It is stall news, this might just be a company or firm helping people to manage their asset. In any way, we have always been safe and will keep been safe. When your mates are conservative, you have to strike your goal without pity. Here we have the test of brave heart.

Before now, I use to be a big fan of ICO and was loss to it, after much-failed project and loss of huge investment, I had to re-think my steps and withdraw from ICO projects by 98%. It's painful to see a promising project even been announced and managed by a Full Member or even a Sr Member go scamming. There are a good project with good intention by bad eggs have created unhealthy atmosphere for them.

You are majorly right. We get to see huge rewards from bounty allocations as reflective of ICO/IEO sales price. But when they reach exchange, the price is about 500% dead. This doesn't apply to all project. This is why it's important to wisely choose project to promote to avoid waste of energy and time.

President moves can't be accurately predicted, he acts and later reviews his actions for necessary management or damage control, he is whom he his, that you can't take from him. On bitcoin, I am, certain he won't give any executive order on it. If peradventure it mistakenly happens, bitcoin will see a temporarily dump in price and spring massively almost immediately. The truth is that: USA is a very great nation but does not control the bitcoin network.

This is consolidating. It seems they can't really voice it when still holding political portfolio,  so as to serve their masters and the banking industry Mafias. Well, we all know the politicians love cryptocurrencies, but their only problem is just how to control it, which is out of their reach.

I loss good amount of money after the dumping of bitcoin from the 2017 ATM. Including the people I had helped in buying bitcoin.


I have since been investing because it's currently surer than my day job, where I keep making losses and ridden with debt. So I had to use the profit from bitcoin in paying off part of my day job indebtedness. 

Not everyone definitely will subscribe to  ETF, but everyone has their choice to make, it entirely boils to an individual on how they use their money. I personally hate a third party holding my money for me, but still, if this will bring more liquidity to the market it's okay.

I don't follow those false price predictions, it can only lead to loss of more money, some of them don't even make a trade of their useless analysis. They are looking for noobs to send to the pit.

I will rather use a centralized exchange that I understand it mechanism well. Use a trusted exchange and avoid exchange like  bitebtc, and avoid the one with too much withdrawal fee, and not requiring KYC for the amount you are about to exchange.

Trust icobench at your peril. All they do is collect money and carry out good rating. They are part of the scam. The FXpay they gave a good rating and team even pass kYC scammed investors from day 1. Sometimes I go to FXpay to check some links of project and not ratings. You can check my signature and check out some project been handled by the BM if you carry out your due diligence, then the choice is yours and never forget, you are going to bear the risk alone.

This is just a way to lure investors to the project and get to buy early. This doesn't in any way mean the project will be successful. In fact, I even prefer a project that sells cheap without bonus than selling with big bonus only to struggle to keep the price from crashing after listing in an exchange. But still, the team are scared that without bonus they may not attract enough investors.

Alright, Akon has always supported Cryptocurrency and the bitcoin, but his idea of creating his own coin is what am not too comfortable about. He could either use the bitcoin to reach out or partner with one of the good altcoins already existing in the market place. With the way altcoins have been failing, it will be much better to support existing projects especially when one does not experience on how these works.

We can't say for sure how long it's going to take almost everyone to use bitcoin. Some persons or group of persons just may never use bitcoin because of how rural their community is, and lack of basic technology to ease conversion of bitcoin to physical money so to speak. If the world government will be truth to themselves, we should see many world population using cryptocurrency. You know some persons allow the government to do the thinking and certify what is good and bad.

No, BTC won't kill banking system, it will complement the ones that choose to incorporate bitcoin in their services. However should the banking system refuse to see the opportunities in bitcoin technology and exploit them, they will just be losing huge revenue and more and more persons discover how to send more across borders at a faster rate and almost at no-fee as compared to the brutal traditional banking system.

I learned about bitcoin and how to buy/sell in several exchanges and how to use DEX without single assistance from anyone. This is the reason why I didn't buy bitcoin when it hits $800 in August 2017, because I was really scared it was going to disappear. I was told about bounty by a friend and had to research it myself and would later go ahead and teach hundreds of persons I don't even know through WhatsApp. Funny I am not as intelligent as a good academic student. So noobs need to chase quick gain as a first call but knowledge.

The problem lies partly on the bounty managers. We have many dishonest hunters which are causing harm to the project. The BM, should always employ Proof-Of-Authentication "POA" post which they have always have done, and participants should always sign up with google form and IP should be tracked, and proxy IP tracked too, and the part of authentication using telegram can be incorporated too, and a project can partner with a third party to detect multiple accounts. all these are just few steps to getting rid of cheaters.

As long as the person has no criminal record, the government will do anything about it. But I don't like the idea of transferring fund from a centralized exchange to my main wallet, and this person's wallet is massive. Nothing to fear though, but keeping one's identity in a region that the government is still confused about bitcoin can be wise.

Gold is less volatile, and the conservative investors will always go for gold as a store of value and investment. If the world adopts bitcoin, then the price will be more stable and quickly bring a return on investment, and the people of the world will have no option than to follow bitcoin not totally leaving gold behind.

Never heard of Volentix and never use it for once. I have been using Idex, Folkdelta and Ddex. I love Idex for the fact that it has some good volume but hate the idea of having to make withdrawals of tokens after trading. I don't that fancy Folkdelta because it works with ethereum network and ethereum network is very slow, but anyone can list on folkdeta and it's truely decentralized. Ddex is a good dex, but lacks volume, and the idea of wrapping ETH before trading is not very okay with me. In the end, we don't have perfect Dex yet. Let's keep building.

Crypto is still the way to go, it remains very much untapped. I am soon starting my small private school to educate people in my city about cryptocurrency, but will never teach them to invest in altcoins at noobs they are that will be a great disservice to them considering how much I have loss to altcoin investment. Cryptocurrency has the power to dislodge poverty in a lifetime if a wise investment decision is taken.