These things should be reserved for older youth. I don't personally have any issues with people who identify as a gender that contrasts their chromosomes but those types of decisions are meant to be made for individuals who have more fully-developed minds, not kids.
It may influence them to perceive this as something they want even if they do not truly desire it.
|
|
|
Well it sucks that it takes 2 weeks to change your status because i Made ŕ serious coin announcement thread and i cant even put the main introduction pic, i put 3h in this translation and ill get refused simply beczuse of that Silly rule that doesnt allow me to put pics or at least ask for modération approval on spécial cases liké this.
If it's a translation then there shouldn't be any problem since they can simply take the bbcode from your post and use it themselves. For anyone that is equal to or above Jr. Member status, they are able to post the image. I don't think that a refusal would be granted solely because you can't display images ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
You have to be a Jr Member to display images. This is achieved at 30 activity.
|
|
|
.094
We need to keep this auction alive, folks!
|
|
|
.091 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Estimating worth to be 400. Who wants to bet?
|
|
|
Nice thread you've got here. Delete
What happened to the old one? https://archive.is/EYskK
Prove your solvency. Prove that you have a bankroll of 5.328 BTC like you claim.
|
|
|
Let me try to be sneaky and get a 0.052 BTC bid in!
|
|
|
Answer: No.
Yahoo doesn't deserve to manage any campaign. He deserves to manage the best campaigns, devoid of spamming idiots like OP. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
even as a higher rank you can not add videos, and this forum doesn't have the "flash tags" (possibly disabled due to security reasons). the best thing you can do is to take a screenshot from the youtube video while playing and post that in a [img] tag. something like this: [url=link_to_youtube_video][img]link_to_screenshot[/ img][/url]
I don't think I can even post images yet. Totally understand the not having the flash tags for security purpose but they are there in the icon bar next to the img tag button. Anyone got a link to find out when these features become available? ie rankings? Thanks! Images are available upon ranking up to Jr. Member. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.0Due to abuse, newbie-posted embedded images are now disabled on these pages: - Topic display - Recent posts / patrol - Previews They're not currently hidden in PMs or on some other pages (like a user's "show posts" page), though I might change that later if it seems necessary.
Disabled images get transformed into links automatically. When the poster becomes a Jr member, the images that he tried to post previously will automatically be re-enabled (though there might be a few minutes of delay).
This extends to all past posts as well as future ones.
|
|
|
Proud to announce, lowered house edge! After much user feedback we've decided to decrease the house edge From 2.5% to 1%. Happy flipping!
Good job ignoring all the requests to proving you're solvent. Sign a message from an address with the 5 BTC in it, please.
|
|
|
actmyname 0: -0 / +0 2017-04-18 100.00000000 This person scammed 100 Bitcoins from multiple people over a period of months. Ah, don't worry about that there. It's not malicious feedback from QA. It was retaliation towards a feedback that was referenced to a cynical comment, so I'd think nothing of it. The original feedback was removed, as well.
|
|
|
But is there actual evidence of the accused cheating?
Maybe you'd like to take a look at any of the report posts, which encompass probably 80% of replies for this thread, instead of ignorantly replying to this with an idiotic question that can be answered with a single scroll.
|
|
|
Ooooh, fantastic! 000000000000000000e497c64afd954b2e4199bc7cd405532b3bd3ab4839e17 8The Lost numbers never fail ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
To 1ActBTCi5XUMjqnyFxVWgSfE5xWicj8g3o please.
Received! ec957e364a4b15bb8247b9ce12072036a628aa1ed2275fb9336fb49542c0bff6 Though the transaction fee ate up half of the profit... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Bump. Also, check out this 100 mBTC Guaranteed Turbo event. The circled ones are colluders and there are 11 players total. 4/11 are colluders making up over 36% of the playing field. Doesn't seem fair to me.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxubAtXl.png&t=663&c=pVTv8ZDp2VAbRA)
|
|
|
Thanks for removing the hand challenges but I believe that right now the best course of action would be to eliminate the earliest colluders reported. You can refer to Sadsong's thread for that since there should be enough proof via the code that showcases the many folds to one another. I will continue to try and keep the spreadsheet as updated as possible to show their winnings (and who won them). https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/154tA_ItvbAKbFUSN9BC7p1ZCp9zjoeMP7sJez3vYHRw/edit#gid=0
I think it will be pretty obvious to tell who the colluders are in the limit games once they are forced to create new accounts.
|
|
|
Two users withdrew thats what I mean all withdraws, I dont want to specify the exact ammount typically , atleast in the future. Also house edge will be lowered to 1% once we have more active users
Seems okay. Alright, one more request then: can you sign a message from an address that has your bankroll balance to prove solvency? If you advertise that you have 5.328 BTC as your bankroll then you should be willing to prove it.
|
|
|
too much care in this thread. any team that is colluding in a tournament worth a few bucks only.. they probably suck at poker anyways and don't know how to collude properly/effectively.
Granted, $186 (82.21 mBTC) over the course of 5 days isn't that much but you will start seeing them clogging up the lobbies and larger tournaments with buyins, using the money they garner from the freerolls. And now that Nitro added another freeroll that they can abuse, they'll do it even faster.
Despite the fact that you'll probably be able to scratch down a couple of them given that their poker ability is subpar, do you think that's worth having the free chips out there for all to take? (Or potentially, they could win easily when 4 of them are at the same table playing against you) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCOfKJVT.png&t=663&c=FpyS1Vgz2is0HQ)
|
|
|
for the post above its not the same players doing it the micros and the higher ones lolol and i dont need ur link i been reportiing these guys for 2 years way longer than you have might enlighten me on the topic? lol iv been reporting players that do this for the bigger freerolls not the micro freerolls
But you apparently didn't know what value the pot needed to be to start getting raked. lol i dont play micros just going by what the site says and it says they rake the .02/.04 tables there is no min pot maybe they should just take away the the little freerolls? it really doesnt help them get action Even if you don't play micros, it should be made well aware that these colluders have found their way into the GTD tournaments because of their freeroll winnings. Doesn't that raise a little bit of concern?
There was one GTD tournament in which 4 of the 21 players were colluders. It's a bit disheartening when you know you're at a constant disadvantage in terms of information. (After all, the very same person knows what's happening and what cards are dead)
|
|
|
|