You just described not "an evil and terrible government that is only interested in money" but a classic natural cycle. That animals-the weakest in the herd can be left to die/kill that they would not interfere with the survival of the rest, and people-the weakest inhibit growth/development/reduce the chance of survival. There is nothing surprising in this
we are human and cannot be compared to animalism lol. Yeah there are some person that has animal attitude but this is a rare cases because people are concern with each other and this is proven how we fight about this Pandemic with helping hands. We are not far from them actually. in a global sense, I mean . Until now, we always sacrifice the weak for the welfare of others, and when we give up the mercy, we suffer from it ourselves. I think that you will understand the examples here. |
|
|
|
|
If all projects follow your advice, then instead of at least some idealism, we will get millions of tokens that serve as a replacement for money and do not differ in any way from synthetic exchange instruments, and if even simpler, they do not differ from air with the taste of success. The market is already oversupplied - and now projects are at least trying to attract new customers in addition to the fact that "Oh, we are working with [exchange-name]"
|
|
|
|
|
>hi we are a cool token
>Yes we only have a group in telegram
>what do you mean you don't trust us???
It's even funny - your post and your message. Maybe you should first make a site with a team and wp and not spam the Tg group and be happy about it?
|
|
|
|
|
You just described not "an evil and terrible government that is only interested in money" but a classic natural cycle. That animals-the weakest in the herd can be left to die/kill that they would not interfere with the survival of the rest, and people-the weakest inhibit growth/development/reduce the chance of survival. There is nothing surprising in this
|
|
|
|
|
Is it risky to jump over a knee-high fence? You can successfully jump over it and go further or you can catch your shoelaces and break your face.
It's the same here - it all depends on how well you know the information about the new project and how much you trust yourself and your communication channels.
|
|
|
|
|
You understand that this is due to how huge the market has become now. If earlier, God willing, 10 positions were or even less, now almost every week there are new coins and immediately with the release of the exchange, "clean - new - beautiful". People do not want to change their view of the market in a more classic direction - and do not want to accept that gradually the crypto market becomes exactly the same as a "normal" exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
This is all very fine - all these wet dreams of a world between cryptocurrency and the state. But they break down just about the confrontation between cryptocurrency users and the state machine. Put simply, it is
- crypto users want complete anonymity, security, safety, do not want to pay taxes, do not want KYC, do not want tax supervision
- the state wants to keep under control, to be able to investigate crimes, issue suspicious data, register all wallets, taxes on trading
Until these issues are not resolved, you can forget about the ubiquity of cryptocurrencies and the ability to legally (completely legally) pay for a purchase on every shop
|
|
|
|
4. Russia (cryptoruble)
The president showed an interest towards cryptocurrency however, Russian central bank hasn't yet showed any interest on the said crypto.
You can just forget about Russia, guys. To believe in the words of their President is like throwing stones into the water and hoping for Aphrodite to come out of the sea foam. There everything is very difficult with the economy and no one will deal with cryptocurrencies at the state level until the government changes. The fact that Vlad Putin showed interest in the crypto means nothing |
|
|
|
This makes sense, but the measures are still quite strange. Why not to just ban temporary the use of paper money? I am sure that South Korea has a sufficiently advanced banking, and that all people (the vast majority) can pay on the card/through the phone are contactless methods. Am i right?
I agree to that, and its doable as internet / mobile banking is not that hard anymore. The government can easily cancel the used of paper money It will help conserving the printed money instead of being burned it can be used after this pandemic virus find the right vaccines. Though we don't know what's behind this decision as ling as they are doing everything to prevent the spread of this virus and trying to conserve life to the extent of burning their cash / paper currency. Yes, you do not even need to take and cancel paper money - this is quite a natural process for me. I don't remember the last time I held coins or bills in my hands - I even pay with a card or transfer to the seller's account at the weekend market or fairs. You will see after another 15-20 years and the use of paper money in everyday life will cause the same perplexity as an attempt to pay with a watch for a purchase in a supermarket 5-6 years ago! I believe and hope so. |
|
|
|
It depends on what you mean by "freedom". Yes the freer the market the freer people are in things like
- opening/running your own business
- product selection
- easier transition from one job to another
but at the same time, you can face problems that are currently solved by antitrust committees in different countries (although they do not cope with the same Disney). I do not believe that the market can be left completely uncontrolled entity, but there are already levels of sufficient freedom that allow you to feel comfortable and not think about not being free.
While being free is good and what we all wanted, there is always a negative side on it as there will be no rules to follow, some will be free to do scam or do bad services and cam ruin the market as a whole. Its good to be free in buying and selling as well in having different investment and payment methods in our own means but some situations really needs to have laws or rules to follow for equality and betterment of the situation. When we begun to be too open in embracing everything sometes we forget that it doesn't really necessary that makes the situation worst. I just follow one rule: if someone promises me "freedom, equality and fraternity" then it means only one thing-an attempt to build a cultural Gulag and take away all the freedoms that already exist and make a person as limited as possible in their rights. If I am promised a "new wonderful world of universal equality" , I immediately remember the book "We" by the russian writer Yevgeny Zamyatin. Well, Orwell's 1984 - who is closer. |
|
|
|
If WW3 happens, the only question I care about is whether I can afford to buy an expensive set of MK3 power armor, or will I have to listen to Sergeant Dornan tell me I'm an idiot?
But seriously, WW3 is too big a name. Throughout the twenty-first century, there are some small conflicts with different forces on the sides and goals. For a full-scale world war, you need something stronger than what you described. Remember what the biggest wars were about. No, not because of any economic problems, viruses or anything else, but because of super-aggressive politicians who were adherents of bad political ideologies.
World war is war between nations, so you don't need to worry about weapons stock, you don't have to buy it. Provided by the state or can be looted after a war. indeed a political problem even though it was considered small could lead to a World War, such as the beginning of January 2020. between America and Iran. well even though it didn't happen, so we should be grateful. I see only one prerequisite for the future of WW3 - modern radical left movements. Anti-fascists, SJW, blm and other gender-fluid acrobats who climb everywhere and impose absolute nonsense which at the same time also begin to support. They call themselves "fighters for justice" but Hitler also wanted justice, didn't he? This is a time bomb, and i hope that gov ready for this |
|
|
|
|
If WW3 happens, the only question I care about is whether I can afford to buy an expensive set of MK3 power armor, or will I have to listen to Sergeant Dornan tell me I'm an idiot?
But seriously, WW3 is too big a name. Throughout the twenty-first century, there are some small conflicts with different forces on the sides and goals. For a full-scale world war, you need something stronger than what you described. Remember what the biggest wars were about. No, not because of any economic problems, viruses or anything else, but because of super-aggressive politicians who were adherents of bad political ideologies.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on what you mean by "freedom". Yes the freer the market the freer people are in things like
- opening/running your own business
- product selection
- easier transition from one job to another
but at the same time, you can face problems that are currently solved by antitrust committees in different countries (although they do not cope with the same Disney). I do not believe that the market can be left completely uncontrolled entity, but there are already levels of sufficient freedom that allow you to feel comfortable and not think about not being free.
|
|
|
|
|
This makes sense, but the measures are still quite strange. Why not to just ban temporary the use of paper money? I am sure that South Korea has a sufficiently advanced banking, and that all people (the vast majority) can pay on the card/through the phone are contactless methods. Am i right?
|
|
|
|
|
I’m waiting for new btc pump after several hype videos for kids in tiktok
|
|
|
|
I work from home, nothing much has changed. To live exclusively on trading/bounty, you need to be either very confident and rich ( to not to be afraid of long downtime and major failures) or the biggest fool.
It's hard to live exclusively on trading/bounty, but not impossible. Some people, early adopters and big investors, who have huge bankroll can do that, to risk losing and wait to make profit. Some of us needs to work to have for living. But probably just a few people do that, most other lose with trading, and don't make profit from trading and bounties to have for life. I have a job, but I work here when I can. I invest in crypto-currencies from my salary and I work for crypto-currencies, I plan to keep all that for the future. I'm not saying it's impossible. It is sounds realistic to live on trading / bounty if you have a high skills in the first and stability in the second. But now many people do not have a lot of patience for this. Not everyone is a whale with big crypto income |
|
|
|
|
I work from home, nothing much has changed. To live exclusively on trading/bounty, you need to be either very confident and rich ( to not to be afraid of long downtime and major failures) or the biggest fool.
|
|
|
|
It is a pity that people generally come up with such a stupid idea as taking a loan for cryptocurrencies. How many classes of education do they have? 1-2? I understand when people who are already established and know the market do this - they fully understand what they are doing and know what to expect but when a newcomer comes to the crypto industry with credit money… This will cause news of another suicide. This is very sad.
who does something stupid like that? it would be better to sell the real assets we have than to have to borrow from others. it's like killing yourself by losing people's money. no one gives certainty that they will benefit in the time they planned. Bison, people who are doing this are people who are self-confident in their intentions. The same people learn from their mistakes, after they make them. And we shouldn't bother about this, it's their thing what they do with their own life! What is important for us it to learn from other peoples mistakes, and if we made a mistake to not hurt us too much. It's what we learn and what we need to teach our children and close people we know. But we are talking about newcomers who only yesterday knew about the crypto markets and cryptocurrency from some articles on buzzfeed and decide that they are " PRO INVESTOR" |
|
|
|
It is a pity that people generally come up with such a stupid idea as taking a loan for cryptocurrencies. How many classes of education do they have? 1-2? I understand when people who are already established and know the market do this - they fully understand what they are doing and know what to expect but when a newcomer comes to the crypto industry with credit money… This will cause news of another suicide. This is very sad.
who does something stupid like that? it would be better to sell the real assets we have than to have to borrow from others. it's like killing yourself by losing people's money. no one gives certainty that they will benefit in the time they planned. Yes a lot of people think like this. All sorts of guys who think they are the smartest in the world. That they smart enough to trade with loan money. Sometimes they could even have several successful trades. They take even more confident in their victory and then just burn all the money and start whining: - my God i loose everything and don’t want to live anymore..... a stroke of genius no less |
|
|
|
Well, maybe they finally collapse. And then they will deal with their authorities and choose new ones/build a completely different regime. Why don't I feel sorry for them? I don't know, it's just their fault.
Usually the collapse of a currency is only a disaster for the people, but just a walk in the park for the politicians. Just look around you and you'll see it's harder to find a country with a long history of the same currency than the other way round. Practically every single country went through a currency reset. Some more than once. And what prevents the people from removing a government that does not suit them? Or revolution can only be made by government? If people have not done anything for the welfare of their country then they deserve what they have received. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
