Thanks for the explanation. So, I did not send this transaction, I received it from a user who unfortunately put a low fee!! I use http://blockchain.info/ as a BTC wallet So now I do not know how to get out of it! In the meantime I made a deposit on yobit and even this, despite I put a fee of 140satoshi, is still not confirmed because the previous transaction is not confirmed! ( U) I do not know what to do. I absolutely have to confirm this transaction! If in addition to accelerating the transaction, I make a double spend or an RFB, you say that I can solve in some way? thank you Like he said, you'll have to make a huge Child-pays-for-parent transaction paying the fees for ALL the unconfirmed transactions but you'll pay a relatively large amount of bitcoin (~0.04BTC) to make them all confirm. If your CPFP transaction is successful they'll all confirm at the same time. |
|
|
|
Those a Bech32 segwit addresses defined in BIP 173 by Peter Wuille https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawikiWith bc1 addresses your transactions are 38% smaller than that of legacy transactions of the same input/output. Eg for 1 input and 2 outputs, a legacy (address starts with 1) transaction is 226 bytes, but a Bech32 transaction is just 141vbytes. Right now only Electrum supports the creation of wallets with this address type (select "native segwit" when you're setting up) Also, it's not backwards compatible, meaning wallets without segwit support won't be able to send funds to this type of address. |
|
|
|
Segwit addresses that start with 3 are P2WPKH nested in P2SH. (Not all addresses that start with 3 are Segwit addresses, they could be multisig addresses. There is no way to tell the difference between the two until the address spends funds.) The ones that start with bc1 are Bech 32 called "native segwit" in Electrum. Defined in BIP173 by Peter Wuille https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawikiBech32 transactions are 38% smaller than legacy (standard addresses that start with 1) transactions, while P2PWKH-P2SH transactions are 27% less than legacy transactions of the same number of inputs/outputs. Unfortunately bc1 is not backwards compatible so users have to upgrade to a wallet with Segwit support to be able to send funds to this type of addresses. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin talk name: Xynerise
Rank: Member
Current post count: 154
BTC address: 39twH4PSYgDSzU7sLnRoDfthR6gWYrrPoD
Wear appropriate signature: done.
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanges do not send out funds immediately you request for them. 4" is not a valid transaction ID and the blockchain doesn't lie so they haven't sent it out yet.
There's no pending deposits on the receiving address so it's not waiting for confirmations either meaning the transaction has not been sent at all.
|
|
|
|
Currently LN software only work when segwit is activated. There is no "without segwit".
Yeah, I was also a bit surprised to see that bit... LN works with Segwit only because non-segwit transactions are vulnerable to transaction malleability. |
|
|
|
|
Double spending = spending the same inputs more than once.
In cash, this would be the equivalent of giving someone a $100 bill, then giving another person the same $100 bill.
You can see it's not possible because once the money has left your hands you can't spend it again.
Bitcoin tries to replicate that function with the blockchain and proof-of-work (aka mining) is what makes it possible.
In bitcoin once you send a bitcoin input to someone and it's confirmed (written in the blockchain ledger), you can't spend that same input again because it's no longer yours to control.
You should read the bitcoin white paper to understand how it works.
Signing a message or transaction* has nothing to do with the blockchain (read: mining) (you don't need to pay fees for it),
Once you have a private key you can sign anything without paying miner fees.
Signing a message or transaction is just maths.
*Transactions are free to create, sign and broadcast, but if you do not include enough fees in the transaction then you run the risk of your transaction not being confirmed.
|
|
|
|
Hello,
My question is if its possible to make for example ETH transaction and coins would get two address?
For example, some person want to send $2, $1 would get one address and another $1 would get different address?
And everything would be done automatically.
I am planning to run some service and I need such scheme to be possible.
Or maybe i would need some bot or script which would do the job?
Electrum wallet can do that for BTC. You can also do that with bitcoin core. You can send to different wallet addresses in the same transaction |
|
|
|
|
What exactly do you want to do?
Do you want to claim one of the many UTXO forks of bitcoin?
Because bitcoin hasn't had a hard fork.
If so, then just send out your bitcoin to another wallet entirely, then import your seed into a wallet that supports the fork.
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't used bitcoinwallet.com.
Paste your wallet address or the address of the exchange you're sending funds to and see if there's a pending transaction.
It MAY be that there's a pending transaction already.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for replying.
The whole thing is driving me nuts.
I checked again and unfurtunately I used private key, but still the wallet is watch-only.
Can I open a new wallet via Electrum and import the old private key? Would that work?
The private key should start with 5, K, or L. |
|
|
|
My understanding was I was just changing the platform of my wallet rather than creating a new wallet. I appreciate if I had created a new wallet it would not have 'seen' my stuck transactions. The reason I mentioned doublespend is that is what the bitap link stated.
Could this be a rebroadcast as there are 2 txid, wouldn't a rebroadcast have to use the original tx?
original: 5de4d738788e5b21bfec4925765ebdadf92907c8e6de63a8cc9834f02d5a57d0
yesterdays: e2db4fcb3151aa1a7154d1ee57fb08481acd1f75e20a5a92b05dec515bcecf4a
I do appreciate I have a very limited understanding of this, hence the questions. Thanks all for trying to help me understand.
Relax, everything is fine. You did what you were supposed to do correctly. |
|
|
|
.
Does exporting a wallet with a stuck transaction to another wallet permit a double spend? I am unsure as to how I was able to double spend otherwise.
Technically not a double spend because it wasn't confirmed. So it breaks no consensus rules. |
|
|
|
Hi all i did read the information in this form and tried what was asked
so far no success
i made a transaction last night
to exchange ETHER from my Coinomi wallet to Binance exchange as i wanted to do some trades
transaction i made was over 12 hours ago now, and its still pending,
more less other side has not accepted.
is there any way i can backpedal this and cancel? or what are my options anyone else have similar situation
follow this article to replace the transaction: https://myetherwallet.github.io/knowledge-base/transactions/check-status-of-ethereum-transaction.html |
|
|
|
Hello Xynerise thanks for your helping me,
Your question is What wallet did I get the BTC address from? I’m sent out From Trezor hardwares wallet , and I have no idea how to get the private key from them, please help me how to get private key from there, thank you so much
Do you have the seed? (Those 24 words you were told to write down when you were setting up the Trezor) It's equivalent to your private keys. Send your bitcoin away from the Trezor to another wallet for safety reasons. Then download Electron Cash, import the seed (tick the bip 39 option) You should see your BCash in the wallet after importing. Now send them to another BCash address you control. (You can create a receiving address and send the coins there) |
|
|
|
....
If you want lower fees then use segwit and tell others to use it also.
Segwit does not solve the fee problem. This is simply mis information. A reduction in fees of 30-40% is not material. To rephrase your statement: "Reduction of fees does not solve the fee problem." The levels of fees have utterly destroyed large parts of the bitcoin economy, and segwit does not change that. Cutting fees to 1/10 of current levels does not change this.
Fees would have to go to 1/100 - 1/1000 of current levels for the old bitcoin economy to arise again. Segwit DOES cause fee reduction in the long run: because segwit transactions are smaller, more of them can fit in a block. To better illustrate the point, assume that all transactions in the block are segwit transactions with 1 input and 1 output. There will be ~12,195 transactions that can be contained in that block, compared to ~5,208 non segwit transactions of the same type I'm talking buying beers, pizzas, tipping on line, Starbucks gift cards, etc.
You forgot to add coffee... |
|
|
|
please help me I am New to this please show me step by step how to recover the lost coin let me explain. First I used Trezor wallet sent bitcoin(BTC) out convert to bitcoin cash(BCH) using shapeshift.io, however the received address I input BTC received address instead of BCH address so I email shapeshift and asking to recovery my lost coin, they emailed me and say they're nolonger access to my coin to recover it, so they sent me a LINK ( https://blockdozer.cominsight.tx.......) ask me to extract the coin using your private key... please show me how, Im lost... thank you so much.. Shapeshift CANNOT help you because they do not possess the private key of the BTC receiving address. If you do, then you can help yourself out. What wallet did you get the BTC address from? If you have the private key/seed to that wallet then you just have to import it into a BCash wallet then your coins will show up. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
