His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. Hitler's psychological profile as described by the United States Office of Strategic Services: source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie |
|
|
|
I love the logical inconsistencies in a single hand drawn picture.  "Appearances vs. Facts The phenomenon of the disappearance of a ship, hull first, as it recedes from view, is caused by the same law of foreshortening as that which governs the disappearance of the rail, or causes the two rails to appear to approach each other. If we should make calculations on the basis of the appearance instead of on the basis of the fact that the rails do not approach, but only seem to, we necessarily draw false conclusions. This is precisely what the astronomers do. They conclude from appearances rather than from facts." -- The Cellular Cosmogony, Cyrus Teed |
|
|
|
I respect that the Bern was against the Federal Reserve. I don't fault him for having an expensive house like most people point out. He deserves the product of his labor.
But as for his democratic fascism...not a fan.
right there with you But god damn a Trump v. Sanders race would have been entertaining, and I blame Clinton, Wassweman-Schultz and the DNC machine for denying us that pure choice. A generational opportunity squandered for greed and hubris. Welp we may get that in 2020. Although I worry Sanders is getting too old. |
|
|
|
Too bad we never saw a really good dirt on Hillary. Yeah, we saw some dirt, but...
You mean like her campaign manager laundering money, or her offspring conspiring with Russian spies or her sleeping with porn stars? That sort of dirt ? How about selling 20% of U.S. uranium indirectly to the Russians as Secretary of State? Or funneling $145M of Russian donation money to her/husband's Clinton Foundation, and then directly into their own private bank accounts? Or her husband getting blow jobs from an intern in the oval office while he was President of the U.S.? That sort of dirt ? Jesus Hairy, these types of comments of yours really get my goat... so hypocritical. *All* politicians are phony, selfish and corrupt, including the Dems. So how much more circle jerking whilst living in the Liberal echo chamber do you intend to do ? Ok educate me on how Bernie Sanders is phony, selfish and corrupt. (I am open to the possibility that he is). |
|
|
|
|
I’m sure I would watch the video once. But only once.
|
|
|
|
Too bad we never saw a really good dirt on Hillary. Yeah, we saw some dirt, but...
You mean like her campaign manager laundering money, or her offspring conspiring with Russian spies or her sleeping with porn stars? That sort of dirt ? |
|
|
|
Stop being so bloody morose already. I'm trying to foster some positivity over here!
Which part of Bitcoin is going to $100k was confusing to you?!!111! |
|
|
|
First it was a need to wait for 6 months, then 18 months, now it is looking like have to wait nearly 4 years for the next BTC rocket..... sucx to be a bull...  Just be a sleepy bull. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin fundamentals are still in the wind.
Undecided futures have provided deranged thinking.
Up is down and down is up.
What does that mean? Are we going to go up or down? Swings like you never seen before , buckle up Or maybe we already have https://wex.nz/exchange/zec_usdNow the question is, why is ZEC so expensive and not expensive anywhere else? Because Wex is insolvent and all the crooks are trying to get their money off |
|
|
|
The road to $100k in 2021.  |
|
|
|
That girl is a 6/10 at most,.
Sorry guy. The resident gay dude is rating her a hard 8/10, at the very least, just on that photo alone. Rick is being catty this evening, and is feeling generous with a 7/10 rating. No way is that a 6. She looks young enough to go on and on about Justin Bieber all.... night.... long..... 6. With earplugs, 7. Are you judging her looks or her personality? Looks are a 9, from a raging hetero here. |
|
|
|
|
How about never using sms as 2FA.
|
|
|
|
For certain purposes it's necessary to determine the logical cross-bearings of the concepts which we take for granted. But honestly, is there a single not obvious thing in here. You really thought I needed a reintroduction to basic financial literacy by way of cringe-y homespun wisdoms?
Now I'm even more morose!
Aww, don't go down that road. It's closed anyway.  9.5? Nice That’s an awfully big latte. If she drinks that whole thing she will likely jump off the pier. |
|
|
|
ot: Climate change denial – involves denial, dismissal, unwarranted doubt or contrarian views which depart from the scientific consensus on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudosciencelots of these are obvious wierd, but wtf is that^ authoritarian socialist claptrap on topic: also includes this lol Technical analysis ... The efficacy of both technical and fundamental analysis is disputed by the efficient-market hypothesis which states that stock market prices are essentially unpredictable.[13] It is still considered by many academics to be pseudoscience.[14] TA is probably the only pseudoscience where if enough people believe in it, then it becomes true. TA is effective as a form of collective delusion, and that is enough. But everyone's is different. Whose chart becomes true? Anyway btc died again. That is the reason why you should only ever use the most trivial and childlike TA (such as lines on charts and Fib ratios). Anything more complex cannot work because it will be different, or if it works is just a fluke. |
|
|
|
ot: Climate change denial – involves denial, dismissal, unwarranted doubt or contrarian views which depart from the scientific consensus on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudosciencelots of these are obvious wierd, but wtf is that^ authoritarian socialist claptrap on topic: also includes this lol Technical analysis ... The efficacy of both technical and fundamental analysis is disputed by the efficient-market hypothesis which states that stock market prices are essentially unpredictable.[13] It is still considered by many academics to be pseudoscience.[14] TA is probably the only pseudoscience where if enough people believe in it, then it becomes true. TA is effective as a form of collective delusion, and that is enough. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
