We've thoroughly studied the Bitcoin client from within and have found an almost imperceptible but very significant flaw (associated with the commission), using it we have committed a Bitcoin transaction in which the recipient has received more Bitcoins than the sender has sent.
Gave me quite a laugh. To sum eveything up: Bullshit. Don't invest with this joke of a site. 100% straigh ponzi, not even abled to find any great lie about how profit is created. Timewaster. |
|
|
|
You're so innovative. That's totally not the 100th moneypot app I've seen that looks exactly the same and hasn't been modified one single bit. Oh wait, it is.
Payment honeypot tool
Fast and reliable payment
Maybe you get straight about what site you use for your app before publishing it  Honeypot is a site I have yet to discover. But I still think your app is pooh.  |
|
|
|
Just a heads up and explanation why I have not left the users in question a negative rating when you asked me to:
Connections like these are a pain in the ass to verify. It looks to me like you didnt verify it yourself, but just trusted walletexplorer. There is not a single TX posted connecting any of the address, the archives have been put into place days later when the profiles might have been changed. Please change this in the future.
Yes, they are. And I actually have been just looking into it/formulating my post, you've beaten me to the task. Thanks for that. Will be used as reference for the next update in OP by either mexxer-2 or me.
Again sorry for my ongoing inactivity considering verifications/updates. Currently can only limit my activity to the very least, that will change next week, and I'll continue maintaining the thread together with mexxer-2 as in the first days I started helping him out. |
|
|
|
Yes, that is my problem i dont like to be tag with scammer or anything that could spoil my personality.
You were selling an e-book teaching people how to gain/earn money with fraud! What personality is left to spoil? You have reached rock bottom. Don't even try talking your way out of this. Let me quote some feedbacks for you: If you deal with him you will help to commit a crime and may get in legal issues. (~EcuaMobi) Selling a method that almost certainly includes the commission of credit/debit card fraud, receiving and selling stolen property, and conspiracy thereof. (~TBZ) Selling a "money making" method which is illegal and this user agrees it is illegal! (~Muhammed Zakir) Now here's what you said minutes before: I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused. -snip-
And then, you admit to be meadefreling: If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account -snip-
Case closed. |
|
|
|
If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account but it does not rob anybody as well but i have nothing to do with wealthy$ account in truth.
So, your only problem is, that we tied you to the wrong scammer? I'm terribly actually not a bit sorry we connected you to the wrong scum red trust user. Now move on, you're red shining for a reason. |
|
|
|
Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.
First off, you do deserve the negative trust. I agree, and I also thing your currently untagged account should be negged also ( melisandre). Now to the thing at hand. The account meadefreling uses the address 1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe (courtesy of your wallet) up until 8 days ago: Done
meadefreling
1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe
I dont think this is allow here because it is a giveaway.
First time he's seen using it is 8 months ago in the DaDice signature campaign here. Between that, he recieved negative trust from EcuaMobi for this thread. Don't tell me that was not indeed your account back then, is it right now, and you were the one who created that thread.
I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused.
incomprehensible arguments i dont know how to explain this better.
You can't. But for starters, don't talk about "btc addresses auditor"s, instead start explaining your connection and lay things open for us to see. If you don't, there's no reason at all to believe you one little bit. |
|
|
|
Ich würde mal im englischen Teil dieses Forums stöbern ob die Adresse bekannt ist. Denn 1.6BTC durch clipboard hijacking... Das hat bestimmt schon mal jemand gemeldet.
Nope, konnte bei einer kurzen Suche nichts zur Adresse finden (was wiederum ehr für die zweite Möglichkeit spricht).Irgendwo anders mit Adressen in Berührung gekommen? Vielleicht eine Deposit Adresse bei irgend’nem BTC-Service?Scheint ja doch ersteres zu sein. |
|
|
|
What I meant was "Do you continue the campaign based on traffic, plain popularity , or any other factor?" or is it something you haven't discussed yet?
It wasn't discussed yet, probably a mix of different factors. For now I'll focus on running the campaign. Any decissions can be wait up until they have to be made. |
|
|
|
BTW by that you mean continuing only if there is a significant amount of traffic from signatures?
That's not my decission to make. I don't pay for the campaign, hence I can't decide the size and/or how long it runs. OneHash contacted me, stating that they would like to try advertising via a signature campaign, we formed a concept together and that's what you see right now. In which size and for how long this campaign runs is fully up to them. We however agreed on a 4 week frontier phase, after which we will then see/decide how to continue. |
|
|
|
Can you create more spots? Maybe for junior.Members?
This champaign looking very professional, and onehash is really amazing i will try it, i like mixing sports bets and bitcoin!
All I can currently say to that is maybe. This is a "testing" campaign right now (hence the frontier in the thread title). If all goes well, and it looks promising, we will continue with a bigger campaign afterwards. Or, to put it in the words used in OP: Please note, that this is only the frontier phase of our signature campaign. If it proves successful, we intend to start a bigger campaign with a broader range of ranks.
For now, in this little frontier stage, we are only looking for a small group of users.
|
|
|
|
so you actually created a thread to enroll one user because 2 others have already had the spots somehow reserved? nice...
Nope, both users contacted me after I created this thread. All 3 spaces were filled through the thread/PMs in response to the thread. Regardless of any past contact, kingaltcoins didn't know about the campaign up until I posted the thread. And the other spot is reserved for MedaR, who posted prior in this thread also. I'm also interested.
|
|
|
|
Fishy campaign. As this campaign rules. This kingaltcoins account holder haven't applied But I don't know how he is inside this campaign.
I don't think there is escrow here as shorena said. Check with op before apply guys.
Fishy indeed, he applied via PM. I had contact with him even before, as he wanted to enroll with another campaign I manage. Oh, and then there's this: Username/UID: kingaltcoins/234896
Current number of posts: 552 (Including this one)
Bitcoin Address to send the payment: 1Nvas3DToqprZdac3bNXmFDXc3jSnNTsjr
Oh, and please don't apply guys, no need to check with me also. I already filled the spots. |
|
|
|
The reserved spot (participant #3) on the 2nd post is linked to my everyones profile, but not really sure whether I'm accepted or not because I have not received any pm yet. Waiting confirmation  Participant #1: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=441443]MadeinCoin[/url].
Participant #2: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234896]kingaltcoins[/url].
Participant #3: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=]Reserved[/url].
Spreadsheet: [url=https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12-f7MwKFyuEtYYLlWCoyrx_yO84HYM9wwGecwfN6BRw/edit]Here[/url]. Added code boxes for you, maybe you get now why it links to your profile. |
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm pretty dependent on Lutpin when it comes to table updates . Damn you Lutpin for complicating the thread, even I could update the thread, when it was "Name: Proof link" stage.  Well, anybody could do that. Whilst the thread in it's current version is a little harder to upgrade/maintain, it also gives an additional value I wouldn't want to miss (compared to the easy listing you had before). I'll be fully back next week, till then you have to get along as it is. |
|
|
|
oh sorry about that, the title said it is full and there were a few people enrolling so i thought it is full
I had already changed the title, because I contacted kingaltcoins and decided to give him the spot. No need for others to post enrollment posts then. However, he had still to do his one, which he just did. |
|
|
|
who did you accept to this campaign? just curious how it turned out
You can check that yourself. it is clearly said that they do not accept hero members and that it is full, why people just dont read the title post?
Probably because kingaltcoins contacted me earlier, we agreed to enroll him into a senior member spot and he is one of the participants I've chosen.
Hello, I'd like to join this campaign. However, I'd like to know if it is mandatory to wear the avatar.
No, it is not. But we don't allow any other paid advertisements in your avatar/personal text. Enrolling here and with any avatar campaign (e.q. Squallcoin) doesn't work. |
|
|
|
|
Is this still being updated/maintained?
I've ranked up to senior member, started managing a second campaign (OneHash.com), and my MBE should probably be switched to 3BTC.
|
|
|
|
how much you'll pay for avatar? I am intersted in avatar campaign.
Juniors can't wear any avatar. We also don't run an avatar campaign, but a signature campaign (as pointed out by Jeremycoin). Besides that, we don't pay extra for the avatar. It's optionally, users can wear it or leave it. |
|
|
|
Payouts are every friday and will be made by OneHash directly. ~snip~ No escrow, correct?
Seems like it to me. Already answered shorena via PM. We're currently not escrowing any funds for this campaign. From the name, it doesn't strike me that OneHash is a betting platform, sounds like one of those ponzis at first. I guess they want to clear that
Maybe you shouldn't judge a book by its cover (or name in this case) then. The name OneHash is not related with hashpower or something similar. If you visit the site for one second, you will find out it has nothing in common with "cloudmining" or other ponzies. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
