Perhaps through campaigns like YoBit, that require users to visit their site?
Didn't think about them (not a big fan either), but with VPNs and stuff, that could lead to alot of mishits IMO. Nobody would start banning on that basis. |
|
|
|
However, some signature campaigns do explicitly prohibit users from joining with more than one account, and will ban (from their campaign) and deny payment to anyone caught (or believed to have been caught) doing so - although, having the same IP as another user is probably not enough for someone to act on, but I could be wrong.
How would a signature campaign manager get access to the IP addresses of the users in the campaign, in order to connect two accounts in that way and kick them for the reason of multi-accounting? |
|
|
|
I think this got lost in this crazy thread (if its ignored bc this is wrong place or some other reason I apologize - dont mean to spam)
Nothing gets lost, we just aren't up to date with the OP currently. Also, I wanted to have a look how the situation plays out. |
|
|
|
|
Given the situation, you should consider closing the thread and starting a new one.
Since this hasn't the character of an auction, you probably should post it in the "Digital Goods" section.
Include all details in the new OP and you're ready to go.
|
|
|
|
Maybe I am bit off here.
I am after the biggest signatures which are
Sr. / Hero / Legendary Members:
It seems that the one I have posted in the signature size under. (Which is no good)
Full Members
Can someone confirm this thanks..
If you want to use sizes in your signature, you need seniors, if you want to use background coloring, your need hero/legendary. Ofc prizes also get higher with the ranks. - Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 50 characters.
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 150 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed
|
|
|
|
I would like to join this campaign if there is a free slot for Hero member - Username: xinzark
- Current Post Count: 1195
- Current Rank: Hero member
- Bitcoin Address: 1KBcdRxzPaC4XWkkJBFz4eNemhN64f6EbC
Please let me know whether I am accepted or not so that I will change signature, avatar and personal message  Sorry, I just gave the open hero spot to badjacks99 earlier today. Currently still waiting on the legendary I agreed to enroll to come foreward and make his post. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the tips guys. Scripts use php, js, css, mysql and html. I don't know about his preferences, but this might be something for MillionsBTCdev (that's the only one that came to my head in the short time). I've sent him a message regarding this topic, maybe he can help you out. Edit:He also got a thread about his programming here. Services Offered:
✧ Web programming ( php, html5, js, nodejs, etc )
✧ Security check ( I will give you a report regarding your site's security: sqli attack, xss attack, clickjacking, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Well in that case you should be looking for people with positive trust to be part of your team, the people you are talking about either hardly had any pos ratings(QS), only were auctioning off a part of their signature (mprep) or were not quality posters.
With all being said, how does 0.05 per week sound?
Do you understand, that OP wants to buy 5-10 accounts, to give those accounts to his team members?! He's not searching for users for his team, but for accounts for his team. |
|
|
|
bump
Your auction ended over one month ago according to the terms in OP. quote author=multibit.wallet link=topic=1307687.msg13386792#msg13386792 date=1451372786] Auction for 4 days and i might cancel/sell early depending on the bid's. [/quote] Shouldn't you have contacted the winner by now and proceed with the transaction? |
|
|
|
No, they are on DT, you are not. Your feedback will show up as 'untrusted' while theirs will show up as 'trusted' , theirs can change your trust rating with a positive or negative, yours wont
DT? I don't even really use this forum so no idea what that is. Regardless I'm not worried about the feedback as I haven't done anything to hurt anyone. Freewold after all, everyone can have their opinions. What he says is, that shorena and I both are on DT2, meaning our comments will be considered "trusted" for users with default trust settings. Your comment however will be in the "untrusted" section that is hidden by default. Your right it's just a comment as we're the feedbacks left on me. Wasn't meant to have a negative trust effect on their ratings.
You wouldn't either have. For above reasons, it would only affect our trust score for the small group of users that got you in their trust network. Freewold after all, everyone can have their opinions.
Indeed. We've stated ours, if you got another one, that's your thing. But don't be upset about us leaving comments, when you are doing the same on return.
Sorry i missed all this, wish someone had of PM'd me, nothing shady going on.
Thanks for your PM and sorry you didn't get one from me/YPII earlier. I've responded you by now. |
|
|
|
If it wasn't complicated, we wouldn't be having this discussion and as a result this thread wouldn't be here.
Well, tbh I don't think it's complicated. For me, the hard part was finding the post (although shorenas " One to link them all" made that certainly easier). But fair enough, a straight up explanation other than the pure algorithm might help some users who can't seem to get the latter. Just don't make it "incomplete for now." the next time  |
|
|
|
If it wasn't the topic wouldn't be there to start with  . Sorry, what? I don't even get you there.
My trust color is red and i like the red color...I like blue and red...
Thanks for moving OT, but since we're already there, you're welcome. |
|
|
|
BTW nearly forgot to add, the negative feedback gets complicated when the time variable changes or as some like to call it "trust age" here. So consider the negative feedback explanation incomplete for now.
Why don't you just link the exact algorithm in that case? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1066857.0Afraid it would be "too complicated" for users to understand? |
|
|
|
I gave the trust rating on both accounts as u both have stated several times on here that he is the same person.
As to the risk statement, I my self may not have had any risk or problem per say. But every user who took part in his program did take the risk of loosing their funds, regardless of escrow or not.
You risked not a penny, hence your risk amount is 0. Thb, it has been often discussed, that escrows should even not leave positive trust at all, when acting in their role. The point of using escrow that you do not have to trust the seller/other party. And you understand, why it's not ok to get 2 independent trust ratings from 2 accounts being held by the same person over one single action? |
|
|
|
|
So, let me get that straight:
1) cmc shows me a market cap for $432M and a trade volume for $12M when I check Eth.
2) wci shows me a market cap for $433M and a trade volume for $12M when I check Eth.
What is the difference between those sites? Their default ranking system.
CMC ranks by the total market cap (duh, that's the name), WCI ranks by 24h trade volume.
And that kids is the reason why Eth is ranked #2 on cmc and #3 on wci.
And the reason why the trade volume on CMC for LTC is that low seems to be the fact, that they don't list/crawl the chinese exchange Huobi (which has 92% of the volume isted on WCI).
|
|
|
|
Username: Badjacks99
Current Post Count: 742
Current Rank: Hero
Bitcoin Address: 138JRWPx31YiGUs33iovowuWYHBtBuRP99
Would like to join the campaign if there is a hero spot for me.
Enrolled for one probational week. Welcome to the campaign. Thank you! Received the payment.
Was another slow week for me, managed to get the flu and a nasty eye infection. Hopefully this week will be better as im starting to get well!
Get well soon At least you made the minimum. From our side, that's the important thing. If you read the first page you can see that there's no open space for Full member. I hope you can understand it.
It's better to stay in your campaign.
Word. I would like to join this campaign if there is a free slot for Hero member - Username: xinzark
- Current Post Count: 1195
- Current Rank: Hero member
- Bitcoin Address: 1KBcdRxzPaC4XWkkJBFz4eNemhN64f6EbC
Please let me know whether I am accepted or not so that I will change signature, avatar and personal message Sorry, I just gave the open hero spot to badjacks99 earlier today. Currently still waiting on the legendary I agreed to enroll to come foreward and make his post. |
|
|
|
Thank you for working with this user, as an outsider looking in on this thread it seems pretty abusive.... good for teaching a lesson yes. But it seems that lesson has been made and the user is well aware of it. I hope others take ur lead and give him a 2nd chance.
If I can be so bold as to ask you a question: Why did you give both Alt's glowing trust for what appears to be the same transaction (given that the reference is identical)? The even better question is, why did both alts give him trust for this same transaction. When people start giving and getting trust from all their alts for a single transaction, I don't want to see the mess that comes up when SulphurXX gets involved. I also don't know how MonetaCoin can claim a risked amount of 0.1 BTCAs far as I understand the situation, he was holding 0.1 BTC of xavTrot6/x_Molotov in escrow, resulting in a 0 risk on his side. |
|
|
|
I would also say that it is not safe to assume that the trust is for the sale of the account because of the time difference. According to zazarb the deal was on Dec 17, however according to the screenshot in the thread in meta(that will likely get moved to reputation), the trust was left ~2 weeks later on the 29th
Alright, let me rephrase it. I personally got the feeling that this trust was leaved over the sale of the account (checked both accounts posts in the 2 weeks from the sale to the feedback). But since I can't bring up any more than my gut feeling for this I came to the conclusion posted earlier: However, a neutral should sufficient.
|
|
|
|
I don't have any way to validate with 100% certainty that the account was actually sold though. Based on that trust rating, it might have been around December 29 of last year.
Cross-posting from the know alts thread, so it doesn't get missed here. You were correct with the sale and close with the date. ausbit account sold (escrowed by me) and not belongs to bitkilo (I will check exactly date)
edit: 17/12/2015
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
