for europe: nasa announcements starts 17:30 CET  btw. wb vod. i read the quickseller thread last week. now i cant eat any more popcorn for the next few years lol |
|
|
|
get the btc or die trying   |
|
|
|
Watching/watched it live from germany |
|
|
|
|
They will probaly be out of the eu and eurozone if that happens?
Contracts are only valid with the nation of spain, which would not include catalonia if they get independency no?
|
|
|
|
Rover fell through the ice, transmitted pictures of the second Stargate ( the first one found in Iraq) and the inscription of the dialing codes. Once they move earth's Stargate to the Antarctic, no more need for a manned spacecraft, SG-1 just has to gate over in a submersible, dial back, and flush the lake! Duh just wanted to write that you watch too much stargate ^^ 80% chance: traces of water 15% chance: aliens 4% chance: something else 1% chance: human like skull with bullet and similiar |
|
|
|
Oila lot of money makes the prince people above the law and own slaves. Cultural differences...
-snip- Also the cultural differences should be cultural similarities  Any thoughts on the victims, those five women? Uh i dont think there is a need to say that this is horrible. Just tried to tell that a lot of money/power makes most people evil and that is the same in every culture. We are pretty similiar if its about such basic things. |
|
|
|
Oila lot of money makes the prince people above the law and own slaves. Cultural differences...
-snip- Also the cultural differences should be cultural similarities |
|
|
|
He better not be let off on diplomatic immunity or some BS. A violent crime is a violent crime.
On one side, you have justice for you and I. On the other side you have justice for saudi princes, the clintons, etc... Every human is equal but some are more equal then others. |
|
|
|
Oila lot of money makes the prince people above the law and own slaves. Cultural differences...
|
|
|
|
https://21.co/ [Suspicious link removed]j.com/moneybeat/2015/09/21/21-inc-releases-first-product-a-bitcoin-computer/  A wobbly Raspberry Pi? Can someone explain to me why this isn't the dead end I think it is? This is more of a prototype, according to the article. A proof-of-concept, something for the devs to tinker with. The finished product would have a real, full-featured OS (Windows), and a real, robust payment system (Visa/$). And why would anyone buy the finished product? I thought they were going to integrate their chips or their chip-tech into standard PC chipsets, not make their own computers. I don't see a market for such a product. If it weren't for the mining bit I would think all of this could be done in software. Actually, I don't really see the point of this chip at all. The amount of coins it will be able to mine is so minuscule that it would make more sense for the users to just bite the bullet and buy some coins. In fact, what we need is (please don't shoot the messenger) the option of exchanging fiat for BTC directly through our online banking solutions. maybe this is a miner + PoS device for vendors? seems not that game changing right now lol |
|
|
|
|
Atleast he is no pedo like all the other british MPs right?!
|
|
|
|
The only difference from other companies is that they just got caught cheating
This  Also short of the year volkswagen stocks went -20%+ today They lost around 16 billion $ |
|
|
|
does this look like a HEAD AND SHOULDERS pattern to anyone here?  it looks like a self-similar fractal repetition of the Spring 2013 through past-summer of 2014, compressed over shorter timescale and over shorter amplitude. Exception being at the end it dropped relatively lower, but all the major features are there. why are you guys talking about dark here? |
|
|
|
Ok guyz!
What should be my target for the oct-jan bull run?
$1800 or $2500?
Just remove a zero from each number and you won't be disappointed. I think everyone needs to think very carefully before making assumptions about continued lacklustre price movement. When bitcoin went from ~$25 to more than ~250 within a couple of months leading up to April 2013 many would have thought they would never see anything like that again. Those who sold out and didn't buy back in again when it went back below $100 would have been kicking themselves when the big boom happened that following November. Well we're in the same situation right now. If things start seriously unravelling with fiat (and indications are that this is going to happen; it's only a matter of when) there will be a race into PMs and crypto. It's entirely likely we could see another run up that will make the ~$1200 from Nov 2013 look like the $250 from April 2013 (i.e if it follows a typical logarithmic trajectory, a $10,000 ATH is not out of the question). Bottom line: I would be very careful jumping in and out of BTC at the moment as it could suddenly take off and will catch many out. I have very close to my ATH of holdings of crypto currencies and trying to buy back what I was recently forced to sell. I believe at some point the usage and price will go up. I just have no expectation when that will happen. I don't even listen to the weather forecast. The issue here is that usage doesn't relate to price at all. Most services that come out are all about going from cash -> BTC -> cash quickly, which negates the usage factor altogether. We need more to adopt BTC as a method of transacting, without continuing the dilution via liquidation. this is wrong. if usage goes up demand for btc will go up. supply will not inrease therefore price has to inrease. if price is stable it just means demand and supply are in a equilibrium. Usage only matters if people are holding. Take this, for example: We have 100 BTC. There are 100 people interested. All 100 are buying and instantly selling their BTC. 1000 more people get interested. The market is constantly buying and selling, so they jump in as well. This has no effect. If people HODL, this will change things. But that's just as easy to do with 1k people as it is with 1m. in your example the price will increase because the 900 other people demand bitcoin that they dont get at price x. although the 100 are buying and selling instantly the system can only serve 100 out of 1000 ppl. demand is not a single event. |
|
|
|
Ok guyz!
What should be my target for the oct-jan bull run?
$1800 or $2500?
Just remove a zero from each number and you won't be disappointed. I think everyone needs to think very carefully before making assumptions about continued lacklustre price movement. When bitcoin went from ~$25 to more than ~250 within a couple of months leading up to April 2013 many would have thought they would never see anything like that again. Those who sold out and didn't buy back in again when it went back below $100 would have been kicking themselves when the big boom happened that following November. Well we're in the same situation right now. If things start seriously unravelling with fiat (and indications are that this is going to happen; it's only a matter of when) there will be a race into PMs and crypto. It's entirely likely we could see another run up that will make the ~$1200 from Nov 2013 look like the $250 from April 2013 (i.e if it follows a typical logarithmic trajectory, a $10,000 ATH is not out of the question). Bottom line: I would be very careful jumping in and out of BTC at the moment as it could suddenly take off and will catch many out. I have very close to my ATH of holdings of crypto currencies and trying to buy back what I was recently forced to sell. I believe at some point the usage and price will go up. I just have no expectation when that will happen. I don't even listen to the weather forecast. The issue here is that usage doesn't relate to price at all. Most services that come out are all about going from cash -> BTC -> cash quickly, which negates the usage factor altogether. We need more to adopt BTC as a method of transacting, without continuing the dilution via liquidation. this is wrong. if usage goes up demand for btc will go up. supply will not inrease therefore price has to inrease. if price is stable it just means demand and supply are in a equilibrium. /edit for the sake of the argument i didnt include the btc mining, but looking into the longer future it would still be correct. |
|
|
|
|
can you explain why the need of 9999 coins after block x?
with the collateral it looks kinda like pos with dynamic interest ( 1-40% ).
if i understood something wrong please feel free to explain.
|
|
|
|
it could be Hals family members who move/sell the coins...just a theory.
Im pretty sure they already did that. I can remember his wife giving a interview where she stated such. @OP I dont think it is satoshi. If he ever would move the old coins it will be very fast. At that point btc will either die or not giving a shit about it. |
|
|
|
|
He was payed and supportdd by the eu to control/hold the refugees in libya that wanted to cross the mediterran sea from there.
It is one of the hotspots, but then the arab spring came.
This whole refugee crisis started years ago and the eu knew it - they just ignored it for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
Well i like krombacher and kölsch the most I think beer from other nations always taste like they put in way too much water |
|
|
|
U dont really know what beer is before you visit germany |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
