Normal people like me will never subscribe to youtube premium, why do we spend money on Youtube premium only to avoid gambling ads ?
By the way, even if you somehow do not see the gambling ads, there may be other ads that will be shown to you by youtube. So in any case, unless you have paid and opted for the youtube premium, you will have to watch the youtube ads.
Anyways if the gambling sites are paying youtube to display their ads, we have to cope with it because this is another form of marketing by the casino's.
Only people who have a lot of money use youtube premium let alone just don't want to see gambling ads, one very bad way is to use extensions on the browser to block ads on youtube, even though using brave browser is safer than ads on youtube even though it doesn't really respect creator content but to be honest gambling ads are very annoying if displayed there because it will confuse people who have stopped gambling and then want to gamble again. One of them is using another browser to prevent and block ads if you really want to feel safe using YouTube, so far brave browser offers to block ads so I feel comfortable there even though brave browser is also annoying because now it displays annoying ads on the main screen too but at least it's not a gambling ad. but if you are a gambler for me you will not mind gambling ads. Its an angle that puts the value of money against the value of ad-free content consumption. As for ad-blocking extensions, I second your opinion that they dont fully support content creators' revenue streams. However, it's worth considering that they offer a semblance of control over content that isn't possible otherwise. While the Brave browser is an effective tool to block ads, it is not free from faults, as you have rightly pointed out. The line becomes even more blurred with the influx of disruptive ads on the main screen. Your point on gamblers tolerating gambling ads could be a controversial one. It might imply that the nature of the ads we tolerate is a reflection of our personal interests or inclinations. |
|
|
|
~snip~ But taking too much risk by implementing someone else's strategy is one of the wrong ways for me.
I admit that big wins will come for someone who dares to take risks, but the problem is that the strategies given by other people are sometimes not right.
If this fails it will be a valuable lesson but I prefer to use our own strategy with lower risk. It doesn't matter who "invented" or told you about the strategy. It's all just maths in the end and the expected value of gambling is negative, no matter what you do. This means that in the long term, if you keep betting, you will lose money. The only way to win against the casino is to stop forever after you win a large enough sum that covers all your costs, but the probability of that happening is extremely small. And after a gambler wins that big they are usually very excited and continue betting until they lose it all. Its interesting how you've boiled down the complexity of gambling to a matter of mathematics and probability. Your logic is sound; the house always has the edge, and the expected value of gambling is indeed negative in the long term. However, could it be that your perspective is too deterministic? Gambling also involves elements of psychology and human behaviour that may not be so easily quantifiable. The thrill of the game, the intoxication of risk, the hope against hope that the next bet will be the big win—these are factors that motivate people to gamble despite the odds. That being said, your advice about quitting after a big win is statistically sound, yet ironically, it is this very thrill of winning that keeps the gamblers hooked. Its a paradox, isnt it? |
|
|
|
`
If we look solely at the stats, we might criticize or think that he is overvalued. However, man, the Warriors definitely know what they are doing, and even if you ask an expert, they'll say that Green is truly one of the major reasons the Warriors achieved their previous championships. I would say that Green is the obvious leader of the team. Without him, this Warriors team might struggle and wouldn't be as fun to watch anymore. The Warriors face a true dilemma. Losing a lynchpin like Green would tilt the scales, yet the fallout can't be ignored. Meeting Green's terms could stir the pot, especially around Thompson's paycheck. The honchos must think beyond cash—team camaraderie and chemistry hang in the balance. It's not just about one superstar's deal, no matter how game-changing they are. |
|
|
|
But at times, some people could be so rich through gambling, yet they must either gamble with a high amount of money or took a huge chance where luck merely shone on them.
Instead of gambling been a source of steady income, it can only be a source to acquire you wealth and make you quit looking for a steady income. For gambling to be a spruce of steady income it means you have to be certain of an amount of money to be earned daily, weekly or monthly. Gambling can't be used to replace jobs, you'll stress yourself if you force yourself to win everything you bet when you don't win you'll go into depression. We don't have to depend on gambling for steady income instead we should have a steady income and can use gambling to support. That steady income will make you relax when gambling and you won't be pressured to do something that might give you loss instead of profits like chasing after your losses or over betting with huge capital just to make up for the other bets that you have lost. Get this - your stance on gambling not being a stable moneymaker is solid. It's the essence of chance, peppered with a pinch of luck. Tagging it as consistent? Like catching a cloud - futile. Got the risks right, too. Relying on gambling for bread and butter? Fast track to Worry World when the winning streak stumbles. Downward spiral into despair, losing chase, and shaky finances in view. Yet, dont nix gambling outright as a wealth generator. It shouldnt be plan A, but with a planned game, shrewd money management, and an ironclad mindset, it can beef up your income. Treat gambling as amusement, funded by play money. And don't forget, the house always packs a punch. |
|
|
|
`
Right now most chances Harry Kane for any other club then England is not going to happen because Tottenham is already asking for the price which is not acceptable for any other club in this all situation most chances he will stay here in Tottenham or Manchester United will be doing something as they are also looking for the central striker. But in last few weeks, we also have rumors about Vlahović which is looking for the another club and right now Real Madrid and Bayern Munich both are looking for him but currently nothing is clear because things will be clear in next few weeks without any doubt Robert Lewandowski is bog lost for the Bayern Munich, but now they need to look forward and most chances they will find solid replacement as well. A switch from England for Harry Kane? Tottenham's sky-high asking price suggests a no-go. It's a money mountain many buyers shy away from. Rumor has it that Man Utd needs a spearhead, but will they foot the bill? That's the million-dollar question. The Vlahović gossip, and Bayern Munich's Kane courting, certainly spice up the tale. With Lewandowski's goodbye, Bayern's jonesing for a solid striker. Can Kane step up to Bayern's challenge and offensive prowess? The jury's out. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin as the currency of the future? Not too far-fetched. I'm on board with your Bitcoin being Anti-FUD theory. Its weathered numerous regulatory tempests and panic purges, yet it perpetually rebounds
However, I find your "whale-proof" Bitcoin assertion slightly doubtful. Despite a sprawling global market, the big fishes do frequent this sea. Their presence can cause market ripples, triggering erratic price fluctuations. This facet demands a closer look.
You hit bullseye regarding the roadmap. Bitcoin has progressively opened the gates for borderless transactions, placing it as a serious contender for the global currency belt
But one piece of advice, lets not trivialize the road to universal endorsement. Given Bitcoin's fluctuating nature and enduring trust issues, its likely to take more than a generation for widespread adoption. Its a waiting game. The future's a wildcard, and time holds the key.
|
|
|
|
|
Tools like Blockchair give a rough sketch of Bitcoin halving, based on current mining rates and the 10-minute block addition rule. But, lets not carve these estimates in stone; they're mere projections, not exact truths. Mining speed sways due to a host of elements like network complexity tweaks and overall mining might. So, while these tools sketch an outline, pinpointing the exact halving day, let alone hour or minute, is a shot in the dark.
As Bitcoin and blockchain enthusiasts, we should understand foundational principles, rather than leaning entirely on prediction models. These forecasts, while handy, arent fail-safe. They're as precise as nailing the next raindrop's landing time
|
|
|
|
~snip
Sometimes, people who are very passionate about something (for example, bitcoin) turn out to be overly persistent and assertive in agitating the subject of their passion. The point here is the excitement that a person experiences from delight and awareness of future prospects, if we talk about bitcoin. Such a person wants to share this knowledge with his friends and relatives in order to help them share valuable information for the benefit of their loved ones. But most often, these impulses are met with indifference or distrust of loved ones who don't perceive this information with similar enthusiasm. Because of this, there is a certain dissonance in the views. At this point it is better to stop and not try to convince them that bitcoin is the solution to all their problems and a ticket to a brighter future. I tend to think that there is no need to agitate and try to attract more new users in bitcoin, as in some kind of sect. I believe that when people themselves are ready, they will find a way to get information about it. There is enough information about btc around, whether it is in the news, or promotions carried out by enthusiasts. I want to say that bitcoin appears in the news background quite constantly and I hear from people who are far from bitcoin mentioning about it (heard about BTC for a long time, but they are not in a hurry to try it). So, many of our people around us have heard about bicoin more than once, but still they are in no hurry to study it in more detail. If they were interested, they would have taken a step in this direction long ago. Talking to friends like " buy BTC - get rich" is the dumbest way to talk about bitcoin. You are indeed right in saying that only a personal example is the best way. Less words - more results. And then, when you have something to show, others will start asking questions. It is this moment that will be the best to talk about btc. In general, I believe that it is not entirely right to try to change other people's lives. First, change yours for the better. Start with this. Otherwise, it turns out that as soon as they learn about bitcoin, people are in a hurry to advertise it to everyone around. Your words stir my thoughts. Does Bitcoin alone trigger strong responses among our circle? Is it our vigor or the topic itself that ruffles feathers? You propose news presence should quench curiosity, but what if the news is distorted? As Bitcoin aficionados, isn't it our duty to dispel myths and portray a rounded image? Aren't we failing our dear ones by letting them tackle Bitcoin's intricate universe solo? While peddling Bitcoin as a "strike it rich" tactic is misguided, I reckon we should champion its tech. We need to enlighten our circle about its potential and discuss its risks without bias |
|
|
|
In my optinion any redistribution scheme is a terrible idea. You were given a finite deflating amount of coins, trustless and decentralized. It's your responsibility to safely store your wallets / private keys. If you can't do that, you loose your coins. Simple as that. And others coins gain a little bit more value as the amount of active circulating coins decreases.
Why should anybody care how long UTXOs stay dormant and for what reasons. It's not your business. Bitcoin is a proposal and an offer different from traditional fiat and so far it's pretty well working within its technical bounds. My understanding is that you can't and shouldn't force UTXO holders to move their coins for whatever reason. It's not your business.
Debatable are schemes where coins are actively burned (proof of burn is worst) or sent to addresses which to utmost certainty don't have a matching private key known to mankind (still worse, too). IIRC things like CounterParty or similar burned a 4-figure amount of bitcoins.
While I don't find burning coins particularly charming, it's again not my business.
What if I told you the decentralized, trustless aspect of Bitcoin doesnt necessarily negate the necessity for a collective responsibility? Its true. Bitcoin, in its essence, encourages independence and self-regulation. However, imagine the potential for a more robust, resilient network if we cared more for each other. I'm not suggesting we distribute lost coins or even force the movement of dormant UTXOs, rather, can we not strive to create a safer space for everyone? Burning coins, on the other hand, is a complex issue. It’s like sending a spacecraft into a black hole. Its gone, contributing nothing to the economy. Could this be a valid criticism? Yet, as you stated, its not really our business, is it? At its core, the beauty of Bitcoin is its adaptability, pushing the boundaries of traditional financial systems. Let's hold on to that |
|
|
|
~.
In short, if you disagree with the view that economics is not the backbone of everything in this world. What will be the backbone of your life? I want to ask if you have no money in this day and age, how would you survive? Our lives have a lot of things that are necessary, not just money, but if you don't have a stable economy, you have nothing in your hand, even your family, wife, children, and friends will not need you. I think it is MoralitySince you're assuming something that isn't true, I won't be able to give you an answer as to how that would work out, but I'll mention that I still have money, though not too much, and not too poor to pay for it treat them as something to put first. Remember that the fact that you work and you get paid is fair, so what kind of work does it have, I think you will figure it out for yourself when a farmer does what they do to support them, raise their own livestock to provide food and share it with everyone you can imagine. I do not deny the importance of money in today's life, but it is clear here that we have made a difference between perceiving money as a tool people and people as a tool for money. Cash, its just a tool, right? And arent humans beyond mere cogs in this vast financial apparatus? A thought-provoking notion indeed. Bitcoin, like any cash variant, is an instrument. But it's a revolutionary one - decentralized, trust-free, and a potential democratizer of finance. Doesnt that impart a "moral" edge to it? The Bitcoin miners or blockchain innovators - arent they performing purposeful tasks, not merely chasing the greenback or, in this context, the Satoshi? Isnt this a stride towards prioritizing people over mere financial exploits? As we integrate these technologies into our monetary system, perhaps we're not just trading tools. Maybe we're remodeling the entire workshop. |
|
|
|
The price of Bitcoin has fallen drastically this year but the market definitely has the potential to grow. The Bitcoin market is not stable but always in a state of flux. It must be accepted that there is volatility in the market, we never know when the market will turn bad. There are many people who make predictions about the Bitcoin market but they cannot guarantee when and how the price of Bitcoin will determine its course. But if an investor keeps investing in Bitcoin at a high price, he must be patient until the market turns bullish again. When a person invests he must be particularly aware of the volatility of the market so that he can succeed in the future. A new investor must know about investing when the Bitcoin market drops. Investing in Bitcoin after learning about Cryptocurrencies well will lead to success in the future.
Predicting Bitcoin' flight path is as elusive as calling an election's result. The final word belongs to the investors, our voters - doesnt that scream democratic currency? For Bitcoin newbie, buying during a price dip might seem like a spooky forest expedition. But don't the audacious explorers unearth the hidden gems then? Mastering the Bitcoin game demands patience. Its similar to seizing the opportune moment for a stunning snapshot. If you bide your time, couldnt you immortalize the perfect shot? |
|
|
|
It's still too hard to imagine global adoption for bitcoin, that's because governments probably don't want it.
Obviously we know that bitcoin can be used as a means of payment, but its limited use cases and regulations still hinder much growth in one country or another. Bitcoin is a very useful alternative payment solution even safer than fiat, but when one expects it to be adopted globally then of course we need a very long process soon.
In fact, I'm sure, not all users who are active on bitcoin forum want to use bitcoin as a means of payment. They only use it as a means to generate profits or more precisely as an investment asset. Of course it is not as easy as imagined and maybe it will not be achieved globally towards the adoption of bitcoin because there are limitations that can hinder it, both through regulations and the will of the government itself. Payments using bitcoins are still quite limited and there are even some countries that prohibit payments using bitcoins openly. Even though bitcoin is really easy to use but those limitations will prevent it from achieving global adoption rapidly. For now there are still many people who use bitcoin as an investment and not many people use bitcoin as a means of payment. Even globally, people still use fiat currency to make payments every time they buy something they need and it cannot be denied that fiat currency is still quite needed and is unlikely to be replaced in the near future. Isnt this less a limit and more a dare? Faced with hurdles, Bitcoin' resilience and the blockchain' adaptability have shined When governments ban Bitcoin transactions, isnt it proof of its unsettling power rather than defeat? Doesn't this spark necessary conversations and a thrust for open, decentralized systems? Bitcoin is used more as an investment than for payments. Doesnt this amplify its esteemed value? The trend of treating Bitcoin as 'e-digital gold' is a thumbs-up for its future. With blockchain acceptance on the rise, cant we foresee a swing in Bitcoin' use from an investment tool to a payment mode? |
|
|
|
There may be a point, in that someone who is penniless might have more time to study and learn about Bitcoin and the exchange as a whole. So there is no rush to make investment decisions and have the opportunity to avoid the drama that sometimes occurs in the crypto market.
In any investment, solid knowledge of the assets to be invested is essential. Therefore, if someone has the investment skills and is prepared to deal with the associated risks, they may be better prepared to take the appropriate step in considering allocating some of their funds into Bitcoin.
Plus crypto world is filled with opportunities which means that if you have a lot of time, and a willing character to work hard, and no money at all that makes him hungry for more work, all that equals to finding a job here. Most of the time a job here would be a lot better, it is not going to be even remotely close and it would result with an insane high levels of return without a doubt. I think it is quite obvious that we shouldn't be really worried about an unemployed person in the crypto world because if they really work for it, they can definitely find a job. One way or another, even if it is not a "job", they can find bounties, airdrops, promotions, signature campaigns, management, and many other things as a business and could do so well. It is true that the crypto market offers various opportunities for someone who is willing to work hard and have enough time to develop his presence in it. Some people have managed to find full-time employment or a significant source of income through various activities in the crypto world, such as project development, trading, mining, or participation in reward programs such as airdrops, signature campaigns and the like. However, it is important to remember that as in any field, there are no guarantees of success, and there are risks and challenges to be faced. Keeping abreast of developments and trends in the crypto market, continuing to learn, and having a realistic and disciplined approach can help in taking advantage of the opportunities that exist in the crypto world. I agree with your points and it's true that sometimes in spite of having everything in a field there are some risks and challenges that we must have to face. The crypto-market is also full of such risks especially for those who are in the field of crypto trading because in crypto trading there are many altcoins that have no good use case, and those are only made for the purpose of pump and dump promotions. The traders who trade those altcoins are at very high intensity of risks because those altcoins can lose 99% value anytime, and the traders can empty up his/her capital by investing in those coins. The risks are quite high if you take part in presales of those coins because most of those coins are useless and they won't earn you anything. Aside from risks, the crypto-market is also full of opportunities and many people who can work in this field could be financially stable within no time. Even the income that people generate from the signature campaigns and other simple tasks is quite enough to live one's life happily with minimalistic expenses. In many countries people earn very low wages for their hard work, but in the field of crypto-currencies one could earn substantial income by doing not-too-hard type of work. In any field one's knowledge is the most important factor for success, and in crypto market the same rules are valid for the ones who want to earn some money. If someone is knowledgeable about the crypto market then things could be in his/her favor, on the other hand if someone is not knowledgeable about the market then that person couldn't make a lot from crypto-market. You raise compelling points about the dangers posed by certain altcoins. But should we not also take into account the equally transformative potential they offer? Can the very volatility that frightens some also create opportunities for others? When we turn to earning potential in crypto, we walk a delicate line. True, many have reaped significant rewards from simple tasks. However, isnt it overly optimistic to dismiss the effort involved as 'not-too-hard type of work'? Isnt it precisely the complex and often inscrutable nature of the crypto-market that makes it so lucrative? Knowledge, as you rightfully point out, is crucial. But isnt adaptability just as, if not more, essential? The crypto landscape is ever-changing, demanding constant vigilance. Isnt this precisely why Bitcoin, with its revolutionary blockchain technology, continues to intrigue us and hold such promise? |
|
|
|
It's Bitcoin trust worthy for investment? Cus have tried many platform but all failed and this my last hope... I was introduced into it.
OP are you having a doubt on Bitcoin based on the scam platform you have been introduced to? There are many scam platforms that offers Bitcoin payments after performing some certain task or investment, maybe you were introduced to one of the platform that makes you feel Bitcoin is not trust worthy, one of the functions of google is to research, investigate and get information about a particular system or platform to know if actually is real or not before you could venture into instead of coming here to make this kind of Statment which you were suppose to researched on before joining, to me this question is an irrelevant one, if I may ask, do you think anyone will be here if bitcoin was not real? As the matter of fact Bitcoin has been on existence for years and has empowered many, all thanks to the founder. So among all the coins to invest Bitcoin is the best but it all depends on your money and how you intend to invest it, one thing you most know is that sometimes market could be volatile as such going against your trade. A friend ones told me that in times of investment you should invest what you know will not affect you mentally if it doesn't work the way you expected. Intriguing argument, but isnt your statement somewhat one-sided? Yes, scams are prevalent, but is every skeptic a victim of a scam? Might it not be the case that their concerns stem from the erratic trends and the decentralized, unregulated nature of Bitcoin? Surely, we all agree Google is a handy tool. However, can all the complexities and nuances of a subject like Bitcoin be unraveled by a simple Google search? Is it not our duty as a community to help one another navigate these complex terrains? Indeed, Bitcoin has empowered many, but hasn't it also left many in ruins? Is it not crucial to acknowledge that while Bitcoin may be a profitable investment, it also comes with significant risks? |
|
|
|
Youth are interested in Bitcoin because it's easy to work with if you understand the ntrigrity also it's a way to make money, over time BTC has risen, and with this, the youth may be interested in a way to do business digitally.
We need to talk more about the benefit of Biticion in other to attract more youth because the majority do not know how this coin works.
we should be able to invite these young people to get to know more about what Bitcoin is and how it will benefit them. because not only for trading, bitcoin is also quite helpful for young people who work freelance and want to make transactions internationally but don't want to be taxed for it. bitcoin is a payment that makes it easy for them to get paid for their work but don't want to be complicated to manage various files to receive their payment. and not only that, bitcoin also makes it easier for them to be able to accept payments on their business for tourists or people who use bitcoin and it will give them more advantages compared to using fiat. so we should be able to provide information on the advantages of using bitcoin to them, so that they will be interested in adopting bitcoin for their various needs. Unquestionably, Bitcoin is a revolutionary trading medium, a significant asset for youth, especially freelancers. But are we bypassing potential downsides? While tax-free international dealings sound appealing, let's not forget—tax evasion is unlawful. Bitcoin doesnt grant tax immunity. Shouldnt we advocate for legal tax arrangements? Also, we can' overlook Bitcoin's instability. With values seesawing unpredictably, isn't it a precarious choice for young go-getters? Might the demerits overshadow the merits? Crucial to consider before advancing mass acceptance. Lets not exaggerate Bitcoin, but exhibit it as it is - a commendable, yet strenuous, element of the current financial matrix. |
|
|
|
what we do know is bitcoin's total supply is just 21 million and that makes it scarce.
It's more precious than gold.
Well, even if gold isn't as scarce as Bitcoin, it still has the trust of the world and people don't believe in Bitcoin as much as they do in Gold because they know that the supply of Gold, no matter how big it is, will never get cleared from existence no matter what happens because it exists in reality which means it has a physical existence while Bitcoin is just a digital currency and a technology and we all know that technologies are not really that scarce as they are always replaceable. We all know that there can't be any other asset to replace Gold until the existence of humanity but we all know that Bitcoin is something that can be replaced by something else in the future, something with better functionalities and properties can take its place. you have a point there, you have a very fair view of these two assets, what people are trying to deny is that gold is still being trusted and used more than bitcoin. bitcoin is still something of an uncertainty and can still be replaced in the future with better technology. But with gold, at least it has been around for thousands of years and still stands as the most valuable asset and is still absolutely trusted by people. Bitcoin is a great invention, it has many outstanding advantages over other asset classes and especially it brings wealth to many people. but that doesn't mean it will surpass gold, surpass everything in this world to become a god, people are exaggerating about bitcoin. Intriguing viewpoint, but lets flip the coin, shall we? Gold's been our pal for eons, no question! But does longevity necessarily imply indispensability? The mighty dinosaurs enjoyed a longer reign, and we all know their fate True, Bitcoin's roller-coaster ride and unpredictability give us jitters. However, isn't this inherent to any budding technology? Can we reject it just because it’s novel and unorthodox? If Bitcoin gets dethroned, wouldn't that be the law of tech evolution? Unlike Bitcoin, gold cant adapt - it remains merely gold Bitcoin won’t ascend to divinity, agreed, and such claims are hyperboles. Yet, let’s not downplay the might of innovation. Perhaps, we'll soon be trading Bitcoin |
|
|
|
`
The US has all it takes to host the world cup. They have quality facilities,tight security and good infrastructures, which makes them far better than Qatar. US will spend less because they will only have few things to put in place. The problem is that the country us already populated and might make them reduce the number of fans that they will grant access to the country for the world cup. One thing I know is that it will be well organized and people will complain less and will feel happy because it has been so many people dreams to be in the US,and I think that the world cup will be a good opportunity. Undoubtedly, the U.S. with its top-notch infrastructure seems an ideal World Cup host. Yet, aren't the intricacies of such a prestigious gig more than just amenities? Cultural and social facets matter too. Given our current demographic and immigration policies, could there be a cap on fan inflow? Yet, America's cultural mosaic may promise a one-of-a-kind, inclusive World Cup. And, we've showcased adeptness in managing big-ticket international events. Still, lets not forget, hosting is not merely about national prestige or a tourist surge. It's a significant investment needing meticulous planning. Could it strain resources and services? Hence, a well-rounded strategy ensuring the pros eclipse the costs and potential hiccups is imperative. |
|
|
|
Losing certainly feels bad. I know the feeling of losing a lot of money due to my stupidity but that has not stopped me from losing even more money in the all-too-near futures after that. Just put it out of your head and not dwell on it too much. Otherwise you start thinking you can win your loss back but end up losing more money...
You're right, I think we've all experienced at some point that things like this, losing because of a bad move feels ugly, sometimes with sadness, anger, of course that turns into remorse with the desire to have a feeling of revenge, and that Sometimes you have to control it, sometimes we must humbly accept that we lose when we gamble, it is the best, since seeking revenge or chasing losses is the worst, because that turns into continuing to lose money, and that is not correct, because gambling In a casino it should be synonymous with fun, but not with pressure, stress or something that turns into a nightmare. Absolutely, loss is part of the game, and its acceptance safeguards us from the treacherous cycle of vengeance gambling. However, your view banks on players having the emotional wisdom for self-discipline. Also, consider the socio-political undertones of your stand. By pushing "gambling as fun," you're aiding giant casinos that glorify gambling. For them, its a goldmine, but for others, it morphs into a compulsive demon. Therefore, I endorse stricter oversight and public enlightenment about gambling hazards. A community-centric strategy, mixed with personal duty, is the future. |
|
|
|
Your remark seems to embody a recurring fallacy about the supposed invisibility of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. While Bitcoin transactions offer somewhat greater discretion compared to traditional financial systems, it's a distortion to deem them fully untraceable. It's also essential to respect the law's authority. Evading regulatory oversight is not only ethically unsettled but could invite severe legal penalties. Believing in eternal cover-up for such actions, in the advancing digital age, is illusory. Therefore, it's prudent to stay within the legal bounds when using cryptocurrencies, instead of attempting to bypass regulations. This path is ultimately more enduring and safe.
Or he can choose not to gamble even though his government allows gambling. Yes, I agree not to go against government regulations because we can get into trouble or punishment from the government. In the meantime, it's better for us to remain silent and say nothing if we still own crypto to others. It is necessary to be careful when storing crypto, especially now that many are starting to target it. But the important thing is not to store it in third parties because we can't keep track of it later. Never ever. Use third-party applications only with how they are created. Either to exchange our cryptocurrencies for our own currency or just send it to another crypto user in speed. Never go against the government because there's no such thing as a secret to them, especially to those who own loads of amount of Bitcoin. They will not keep themselves silent and allow it to be non-taxable. Regarding gambling, I would not mind just quitting if ever the government bans Bitcoin. But, if there are available cryptocurrencies, why not? The perk of using this is because of the cheap way to bet. You can play as long as you like with just satoshis of bets and it doesn't matter to the gambling sites as long as you are losing.  Banning the gambling site itself though is non-negotiable, better find a new hobby. I stand by your view on mindful usage of third-party apps and being tax-savvy with Bitcoin. Governments have their methods, and outsmarting the system is fool's gold. Yet, I question your stance on the gambling bit. Sure, Bitcoin's low-stakes appeal is enticing, but let's flip the coin. How about the risk of addiction it carries? Is the fleeting thrill worth the potential fallout? As for seeking another pastime if Bitcoin gambling gets the boot, brilliant remedy indeed. Maybe this ban could be a wake-up call, redirecting our vigor towards less hazardous and more rewarding endeavors. |
|
|
|
Norway could get more points in this group at the end of 4 matches.They managed to beat Cyprus 3-1 but they have less chances to get out of the group than Georgia.Georgia has one match less and it is very strange that Scotland is the leader in the group.I was thinking that Spain will be the leader and Norway will be the second, but it will not be as I expected.Both Spain and Norway have a chance not to get out of the group.
Talking about group A currently Scotland is the favourite to qualified and they got 12 points from 4 matches and they even only conceded 1 goal so far and their achievement is much better than Norway or Spain and for Norway i think it's hard for them to qualified because if we see from their last matches Norway has lose from Scotland and Spain although Haaland has been consistent to scores goals but it doesn't help the team to win the match and if i am not mistaken Norway has 4 matches remaining for qualification matches and maybe if they can able to win all of the matches there is a hope for them to qualified but i personally thinking this is very hard to do so and for group A i think the teams who possibly will qualified is Scotland and Spain but for Norway i think their high achievement in this group is only 3rd place The Scottish warriors are on a winning rampage, with four conquests in a row, making it tough for them to lose grip. Their exceptional feats and the resulting morale surge grants them a decisive lead. Toppling Norway and Spain, Scotland has marked itself as a stern challenger. However, football's winds change abruptly. While Norway's road to qualification seems rocky, four matches can bring a turn of tide. A quartet of wins might just create a ripple. It's ambitious, no doubt, but football has seen bigger overturns. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
