why's that, explain
With PPS pools, you get paid by the shares you submit, not when the pool finds a block. Those usually come with a small fee as the operator is covering the variance for you. A few pools like Clipse's pool and Coinsauce offer fee-less rates though. A DGM pool like OZcoin, EMC.. is the best bet for you if you consider multiple issues. The total hashrate of the pool is irrelevant in the payout - the more isn't considered as the best. The variance is low, and they usually don't charge a fee. The payout is slow at first but slowly builds up to be constant later on. |
|
|
|
|
If it's a hacker, he would've cleared your address.
|
|
|
|
I use bitcoincharts with the function: =Index(ImportHTML("http://bitcoincharts.com/"&"?workaround="&INT(NOW()*1E3)&REPT(GoogleFinance("GOOG");0),"table",4),2,2)That'll cause the newest price to be downloaded, and be refreshed damn fast.  |
|
|
|
'Updated' this thread.  |
|
|
|
should be at least 1mh  Could be around 2000KH/s (2MH/s) but you're wasting your time. You won't even find a share with that. |
|
|
|
Deepbit literally asks for 5-8% of your earnings, but with Slush it's only limited to 2%, is it my best bet?
If you take a look at the 'Pool' subforum, you'll see that most of them offer 0% fees. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=41.0 |
|
|
|
Is lastpass better than blockchain
Both are fundamentally different things. LastPass is a password manager, and the blockchain is Bitcoin's ledger. Unless you mean blockchain.info's wallet services - you can use LastPass to help generate and remember the password you have for your blockchain.info's wallet. |
|
|
|
The next move has to be down.
Care to give a rational explanation for this? Have any fundamentals changed since the rise from $2 to $8? I didn't mean the very next move. But this is going to pop soon. Yeah, I hope so.  *prays to the bear god* Disclaimer: I wanted to buy, but my second money influx missed it. |
|
|
|
I slept, I woke, I saw the money in MT.Gox and I saw the price. NUOOOOO!!!! I wanted to buy yesterday! *buys now* |
|
|
|
from the command line in guiminer type
poclbm.exe
and see what it says - you will probably need to point the device to the card
i.e.
-d1
Use this. If I open poclbm.exe in the guiminer folder it closes itself immediatly after opening...
Run using CMD as RaTTuS said above. |
|
|
|
Please note that CPU and Nvidia mining is VERY SLOW, you are just wasting time and electricity
An ATI is much faster
Yeah i know that, for that i want to change to GPU but i dont know how... It's impossible to change the GPU for most laptops. |
|
|
|
|
No one knows as no one bothered to test. It should be measured in KH/s not MH/s.
|
|
|
|
Voted. |
|
|
|
If you are right, why say Intel is not selling "special for Bitcoin" ASIC-on-one-chip right now ?!
They are in better position, than some marginal lab from the basement.
Keep in mind that Bitcoin is still experimental, and Intel will have a lot of hard questions to answer if they pour millions of research dollars into something that later turns out to be a complete failure. All is possible, only probability of some of the options is a bitch  but i like your "i am in this box forever !" style of thinking !  What "box" are you talking about? CPUs and GPUs are general-purpose devices. A special-purpose device will always be more efficient than a general-purpose one, simply by not requiring the overhead of functionality which is not needed for the purpose in question. The idea that an function can be devised for a general-purpose machine that cannot be better performed by a machine specifically designed for that function is laughable. If anyone's stuck in a box, it's the people who insist on using CPUs when more efficient devices exist. A CPU exists to do anything you can program, and do an average job of it. If you want to do one thing only, and do that thing well, a specialised device really is the answer. "more security" ?!
yes, let's put security of the coinnet into the hands of the Big Money, which will buy majority
of the ASICs, will it be REALLY so good ?!
The "Big Money" could equally well buy a huge number of CPUs, so what's your point? In fact, they wouldn't even need to buy their CPUs: any "CPU-friendly" coin is also ipso facto "botnet-friendly". Will that be really so good?This exactly. CPU-friendly coins run the inherent risk of being mined using botnets. Hell, even GPU-friendly coins (the stage where bitcoin is still at now) are mined tremendously by botnets. IIRC a reddit post said the botnet controller earned over a couple of k's per week from his bitcoin mining botnet. |
|
|
|
You really have *no* idea what password you used? Did you wake up in back-alley this morning? :-)
You seem to be looking for a fast way to crack the encryption. Realize that if someone was able to provide you witih this, it would mean wallet encryption was fatally broken. And all signs says it isn't.
Exactly. Wallet-stealer < wallet.dat encryption. |
|
|
|
There goes 1.7k of the wall. It's down to 3k from the ~8k I saw 4 hours ago. Better grab your coins while they're cheap. +1 we may rise and come back near here but I dont believe we will stay in this range for months. Time to get on or get left in the dust buying in at much higher prices. Down to 1.8k... |
|
|
|
But, theoretically, we have possibility to design the mining algo, which :
1) will not give substantial speed up on GPUs against CPUs.
and at the same time
2) will make construction of ASIC or FPGA or any specialased hardware
VERy-VERY expensive task ( i.e. economically impossible ).
Your CPU is an ASIC too. |
|
|
|
There goes 1.7k of the wall. It's down to 3k from the ~8k I saw 4 hours ago. Better grab your coins while they're cheap. |
|
|
|
Do you roughly remember the password ? Like in the words used? If not, it's generally uncrackable.
how to do ,crack it Lol, its hopeless to help. 10 password combination containing words, numbers, capitalization, and special symbols.But I have written a password dictionary You mean a complete password list? IIRC, even with that plus the help of a couple Amazon instances you'll take ages to find it. A 10 password, 62 charset dictionary would span across 3-4k TB's. A 8 word pass with the 62 charset takes 1787 TB in space alone. Not to mention that the passphrase is converted into the AES key by doing more then 10,000 SHA-256 operations. See this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85495.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
