Excuse me, lauda
As I have said before, I have improved the quality of my post, so today I am here and want you to rethink the quality of my post. I believe it's really good, and I hope you too. Most importantly, I expect you to remove my name in the blacklist.
Thank you!
Regards
Pau
First and foremost, it's only been a week. "Rules specific to Laudas list: If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 30 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread."
This is a rough estimate, but I would say that of all the bitcoin that I have acquired, approximately 95% of it I bought. The other 5% or so I earned through gambling - poker and sports betting. Also a tiny, less than 1% from sig/ava campaign. I don't do any trading.
A legendary member, I suppose you have earned a lot of bitcoin from avatar campaigns. But it only accounts for 1%. This makes me think you are very rich. I never buy bitcoin, I only join signature campaigns and earn money from that job. I wish i can trade coin like you. Are you saying that this is a quality post? You're just repeating what you quoted. That's the right thing to do as if you are buying them regularly then you are making a good investment that can secure your future as price is expected to go higher in future and if you have good amount of bitcoins in your wallet then it will give you best returns on your investments.
The price of bitcoin may actually increase in the future, but there are many risks if you invest in bitcoin as a stock. There are many possible risks, we should calculate carefully. Myself, I do not buy bitcoin, otherwise I always sell it for cash, because that is safe, there is not any risk if you own cash. And this one too? What are the possible risks, exactly? And what do you mean by, "Myself, I do not buy bitcoin, otherwise I always sell it for cash"? This is a bit contradictory, is it not? Freedom is the strength and weakness of bitcoin. It is easily exploited to commit violent acts, many articles have been written about this before. Bitcoin is used in money laundering, illegal trading and transportation of illegal goods. Bitcoin is used as a tool to carry out offenses. That is a very bad thing for a coin. Its reputation is greatly affected.
How about this one? You really believe that this is useful after 500+ replies to the thread? Those people who dont like bitcoin has a view that Bitcoin has the drawback, as well as most others alts that there is the need for confirmations before it can be a trusted TX, and that makes it harder to use as a currency
As your opinion, it is not difficult to solve, otherwise, it is really easy. If you are really a bitcoin enthusiast, you will understand the advantages of it, so explain and analyze for those who know bitcoin. I believe that if you do that, they will change their mind and accept bitcoin This is post #394. Bitcoin continues to establish as a,strongest and the most valuable cryptocurrency. This hasn't come over knight and can't be replaced over knight but at the moment I also can't see that some other cryptocurrency has the potential to go through that way and take Bitcoin's position.
I wouldn't say it's impossibe but it will not happen for a long time.
Altcoins are growing stronger and stronger than before, however, only really powerful altocoins are able to compete with bitcoin, as most altcoins are copied from bitcoin, but are used with a different name. . Only a few altcoins are fully developed. And those altcoins are really powerful, they have absolutely a chance to compete fairly with bitcoin. But bitcoin is really too powerful, it has taken over all other altcoins from the moment it is formed. It's unclear what you're trying to say here. "most altcoins are copied from bitcoin, but are used with a different name" is not absolutely true. "they have absolutely a chance to compete fairly with bitcoin. But bitcoin is really too powerful, it has taken over all other altcoins from the moment it is formed." contradicts itself. Banks are not afraid of any crypto and especially the bitcoin because it is primarily used as asset, that is as a commodity and rarely as a currency. The same happens with the gold. As franky1 above said the fiat are not lost when people use their coins, just has changed hands (bank accounts). If ever banks loose their profit then we will understand how they will react.
No, I suppose you were wrong. Bitcoin is really a challenge for banks, because its value is not real, it depends entirely on other currencies, which are issued by the government. The risk of bankruptcy always clings to banks if they accept bitcoin. That is true, and most banks accept bitcoin as government-led banks. This is more of an accuracy issue that I have (though is still the 38th post of the thread): it is true that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value but it does not at all fully depend on other currencies. The same can be said of FIAT currencies. I'm not sure what the last sentence is for, though. "That is true, and most banks accept bitcoin as government-led banks." is a strange statement.
I could go on and on and talk about the posts in more depth but that would be a waste. Again, length does not mean substance.
If I have a long essay that repeats the exact same points over and over again, being redundant - or better yet, paraphrasing previously-published essays, then it's completely pointless and adds nothing. |
|
|
|
Hey everyone, I'm now home, and here's my signed message confirming I'm back in control of my account:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is the real tonto. The one that lives in Lawrence, KS. It is 4/20/17 at 5:00pm central time (10pm UTC)
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
14ciqtCjzgEXFea4Xzu8tcXHKxRxaahKo7
HLcvt+Nb4ue62c0WH4cu6Es468s3AL6X6RjnZjVzmj6rUVvgKTZHh36eww0qhLp5+3uxFYGDXAO1TxV7FGVtUR4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Verified:  Welcome back to the world of Bitcointalk! Since I haven't received any restitution by my deadline, I will start cleaning up my account as best as possible, and see if I can salvage up that bounty or something. I hope you all understand, because I feel very violated about the whole thing. It was unlikely that you would have received anything regardless, given that you couldn't really have impacted anything that he had anyway - unless an alt is discovered with one of his addresses. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is the real tonto. It is 4/20/17 at 5:00pm central time (10pm UTC). This is my message for staking my account so I can cleanup this nonesense caused by the scammer/hacker dude. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 14ciqtCjzgEXFea4Xzu8tcXHKxRxaahKo7 GzkL0iJDmaCKzG4yM+hNT+xyL9Tqvh6Ue2sHGM2rnPtuPcmsKzzz0nCh0IYSq3D9EL/vkiCFFqphBjnAo9Du7h0= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Note this is all given as proof in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1877655The malicious guy even admits it later on in the thread (using this account) and then posts under his new account. I will PM the user SmartIphone, and have him remove his quoted post. Quoted and verified. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Ken of Galandus Dice and Collectibles. My website is https://galandus.com. My bitcoin address is 12xjUW8KcPLsCAiuy4JHCoBbE1HygafSCq. My keybase username is kenhuman (https://keybase.io/kenhuman).
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
12xjUW8KcPLsCAiuy4JHCoBbE1HygafSCq
ILvsS3t/UFDYhaSf8Nq4cqPFW4u1T5d4+xIR0lhTu5n6PHKbLYaugof5hv72OGmiSKxHo/F/HCKUUuarK6KsdD0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Please quote and verify, thanks. Verified.  |
|
|
|
I was told to you, You're lucky one i was bought your account and maintain.
tonto is lucky that you bought his account - which is a seriously suspicious sale considering the period of inactivity - and then proceeded to spam up the forum whilst in a signature campaign, create an uneasy reputation for him and then helped an alt of a scammer? This doesn't seem like you're exactly doing him a favor.
I'm begging you for rewards bounty but your asking me for 1btc? with reason restitution ? xD
Sure, Just delete signature campaign on your account.
I'm able to prove who's guys selling those account, but for what... that's nonsense for me.
You sound pretty entitled.
If someone were to offer you an account that hadn't posted in over a year for 0.2 BTC, would you honestly take it? Did you seriously think that the merchant was the real owner of the account? Why not ask them for a signed message to prove ownership? (we found an address easily enough) The account thus is evidently hacked and hence you contributed to the market of hacked accounts, encouraging the culprit to continue. |
|
|
|
14ciqtCjzgEXFea4Xzu8tcXHKxRxaahKo7
tonto1992 on bitcointalk.org here. Today is 4/20/2017 and I own the account tonto on bitcointalk.
HGQLHolJwoT3mQgLxupHyHJ8y0RjW4PfZarYDJrR6woJLls4fKhKgIPKgdmCBKRkS4fEhjKDh1Hm8uC kKQnAdeA=
 Verified! You're good to go. |
|
|
|
Yes, I have access to the wallet with this address  14ciqtCjzgEXFea4Xzu8tcXHKxRxaahKo7 Here's a screen shot of the transactions for that day, and the 15 btc  I don't deny your ownership of the account though there may be some who still do and require a signature. This showcases the steps for Bitcoin Core: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0#post_core0100Just copy in that address, write a message along the lines of, "tonto1992 on bitcointalk.org here. Today is 4/20/2017 and I own the account tonto on bitcointalk." Then send us the address, message, and signature in a post. |
|
|
|
quite critical from a guy who has most of his posts in the off topic section...
Quite the ad-hominem you've got there. Except, it's interesting to note that despite being the board that I have the most posts in, it encompasses 11.65% of my total posts, seconded by Gambling and Meta (which are less than ten posts off from overtaking first place). You'll find that I haven't posted in Off-topic once in my latest 778 posts (including this one) and the most recent reply from that board was back on June 27th of last year. Here, I'll link it for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1392019.msg15388169#msg15388169It's a pretty shitty post, I can admit that. And you'll find - if you decide to peruse my post history - that I stop from replying to such spam megathreads.
Ignoring the fact that it doesn't matter how many posts I have in off-topic, can you seriously tell me where I went wrong in my analysis here and why it's wrong for me to be critical of others? Sure, in the past I have posted a large number of replies in Off-topic (and I still occasionally post in Games & Rounds when the odd promotion or giveaway arises) but that doesn't make my points any less true. Having lots of posts in off-topic doesn't make for being a spammer. Likewise, having a lot of posts in Technical Support does not make you a Bitcoin expert. What if you were posting on "my confirmation is unconfirmed!!!" threads the whole time?
I think that your point is invalid.
Did I say you were wrong? No, I said you were critical, nothing is wrong with being critical, I'm just expressing my right to say whatever I want on the forum
The tone implies cynicism. |
|
|
|
I'm happy if someone takes the time to evaluate my post quality.
You said over a year ago, yes? I'll go back 6 months. this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing)
(the occasional posts are also not too constructive, but I will not go into those deeply) {i would think that the further back you go, the worse the quality is [and i did not wish to waste too much of my time] so i halved the timeframe}
Someone from DT should tag him for this even if this was a joke/troll post, seeing that his only other negative comes from a no-collateral loan. I'm pretty sure there is no need for anyone else to explain why this is something that warrants a neg.
Not sure why you had to comment this despite not having given a negative feedback to the user; it's also not as necessary since Vod did give him a negative previously. Hey again. Sorry but I was inactive for a few days and when I got back to your PM I found the file link was expired, could you resend it after reuploading it?
Should be in a private message. That depends on how we think on it .,Yes it probably fair random but it is in their system even they say propably fair it doesn't mean its fair its just like sweet words to attract to catch up our mind .Then if its probably fair 50-50% chance on my own understanding . If i am a the owner o a gambling house even i say that its probably fair it doesnt mean how it is as i said. I don't need to elaborate but the point there is you must be a responsible gambler.
Christ.... please don't use such terminology, i.e "provably fair" actually, if you don't know the meaning behind it or how it actually works. Yes, you're quoting bad English. However, this post does not accomplish anything and barely contributes anything to the thread (that already had 100 replies, mind you). It's pointless to berate someone for misusing a term and saying that they don't know the meaning behind it and then not explain it yourself. How difficult would it be to insert a little snippet: "provably fair means that ______________" in case anybody did want to know? (which they do not since the thread would just be jam-packed with spam) I dont give f'''$$ k about mining blocks or any techinical Bs. I payed real money. Money does not come from the air. Its their problem to solve that.
at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
This guy thinks others will listen to his nonsense and offer some way to help. Oh the hilarity. Hey there, you, yes you. Nobody gives a shit about you too ? What's with this purely berating post? Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 22, 2017, 11:24:22 AM
are you an expert of provably fair option? would be able to tell if a site/game is provably fair? Google "999dice scam" or view the linked scam accusation thread in this topic , it has been known as a scam site for ages now I'm not sure what your reply is supposed to do, exactly. JackpotRacer asks a question and then you respond with a scam casino. It's unclear. Interested for the job. Might be a good idea to have a look at the participants' post history first, instead of selecting a random guy. This could be in a private message. The price of Bitcoin changes from time to time you know.
This is fine but I would usually prefer more explanation (again, it would be useful to provide more detail; seen as OP was confused) Finally people can buy it again, the price should just go back to under 900 IMO.
? Is this really useful?
Overall, your quality isn't that bad. It may comprise of one-liners, but I found them to be sufficient enough to be somewhat constructive. Given the fact that I had to actively seek out unconstructive posts, I would not consider you a spammer. And in the context of burst posting, plenty of people may do that with consecutive posts though I've found that you have had gaps between sequences, unlike other offenders. |
|
|
|
|
Get an escrow to hold to password, make a 2-of-3 multisig so that it is not necessary for the escrow to release if they come to a resolution themselves. Then escrow sends the password (working) and releases funds
That should work, no?
As long as the escrow is my secretly working with one of the trading parties everything should work out smoothly. When this fact is affirmed, even if the escrow has selfish desires the trade would be able to go through since Alice and Bob could approve it themselves
The problems occur when two of the three parties don't want to follow through
|
|
|
|
You have to refer to this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0 (remember to send a PM to only one of the admins, not both.) To learn how to sign an address, refer to this thread by shorena: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0You were banned because you tried to reset via a secret question.
What is the name of your original account? If you have posted an address on it in a post or have the address on the profile, then you should be able to sign a message with it (given that it is yours and you own the private key) |
|
|
|
Free domain: https://www.000webhost.com/This is a pretty shitty site that could have probably been done in 20 minutes, never mind 3 hours. Perhaps you should have had a portfolio showing your skills or lack thereof, to truly showcase the quality of your product.
Moreover, you decided to use a shitty template with crappy white background images and shoddy locations for navigation. Why are you not putting the main page link at the top and the contact information link somewhere to the side? It makes no sense. Additionally, you have literally 5 different descriptions. One each for the accessories: frame, charger, band, and the spotify membership and an unchanging constant description for all the fitbits. What a piece of shit. |
|
|
|
^^^^^
I agree mostly, but then NO locked or self-moderated threads should be allowed in Digital or only HERO or above should be permitted. Sure, people should be smart enough but why give a scammer such an easy place to setup a scam?
Locked and self-moderated threads can help clear spam and are clear indicators of potential scams. If you see the warning - where your posts may be deleted - you should peruse the forum for the trustworthiness of the individual, either by asking in the thread or by checking the Scam Accusations section. I have no problem with people learning their lessons the hard way or the easy way (through simple logic and observation of others). In time, I hope that it will no longer be necessary to remind people of rules and stickies, and that ignorance will be driven to naught. Many have been smote by scammers and from that point on have learned to be more cautious. If you see a locked thread, typically it means a discontinued service. If you see a self-moderated thread, you exercise caution. In both cases you should check the OP's trust and reputation on the forum.
I see no point in preventing access from locked/self-moderated threads for people who actually wish to control real trolling/spamming/etc on their threads. |
|
|
|
I would be able to fill this loan if you were able to add some Bitcoin to the concoins as well. I am not into trading that much but I would take the 7k concoins and 0.005 if you were interested. I will only discuss on this thread.
This is an illogical offer, given that if OP gave bitcoins as collateral, it would be pointless. Why not simply deduct the collateral amount from the loan request? Where's the sense?
Well sorry to interupt but it's not ok now...they have fees to move Concoins right?
besides the collateral must be at least 120% and this is not.
If the coin crashes, the loaner is at a moderate of losing money. The usual is 120%, but this is 115.68% of the norm - it's at the discretion of a lender. But, this is 21.6% (relative) less than what the typical person is looking for in terms of security and seems like a coin that's not traded too often, with a 24h volume of 0.14 BTC (about 10x the amount a lender would have to dump). It's not my place to say how good the deal is the coin seems to be trading at low prices right now, fluctuating between a little over and a little under 0.012 BTC for the collateral. |
|
|
|
Why not disallow locked threads and self-moderated threads from anyone with less than maybe 75-100 posts particularly in the digital items fora?
And on that day, the Off-topic section was flooded by a mass posting spree. It won't change anything. In fact, it may add to the amount of spam in the forum given that newbies would have to post x amount before they're able to create their shitty little threads in the digital goods section. And they would probably post in other sections to circumvent their problem, infiltrating the goods section.
It won't SOLVE the problem but at least it would make it just a LITTLE harder and a little bit safer. There is nothing to lose by doing it and plenty to gain.
It would make it a little harder and safer but then at the same time you start getting Jr. Members posting threads instead of Newbies, which may give people some false confidence in the merchant. After all, people associate rank with trust. Which is not the case. And the thing is, most intelligent people should be able to tell a scam from a legitimate trade offer. It is not the forum's job to baby idiots. |
|
|
|
very good!!! now you gave me a negative feedback for no valid reasons ! okey
when i said i test the website its not a self admitted that oi promote it and still promote it i do not support them !can you understand my situation here before you give negative feedback ?!!
i test it and i investigate finally i found startminer scammer
now i know lotof users will start giving me fool negative feedback like you ! and for what ? for posting startminer scammer ? oh !! or you want to me to delte this thread or i change the title and say startminer legit ??
no ! startminer scammer and when i said i promote it i promote it with my friends to investigate if they are really paying or not
next time think , think an think again before give me a negative feedback
Your trust feedback to me is this: "giving negative feedback for no valid reasons , and i'm not a ponzi promoter , i'm a website investigation and scammer finder , becarful" What is your website?
Why are you promoting it amongst your friends regardless? It only takes one person to investigate a site and it's quite plain to see that it's the same type of scam that's been around for years. The whole "level up your miner" trick where they have levels/upgrades and you earn n number of bitcoins every second/minute/hour. If you really have been investigating for some time, you would have encountered the very same type of ponzi and immediately thought, "this is a scam." Me and my friends agreed to not deposit anything bcz we think we can earn % from what referral earn not from deposits
Second only one made a deposit without inform us and he didn't understand our rules as a team and I'm ready to cover his loose
How would you earn any bitcoins from your referrals given that literally on their site, they state the following: Affiliate Program 20%
Invite your friends and get 20% each time they upgrade StartMiner. [Archive]and thus anyone who does not deposit is worthless to you. The initial miner on their site is limited to a maximum of 0.0006 BTC daily and it takes 0.01 BTC to upgrade to just the first level. (I assume that there's a cap of 60 claims per day, since they repeat the same cap on their FAQ) Do the math. That's a minimum of 16.67 days (over two weeks) of using an hour of your time every day slaving away at the ponzi just for a little bit of referral bonus. Additionally, it's completely pointless given that the minimum withdrawal is 0.005 and you would be able to withdraw before upgrading. Your story does not make sense. If you're going to lie, then at least do your research beforehand.
Relevant archives: Home page: https://archive.is/a9vHL#selection-147.0-147.10Free miner cap: https://archive.is/mVvTK#selection-159.1-159.131Minimum withdrawal: Minimum withdrawal amount is 0.005 BTC. Minimal upgrade amount is 0.01 BTC.
I smell some serious bullshit. |
|
|
|
I said I was promote them for some hours not for days and I mention why I promote them and I stop advertsing until I make sure they pay .
It matters not whether you promote a scam for an hour or a day or a year. In the end, all that matters is the fact that you promoted a scam. It is the intent. That is untrustworthy in its own regard, given that you had good reason to think it a ponzi anyway: you admitted it yourself, that you were testing to see if they were truly a scam or not. Archive: https://archive.is/U9ARcIn fact, here's a good question: would you have continued promoting the site if it paid you? I never promote them here in bitcointalk so why I will receive negative trust ??
Shit... so we should keep giving positive trust to serial killers since that's outside of bitcointalk, right? |
|
|
|
Because your posts are shit. Example 1:Our website is already works with https https://bitsharemarket.comMinimum withdrawal for all free members and investor is 0.001BTC and there will be 5% fees on all transaction, to speed up the Bitcoin confirmation process. The question was answered before you even asked it. ADD OR MORE INFO HERE LIKE MINIMUM WITHDREW ETC .....ETC ...
Then you asked it, stupidly and aiming to increase your insignificant post count. Minimum withdraw ?
And you asked it again.
Example 2:You can use wallet on Exchanges for withdraw your stratis, Bittrex, Poloniex, also make sure to get an code into your email, the process instantly you will receive your Stratis soon. Good luck
THANKS FOR HELP You need to download the stratis wallet or generate a deposit address on bittrex or poloniex and just put the address there.
THANKS FOR HELP Are you seriously double-posting thanks when you can simply either cram it into one post (still useless and insubstantial) or just as easily PM the users privately thanking them? No, but the pennies you earn are precious.
Example 3:Ireland are doing extremely well, taking 7 wickets. Afghanistan are 132/7 after 32 overs
Good performance from Ireland and especially from Kevin O'Brien who bowled really well and took four wickets and then even with an injury taking the team to victory with the bat,it is an incredible performance and with the series level at 2-2 the final game will be interesting ,hope Kevin O'Brien will recover and will play that match.
yes ir won this match Yeah, thanks for reporting the match summary. That's valuable on a prediction thread, definitely.
You also have some great content outside of Games & Rounds, which you frequent way too much. Bitcoin is a cash or we can state another sort of cash yet the diverse thing is, it's virtual and you can just have this sort of cash in the event that you are in the web. Bitcoin is additionally an another sort of venture where you can make a great deal of benefits on the grounds that the cost is moving volatily so it is a decent sort of trademark for me
i want predication where i get it any idea ?
Games & Rounds and Services combined consist of 30.7% of your total posts. That's quite high. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
