You can use any EOS wallet mentioned on the login screen. There's little or no difference between Binance DEX and Newdex on this matter.
However, depending on your taste, I think Newdex has a slightly better interface.

Yeah, I should say "streamlined" instead of "easy" since I don't have to go through BNB conversion.

Let's say I receive 1 EOS dividend. I have to go to Binance.com to convert it into BNB, then transfer the BNB to Binance DEX, then trade there.
Meanwhile, with Newdex, I can directly exchange my 1 EOS for BET token.

Aside from that, there are fewer trading/withdrawal fees involved.

Yes, you are making an assumption that mentioned skill-based games == PvP without enough information, it's different.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQtltNZ_pjs << a lot of skill games but not PvP

With that in mind, if Pyramid etc. is PvP, then taking away bankroll isn't possible, just like you said.

I'm curious about these skill-based games, does it implies that users can earn profits by mastering these games?

I'm concerned about some skilled guy able to take away the house bankroll. Furthermore, unlike real casinos that can ban certain individuals, in online casinos, TOR/VPN can bypass the blacklist.

Okay, then you have a good case about this model's ability to forecast.
However, careful about "overfitting" and let's see about it in the next few years

@fillippone thanks for the serious response.

In the time series analysis, you can divide the period into (1) in-sample period and (2) post-sample or out-of-sample period. I have no problem with the (1) in-sample period if the model is statistically significant. In this case, the Stock To Flow Model can be presented and discussed to underline the scarcity, halvings, as you said, but only for 2009 - present (up to the model generated).

This post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191012.msg52693516#msg52693516 also about the in-sample period or in-sample forecast.

For forecasting (let's say 2020 or 2025), we deal with (2) the post-sample period. This is when "uncertainties" come to play. If every relationship stays the same, we can expect that this model can accurately predict future BTC prices. However, in economics, that's not possible since the world is continuously changing.

Suggested reading:
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/260899/what-is-difference-between-in-sample-and-out-of-sample-forecasts
https://people.duke.edu/~rnau/three.htm

Let's compare:

Yours:

IMF:
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/07/18/WEOupdateJuly2019

World Bank:
http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/308981560187921635/211398-Ch01.pdf

OECD:
https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/ieo106_handout_final/4

So basically what I'm saying is you need some rather serious literature research before able to produce something worth to discuss.

OP, if you like to read this kind of topic, you can download proper reports here:
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects
http://www1.oecd.org/economy/outlook/

Also stop doing multiple posts since it's not allowed on this forum.

Finally something new and worth to read. I'm not familiar with this "stock to flow" in Finance. Let's see what this is about:

Oh, it's basically a measure of scarcity, by looking at the "world inventory" and the amount produced annually.
https://monetary-metals.com/gold-economics/lexicon/?mmdesc=stock-to-flow-ratio#stock-to-flow-ratio

This model should suffice for an academics paper (at least in my country). However, it might not get an accurate result for forecasting. It still utilizes historical data, right?
For forecasting purposes, however, this model can be used as one out of many models and assumptions.

The good news is, as Satoshi said, if you can get enough people to believe this model, it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The term "asset"  only means something that has value and can be used to pay debts.
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/asset

While the term "yield" is more closely related to business. An asset cannot yielding profits if it's not used in productive activities by a person or an organization.

My problem with the token built on top of income operations is that it will no longer function as a currency, but a security, or a non-dividend paying stock.

Fake volumes are everywhere, including on the Binance DEX. As for popularity, I think Binance DEX has the early advantage of being well-known. However, Newdex is a straightforward better trading platform for EOS holders. IMO compared to Binance DEX, Newdex is simply better, faster, and easier to use. BET holders also don't have to get through the EOS - Binance chain (token) conversion.

@CryptoCheckk is that alliance will do any good for EOSBet? I mean, what's the purpose?

Oh, Manchester United.
- The club replaced the best manager in the world with an inexperienced manager.
- The club sold the only established proven EPL center forward.
- The team doesn't have a "physical presence." It's worse than 2017/2018.

They will struggle to get in the top-6, more likely to finish mid-table.

Juventus clearly have more quality and experience than Inter. Excellent match, but Juve could have scored more.

I think head to head Juve is the strongest in the Serie A at the moment, but the strongest team not necessarily always be the champion. Inter is only one point behind.

Nah justru disinilah letak salah paham tersebut.

Ada pandangan dari Bitcoin maximalist kalau teknologi blockchain itu ya Bitcoin, cryptocurrency itu ya Bitcoin, yang lain cuma altcoin atau scam dalam artian kesalahan pemahaman dari komunitas altcoin.

Pandangan mana yang benar? Ini sulit karena tidak ada yang bisa meramalkan masa depan.
Mari kita lihat saja pada coinmarketcap di 2030 (kalau situsnya masih ada).

Bahan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3JnrMlpEFY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2f0HlaRdgo

I could not find any casino license on the web page, it seems like an unlicensed casino? Summon @game-protect
So after Roger steps down from CEO, I think bitcoin.com now adopts a more "friendly" strategy towards BTC. But still, I don't like their strategy that involves misleading people to buy BCH when they actually want to buy BTC.

@darewaller @alyssa85 people seem to forget what Ethereum is.

Source: https://www.ethereum.org/

In BTC, people could argue that high fees are good because BTC is digital gold, etc.

Meanwhile, high fees in ETH means that the platform doesn't scale. How is this platform will be able to serve thousands/millions of dApps if it cannot handle a mere CryptoKitties?

Masih banyak salah paham yang gak cuma di Indonesia saja: (lebih seru tapi ada yang sudah berkali-kali juga sih didiskusikan di SF Indo)
1. Pseudonim vs anonim
2. Halving pasti harga naik
3. Bitcoin uang buat kejahatan
4. "Blockchain Technology"

Even Google snippet put the lexico page as its reference:


Click that link, and you will be redirected to https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/cryptocurrency

In a real-world situation, copy-paste verbatim should follow citation rules, such as IEEE/APA/MLA/Chicago, etc. Hence, what you did is undoubtedly plagiarism in academics institutions.

For non-academics, you might get away with a simple mention. In this case, mention the "Oxford Dictionary" or "Lexico."

You didn't do any of that.

I want you to earn more merits

Ok seriously, my opinion != my needs/wants.

Bitcoin is not all about features mate, security/hashrate matters. Unless we see some radical change in the mining landscape, I don't think we will see a new champion anytime soon.

So is this good news or bad news for Bitcoin? So which is better, low fees or high fees?
Ethereum will migrate to POS, so why do we even talk about this mining stuff?

Thanks for the compliment, however
Guaranteed loss is an overstatement I think. It depends on how many rolls and your target return.

This result was not telling the whole picture, such as how many of it would get busted (0 balance).

Perhaps 73% of "original" martingale users would get home with an empty pocket, while only a few of Fibonacci progression users got busted.

Fibonacci progression lowers the risk and obviously lowers the return as well.

---

By the way, congratulations on your newborn baby! Less gambling, more buying milk!