Just kidding. I was pulling a prank on the community.

Yes, Litecoin ASICs do not exist yet, but are not harder (or  costlier) to build than any Bitcoin ASIC. It's just a different hashing algorithm!

Scrypt has different parameters than SHA256, but those obstacles should be easily tackled.

I'll send you 100 quadrillion ripples.

Instead of using USD, can I purchase shares with BTC instead?

You would get a buyer if you would show the site URL and use escrow (e.g. johnthedog's service).

What's your wallet address?

I'll make an offer of ฿0.98. My basis is that $150 = ~฿1.4, and since you opened the box, it lost 30+% of it's value.

Well, they both invest in bitcoin...

Giveaways start now. Just mention your name, and you will get some AC.

I'm changing the thread topic:

/topic "[POLL] Should we ban Tonko?"

Thank you!

I'll buy both for a two shillings.

Just quote it. 

LOL.

{
             "action" : "claimgenesis",
             "account" : "ICX07709",
             "subsidy" : 1,
 }

I propose a fork of AC that instead of using C++ context, it will use JSON context:

E.G.

{
            "action" : "sendtx",
            "txid" : 1,
            "sender" : "RICHG37T",
            "amount" : 0.01,
            "recipient" : "ACR97018",
}

or

{
             "action" : "declarebalance",
             "account" : "RICHG37T",
             "amount" : 0,
}

Quote chain dynamics work the same as original AC, though.

EDIT:

It is recommended that you use triple confirms for security.

More "actions" coming soon!

You should really create a testnet. If you want I can do that for you.

My parents would kill me if I used Tor.

Go f*** yourself. Stop insulting donators!

Your "runtime" is ridiculous.

The older protocol was fine.