a guaranteed way to win at the casino, nobody would be gambling there. Those who profess to have a foolproof plan are either completely wrong or being dishonest. Avoiding this train of thought is of paramount importance. Gambling is meant to be fun, not a means to an end (making money). Play only with money you can afford to lose, and do not risk more than you can afford. |
|
|
|
The bitcoin ATMs seem to be accumulated in some specific countries as per the coinatmrader website and I guess that follows the local government rules and regulations. I would like to see them come to more countries but I guess this will follow the same order as western companies did gradually moving to eastern countries.
I do feel encouraged to see such news come up, hopeful that in future I can at least wake up to see a bitcoin ATM in my neighborhood grocery store and people use that regularly without law enforcement breathing down their necks.
Good or bad, this instills hope for such a future and criticism and finer points being kept aside, I hope this project goes ahead and makes a name for itself.
Bitcoin ATM distribution is significantly influenced by the state of the law in the area. There will be a change in availability and acceptance of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as their validity grows, in my opinion. Seeing Bitcoin ATMs pop up all over town is an exciting prospect for the future. In all seriousness, this would be a huge step toward making Bitcoin transactions commonplace. It is crucial to maintain optimism despite the fact that we recognize the legal and regulatory difficulties that such endeavors confront. There are many others who share your excitement for Bitcoin, and we can all work together to keep bolstering efforts to spread the currency. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
