TradeFortress I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but did you post your verified real world identity somewhere? I think for a service like this, we would need to know.
No. If I default, it wouldn't help you much anyways - the identity of pirateat40, ianbakewell, etc are known, but that hasn't achieved much. There's also similar assets like Deprived's fund that people don't seen to be wanting identity from. I understand that this might turn people away from depositing their coins, but if you don't feel comfortable depositing you're free to not to  |
|
|
|
Is this irc or just some webchat?
A webchat that has very irc-styled, with some modern enhancements (for example, you don't need to join each room every time you start) and bitcoin specific rewards + tipping. admin back
Yeah |
|
|
|
|
How about making a complaint to the FTC?
|
|
|
|
That's something BTCJAM has to do. |
|
|
|
coinjedi, why did you change the bet deadline of my bet (Are BFL ASICs real and doing 350+ Mhash/Joule)? I had set it to June 30, but it now reads April 21. It seems that you decided to close it prematurely because BFL started shipping. Why? BFL will release multiple products between now and June 30, leaving the bet undecided about whether one of these products will achieve 350 Mhash/Joule or not. Editor's note: BFL claimed shipping on 4/22. |
|
|
|
I track this topic from another thread into this one, I said people in China could not connect to your site, now it remains fail.
I sincerely apologize but I am unable to assist on this matter. It is a problem with China's internet censorship, not a problem with the connection. Sorry. Otoh, ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED: GET BLOCKED BY A COUNTRY |
|
|
|
Where have you read about 7% weekly?
You mentioned pirate, I told you that anyone who offers 7% / week now most likely will get mod tagged. And how do you know that none of the content was written by people behind it? (And even if it was not written, it was perfectly collected together.)The organization is 100% anonymous with bitcoin early developers and great programmers behind it. Satoshi Nakamoto, before he vanished, in the last interview in April said that he had "moved on to other things," how do you know that GBBG and their software is not that other thing.
Do not misunderstand me, I am not suggesting that it is, I am only pointing that no one can know and would not know, who is and who is not behind GBBG project. Contradiction. I'm willing to bet 100 BTC that no bitcoin core developer will say that they are behind GBBG. You're probably going to say something about anonymity. Where have you read about 7% weekly?
And how do you know that none of the content was written by people behind it? (And even if it was not written, it was perfectly collected together.)The organization is 100% anonymous with bitcoin early developers and great programmers behind it. Satoshi Nakamoto, before he vanished, in the last interview in April said that he had "moved on to other things," how do you know that GBBG and their software is not that other thing.
Do not misunderstand me, I am not suggesting that it is, I am only pointing that no one can know and would not know, who is and who is not behind GBBG project.
I am convinced that no one will fall for this, and therefore a tag is not needed. Please move along guys. Lawl  |
|
|
|
I never wrote anything about the backend. I wrote that the frontend code suggests your skill level. You use HTML 5 doctype, yet you use deprecated <b> tags. You use for elements spacing instead of proper CSS. You didn't even know how to use Bootstrap properly, so you just wrapped everything in a <center> tag which also has been deprecated for years. You hot-link images from external websites instead of downloading and validating them, and then hosting from your site. The URLs suggest not using any framework, not even some simple URL routing and layer separation - it's just a PHP file per feature, with most likely totally mixed HTML/PHP code inside. Relative file paths, not relative to docroot, are nothing wrong per se, but also suggest lack of good habits. Also, I haven't seen page urls like “addtodirectory.php” or “index.php?page=2” in any professional work for years (instead of “/add” or “/2”).
Heh, pwnt |
|
|
|
Yay, you have a coinchat link Come online, I'll tip you a bit. |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it is someone who only uses Bitstamp and wants to buy as much bitcoins as he can under $130.
|
|
|
|
Sent, enjoy It's very much like IRC. Except you don't need to install anything. |
|
|
|
|
Right now: {"result":"success","return":{"lag":3554298,"lag_secs":3.554298,"lag_text":"3.554298 seconds","length":"17"}}
|
|
|
|
|
First person to reply to this thread with an address gets 0.01 BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! CoinChat also has a lot of cool features. Such as creating your own rooms (and self moderate it), purchasing different text colors, IRC commands like /me, /query, /pm, nice scrolling, a userlist on user created rooms, and way better payouts.
|
|
|
|
Contest:Create your own room on CoinChat and make it the most active room to earn $1000 worth of BTC. There's 7 prizes (on top of the coins you get automatically for chatting on CoinChat): 1st: $1000* 2nd: $400* 3rd: $200* 4th to 7th: $100** *Req: At least 50 active unique users **Req: At least 25 active unique users All prizes are paid in BTC using the exchange rate at time of payment. Don't want to do that? You can still earn bitcoins for free for just chatting on CoinChat! How?1. Visit CoinChat and make an account if you haven't registered already. 2. Click on "Join Room", and enter a new, unused room name. You'll automatically create that room. 3. Get people to join your room - you can also use your referral link to get a bonus 10% of their withdrawals! 4. Get a PM from me on May 26th if you've created one of the most active rooms. Claim your BTCs! Each user may create a maximum of two rooms. You may delete a room you already created by making sure everyone exits it. What's an active unique user?Someone who is active on the chat. Suspected duplicate accounts only counts once. Inactive accounts do not count. Users who are spamming or have being banned do not count. CoinChat has the final say in determining if an account qualifies. You may not give incentives such as sharing the prize. CoinChat may update the rules of this contest at any time (for example, if there's a loophole). Unclaimed prizes will be forfeit after one week. Void where prohibited. What can my room be about?Anything not illegal, and not spam. It doesn't have to be about bitcoin. If you own a popular site, wiki or forum, why not make CoinChat your home.
|
|
|
|
Should have registered patent for this... It's annoying to see everyone copying my ideas.
There's a difference between ripping something off and improving on it Hey man whats with the outrageous fees? A lot of people in chat are discouraged by it. 10 mBTC takes forever to get to and yet you take 6 mBTC for fees for a 10mBTC withdraw? I think your fee should be a flat 1 mBTC for the miner fee. I know its free but its discouraging to say "you won .01 mBTC" when really its not even half of that.
It's because I have to manually review all withdrawals to make sure they are not duplicate accounts and spam. I'll bet that the people who got whole bitcoins from me aren't pissed off  |
|
|
|
@TradeFortress, how they could pay earnings in that fund from new members??? When new shares are sold, the value of shares is always divided by the current number of shares, that has nothing to do with new members. As to the books, the fund is very new, we will have some access to the stats too, for now, they only share with members the fund's new placements, the total number of shares sold and the share current and past value. That is if the NAV is correct. BitBillions have not published any information showing where their NAV comes from. None of the content was written by "the people behind it". The use of "USDs" should also be a giant red flag. To compare them to some previous Pirate scam is VERY stupid. With the Pirate, gosh guys, even the name should tell you, they are nothing serious...
Anyone offering 7% per week today will most likely have their most mod tagged too. |
|
|
|
Moderator should show some level of intelligence and conduct.
I think they are showing intelligence with that labeling. For things like investment funds, just like legal, medical practice and driving, it's not up to someone else to prove it is a scam (although I already reasonably have, with the lack of reports of financial books to back up claims of NAV growth), it's up to the fund proving that their management is competent (and won't flee with the money) and that they actually invest instead of paying earnings from new members. You don't tell a cop "prove to me I'm a bad driver" when you're driving without a license. You need to prove it to them, via a drivers license. Same thing here, prove that you have holdings, and keep in mind that this audience is not your typical Internet marketer who signs up hearing about buzz works they don't know the meaning of. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
