But he's talking about those players who just play randomly right? Experienced players may be a part of this and tbh, it happens. Especially when motivation is gone, players just randomly choose a decision out of numerous ones, and their basis? Just pick something random. Tbh, this could also be a counter of some strategies, but it also affects you yourself. It's like a part of chaos theory, where it's completely random, but it can actually largely influence the results. Ofc, since the note of the term chaos, even the one doing it himself has no idea it could produce a result like that.
It's not about speed imo, but rather with how experienced players can create a winning strategy even with a bad hand. Heck, even making decisions quickly can be detrimental at times since mistakes are bound to happen when you try to think quickly, quick enough that you don't understand what's happening and you're just grasping straws by the end.

It's basically something similar to a dictionary or list of terms that you need in day trading. Still, I don't exactly see any way on how to win so for those trying to read it, don't get your hopes up too much. There's always wins and losses in day trading. The guide mostly states on how to understand how you can win, and when you lose, how to understand how you lost. OP should've also probably added a few trading simulators or something of the like. Though the data may be false, they would at least have an idea on how the various terms work after seeing it in real-time, unlike in pictures.

I'd rather stick to eSports temporarily than let the players expose themselves to further risks. We already have a few infected players according to others here in the thread, and opening the NBA season just invites more of such events to happen imo. Plus, let's not forget how there are cases where people are asymptomatic (shows no symptoms) and can be very dangerous, especially with close contact games such as Basketball. If they were to test themselves, then there's a chance that could be avoided but that doesn't say that the chances are zero though.

Precautionary measures would be to stop the protests. Or at least, think of an alternative where they don't actively seek for their deaths like what they are doing right now. Ofc, i'm not saying that they should stop but rather look for an alternative. It's also with these kinds of issues why the spread still won't stop, mainly because they think that the pandemic has already passed over after the past 3-4 months.

Made a quick list about countries that allow it. Got it from Wikipedia though, so it may actually contain some bits of wrong info here and there.
Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines
Indonesia has it banned but they have religious aspects tied to Cockfighting, so those are allowed.
Spain has it banned except for two regions, Canary Islands and Andalusia.
France has it banned except for a certain region, Nord-pas de Calais.

Of course, other countries where it's banned continue to host a few cockfighting sessions, regardless of consequences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockfight
Well, some people enjoy weird things mate. It's like since the age of violence against each other is over, and literally almost no one would beat up each other in the streets, they went to look for possible substitutes, and cocks were one of the options they found. They're rather easy to raise after all.

First time hearing about BPlay. Might check them out sometime later since Binance did allow a Collab with them, and I doubt Binance would collab with a bad gambling site. Still, it seems like they only have a small arrangement of games at the moment. Haven't seen much people reviewing about them so I might actually wait for a few more months and see whether issues crop up before trying to play in their site.

Still, since BPlay is only a new gambling site, it's still up to question whether this collab is actually going to benefit Binance since it has a lot of sites to fight with. Hope Binance actually manages to get something out of this collab though, especially since business puts profit as a top priority.

Isn't the reinfection stemming from them being infected by someone with Covid? Doesn't that mean that recovered patients can be seen as patients that are cleared of infection? After all, having the name "recovered" means that the Covid-19 should be removed completely from the system. Just based from this, you can safely assume I suppose that there isn't any risk at all in playing with people that have recovered from the Covid-19. This is assuming that the said recovered person has completely "recovered".

Source? Just looked up a bit and from what I could gather, it was basically the same as what the article @TimeTeller quoted that there has been no evidence as of yet, on both sides that is. No evidence of recovered person developing antibodies, and no evidence of a recovered person being reinfected once again.

You can already identify it just from a few things tbh. 1, it's from telegram, a hellhole filled with scammers. 2, it's a new site, as OP said, and from what I found as well, the site was created on June 28th. Lastly, the mod cheating to make you win? Please. Idk why he would even need strangers for that, just make your family members or friends do it instead, it's a lot easier and safer. Especially the last point, that itself tells you that the one you're talking to is a scammer, or the site they are making you enter is a scam itself. I still don't really believe that others can fall for this, deep scams with a lot off planning involved, maybe, but this? Then you'd either be a complete noob with the internet or you're just plain ol stupid.
Well, if what the other party is legit, then if you won, he'd be able to manipulate the records one way or another. I doubt they'd be stupid enough to actually show to the public records of them winning continuously. A balance of win/loss should be maintained with them still profiteering off of it.

Well, it is often compared to Gold at times, but really, there's a difference between the two. Also, the whole world should get to know it to actually increase adoption. No matter how many people know it, the fact remains that it has a limited supply, so I don't suppose it's credibility is in doubt here. Limiting the knowledge of what Bitcoin is to only a part of the world isn't adoption anymore tbh.

Also, in the case of quantum development, would you think that Bitcoin would just stand still and let it get to the point that it becomes useless once quantum tech comes out? With how the warnings of its development were made, I guess we can assume that community developers would think of a way to avoid being useless due to it. And in case it does become useless, then what's the point of adopting it? It'd lose credibility real quickly I suppose.

You should probably consider adding Bitcoins' current state. Like how it's being seen as a speculative asset, far from it's supposed to be used as a currency. I also doubt you need to discuss mining deeply? Probably an idea on how mining works, but that's it, no need to overcomplicate it or something. Also, I don't particularly support the idea of adding the Bitcointalk forum as a huge part of the plan? Probably just speak of it in the passing and tell them that they could ask people there with regards to any questions they have with Bitcoin.

There's also the idea of adding the timeline of Bitcoin, don't just sum or skip them, probably discuss every major event that happened with Bitcoin. Also, avoid CSW please, students can afford to live their lives without knowing this dude.

Erm, a few betting sites already have Valorant on its list. A few I could name is Loot.bet and unikrn. And it isn't surprising, RIOT surprisingly developed the game pretty well and since the combined elements of Overwatch and cs:go plus some additional here and there, it really is a fun game. I've had my fair share with it and it truly revitalizes your will to play fps games, especially if you've been playing cs:go for a long time and is starting to get bored of it or is starting to look for something similar. And unlike other games, It can easily be considered as an Esports game because of how similar it comes off with cs:go.

I am surprised that you're surprised. It's not like Bitcoin was taught in school books, nor is it posted on every wall outside or every ad on the internet. It's like you're asking someone, "Why don't you know this game?" when they aren't even a gamer. If they were along the lines of developer/businessman, you can be half surprised since both have the chance of actually chancing upon Bitcoin. Besides, even the majority of the people who know about Bitcoin only know the word, they don't even know what it is.

Agree. Most Surveys are done in groups and a few that I found had only close to 1000-2000 citizens in each survey, which imo, is not enough considering how big and diverse the US can be. Sure, they can use it as basis but really, not everyone is literate when it comes to tech things, and some just even enjoy playing around with games and the like.

Highly possible. Yes, there are people that both enjoy normal sports and eSports, but most eSports are easily catered by the young age right now. Most of those young ones are actually influenced at an early age by games played on eSports. Still, it isn't that particularly difficult to watch both, it's just that eSports right now is comparatively growing at a huge rate compared to normal Sports, BUT if you consider how it started from zero, that is completely understandable.

The issue of young and old probably stemmed from the fact that eSports is still young. When compared to sports that were already showing its prowess for a long time right now, it's understandable how both young and old people enjoy it, compared to how eSports is comparatively enjoyed by young. However, such problems would probably move on after a few more decades, when the old is replaced by the new "old". Also, age 19-20 is the age where players start entering the scene, while the average age is around 22-25. But expect no one to exceed the age of 30.

There are sites that let you perform simulation of TA's. You can try them out and I believe that you can learn either from stocks or Cryptos. In the end, it's the process that counts, and what your studying shouldn't really affect the progress that much.

You can check out this list and see whether one catches your eye. You can also lookup a few guides on the site itself (Investopedia) about the various terminologies you need to understand as well as various sites you might be able to use for TA's. Lastly, you can also look up on Youtube (or any other site that gives videos of people doing TA's) and try to see how they do it. Ofc, this isn't really reliable since they might just be speaking gibberish, but you can nonetheless try. Just don't take their word for it 100%.

Signals aren't something to be trusted 100%, but you can assume the idea behind it and use it to build up the idea of trading you want to take. It's most difficult to find/predict what the price would be in the next few days if you were to start at zero, so you could try to use other's analysis and accept or deny their hypothesis and move from there. You can also see this being applied from various research/inventions, they always have something to start with, that is, except for those that literally started from zero. Though most of the time, signals are just traps, shitposts that people make to push an empty argument.

The hard part about trading isn't learning about it, but rather putting what you learned to constant use every day. You can describe trading as something that requires your daily attention, and not only that, applying everything you learn at every possible moment is a must since losses and wins stand hand by hand.

Well, we never know what's really going on with the Chinese government tbh. Me saying that they'll exceed the US dollar all came from what they've actually said, and could just be empty words of threat so the US would feel some form of pressure. Still, it isn't all without any backing, with how big the economy of China is, they have the potential to uproot the US from its place. That is if the US lets them.
Even if every country was hit, ngl, the current difference between how the US handled it and China handled it shows how China is able to recover from the pandemic. Not to mention that a lot of issues suddenly popped up from the US, with the racism protests as well as the upcoming recession of the US dollar which is in the near future now. China, on the other hand, was able to remove the virus, albeit temporarily and they're already managing the second wave and how to prevent/stop it from getting larger.

Naturally. There isn't only one future in a sense, and a trading chart could only show one future. There can be said to be an n amount of futures in the universe, and no matter what, one just can't simply predict what would happen in the next minute, hour, day, week, etc. Trading charts are something that let you make a decision based on what you see, but that doesn't mean that it would be the only basis you have on making a decision. It's not like you'd decide to enter a school for pilots just cause you saw your crush there right? And even if you did, that'd be called impulsive decisions. Even having 2 or 3 factors while deciding could still be said as an impulsive one.
Imo, yes. Though you can at the very least put it at the minimum of 50%, since if you were to look at it as to whether you'd only lose or win, chances are 50/50 no matter what TA's you read, no matter how many analysis you do.

Any bonus is welcome tbh. I mean, we are in the receiving end, after all, so receiving a bonus of any type should be acceptable already. I would like to comment to avoid giving bonuses of types such as money that they can immediately withdraw, which would only result in account spams so they can get free money. Probably a type where they can only use it to play, and they can only withdraw after depositing OR spending all the bonuses they got. You could also introduce a rake back system right from the start. Though it highly depends on how you want to do it, but beginners could have at the minimum 1% rake back and would only increase after reaching x amount of wager.

I doubt stable coins would be used as a payment method. It'd probably be similar to how Bitcoin is, an alternative. Digital fiat would dominate e-commerce sites no matter how I see it with how easy it is plus, it doesn't have fees. Not to mention that some apps even offer cashback. Even in the long term, I see Bitcoin as an alternative, for when you want to purchase something anonymously or something. The system of Bitcoin right now is way too forced and is mostly seen as an investment or speculative asset, which really kills the concept of what Bitcoin is supposed to be. This just makes users that have Bitcoin hodl, instead of actually using them for everyday life as a currency.

The article basically sums up how Bitcoin instead of being a cryptocurrency, became a speculative asset, an investment of sorts. It's basically the problem of adoption that has bothered Bitcoin for as long as possible now, and why we don't really see much merchants actually accepting payments via BTC except for a select few.
Isn't that the problem itself? With how miners incentives last a few decades, they would of course try to get the best profit out of them. Hence creating the idea of Bitcoin being an asset to invest in, and in such, those that would buy the said asset would also try to sell it for as high as possible, creating the problem of them storing the coins in the long term instead of actually using it to buy something from others.

Simply saying, when compared to the current situation where fiat is used to buy an item, crypto is supposed to replace fiat from the system but instead, it became the "item" that is used to exchange for fiat.

Tried looking for a few sites that offered Fortnite betting but other than what was said by others, I couldn't really find anything. Still, you could actually question why Fortnite? I do believe that a lot of people would actually argue why Fortnite was the first one to put in the list of possible games to be added in the Olympics when there are PUBG/Apex legends on the same genre of Battle Royale. In terms of FPS, there's CS:GO, Rainbow Six Siege, and the recently released Valorant. I'm not saying that Fortnite is a bad game, but there are a few others out there that are a lot more worthy to be placed on the Olympics.

Also for those opening the first link of OP, you need to register to view the entire article so you can try visiting this instead
https://headtopics.com/us/why-the-next-olympics-should-include-fortnite-13919490
Though the arrangement of the paragraphs is messed up, but it was the best substitute I could find.

That's odd, I visited bet365 and I couldn't really find Fortnite. Though it's possible that there's just no Fortnite tournament right now.