Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 04:12:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 [240] 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 ... 1343 »
4781  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stolen Signature Design on: November 09, 2017, 10:31:37 AM
Can I modify it so that it will not be stolen?

This how bully works, you realize that don't you?

This is totally unfair!
Bullying would be tagging you without:
a) A warning (maybe; debatable)
b) Not giving you an option to get out of the warning.
c) Other kind of mean statements/actions(?).

Both things a and b were done. You've also started breaking the forum rules and spamming left and right.
4782  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lauda's Real Trust Ratings on: November 09, 2017, 10:29:54 AM
Meme needs updating. Open to suggestions.

Update is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2378647.msg24286031#msg24286031

4783  Other / Meta / Re: Can bitcointalk trust system be misued? on: November 09, 2017, 10:12:28 AM
Okay, that makes sense. And how do I see who is on the DT1 and DT2 lists?
Go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust, remove everything besides DefaultTrust. The list that you see below is the list of DT members.

My trust bar is green, so I am assuming I am on one of those, but how can I check?
You are not. You just have ratings left by other DT members.
4784  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stolen Signature Design on: November 09, 2017, 10:07:02 AM
Lauda, you can't call our project a scam.  Call it anything you want, but it is not a scam.
Are you James Fogden or one of the other "team members"?
4785  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stolen Signature Design on: November 09, 2017, 09:56:13 AM
You can not give a negative trust just because that someone joined a signature bounty program.
Of course I can. You're supporting and helping promote the (likely scam) project of a thief. Therefore, you're an accomplice. I've posted a warning to anyone who wants to become their accomplice.

If you have a problem with the dev of alttradex please take it with him, don't involve me in something that you have with someone else.
Stop wearing stolen signature code and then we might talk. Also, stop spamming everywhere because you're a bamboozled bounty spammer that can't comprehend a single post. Roll Eyes

What have I done to deserve the negative feedback?
You've answered your own question.

I just joined his signature bounty.
4786  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stolen Signature Design on: November 09, 2017, 09:52:56 AM
What the hell is your problem?
If you really can't see the problem, you are either very delusional or wanted to run a scam that got indirectly busted.

You really are a nasty piece of shit.  
I can only recommend for people to look at her trust and click on "Untrusted Feedback".  It is full to the brim of bad feedback but it is hidden because of her status on the forum.  Do not trust this person or listen to a thing she says.
Do you need some baby wipes with that?

Too late Jayce.
I love how you edited this and removed the part where you stated you're going to get Sylon fired. A second too fast for me to archive, a second too slow for me not to see it. Roll Eyes
4787  Other / Meta / Re: Can bitcointalk trust system be misued? on: November 09, 2017, 08:59:17 AM
Do negative ratings by Jr. Members and below even matter? I have two negative ratings by spam accounts but it doesnt seem to have a negative effect at all.
No. Only ratings from DT1 and DT2 members are visible by default, and thus also affect your rating. I've got a lot of fake untrusted feedback on me, nothing to worry about.
4788  Other / Meta / Re: Can bitcointalk trust system be misued? on: November 09, 2017, 08:45:47 AM
Pretty much everything that involves some sort of "authority" or "power" can be misused. You should intuitively come to this conclusion.

Between you guys didn't confirm if there is some appeal or rating review mechanism?
No. First you take it up to the person who gave you the rating. If they do not respond or ignore you, then you can ask the community. If the community agrees that the rating is unjust, then you can contact the relevant DT1 member. If the allegedly unjust rating was left by a DT1 member, then you need to contact theymos.
4789  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stolen Signature Design on: November 09, 2017, 08:41:21 AM
Neg added.
I've discussed this situation with others, particularly cryptodevil as he's known for posting warnings on projects before tagging people (which is definitely not something that I tend to do often). Following this input, I've decided to post a warning and start tagging people involved in this project. This warning can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2207351.msg24278006#msg24278006.

This guy is a joke of a businessman--extremely childish, entitled, and unprofessional.  
The very least that he could do, given that he is blatantly guilty of stealing both the thread design and signature design, is not attack nor insult others for exposing him.

4790  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY][ICO] ALTTRADEX - SHARE THE FEES OF A TRADING PLATFORM - ICO 25 OCT 2017 on: November 09, 2017, 08:38:16 AM
!!! WARNING !!!


Please be advised that this platform/project is promoting itself through the use of a stolen:

a) Thread design.
b) Signature design.


!!! WARNING !!!


Anybody wearing their signature or promoting this project will likely be tagged with negative trust.

You have been warned.


Source/proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2367257.0, as well as the negative ratings left on OP.
4791  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: November 09, 2017, 07:42:00 AM
Please do not tag any of the accounts yet, I have a plethora of accounts to raid for more addresses and would rather not spook them.
Is this still not ripe for tagging?

Before i thought that this project are really helpful. Yet now I am not  sure. Cause it was not even accepted as a solid evidence for a case. Can You lauda remove me tagging my other half account(that was being hacked). Cause I am no more liable if that account try to scam someone. Just saying anyways if that is possible
I have no idea what you're trying to say, but whatever it is, it has not been said in English.
4792  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] | 🔥 Coinpayments.net Signature Campaign 🔥 | on: November 09, 2017, 07:34:35 AM
Bitcoin username:BillCoin
Rank:Full
Current post:495
Btc address:123kcuxgdfd56uEMMV1AE2esqGkPBZHiiu

Offers high level of English,Not posting on spam threads, spreading my posts on different sections.
Accepted on probation, which means I'll be watching your posts more closely than the posts of others.

IŽd like to apply for your Signature Campaign.

Bitcointalk Username: Samarkand
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 409
BTC Address: 15z5AZoEMkorbjgGfMUxEEZFpAhVjSaq3o

Thank you in advance for considering my application.
Accepted.


Bitcointalk username: Vladv26
Rank: Full Member
Current post count:188
BTC Address:19zdQsGptF12ERQhVD3dWsBSkVxRmt9rGk
Bitcointalk Username: Noore Najjar
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 157
BTC Address: 1A4GmNMH4HSSUnB5BQLCNttVDqBaNu78aP
Bitcointalk Username: retampan
Rank:Full Member
Current post count: 142(+1)
BTC Address: 1NzG3yhJ8ZvS1vXEYP5NKTggwostRzAq8G
Bitcointalk Username: rjbtc2017
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 839+1
BTC Address:1G7dMaY5Nb19CSgrvQX28fbsZ65HsaEe5w
Bitcointalk Username: Hannahanto
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 129
BTC Address: 1KgZXaWb28YBakNHm39HTfB4HBnZietrbS
Bitcointalk Username: StonedWolf
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 212+1
BTC Address: 1Ew6jECQXqZ6PbqyLSH3gnPdSxegnEg8oA
Bitcointalk Username: franco123
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 338
BTC Address: 3GyBMjp2vDVEqhyg2xvK69hQoT4q6B1K9R

I would like to participate in this campaign. Signature and avatat applied already.
Bitcointalk Username: Asmonist
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 176 (including this post)
BTC Address: 31iM31ENqU9TBt4spK5pnjsXhsTMReZunN
btctalk name: majdoso
Rank: full Member in few hours
Current post count: 188
BTC Address: 13cghxaEhPPkY8FgYPE2r6HwPUov4asnrR
Profil link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950159
Bitcointalk Usernamezarados
Rank: Full member
Current post count: 378 (including this)
BTC Address: 1Ga4NTVhGaGjtA7YsjdkmtTBfYec5VKTCK

Thank you manager.
Bitcointalk Username: Baofeng
Rank: Full Member
Current post count:773 + 1
BTC Address:15HqMP4KRM93Bs23Lf9THt7uWZfQrymrFp
Bitcointalk Username : btc78
Rank : full member
Current post count : 280
Btc address : 39p3Q2mBnKuYMuJgAg2spXG9utbq666MA5
Wear appropriate signature : done
Bitcointalk Username: dissgo
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 145+1
BTC Address: 32KjsnFpD9ED6hjFsjLyjQbRfzHLJKJYBg
Bitcointalk Username: kaysersozee
Rank: Full Member
Current post count:149+1
BTC Address:3JE4Vo2i1sNYs8NojDKZx6zKFTLrKvMcYq
Bitcointalk Username: fantasticromantic
Rank: Full Member
Current post count: 221
BTC Address:  355uJ2NbS3zkFg3B5bVyNRMqvA8vnPtBjn
Rejected.

Bitcointalk Username: Kmrherradura05
Rank: Member
Post: 70 and counting
Bitcoin address: 3QjLrTqDYwfjXs83kuAqKG3z4WegfXrPbL
Wear appropriate signature: done
SMAS blacklist: Done.

Hello.
I see that no spot is left for Senior Member. But considering the rates I'll gladly enter the campaign at the Full Member rate, until a spot opens as Senior Member.
In the hope that you'll accept me.

thank you
I don't review your posts, thus I can't enroll you.

I know that I haven't been to active in the last few months (I've been busy IRL), but do plan to resume posting. Also, is there a required post length (not that I plan to post spammy posts anyway)?
You've been inactive for too long, thus I can't enroll you.

Samarkand got the 2nd open spot. Everyone who posted after him was not reviewed. There are no more spots open.
4793  Economy / Reputation / Re: Appeal to Lauda on: November 09, 2017, 07:14:12 AM
I thought that we able give someone negative feedback only if they ever scam people
Completely wrong. I have a ton of spam butthurt negative ratings on me, and even 1 from a DT2 members yet I did not scam anyone.

And now, when people try to apply on signature campaign , they got -ve because they did not read rule ( Lauda's Rule for this case)
Whether the attempt to abuse/cheat is intentional or not, I do not know nor does it matter.

I'm sorry if I do not understand it right because I'm still blind about how trust shall be use correctly
Any kind of action that makes another party question your trustworthiness, or just outright not trust you anymore. However, DT members are held to high standard where you can't just go around tagging for whatever reason you want.
4794  Economy / Reputation / Re: Appeal to Lauda on: November 09, 2017, 06:40:50 AM
In as much as my allegation was that, I was on SMAS list before applying. I want to ask, was I still on the list and worked in these two SMAS listed campaigns ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2130967.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2189942.0
Ask Yahoo that. His failure to check the list is not my concern. Then again, I primarily check my own list only unless Lutpin updates the main one.
4795  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ICO] ICO IS LIVE- ALTTRADEX- PROFESSIONAL GRADE TRADING PLATFORM on: November 09, 2017, 06:38:55 AM
Everyone should stay away from this project unless you want to either lose money or destroy your own reputation. This is the OP that you're dealing with:

And fuck you, fuck Jayce and fuck Lauda. 
"Highly professional" trading platform as well as a "highly professional" OP.  Roll Eyes
4796  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Segwit2x is dead, long live Bitcoin on: November 08, 2017, 10:51:42 PM
BCH is not a takeover attempt. BCH is an altcoin that is no longer related to Bitcoin in any way or form (other than keeping the same UTXO set at the time of the fork). Don't attempt to spread BCH propaganda in this thread as: a) It is off topic. b) BCH is a shitcoin. c) This is a self-moderated thread.

I'll update OP with the attacks mentioned by theymos and lay out everyone who was involved in them and attempted to take over Bitcoin. #NeverForget
4797  Other / Meta / Re: The Bitcoin Forums usage is Exploding on: November 08, 2017, 10:09:05 PM
so what will we see will this forum grow and develop itself or will it end in a destructive paranoia?
The way that it is currently going, and has been going for quite some time, destructive paranoia (weird wording). You must realize that the majority of legit people, and by this I mean:
1) Users with very deep understanding of Bitcoin.
2) Non scammers.
3) Non spammers.
4) Non account farmers.
5) Active traders and/or community builders.

have either left or severely reduced their involvement with this place due to the reasons that I've been voicing my strong disapproval of for quite some time now.
4798  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: New subforum that blacklist fraudulent projects. on: November 08, 2017, 09:50:22 PM
This may be relevant that theymos posted a while back (not sure how it progressed):

I'm getting a bunch of ICOs wanting to advertise on the forum, but I don't have time to do more than a very cursory review of each. Somebody trustworthy needs to set up a certification service that will work like this:

An ICO will pay you to apply for a certification. You will then spend many hours thoroughly reviewing everything about them in order to determine that they're at least basically sane. Some things that you should maybe check:

 - If they're planning on creating software, require that they have the software already 5% done, preferably with a working proof-of-concept that you can play around with. Check that they haven't just filled a github repo with copy-pasted garbage code from elsewhere which doesn't actually do anything relevant.
 - If they're planning on operating a real-world business (solar, mining, etc.), check that they have a registered business somewhere. Do a background check on all involved individuals. Require that they have some of the necessary assets (property, etc.) already purchased, and verify this using public records, etc.
 - Check that there are no reasonable open scam accusations against anyone involved.
 - If smart contracts are used, verify that the English terms match the smart contract terms. If there's any way for the smart contract terms to be changed, make sure that this is specified in the English terms.
 - After reading all of their public info, ensure that there is no deception or any glaring holes.
 - Check their website for copy-pasted text, photoshopped images, and fake people.

If they fail your criteria, then you should not certify them. That's important. If you just give a certification to everyone who pays you, you're useless. You should keep the application fee even if they fail, though in some cases you could allow them to reapply for certification after failing with a reduced fee. Your goal should be to eventually be able to publish a statistic like, "99% of ICOs I certified did not turn out to be scams." You should not attempt to certify that ICOs will actually appreciate in value or anything -- that'd be far too difficult --, but just that the collected money will be used as advertised.

Once I notice that a good, trustworthy certification service like this exists, I will require that ICOs wanting to advertise on the forum receive such a certification. (If/when there are multiple good certification services, I will publish a list of ones I consider acceptable.) So you'll get a built-in market from this, and even if an ICO has no interest in advertising on the forum, acquiring a widely-trusted certification has significant value in itself.
That's a rather interesting statement. I'd pick up something like that given more thought and time. However, the classic chicken problem will occur there:

1) ICOs will not spend any fee to get certified by me or someone else until there is a need for that. Why would they do that at first as that gives them nothing in return?
2) Theymos won't require certification until someone establishes themselves as a proper entity that certifies ICOs.
4799  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Segwit2x is dead, long live Bitcoin on: November 08, 2017, 09:41:11 PM
Stephen Pair trying to save face here: https://medium.com/@spair/segwit2x-should-be-canceled-b7399c767d34. I've updated the OP to mention this and will list the supporters of this attempted and failed takeover of Bitcoin. #NeverForget.

Long live anarchy.
Side note 1: Whoever thinks that alts have any value pre or post this withdrawal is delusional. You're playing right in their hands while they leech profits from you. Smiley
4800  Economy / Reputation / Re: Appeal to Lauda on: November 08, 2017, 06:06:15 PM
1) You have not read anything in the campaign thread and proceeded to apply.
2) You are a shitposter.
3) I had to block a lot of people from sending me PMs as they waste my time with their bs excuses.
4) This is the SMAS list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2108952.msg23197084#msg23197084
5) You are on it. You tried to abuse it / cheat it. I don't trust people of that type. Questions?

You were so persistent in trying to get into the campaign that I actually blacklisted you twice in 1 update without checking with a list de-duper.  Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 [240] 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 ... 1343 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!