|
For the record: I can't read what mlawrence vomits here.
|
|
|
|
|
Cunticula:
"He doesn't believe in Godvernment and Mommy isn't around to beat him up, so I'm going to whine until he goes away".
:-)
(Note: I haven't read his comment -- ignore list -- but based on my experience, I'll wing it and suppose that's a good transliteration of what he said.)
|
|
|
|
|
The "conversation" continues. I can only surmise the statists have devised a devious scheme involving child slavery and children-as-chattel (ginve that's they usually feel about children, their "what about the children"s notwithstanding).
|
|
|
|
|
Cunticula keeps replying. He probably thinks he's having a conversation with someone who doesn't much care to read his garbage. Oops.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't tell what cunticula wrote, but I can tell you he's on my ignore list for being an abusive person who has no compunction about insulting people who don't believe his statist dogma. Feel free to use that to inform your replies to him.
|
|
|
|
mlawrence, everything you say fragments from fear.
Agreed. |
|
|
|
|
I can't tell from the content (killfile and all), but looking at the mequetrefes from this forum collectively and suddenly assembling here, and gathering some of my experience talking to statists, there appears to be a neutron star level concentration of statism in this thread.
Like, hardcore statism, probably suggesting that voluntaryists sell children to businesses or serial child rapists, because they do not share their selling-children-to-indoctrination-camps dogma (where children are oh so safe, they could never get drugs, or shanked, or bullied, or children could never get molested there either, because molesters obviously couldn't get a job there -- lol). But I wouldn't know
Modern statism makes it very, very easy for a reasonable person to put their finger directly in the wound.
Win. Did I guess right?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, cunticula answered!
Hmmm, given that I can't read his reply, what's an appropriate reply...
Cunti culi, cunti cula
cunti culi, cunti culaaaa
lie lie lie lie lie, cunti culi cunti cula
:-)
|
|
|
|
Hold on there, stop complaining and get back to your studies. Your parents aren't paying for you to have arguments on the internet.
Vacation LOL! (Yeah, I have to wait until I get permission from Daddy Gummint to go back to my house and my woman and my car and my life. I believe they call this paperwork "H-1B". So I'm enjoying vacation right now. Blatherblatherblather has provided lots of amusement these days.) |
|
|
|
I'm so happy that this forum has a killfile feature. |
|
|
|
But the kid isn't the one receiving the service. You are. They're teaching your child for you.
Well well well... So the child is 'owned' by you? And the attitudes, material wealth, and political views of the parents somehow justify some children getting more educational opportunities than others? Every child has the same educational opportunities. Every moment of a child's life is an educational opportunity... and they use it. Sponges, they are. Not sure how you got "the child is 'owned' by me" out of that. Obviously because you don't want to be forced into paying for a statist indoctrination camp -- perhaps preferring homeschooling or unschooling or private schooling -- the "logical" alternative must be that you believe your child is chattel. You have to be statist to understand this "logic". |
|
|
|
http://polimedia.us/trilema/2012/the-imbecilitarians/The world’s pretty clear cut, if you’re an Imbecilitarian : there’s the bad people, to wit, Libertarians and then there’s the good people, the Imbecilitarian himself.
Great read. Reminds me of a few (thankfully, a minority, but loudmouths nonetheless) people who dwell these fora.
|
|
|
|
I notice that you removed the bold highlight I added to one of your replies, so you do know what I'm talking about.
I didn't "remove" it, I just didn't add it back. If someone is providing a service for you, on the other hand, then they need to be compensated, don't you think so? That depends. If the child wants to buy lollies, then yes, they will have to part with some of their pocket money. But you're not seriously suggesting that a child should work in order to pay off a schooling debt if their parents are unable to pay? But the kid isn't the one receiving the service. You are. They're teaching your child for you. That's too truthful, simple and obvious to have any effect in blatherblatherblather's mind. If you want him to agree with you, I suggest the following: You have to understand, there is absolutely no way that a child can get an education in a voluntaryist society unless you enslave him to pay for his education. No adult would reasonably think "Well, my child, a creature I chose to bring into this world, needs to learn, so I'll pay for that learning" because, you see, people are too stupid, so they need to be forced into half-a-day-every-weekday concentration camps where they will be told what to believe so there's no way in hell that a responsible adult would actually pay for the service of teaching his own child. People are malevolent and lazy and shit so obviously statism. That'll get blather's boner going. |
|
|
|
Continuing the discussion from the previous thread... Bitcoin actually provides the perfect voluntaryist solution to keep track of who has paid how much for what services. You didn't chip in for school? Your kids don't go.
That's a terrible example. That's a terrible response. Don't be an idiot. In another thread (about corporal punishment), you and Rudd-O are getting all righteous about child rights and acting like even the tiniest bit of behaviour modification is some kind of crime against humanity, yet you fail to see the bleeding obvious injustice when a child suffers due to his or her parents' inability to pay school fees. Hypocrite. Ohhhh.... So you think school should be "free" then? If it means that the children of jobless hippies get the same educational opportunities as the children of right-wing extremists, then yes. Free AKA: "libre". Or does liberty only apply to a privileged class whose parents can pay? Good news! It is. It's called "homeschooling." Really, you should Google it. If someone is providing a service for you, on the other hand, then they need to be compensated, don't you think so? Don't know about you, but I'm not a big fan of child slavery or indebtedness. Hmm. I wonder how all those private school parents will react when I tell them that they are practicing "child slavery"? No, seriously. WTF are you talking about? What, don't you understand? Clearly if you teach stuff to your children yourself, or you pay for a private school to teach your children useful stuff, you are enslaving them and indebting them. Don't you understand that? Obviously! Hahahaha, blather 3 cracks me up. |
|
|
|
... If it means that the children of jobless hippies get the same educational opportunities as the children of right-wing extremists, then yes. Free AKA: "libre". Or does liberty only apply to a privileged class whose parents can pay? Good news! It is. It's called "homeschooling." Really, you should Google it. If someone is providing a service for you, on the other hand, then they need to be compensated, don't you think so? Don't know about you, but I'm not a big fan of child slavery or indebtedness. Hmm. I wonder how all those private school parents will react when I tell them that they are practicing "child slavery"? No, seriously. WTF are you talking about? Matter of fact, don't respond here. I'll make a new thread. This is worthy. I wanna be on that thread, if only to read your replies, because I need some humor and blatherblatherblather is delivering. Please post a link. Also über LOL at blatherblatherblather equating homeschooling with child slavery and indebtedness. |
|
|
|
Don't be an idiot. In another thread (about corporal punishment), you and Rudd-O are getting all righteous about child rights and acting like even the tiniest bit of behaviour modification is some kind of crime against humanity, yet you fail to see the bleeding obvious injustice when a child suffers due to his or her parents' inability to pay school fees. Hypocrite.
HAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. He's got me confused with any other statist who believes that not taking your children to an indoctrination camp somehow qualifies as "injustice". So "obviously" (like the statist douche he is) he believes that, if you don't pay for someone else's school, that's "unjust"; therefore, since that is "unjust", and since I reject child abuse, I'm a "hypocrite". And he has the audacity to preface this block of concentrated stupidity with "don't be an idiot"! There's so much wrong in that blather 3 quote, it's fractally wrong. Great amusement was had at this thread. |
|
|
|
My wife and I constantly get compliments about how well behaved our children are. This has less to do with what we may consider to be a legitimate correction method and more to do with the fact that they are homeschooled, and thus are not exposed to the bad habits of other peoples' children (in a mostly uncontrolled environment). Corrolation is not causation. You said it yourself: Correlation is not causation. It might be because they are homeschooled (in fact, I'd wager that plays a part - the school is one of the worst perpetrators of this sort of abuse), or it might be because of the relative respect you treat your children with, compared to their kids. As you say, you only beat them a little. At least he homeschools them. That's gotta protect them from the school bullies that helped rot the brains of so many people at large. |
|
|
|
It isn't just children in warzones that are thinking like this now, because of so much exposure to the media even what most would consider normal children are growing up to question things, unless of course the parents decide its unacceptable and stamp it out of them.
...sometimes literally stamp free thought out of them. It all happens indoors, of course. That is the sadness of child abuse. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin actually provides the perfect voluntaryist solution to keep track of who has paid how much for what services. You didn't chip in for school? Your kids don't go.
That's a terrible example. That's a terrible response. I'm amused at how often blatherblatherblather responds to my comments, even as he knows that he's on my killfile and I can't read anything he writes. |
|
|
|
Well, I don't appreciate being told to mind my own business by you. How far you want to go back and forth?  Until you stop being a dick to strangers. "Ehrmagerd, I can't explain how someone makes money, therefore he must be doing it in a fraudulent way." |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
