Again, another attempt at misdirecting away from Bryce getting caught plagiarizing a project to launch yet another scam.
I have provided concrete proof of Bryce's plagiarism. Not you, not ACGCrypto, and not even he has denied it. Knowing his long-time penchant for running scams, he is no doubt preparing to launch another one under the guise of "Tao 2.0"
"Many here know how Github and how cloning a coin works, the coin was forked from another open source coin, and what?"
And many more
don't know how it works. There are ways of performing a GitHub fork to properly accredit the source code. Bryce avoided doing that, hoping nobody would notice, instead telling his Slack followers about all the "hard work" he was doing.
If this issue didn't matter so much, you wouldn't be here, pathetically attempting to dox me. How does knowing my real life identity in any way change the fact that Bryce is a scammer and notsofast is a scam supporter?
It doesn't.
Speaking of
notsofast, who apparently has been a "lowkey supporter of Tao" (
as someone put it) (and now
high-key supporter), let's delve into his track record for a minute. Wonder why he deleted
this tweet, which said this:
I like @CryptoBridge as a kickass, incentivized gateway-based exchange.
Imminently, I expect @The_Blocknet (with Ethfinex and $ZRX integration) to dominate the space for decentralized multichain protocols: dex and anything else you can build.
What happened with CryptoBridge that would make him delete his tweet? Well, let's find out.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/cryptobridge-closes-down-and-waves-relaunches-dexs-face-tough-timesCryptoBridge was founded in July 2017 as “a gateway which provides access to BitShares: a high performance, scalable blockchain” that, in turn, allows users to trade established cryptocurrencies as well as “up-and-coming tokens and altcoins.” To fund the development of the software platform, CryptoBridge launched a native token called BridgeCoin, allegedly distributing 50% of all trade revenue to its stakeholders...
In October 2019, the exchange announced that all its new and existing and customers were required to submit user verification before continuing to deposit and withdraw funds in order to protect both themselves and CryptoBridge from “being held responsible for any illegal intentions or money laundering activities.”..
Then, on Dec. 2, the DEX announced that all of the firm’s services and servers will be terminated within two weeks. Users will be able to withdraw funds from the exchange until Dec. 15 — the last day of operation...
After the announcement was made, CryptoBridge immediately shut down all of its social media channels...
According to the trader, enacting Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering procedures “was not an oversight but clearly intentional on Cryptobridge’s part.” After u/Apollohasgas provided CryptoBridge with their personal information including full name and residential address as well as scans of their driver’s license and passport, the platform’s administration requested a copy of u/Apollohasgas’ latest tax return. “I did not comply with that request,” the trader told Cointelegraph, adding:
“I then contacted CB support asking for help and expressing my frustration that so much of my personal information was being requested. I never heard back from them. Cryptobridge is a scam. I have come to learn that many in the crypto community are aware of this.”
This happened to hundreds of customers. The dumbest thing about all this is CryptoBridge was supposed to be a DEX, so requiring KYC (2 weeks before closing) was especially shady.
If there was any doubt about notsofast being an ardent CryptoBridge supporter, this should put it to rest (taken from an
archived version of the CryptoBridge website homepage):
Despite having a
history of objecting to KYC implementation in exchanges, he had no problem absolving himself (and CB) of any wrongdoing by means of conducting a "poll" on his twitter:
notsofast may have just been an unwitting participant and I'm not saying he necessarily did anything wrong, but his judgment certainly is suspect, especially knowing he had prior history of promoting
scam projects on the forum.
Indeed, the assumption that the project was a scam
was correct, as project founder "
AceOfWallStreet" fled with all his investors' money, but not before pulling one final
exit pump scam on Bittrex.
Again, it could be possible that @notsofast was again just an unwitting participant in another scam.
Interestingly, notsofast and AceOfWallStreet were co-advisors of another project called
Taylor that was supposed to be a "personal trading assistant" app. Taylor reached its soft cap of 500 ETH in 10 minutes,
raising close to 3,100 ETH by the end of the token sale.
On May 22nd, 2018, the Taylor team announced that
they had been the victims of a hacking, claiming that 2,578 of the 3,100 ETH had been mysteriously stolen, along with all of the "TAY tokens from the Team and Bounty pools." (?) Seemingly nobody bought this idea, especially
not the investors:
First step to rebuild your shattered reputation is to hire an impartial crypto forensics team to find out exactly how this (so called) hack occured.
Talk to the CoinDash (now Bloq) team. They successfully traced thier hacker and got 20,000 ETH back:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/hacker-returns-20000-eth-stolen-during-coindash-ico/If the SmartTaylor team does not get an impartial crypto forensics team in, they will just look exit scammers.
notsofast did chime in with his opinion of what happened after being asked for it on twitter:
This statement by the Taylor team received a few responses with an underlying theme behind them:
Taylor's last
development update was made in March 2019, the reception of which was summarized in one particularly succinct comment:
So, even with such a terrible track record of getting caught up in scam after scam, its quite possible that notsofast is just a hapless investor/advisor with extremely poor judgment when it comes to picking projects. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume this is the case:
is there any reason why anybody should be following him or participating in projects he puts his name to, or even just casually mentions? I would say "no." But that's just me. Good thing he puts this disclaimer on his twitter profile:
Guess that means he doesn't think you should take him seriously either.
Show Posts
