Is there a link to the source of this information other than the twitter link? Preferably, an official announcement about this from the Deutsche Bank.

A certain effect of popularizing bitcoin will occur if such a big bank as the Deutsche Bank offers storage services for bitcoin and crypto. But the problem is that banks want to make money by offering these services, and services that the bitcoin user can provide to himself. The user will give his btc to banks (loses control over his assets) and at the same time still pay (loses money) for an unnecessary service. What could be more stupid? The funny thing is that there will be plenty of people willing to take advantage of this stupidity.

প্রতিটা স্টেপ সম্পুর্ন হলে আমি আগের পোস্টকে রেফারেন্স হিসেবে ধরে কোট করে আপডেট জানাবো। আমি আমার প্রথম বিনিয়োগ ENJIN এ করেছি। আশা করি এইটা খুব দ্রুত আমাকে দ্বিগুণ এনে দিবে। এরপর কিসে বিনিয়োগ করবো সেটাও এইখানে শেয়ার করবো বিস্তারিত। কেউ জয়েন হতে চাইলে হতে পারেন।
যদিও এখন আমাদের বিনিয়োগ দ্বিগুণ হতে অনেক সময় লাগছে বা লাগবে, বুল মার্কেটে সেটা খুব দ্রুত হতে পারে। আশা করছি এই বুল মার্কেটে আমরা এই টার্গেটে পৌছাতে পারবো।

Well, if you want to get better answers, you should share the name of the accounts from that screenshot because without looking more deeply into situation its hard to say what exactly is going on and you can only do that by actually checking those accounts.

By the way, you don't have to adjust both width and height of the image you are sharing as one of those is enough while the other adjusts automatically. That way image won't be distorted when you mess up the ratio, like in the case of that screenshot you shared.

Why not mention their name? So that they can review how this user earns merits.

Anyway, I found the first one and 2nd one is pretty hard to find because my keyboard is limited, and can't able to type in a different language.

Based on my own view of the first user, some of his posts are meritable and some of them are not. I don't know if I'm right; I just use a translator to understand the content, but I see that his posts are worth giving merit.
I think the one who can investigate further more about his posts history are those who use the same language.

I don't want to make a comment without observing closely. It requires lots of time. Anyway, the above quoted statement is wrong although it's possible that in this case, it may be true. There are a lot of users who don't post outside of the local board due to the language barrier. Or maybe they post a few times only. That's why they don't get merit in the global board. I'm not trying to say that's the case here, neither I'm saying that's not the case here. We can't tell without having a further look. Do they post on the local board only? If they post in the global section, how many times do they?
Anyway, if it's a big farm, feel free to share with logic and proofs.

Yes, not us on the forum, but many people who are now afraid of Bitcoin would buy it if they can do it through their bank and deposit it there. It is the recurring dilemma: it is not what Bitcoin was designed for, and in fact it goes against its philosophy, but it helps mass adoption and the rise in price.

Ranking up is not a crime. I can't say anything about this case without reading the posts, if they're not worth the Merit, you may have a point.
It's easy to find who you're talking about, just not from Mobile.

Not to be negative, but I think Custody Services by bank is too risky for both the Bank and the Customers because of Bitcoin volatility. As far as I know, when we hand over our assets to the bank for Custody service, those assets will be lended by the Bank to the other customers. If on the period of those lending, the Bitcoin price change either surge or drop significantly, it might be a disaster for the Bank and the customer.

A simple question to those who are hoping to profit on the next Bitcoin bull-run:
How do you determine when is the good time to sell?
in other words: how would you know we've reached the peak?

Do you have a set "goal" price at which you'd be selling no matter what happens? Do you intend to sell incrementally as the price goes up? Or maybe when the price gradually drops (e.g. it goes down for X days in a row), indicating we're past the peak?

Your opinion is clear to me because take for instance of luna how it kill many people because of peg it lost, am also a victim of such only me understand how I felt during the period. Base on my location the are favourable. USDT is a dependant so anything can happen at anytime, if any happen to USDT, the USD will never be affected because the currency is independent of it own. Let assume if today USD collapse the USDT in gone, while if USDT collapse the USD stay. We shouldn't compare the master and the servant, the two are not the same it is clear. I prefer USD than USDT for the purpose of security, and what we need is safety.

Those seem to be different reasons than what I tried to say...

I was largely trying to say that it is a matter of position size and moderation rather than pushing too much too soon.. so there is no reason for CAR to be a failure except that they were likely gambling rather than engaging in an attempt at a prudent investment strategy... the same with individuals who get into bitcoin without an adequate view of their timeline and attempt to invest in a way that is gradually building up the bitcoin position over several years, and perhaps several cycles if your finances might already be on shaky grounds, then you have to build your various finances while you are investing in bitcoin... so if someone, some institution or some government recks themselves from the way that they invested in bitcoin, then one of the ways to recovery is to start back up more slowly and with a smaller position size and maybe even expand the investment time horizon from 4-10 years and start to plan out 10-20 years or more.. which may well continue to mean building and growing in bitcoin small in order NOT to overdo it and ONLY with cash that you can afford to lose... but still nothing wrong with being somewhat aggressive in your investment as long as you do not over do it..

Every person, institution and/or government has a variety of defects, so both you, Sayeds56, and that article seem to want to blame CAR's defects for their failure to be successful in bitcoin, and of course, they have defects just like we all have defects, so maybe in stead of buying $100s of millions in bitcoin, just start out with 1 bitcoin a day or 5 bitcoin a week more something more modest and manageable, and perhaps later on, then work their way up to higher amounts, after getting their shit together.

In short, if the website follows all the security parameters it must have, the risk of this type of attack is at the same level whether you use Cloudfare or any other service.

Now, I ask: why change something that is working well and fulfills its objective?

The question I pose is: Is there another service, similar to Cloudflare, where the MITM danger does not exist? If so, is it really better than Cloudflare against DDOS attacks?

Another thing I would like to know was: are there reports of cases in which Cloudflare connections suffered MITM attacks? _{I searched and didn't find it, but maybe it wasn't a deep search.}

Are we just talking about a possibility, or something that has already happened?

Without usage as a currency is not something you need to worry about because it is used as a currency every single day. Maybe we do not hear about it because it is not talked about that much but online payments are shifting towards more and more bitcoin, a lot more online websites that started to accept bitcoin and that means that it is going to be possible way more.

I am just waiting for amazon and steam type of companies to get back on the ship, if they do that, even if with just stablecoins, that would be amazing. Something like CBDC could make that work, because seeing the government behind something could make them work a lot better on the long run and should be doing a great return on profit as well for those companies.

এমন ধারনা করাটা আসলেই বোকামি/ভুল। আমরা ধরে নিচ্ছি সাতোশি নাকামোতোর ১০ লক্ষ বিটকয়েন হারিয়ে গেছে। অথচ আমরা জানিই না সাতোশির কাছে ১০ লক্ষ বিটকয়েন আছে কি না। এড্রেস গুলো অনেক আগের হওয়ায় এমন ধারনা। তাছাড়া, শুরুর দিকে শুধু সাতোশি একা মাইনিং করেছিল বলে ধারনা করা হয় কিন্তু আমি আসলে এই ব্যাপারে মানতে নারাজ। যাই হোক, যদি ধরেও নেই যে সাতোশির কাছে ১০ লক্ষ বিটকয়েন আছে, তবুও আমরা বলতে পারি না সেগুলো চিরতরে হারিয়ে গেছে। কারণ হতে পারে-
১। সাতোশি ইচ্ছে করেই সেগুলো মুভ করছে না।
২। সাতোশি ভবিষ্যতের জন্য এইগুলো রেখে গিয়েছে। গুপ্তধন হিসেবে। হয়তবা কোন একদিন কেউ এর রহস্য খুজে পাবে এবং সে সাথে সাতোশির রেখে যাওয়া বিটকয়েনও।

তবে, এমনও হতে পারে যে সাতোশি ইচ্ছে করেই কয়েনগুলো নষ্ট করেছে। তার দিক থেকে একদম ফেয়ার থাকার জন্য। শুরুর দিকে সে একা মাইনিং করলে সে অনেক বিটকয়েনের মালিক যেটা অনেকের চোখেই আনফেয়ার, যার কারনে সাতোশি সেগুলো নষ্ট করেই ফেলেছেন।

১। সাতোশি ইচ্ছে করেই সেগুলো মুভ করছে না।