I just checked your post history. You have made 17 posts from December 07, 2019, 02:04:10 AM (GMT) to 03:17:45 AM. 1 post every 4 minutes on average.!!!! (Archived: http://archive.is/Y6llY). I don't know how many of your posts have been deleted. Don't you think you are spamming? You are breaking forum rules. Edit: Look at this post Investing in a coin like Litecoin will not be a bad idea for me because i believe so much in litecoin. You can give it a try.
The problem is not that people disagree with you. All of members of the forum agree with you. The problem is that You are spamming. |
|
|
|
|
Username: hosseinimr93
Lucky number: 47
|
|
|
|
Here are range of winning block numbers for each of participants. | _________________ | _____________________ | | -610,366 | UserU | | 610,366-610,427 | 1miau | | 610,427-610,497 | LoyceV | | 610,498-610,525 | Mashfiqun | | 610,526-610,536 | RapTarX | | 610,537-610,539 | HCP | | 610,539-610,541 | Royse777 | | 610,541-610,552 | pooya87 | | 610,552-610,567 | Souri | | 610,567-610,583 | naska21 | | 610,584-610,597 | hanspeter77 | | 610,598-610,605 | Swordsoffreedom | | 610,605-610,612 | haloxon | | 610,612-610,615 | Upgrade00 | | 610,615-610,621 | Scheede | | 610,621-610,631 | SFR10 | | 610,632-610,638 | DdmrDdmr | | 610,639-610,654 | hosseinimr93 | | 610,654-610,683 | nelson4lov | | 610,684-610,709 | Phil_S | | 610,710-610,745 | crwth | | 610,745-610,773 | GazetaBitcoin | | 610,774-610,788 | micgoossens | | 610,789-610,855 | mikeywith | | 610,855- | Last of the V8s |
|
|
|
|
Today is December 8. 23 days left until January 01. I consider the average of bitcoin block time in the last 10 days as the block time of next 23 days. (8.834+10.588+11.429+10.36+9.931+9.114+8.623+9.931+9.931+9.29)/10 Estimated block time: 9.867 minutes Current block: 607263 Minutes renaming: 23*24*60+3*60+20=33320 Number of solved blocked until 2020 33320/9.867=3376 First block of 2020 = 607263+3377= 610640 |
|
|
|
Seems like a few of you guys went for favourites and expected draws so have 5 wins. I'm the idiot who went for the City/Bayern/Juve upset, hence my 800 BTC payout, but I tried to go too far and went for Palace and Napoli away wins as well (Watford were clear favourites) -- the draws for both were the bookie favourites so maybe I should have listened. Problem is I don't usually go for draws but I do have 2 draw picks for today's matches (Newcastle and Torino).
So my risky attitude puts me as a frontrunner I believe, don't know anyone else with 6 correct picks thanks to the huge upsets yesterday, but good luck everyone! If Aston Villa pull it off, I should be on a home run;) But the way it looks, Vardy already scored so you guys will all catch up with me haha.
I wonder, what if there is no winner? I mean no one has won the parlay, so does that mean there are no winners in this contest? Or will the winner be chosen based on the best prediction? According to the announcement on their website, the user with the most winning selections will win the prize. I don't think any user have predicted all the matches correctly and most probably the winner will be determined by number of the correct predictions. |
|
|
|
Why do you need a new website for all of this? Can't you make freebitcoin a website that people could buy bitcoin as well? You could still get a licensing and KYC thing for people who do credit card purchases and for everyone else it would stay the same?
I mean tell me if I am wrong, you said the only time you will ask KYC on the kingdice website is when people buy with credit card because the credit card companies require it to give you an account, that is understandable, but for everyone else who will buy bitcoin with different methods you may not need such a thing?
That means if you implement it to freebitcoin as it is without any other website, couldn't you just require KYC for credit card people and not ask for KYC from anyone else? Hell you could ask for KYC from everyone who buys bitcoin with fiat but as long as you don't ask KYC from people who doesn't use that part of the website, I doubt it would be a problem.
The reason for creating a new website is quite clear. They want new customers. They want a website which includes "dice" in its domain. I guess kingdice will focus more on dice game and will have lower house edge, while freebitco focus more on faucet. From what I understood, it's more about organizational matters. In the case of gambling site and the possibility of deposit through payment processors such as credit cards, the service will be subject to many legal restrictions. For example, KYC verification. The owner of Freebitco.in does not want current users to have to do such verifications. It seems that you misunderstood wozzek23. As TheQuin had already said, only those who want to deposit via credit card have to pass KYC. wozzek23 is asking why they should create a new website while they can sell bitcoin on freebitco and only require those who want to buy bitcoin to pass KYC. |
|
|
|
Why do you need a new website for all of this? Can't you make freebitcoin a website that people could buy bitcoin as well? You could still get a licensing and KYC thing for people who do credit card purchases and for everyone else it would stay the same?
I mean tell me if I am wrong, you said the only time you will ask KYC on the kingdice website is when people buy with credit card because the credit card companies require it to give you an account, that is understandable, but for everyone else who will buy bitcoin with different methods you may not need such a thing?
That means if you implement it to freebitcoin as it is without any other website, couldn't you just require KYC for credit card people and not ask for KYC from anyone else? Hell you could ask for KYC from everyone who buys bitcoin with fiat but as long as you don't ask KYC from people who doesn't use that part of the website, I doubt it would be a problem.
The reason for creating a new website is quite clear. They want new customers. They want a website which includes "dice" in its domain. I guess kingdice will focus more on dice game and will have lower house edge, while freebitco focus more on faucet. |
|
|
|
|
Honestly, I hadn't ever thought about differences between money and currency and I was one of those people usually use money and currency interchangeably. You made me google "differences between money and currency".
But I still don't know we should call bitcoin a kind of money or a currency. For me, bitcoin is a money and a currency as well. Because I am not sure bitcoin has intrinsic value. Bitcoin has value as long as the community support it. We all know bitcoin's value is very volatile and can drop to zero if people no longer support it.
|
|
|
|
I've considered that before, but it raises several questions:
Some users have legitimate purpose for making multiple posts. Sometimes a best thing a user can do is to make a new post. But there are some newbies aren't aware of rules and that's why they make multiple posts. So, what about displaying a warning message like this? Warning: The last post of this topic has been made by you.
Unless you are sure making a new post is needed, please consider editing the previous post.
If you are quoting multiple posts, please quote all of them in a single post.
I am sure this warning can reduce multiple posts. |
|
|
|
I often break this rule. Not when I'm replying to multiple posts (I edit them all into one), but for these reasons:
1. A post reaches the maximum of 64kB and I have more to add.
2. I'm adding new information to an existing topic after a while. I could copy the last post and add it to my new post, but that feels like cheating my signature campaign (because I've "used" that post already and it doesn't feel right to get paid for the same information again).
3. My last post in the topic was merited and I want to keep it as a reference.
I often report posts that break this rule too, so I'm glad moderators don't strictly enforce this rule all the time.
I have seen your multiple posts and I have never reported them. In all three cases you mentioned, you have acceptable reason for making multiple posts. So, we should have some exceptions if such a feature is added. At least users should get a warning before making multiple posts like what users get for making posts in threads that are inactive for more than 120 days. |
|
|
|
|
^^^
Freebitco has already announced the winner of the first Lamborghini lottery. The user number 4424669 won the Lamborghini with 185 tickets.
I don't think we need more details. That's enough. Because the lottery was provably fair and there is no way freebitco can cheat you.
They had announced the lottery procedure before the lottery. That was provably fair and there is no need to more details. It doesn't matter who is the user with ID 4424669.
Freebitco implemented a transparent lottery and is protecting the privacy of the winner as well.
|
|
|
|
When I create a thread and have to reply to 3-4 people at once who replied on my thread, I usually create two continuous posts. Things look smoother that way.
As far as I know this is against the rules. You should reply all of them in one post. In my opinion, the best thing you can do is to separate them using by a line. Well, whenever you feel like someone is spamming by making continuous posts, just report them. That's the best solution. No matter posts are old or new. I have seen people getting banned for posts made in 2015-16.
I don't think a user is banned due to multiple posts made in 2015-16. At least I am sure they don't get permanent ban. Those users have likely been banned due to plagiarism. |
|
|
|
|
I usually report multiple posts that are made by a user in a row.
But sometimes I don't report them because they are old posts not worth moderators time or they have gotten some replies.
Why should a user be able to make multiple posts?
I think they should get a error like this:
The last post of this thread has been made by you. Please edit that post.
In the case the post hasn't been made in the last 24 hours and the poster is the topic starter. (The purpose is bumping)
The last post of this thread has been made by you. Please edit the last post. You can also delete that post and make a new one.
|
|
|
|
Many are now transferring to a new campaign because they cannot transfer their earnings to their balance, so it means we will have lesser participants when they finally refill the wallet, its a test of patience now, it will take several weeks or even months before they refill it or they will not, the choice now is on the participants.
This is not the only reason many of users are now leaving Cryptotalk campaign. They reduced the maximum daily posts to 5. The maximum weekly income for a Senior member is now 0.0042. There are some other campaigns that pay more than this. Users no longer risk as there are better alternatives. |
|
|
|
I have a little question. I see on the table that there is three status of listed members [Active, Semi-active, & Inactive].
I have no question for the "Active" one, but I am curious how you determine the status "Semi-active or Inactive"?
It is already mentioned in the OP. - I’ve created a "status" column that indicated if the profile has logged-in over the last 30 days (Active), 30 to 90 days (Semi-active) or over 90 days ago (inactive). This is just to get an approximate idea if the profile is still with us or not these days.
|
|
|
|
For the birthday, I am going to use the day of first posts/ topics made for each languages. The reason is it will help me easier to make raw calculation based on the default birthday this way.
You shouldn't use the first post/topic made in a certain language. There are some posts made in a language that didn't have a local board at the time they made and then moved to the local board after its creation. |
|
|
|
There are also users some users have received required merits for a certain rank, but they have not ranked up due to their low activity. Many of them are likely close to higher ranks. Here are some examples of full Members that only need some activities to rank up to senior member. SuperTA: 263 merits terizla: 262 merits cestmoi: 271 merits zasad@: 399 merits Ratimov: 413 merits Rikafip: 385 merits |
|
|
|
Topics in Service Announcements, Announcements (Altcoins), Tokens (Altcoins) and Bounties (Altcoins) are now sorted by their bump score. I think topics in "Service Announcements (Altcoins)" board need to be sorted by bump score too. As shown in the following screenshot, almost all of the topics in this board are bumped regularly by the topic starter. |
|
|
|
I was not able to see the list of restricted countries in their terms and conditions
According to what is said in Sportsbet.io terms and condition, residents of United States of America, Australia, United Kingdom, Estonia and Netherlands are not allowed to open an account on sportsbet.io |
|
|
|
Actually this is what I get when I try with my userID !
You cannot see your merit history, because you hadn't received any merit until the last update. Merits history are updated once a week. As it shown in your merit summary, you have received two merits in the current week. So, you be able to see your received and sent merits in the next update. The last update was on November 29. So, the next update will be on December 06. Edit: So basically I tried this to see if is there sMerits sent from my account for the time it was hacked, (lost for more than two years, just recovered on 28th November), I founded 141 sMerits, from 500 I think.
So do that mean that the sMerits lost are goes just for not using them ?
You can visit BPIP to check your sent merits. Also, your sent merits in the last 120 days are shown in your merit summary |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
