My speculation is different from yours as my bet is that Brazil would beat Croatia and Netherlands would beat Argentina. I don't know why Argentina is often rated so big than necessary in this tournament, perhaps it's because of Messi. Nevertheless, it is getting tougher now as they are being matched with better teams than what they had played with. Not minding Brazil and Croatia, I don't know how Argentina would beat the Netherlands, maybe in the penalty shootout.

It's true that Bruno Fernandes has performed well in this year's world cup and has done a lot to market himself, but one thing I will always tell people is that the psychology of players with a certain team and for a certain reason is different. He is a great player even before now, but his performance in the Man U has not been as obvious as seen in the world cup.

I don't believe that all these core star players are gaining any experience other than showing more effort into the world cup games than they naturally do with the club side. It's personal willingness, determination and change of mindset. So, it's left to them to replicate the brilliant display after the tournament.

Personally, I don't buy the idea of those theorists, Bitcoin is still young in the field of financial investment, and we need more years, if not decades to fully ascertain its true nature. For now, be a good speculator based on the economic and technical reality of the market and shun what I call a "myth."

It's nice you have two thoughts about this, but the second thought might not delay that much. Bitcoin could rise very fast after much falling, I won't doubt that. It only needs a reason to do it, and when the opportunity comes, it would be a strong bullish run as it played in the past.

You are one of the few people that are realistic here. Many would want to be rich due to the low price of BTC, but they neglect the possibility of it falling, the cause of the dumping. Honestly, fear and panic would be in the market then, it's easier said than done.

You made me laugh about your comment on the impossibility of Bitcoin falling to $1,000. Please, visit the dictionary to ascertain this, and then you will know that it is possible for any asset to astonishingly rise or unbelievably fall. However, we hope it doesn't happen, but if it does, it's an opportunity for an ardent fan like me.

True! Fiat still aids illegalities, but it is much lower than what Bitcoin aids. A careful person like me can't just dabble into adopting such a coin without thinking about it over and over, especially when I have alternatives that are earning me income.

Frankly, the reason for my reservation is right, and I was only sceptical to adopt what could aid some illegalities. This made me avoid it rather than the good side of it that could benefit me. Well, the opportunities are still there and my regret was not much, do you know why? I have good plans for my Bitcoin investment, which weighs more.

This was an outright misconception about Bitcoin, mine was not as bad as that, I had the needed information about the coin which happens to be true till today. I was only trying to be a more reasonable and responsible world citizen.

This is a welcome development yet for Africans, particularly Nigerian where the initiative has already kickstarted. This is one of the competitions that Bitcoin has brought to the payment system, it is driving more inclusion regarding the use of blockchain technology and it would better challenge the dominance of banks and other financial institutions that would move money slowly and still charge exorbitant amounts for it.

This is about Bitcoin-Fiat transactions, which is good, and I always say that Bitcoin cannot thrive in isolation, therefore let's kick out the dominance of those old fashion financial ways to give room to faster transactions and low fees like this.

I will be judgemental here regardless of how many people who had replied refuted this though I have not used bc.game before. If you did not truly win the bet, why the refund to your account? This is part of the nonsense that betting companies are playing, and I am with the OP on this. You should however go by the advice of @joeperry which was clearly stated in the second reply as I don't want to repeat what he has explained. But be ready for further proof on this if required of you.

I would have loved it if the OP could expatriate on the significant impact of the global economic order that Bitcoin has put in place. Is it negative or positive? Because according to my knowledge and experience of the economy, Bitcoin has just eased the payment system, nothing more progressive on the part of the global economy.

Also, Bitcoin has not been completely adopted as we see, which makes me know that more would happen in the future on the positive side. This is regardless of whether Bitcoin is stable or not, it's about how the world would need it more due to its enormous advantages. And of course, altcoins will help with this, and more altcoins that would be more regulated and dependable might be developed soonest whether we like it or not.

This indicates that Bitcoin is not the point but the blockchain technology itself, and it would be advanced upon for better exploration.

Your advice is right and accurate, it's good to have more confidence in the old casinos and have so little confidence in the new casinos until they prove they are worthy of your money. The new casinos are the ones with the hugest bonuses, and some of them might practically be insane, which is a point of suspicion by a sensitive gambler.

This is not to discredit them entirely, but starting with them with a little amount after the gamblers had done their background checking is a wise idea.

I don't see it this way, the match and players would continue as it was before the world cup, that's my disposition about this. Although Erik Ten Hag is an experienced coach, nonetheless, that does not change the fact that he would have been studying talents even before the world cup, nothing changes as far as I'm concerned. New international players making their first appearance in the world cup are not many and might not be within his reach. So I believe the Man U and Arsenals' rivalry would be as same as before world cup, at least for this season.

It's obvious you are not an investor, and mind you, patience to hold might be a gift, but it does not guarantee success. What guarantees success in an investment is the ability to speculate rightly at any point in time, and this speculation might even advise you to liquidate your investment at any time to avoid the coming catastrophe. See, 'it's good to attack and retreat in every war,' this is wisdom which is important to replicate in crypto investment.

That said, investors should define the longevity of their investment, it might be short, medium or long-term, but it doesn't matter, yet speculation is still important to be a guide. This indicates that it's not necessary to be an excessive holder of any asset, including crypto, it only has to do with the investors' goal and the plan to realize the goal.

Conclusively, a good investor should be dynamic in decision-making and act based on the current market reality not minding the ROI to avoid making mistakes.

Where did you get this statistic that "most of the people think Poland will win the match?" Poland is nowhere near France in this world cup when it comes to a brilliant performance, and they are the defending champion. They have all it takes to beat Poland black and blue and I easily won my bet with the match. The 3-1 result against Poland is still not satisfactory to me as France played as expected and they deserve the win. Poland has tried its best in this tournament too, but for how long would they keep their stay while better teams are still active?

How I wish I could change my vote on this poll, Germany disappointed me and many other people, but the ones that did not vote earlier are now increasing the stake of Brazil which is, not a bad idea judging by what we have seen so far. I will never bet on Germany again, I was still giving them the benefit of the doubt based on their track record in such competition.

In recent reality, I believe that the winner of the tournament should be between Brazil, Spain and France, but I wonder why the vote of France remains at 5 (3.8%), it seems people have less up in them than I do. Also, my observation reveals that many support Argentina, but I can bet it with nothing, they will not lift that trophy.

Any reasonable and responsible government would be scared of Bitcoin, but the approaches that many of them are using in dealing with the situation are wrong. It's a known fact that the Bitcoin operation is not within the reach of governments (decentralization), hence the reason for being sacred. They fear it might cause unaccountability in the economy since they would not know the financial inflow and outflow, and believe it would aid illegal money flows, which is true as a result of its anonymity in most cases.

I support a full-scale independent probe in this regard and the matter should be taken totally out of the Bahamas for this to be thorough and unbiased. Even in the US and other reliable countries, the political inclination of BSF might want to fight back, but with an independent investigation, such would be nailed completely.

This is total nonsense, the economy is working as it should work, but frankly, some sectors of the economy are shady/improperly managed, crypto industry is one of them, but we should not because of that totally condemn how the whole economy works.

It's not unwise to underrate Croatia, all that I see with them thus far is that they are being lucky. The country's team tried in their own little way too, but how I wish they had met Netherlands, Brazil or France, you would have known the supremacy here. Also with Japan, they would not have won if not for the penalty, and we all know that penalty is not a respecter of how good you are.

Well done team Japan, you have been so impressive in this world cup. After all, the team was defeated honourably with a penalty shootout that is a game of luck.

This kind of question has been asked many times in this section and others, and one thing that is clear is that casinos and gamblers should not take this subject matter too seriously. This is because it's not about investment per se when it comes to the choice of the token or coin to be used often by casinos, but the convenience of depositing and withdrawing. Be that as it is, any coins or tokens that would allow low transaction fees are my choice in this regard. We have many of them, so I don't have to start making lists.

This is generally not worth it even if the OP is responsive, the asking price of $1,500,000 is way too high. This is the site that one would use extra money to inquire about through the tech experts on the internet to verify that the claims of the OP are true to some reasonable extent.

Besides, can you imagine, a casino site garnering as low as 47,259.96 in a whole half of a year, how many years would the buyer run it before such a huge asking price and the investigation amount be made back? It's a bad business in my opinion, and who knows why someone would want to sell a working casino.

Many people have used Bitcoin to perpetrate evil in the past and they are still doing that, but with caution now as Bitcoin is getting more adoption, knowledge and exposure. And Ponzi has been before BTC and would continue to be, but in an advanced scheme, and such is what Bitcoin made available through its privacy and anonymity. Many people have been swindled through this and many would still be scammed unless they are careful themselves in falling for HYIPs.

And as for the question of the OP, the Bitcoin Ponzi scam could only be traced if the scammer is careless. Although BTC transactions are traceable, there are many vices to make transactions untraceable.

This is highly possible judging by what is happening in our society where the rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer. The money is not circulating as it should and labourers are working more but not much to show for it as an accomplishment.

This is part of the issues of the disparities in our society, yet this homeless living could work if you don't have wards. It would be inhumane to be capable of an apartment no matter how small it is but subject your wards to such conditions for the sake of cutting costs. Having said that, some of these people living this life are lazy, we should not pity their situation much. Yet, the rich should also learn how to give out either through gifts or increased wages or salaries for such situations to reduce.

Contrarily, trading is not hectic, in fact, trading is so easy and cheap, it all depends on what you know and your plans towards it. Also, it is good for people without a passive mind, as passive people lag in action unless you don't know the meaning of being passive. In plain terms, just be such that is ready for it. I've seen many people that claimed to be passive but are no more trading because what they expected from it is not what they got. Trading would suit you depending on your nature as a person, and in terms of readiness for trading itself, this is with your time, energy, resources plans and others.