When a person begin to blame himself consistently in a behavior he can't control, soon, wouldn't it get tiring? He, the gambler, wouldn't feel comfortable playing the game, because he's lost confidence in himself. Accurately, a person can blame himself and pick correction that'll help change his life positively. That works on realistic achievements where some determination is needed to accomplish. Gambling with or with no determination, huge funds will get milked away by the inflammation, and losses.


It's also funny that players talk about relying on AI to improve their profits. I've not seen a gambler thay seeks for  gambling help from a toddler, but AI brain is below that of a toddler cannot equate. AI is not as intelligent as a baby. Like you said those AI learn languages for a long time and master how to answer designated questions. How then will a player trust an AI for prediction, If not greed. Human brain is far better and accurate than the AI in terms of predicting games and other human brain task.

I would have said gambling is the cause for this, but it's wrong. Thinking about it, before the institution of gambling in a universal usage across the world, I grew in an environment where people watched sport without gambling and still exhibit similar behaviors like destroying things or really get sad, because their team lost a penalty kick. Gambling I would say brings out the true behavior of some people regarding activities like sports.

Because, these people who behave this way were groomed to behave in such manner. Remember not all gamblers does a things as cruel as that. Hence, players could be aggressive naturally, and whenever something gets them sad they'll begin to act  aggressively. Gambling is a factor that makes such people sad to an extent of causing troubles or become destructive. Gambling, yes, can influence someone to behave in such a way. Yet, the whole blame should be on gambling, as the cause. The player also contributed to the way he acted.

Beginning from your second paragraph, critics indirectly seek for information where there are not. Personally, have seen people who criticized some habits in the past but are now a part of the habit. A new gambler can criticize an addict, not knowing he could get addicted soon. Who knew he'd become a gambler. It's all a matter of environment and fun activities. Same way those critics wouldn't understand that they can become gamblers in future. Hence, getting hold of such critics to realize that their thoughts about gambling is completely wrong is a nice reminder.

Those few words of conversation would be cemented in his brain. Such that, in future, eventually, when he becomes a gambler, those words will guide him. One side of the publicity is in decline. That's why most people in the society accept that gambling is completely wrong. Helping them redirect such thoughts will help the person to see gambling differently. And such complaints on criticism and stigmatism will be reduced. How you know this is that everyone around you who is a non gambler will argue that gambling has no health benefit.

Gambling 7 days a week requires limitations. Gambling should be limited at any strategy utilized. A player can decide to gamble every day for a month and go for a 3 months break. During his gambling hours people could misunderstand him and think he does it and nothing happens to him. Hence, such people will try doing it with no limitations, as they think it requires no such thing. They'll be the ones to suffer problem gambling. Because they gamble blindly.

Showing their inexperienced moves and building up more mistakes. The problem isn't the duration a player gambles. It's about his break patterns. Doing it with no few months break can be too stressful that the brain would be weak to think better, due to lack of rest. Gambling is a psycho thing, and the player's brain is meant to be secured and protected against any type of addiction. A player that goes for vacation still has his self control in place. Hence, can't get compulsive with chasing losses.

The bigger mistake is a family that leaves their addicted ward alone to suffer because of his countervailing attitudes. Such thoughts affects more the addicted player in a way that doesn't seem right. It's right for people to focus more in reviving the addicted players. And let them realize they are not heading to the right lifestyle for them. However, correcting an addicted brain is quite very hard, and so tiring that the addict's family at some point would want to let go of him. I don't buy such an idea in cases that has to do with mental illness. As I read above they're not performing those behaviors at their own will. It's just a quick reminder that addicts actually needs help, regardless of their behavior. If left alone, he'd cause more disturbing problem for the family.

The earlier an addicted player is attended to, the healing process begins. Hence whatever treatment method in form of kindness that is utilized will be effective. Engaging in arguments with the addicts only makes them sad and through anger can do something wrong in their process of proving to his family that gambling will surely get him rich. They could sell or steal meaningful treasures from their home and wager in the casino. Actually, due to the stigma an addict feels people have on him, he'd do anything possible to win big, just to remove the stigma. So, those stigmas, hatred and argument placed on addicts is not the right thing doing. It worsens the struggle to save the person.

I think so, people are more concerned recently about everyone's lifestyle how they gamble and where they gamble. However, it's not a bad notion. Concealing a habit or living an isolated lifestyle is not always good. People need to be aware of some things. At least when issues arises they'll be people to testify about the player's lifestyle. Hence, it's crucial for gamblers to select few trusted people and let them know about their gambling habit or lifestyle. But in this context on the Op the players already are enough acquittance to one another.

No way, all of them can't get addicted same time. If they're educated on responsible gambling strategies, information on ways to avoid addiction can be circulated while they gamble in isolation. I think that such gamblers who engage in a game with friends don't need to share further information about their gambling habit with family members. His friends will easily get the message to his family if any issue arises. It's only advisable for a solo gambler to discuss his gambling habit with friends.

Yes both sicknesses have similar effect to the brain. And requires similar method of treatment. Due to the way it affects the brain of the player to think of things only related to their addiction. Ways to fund or maintain it. However when a player is struggling with both illnesses then it's quite a huge loss for the player. As he could have a hard time tracing his ways back. Such people need a therapists to help handle their mental illness. Although they'll have time to spend with family at the initial stage of healing before approaching the therapist. It's right to first get the person occupied with the thought of getting help or visiting a therapist.

Because if taken immediately to a therapist for a healing program it's crucial to note that the person will miss most of his therapy sessions. Thereby, delaying the healing process of the gambler. I think unprepared gamblers should be watchful of such problems before engaging into the hobby. When the hobby is not gotten right it could result to a bigger trouble like facing addiction in the future. Although, adding drug intake to reduce the anxiety gambling losses could cause will affect the player severely and will land him into a deeper trouble. Hence, drug addiction and gambling addiction is not meant to be taken slightly. Players are to avoid doing both drugs and gambling. The load will be much on the player, such that he'll one way get addicted.

It's true that a gambler cannot quit gambling immediately, but when he's sick it's quite risky for a player to still engage in gambling. I agree that the gambler can be made happy if allowed to wager few amounts and enjoy his session. This is valid if the player is ready to be under watch. Similarly, a sick person shouldn't be left on his own to do some things, especially financial transactions like gambling. Where he could be taken off guard and lose out lots of money enough to affect his health.

The situation as pointed by Op explains the cruciality of online gambling. How it's capable of reducing the way players with transmittable diseases go to the casino. It's all for the good of everyone. Both the gambler and his friends in the casino. Places fully crowded by people is meant to be avoided, as nobody knows who is actually healthy in that premises. I don't see any need of visiting a crowded gambling shop  enough to affect the ventilation of the room, when an online casino is available on his device.

Gamblers rarely get to hear such things as no gambler has gotten rich through the game. What is mainly circulating the society is how big the jackpot is and how it's able to change a player's financial lifestyle to the best. The truth is on decline in gambling. The players get too emotionally attached with the funds gambling has to offer. Instead of focusing on the proper means of getting things right. Most players struggle each day with losses. They never go a day satisfied with their gambling session. Sometimes gamblers are too greedy that they'll use all possible means of winning a game and still lose out. Could remember a player who printed six different slips on a game and lost it all. Gamblers have no proven means of tricking the house. Instead the house is far ahead of the players. Hence players are required to pay more attention in reducing how they lose in the game. As it may affect them psychologically and lead them to addiction.

Gambling is a difficult game for most players to understand. It's not a matter of gambling everyday or not, the whole thing relies on how prepared the player is regarding his gambling ethics. When people play each day it's certain other people would think they're making a huge mistake or losing out a lot of money. But it depends on how the player deals with his gambling habit. Not saying that daily gambling is recommended, but some players already do it and don't fall into problem.

Also, they're not getting any better difference from other players who don't play everyday. It's wrong to think that playing games everyday is the right form of earning big. The whole money equally goes back to the house. And renders the player lesser funds with more pains. Hence, if a player has carefully taken the responsibility to face what is to happen regarding his daily gambling habit, I don't think he'd get himself so glued to the game without staying careful of his losses.

Instead of losing all the funds back to the house, it's better to purchase an item that wouldn't perish anytime soon. Gamblers who are reckless with their winnings don't actually agree with safeguarding their wins. What seems important to them is gambling more, hence losing more. On the contrary players have unique methods of handling their wins. It could be wrong for a player to keep on waiting for more wins while wagering their profits. Provided the gambler withdrew the funds it's not important what he does with the money.

Whether he purchased Bitcoin or gadgets. But, Op, is quite cool with his decisions. Because purchasing bitcoin with the money will only tempt the person to deposit their cryptocurrency into the casino and wager more money. The TV won't tempt the player to sell and make money to gamble. That's why purchasing such items like TV, console, and any other form of hardware is better. Especially for a player who controls their gambling impulse of wagering .

Gambling is not wrong, that means it's useless to worry about what people say regarding my gambling habit. It's a matter of personal perspectives from non gamblers who see gambling as something wrong. However, when they tend to criticize a player it'll be right for the gambler to have a conversation with the critic to understand why he's still thinking of gamblers as irresponsible. Gone are the days when people reasoned of gamblers in such a manner. Hence, it's crucial that the critic learns something new after the conversation with the gambler.

Some of them also wants to become gamblers but are afraid of joining the niche. Due to negative things they've heard about gambling. Although, such thoughts doesn't help enough in stopping people from gambling. Nobody cares about those critics and their wrong perspectives. Once a gambler is not compulsive he's fine and is not meant to bother about what people would say about him. Sometimes close friends would be surprised to learn about our involvement in gambling yet it's not a big deal to bother or worry about. Addiction is the only thing a player should avoid not being a victim.

Admittedly, a reckless gambler with uncontrollable emotions will immediately get addicted. And his behavior while in such trouble will be worse than anyone else. Due to the fact that their self control has been deduced to nothing. You could imagine a player that'll get a mood swing for losing in games and no longer pay attention to basic family tasks to better his home. Most often such players become the problem of their family.

Landing them into huge troubles and affecting the harmony they once shared. Bringing back such person to order will be strenuous because of the person's lack of emotional control. Gambling probably is not the only way people lose their control. If a player lost his emotional control long before gambling, he would face more trouble in the game. Because gambling will help increase the trouble, making the person less attentive to his losses. Hence, accumulating more dispute for the gambler and his family.

Yeah and old people are not meant to engage in things that'll get them too worried. Since they've retired, gambling with their money is not good for their health. Gambling problem could lead an old person to severe illness. Old people are occupied with fatigue and barely have strength to do things like the young people. It's certain that gambling consist of more young people compared to the elderly people. Lots of reasons why young people play games is for the fun and money. Such things may not interest the elderly people anymore.

Only few old people who may have gotten addicted at an early stage of gambling would spend most of their time repeating similar lifestyle as aged people. But a player who didn't get addicted to gambling at a young age, can avoid it when old. Because they've understood how gambling operates, and that it could exhaust their funds. Other than that since they're not familiar with the internet gaming, going to the casino will be a hassle due to fatigue and tiredness. Few known natural factors reduced the activities of elderly people in the casino. Online casino is an advantage for young people who spend most of their time online.

It's interesting to know that gamblers must also consult other players in times of trouble. Everyone has a first time and it's been happening for a long time with no kind of corrections. Chasing lose is not simply the first thing a gambler feels in his journey as a gambler. Most players don't open up or ask other players to assist in providing ways that'll help reduce their frequent problems. To learn about changing the ways one think of gambling. It's important to have a guide; book or a gambler. Nobody is capable to learn on his own.

It's all a thing of reaching out to find which is the best in becoming a responsible gambler. Players need to practice what they've learnt. And advance to a stage where their thoughts on gambling would change. Hence, enjoying the good benefits of gambling by avoiding addiction. Many players are busy with their own gaming sessions that they forget about advancing in their gambling knowledge. That's why it seems like gamblers don't seek for help. However, players are likely to make friends, online or offline, that'll help change their perspectives of gambling.

It's unimaginable for gamblers who have spent years in the niche to blame other people for their problem. That's a height of lesser experience in the game. Such things seem like a disadvantage in telling people about gambling. They can get problems and link it back to you as the cause. It sounds weird to hear an adult blame others for gambling compulsively. Pointing accusing fingers on other people who are not affiliated to the problem, makes no sense.

Was thinking addiction is mainly driving people to play compulsive. Not sure all addicts blame people for their problem. I think it has to do with the lifestyle of the player. He could be the type that doesn't take responsibility for his actions. Gamblers to bypass being blamed at, need to be sure of the people they discuss gambling with. Each individual have unique behavior. Some could get addicted and still comply to advice and change at a time. Others can remain that way causing trouble in the society.

It's right to know that most rich gamblers have a bigger expenses on their end, which makes them to go for gambling. However, most people are not organized enough to handle the disputes gambling could cause to a rich person. Addiction is a gambling obstacle for everyone who don't look into how they gamble, both rich and poor. It's certainly truth that some low income players engage in gambling for the funds. Yet, the goal for gambling shouldn't be anything like that, it's more stressful for a player to only focus on making money. If rich players can take loan for gambling, that means gambling behavior is similar for all gamblers. Both the rich and poor also take loans for gambling.

Looking into gambling as a place to earn is not the right thought. Players need money to gamble not just time. A person with little funds on him would focus on other reliable means of making a living. We all need to win, that's certain, a player must win. But not often. Gambling with the last card or on low income, puts lots of pressure on the player. He, may lose them all, what next would he do other than taking loans. Those who gamble because they have insufficient funds are risking their financial status. The rich have no such reason because they've got enough money to wager. But a person who is not sure of his moves after losing all that money in gambling will have himself to blame. The stress, discomfort, and anxiety that comes with losing all we've got in gambling will fall on the player.

Impressively gambling from observations explains it self, but lots of players don't pay attention to details. Most often gamblers are meant to pursue more understanding of the game than money. Risk is a challenging factor in gambling. And the rich players take risks randomly, every rich gambler, indeed, is not a high roller. Some rich people wager few cents whenever they're gambling. Looking into details you'd notice that only few rich players wager huge amount of money on a game. That's why it's a breaking news when celebrities like Drake wager few million dollars on a game.

Hence, it's interchangeable, to determine who takes more risk would be hard. But when two gamblers, rich and poor, focus on wagering big as their definition of risk in gambling. The rich will be considered as a risky player more than the low income earner. Because it's judged by who has the most money. I think risk is something with severe punishment. Risk can be gambling on places where gambling is restricted. Like around your boss, could be seen as taking the risk of losing a job. In multiple factors the answers would vary. A poor gambler will only play like the rich if he's got the jackpot. Gamblers can't wager more than their source.

Yes the balancing is important, good you indicated that. Non gamblers should also know about the good aspects of gambling, how it could be beneficial to health, critical thinking, money and time management. Such conversation can be intriguing to a non gamblers and could result to a slight debate, between the gambler and the non gambler, on the doubts the non gambler will have upon hearing about the advantages of gambling. A lot of them know of the disadvantages of gambling, how it ruins people's finance and life. Developing their horizons of the health aspects of gambling, not to convince them into gambling, will increase the non gambler's interest on gambling discussions.

And as well could change their initial wrong thoughts on gambling to something better. Hence, gambling conversation shouldn't include a lie of any type. Sharing the reality of gambling with a spouse strengthens the bond between both friends and boost their understanding towards the need of helping a gambling addict. Non gamblers, a lot, have the initiative of blaming addicts that's why they hesitate on helping them when they mostly need it. Being aware of such needs and how it's an emotional problem, a non gambler would add extra efforts in changing or assisting a player in trouble to a better emotional condition. They'll also detect addiction easily, a form of addiction proof for any gambler.

What happens to those strategical players with some common sense and a truck load of greed? Gambling some times may not be defined by those instances. It works accordingly with the emotional intelligence of all players. A day could be so interesting that the player would think he's hit the lucky day, yet he's not sure of his end how the losing streak will follow suit. Money works with the brain,  in a way that no player will comfortably stop going for the money immediately he's won big. Those smiles from winning big still rolls the downward course of losing it all.

Overconfidence, affect players according to their performance in the previous session, hours, or minutes, including experts. That's why when people think of themselves as experienced gamblers, and perfect, they could be making a bigger mistake. I understand that experience helps limit these things. But it's certain that a gambler out of greed could boycott his own rules, regardless of his experience. They're some general mistakes that could occur in a gambling activity. Being able to retain a stable mood, not letting yourself get sidetracked by the funds, could be a better method to limit such mistakes from happening consistently.