Nice, we have an XGR faucet Would someone care to design a nice theme for it?
|
|
|
I published a basic RPC payout and refill script: https://github.com/tuaris/FaucetRPCIt should be taken as more a reference implementation at this point. Although it's fully functional.
|
|
|
How come the difficulty has never risen beyond 4096 It's been that way for almost 3 months.
... I wonder if there's anyone running a node, at least... (so sorry if there's no one)rainbowcoin.securepayment.cc You can also mine Rainbowcoins there too.
|
|
|
Found two blocks at our pool! Congrats to the miner's who will each receive 97% of the reward.
|
|
|
X11 coins can now be mined. However, the hash rate may not be accurate (I'm still trying to figure out how to calculate it). New coins: - ChocoCoin
- MMXIVCoin
- Muniti (X11)
|
|
|
dead coin!!
Hehe, 2.66 TH says otherwise.
|
|
|
Is there any chance a manual for the Antminer S3 can be made available before the S3 ships? A youtube video of hookup and setup would also be very nice.
I can't imagine it's anything more than hooking up 3 wires and logging in to the web interface. I could be wrong.
|
|
|
These are FreeBSD Port skeletons for several alternative crypto currencies (Altcoins) that are not officially part of the FreeBSD ports tree. They are basically shell archives that you would download and extract to your ports/net-p2p folder. Then run "make install clean". This should help some FreeBSD users out there. All include options to build with or without the Qt wallet and some have the option for a static binary. I've placed all the shell archives in a public GitHub repository: https://github.com/tuaris/FreeBSD-Coin-PortsComplete instructions on how to use these files can be found at: http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/freebsd-ports-many-alternative-crypto-currenciesThe general procedure is (for example Terracoin): fetch -o /tmp/terracoin.shar https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tuaris/FreeBSD-Coin-Ports/master/shars/terracoin.shar_.txt cd /usr/ports/net-p2p/ sh /tmp/terracoin.shar cd terracoin make config make install clean
If you find a problem with one, just open up an issue on GitHub. It's possible some of these coins may eventually be submitted into the ports tree after they gain enough demand and popularity (ie. Zetacoin). If you found this work helpful and would like to show your thanks you may send BTC to: 1B6eyXVRPxdEitW5vWrUnzzXUy6o38P9wN ZET to: ZK6kdE5H5q7H6QRNRAuqLF6RrVD4cFbiNX
|
|
|
It hasn't updated since 6/6 Is there another? I need one so my pool users can check their mined blocks.
|
|
|
On the next dip I may sell my Doge coins at a loss and buy ZET.
|
|
|
Is there a technical reason for using BerklyDB 5.1 specifically: AC_MSG_ERROR([Found Berkeley DB other than 5.1, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore)]) Or can I use 5.3 or still build this against 4.8 like Bitcoin does: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/m4/bitcoin_find_bdb48.m4I just hate to add another dependency to my servers, and DB 5.1 is deprecated on FreeBSD. OctoCoin takes advantage of several features not available in Berkeley DB 4.8; I wouldn't recommend building on 4.8. You can certainly build it using Berkeley DB 5.3 and it will work fine; however... your wallet.dat file will not be compatible with the official OctoCoin binaries (as they are all built using 5.1) so you will receive a warning about losing portability. If you ever need to move the wallet to a different machine/etc you would just need to ensure you build OctoCoin from source again using BDB 5.3. At the configure step, just use: –-with-incompatible-bdb (ex: ./configure –-with-incompatible-bdb) Make sure it is using BDB 5.3 and not 4.8, however, if they're both installed on the machine. Of course, as there is no benefit to using 5.3, 5.1 would be the easiest but it certainly isn't a big deal. Most coins are still using 4.8 (I don't know of any coins that are using BDB 5.3) but I know OctoCoin, Murraycoin (my coin), and Dogecoin are using 5.1. I was able to build the daemon with 4.8 and it runs, etc. It's only going to be for mining. However I think I'll rebuild and use 5.3 instead to ensure I don't run into any unpleasant surprises. Or would you say that most of the "features" are only relevent with the Qt wallet? You would likely be fine but if you have the option to rebuild with 5.3, why not? 4.8 uses a different log file format, for starters. Also, among some of the benefits, BDB 5.1 or 5.3 will improve efficiency, reduces the chance of corruption, and, in the case of OctoCoin and Murraycoin at least, assigns a priority level to certain transactions to avoid a potential "deadlock" (this could potentially make a difference if there were enough miners pointed at the client). I just prefer to avoid rocking the boat whenever possible when it comes to dependencies anyway - I've seen some strange things in my day that wasted a lot of my time only to end up being dependency-related (despite no solid reasons why the dependencies were what they were). Thanks for your help. I've rebuilt it using DB 5.3 and it works great. For anyone else who wants to run the daemon (or GUI) on FreeBSD, they can download the port file and instructions here: http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/freebsd-ports-many-alternative-crypto-currencies#octocoinAlso, my Octocoin Mining Pool is up again using the new version. Thanks again.
|
|
|
Is there a technical reason for using BerklyDB 5.1 specifically: AC_MSG_ERROR([Found Berkeley DB other than 5.1, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore)]) Or can I use 5.3 or still build this against 4.8 like Bitcoin does: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/m4/bitcoin_find_bdb48.m4I just hate to add another dependency to my servers, and DB 5.1 is deprecated on FreeBSD. OctoCoin takes advantage of several features not available in Berkeley DB 4.8; I wouldn't recommend building on 4.8. You can certainly build it using Berkeley DB 5.3 and it will work fine; however... your wallet.dat file will not be compatible with the official OctoCoin binaries (as they are all built using 5.1) so you will receive a warning about losing portability. If you ever need to move the wallet to a different machine/etc you would just need to ensure you build OctoCoin from source again using BDB 5.3. At the configure step, just use: –-with-incompatible-bdb (ex: ./configure –-with-incompatible-bdb) Make sure it is using BDB 5.3 and not 4.8, however, if they're both installed on the machine. Of course, as there is no benefit to using 5.3, 5.1 would be the easiest but it certainly isn't a big deal. Most coins are still using 4.8 (I don't know of any coins that are using BDB 5.3) but I know OctoCoin, Murraycoin (my coin), and Dogecoin are using 5.1. I was able to build the daemon with 4.8 and it runs, etc. It's only going to be for mining. However I think I'll rebuild and use 5.3 instead to ensure I don't run into any unpleasant surprises. Or would you say that most of the "features" are only relevent with the Qt wallet?
|
|
|
Is there a technical reason for using BerklyDB 5.1 specifically: AC_MSG_ERROR([Found Berkeley DB other than 5.1, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore)]) Or can I use 5.3 or still build this against 4.8 like Bitcoin does: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/m4/bitcoin_find_bdb48.m4I just hate to add another dependency to my servers, and DB 5.1 is deprecated on FreeBSD.
|
|
|
Added:
Litecoin Terracoin
I've started working on adding merged mining support to the pool server. It could be a few weeks before that's ready.
|
|
|
Only if it's under $300 (0.5 BTC), anything higher is over priced and only an idiot would buy that.
|
|
|
|