Latest posts of: Quickseller

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 752 »

4861

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ===►Maidak scammed me 400$ BTC,this time is for sure===►

on: February 09, 2017, 06:26:46 AM

Quote from: killyou72 on February 09, 2017, 06:03:00 AM I hate to revive a dead thread but I figured I would update everyone it looks like derrik goon has really gone MIA. The phone number I had for him stopped working a while ago and if you call his google voice number it just rings and rings. I suspect that he probably got new phone number(s), and changed(?) his google voice number to forward to a number that he no longer uses. This is not uncommon behavior for deadbeat debtors. Maidak had opened several threads with business proposals that involved him potentially being entrusted with very large amounts of other people's money all not long before he was called out on being a scammer, so there is little doubt in my mind that that he was planning a long con exit scam.

4862

Economy / Lending / Re: 0.15 BTC for short term

on: February 09, 2017, 05:38:57 AM

Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 05:07:48 AM Quote from: Quickseller on February 09, 2017, 05:01:38 AM Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 04:49:53 AM Quote from: Quickseller on February 09, 2017, 03:33:05 AM Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 02:15:43 AM Number of BTC is required: 0.015 BTC Reason: repayment of court costs You have $15 in court costs? This sounds low to me for court costs. What court are you having to pay Court costs in? What was your infraction? we can, and 1 dollar to the court file, for our country $ 10 is a lot, as many receive a month 50-250 dollars if there are statistics that the average income of Russians 800-1000 dollars a month or 8000-12000 dollars a year, it is a fraud. a year many are 500-1000 dollars, such people about 30,000,000-100,000,000 people in the country, if not more. Are you in Russia/are you paying your court costs to a Russian court? If so, what Russian court specifically are you having to pay, and what is your infraction that the court has decided to impose a $35 find onto you? largest communications provider, Rostelecom, I ihnimi services, do not use for a long time, but as the amount kopilas, remove suing bestolku they always win, as the courts are not far away. I think that part of your post is not in English, and I am unable to entirely translate what you are saying to my native language, however from what I can gather, it looks like your post contradicts with your OP.

4863

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [SCAM][UNSOLVED] BTC-E.COM REFUSING TO UNLOCK MY ACCOUNT (thousands of dollars)

on: February 09, 2017, 05:09:18 AM

Quote from: Steven009 on February 09, 2017, 02:56:23 AM Quote from: Quickseller on February 02, 2017, 01:26:49 PM Walletexplorer is showing that the address is a btc-e address and I would generally consider wallet explorer to be reliable. @btc-e.com we're all waiting for you to prove/disprove such claimed evidence. This is unsettled business. Maybe you should explain why your screenshot of your wallet is showing a payment of 480BTC in regards to 2c9b59d2cd4cf153908435a10109d94bb5f664a443165810630f1074c8347df6 when it should show 499.990BTC. You clearly do not understand how Bitcoin works well enough to produce doctored screenshots that match up to how they should look. However based on the above inconsistency, I think it is fair to say that you are producing fake screenshots. Quote from: pbleak on February 02, 2017, 10:42:25 PM How much is in the account? It has been claimed to be over 480BTC (over $510,000) Quote from: pbleak on February 02, 2017, 10:42:25 PM Dark net fake passports (physical) are expensive. It would make zero sense for someone to try scam the notoriously obscure btc-e this way when they could just pull all kinds of easy scams based on an entirely false identity. I will take your word that they are "expensive" although I would doubt that they cost 5% of the amount in the account.

4864

Economy / Lending / Re: 0.15 BTC for short term

on: February 09, 2017, 05:01:38 AM

Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 04:49:53 AM Quote from: Quickseller on February 09, 2017, 03:33:05 AM Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 02:15:43 AM Number of BTC is required: 0.015 BTC Reason: repayment of court costs You have $15 in court costs? This sounds low to me for court costs. What court are you having to pay Court costs in? What was your infraction? we can, and 1 dollar to the court file, for our country $ 10 is a lot, as many receive a month 50-250 dollars if there are statistics that the average income of Russians 800-1000 dollars a month or 8000-12000 dollars a year, it is a fraud. a year many are 500-1000 dollars, such people about 30,000,000-100,000,000 people in the country, if not more. Are you in Russia/are you paying your court costs to a Russian court? If so, what Russian court specifically are you having to pay, and what is your infraction that the court has decided to impose a $35 find onto you?

4865

Other / Meta / Re: Is this one a new feature added?

on: February 09, 2017, 04:38:33 AM

Quote from: irfan_pak10 on February 08, 2017, 07:48:50 PM I just checked my profile and i think its the new feature added in our profile isn't it? "Show the last topics started by this person." or im missing something? Quote from: Cyrus on January 29, 2017, 12:30:58 AM Quote from: Lutpin on January 28, 2017, 05:36:01 PM There's been a few updates lately. Not sure how old it is, but for examle the profile pages have been updated recently aswell (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile). Recently created topics ("Show the last topics started by this person.") were not available via direct link before. That feature was recently added. Before that, there was a 'hidden' public page, but it's easier to check this way. Actually that's why it was introduced, so that anyone could easily see and report a duplicate thread.

4866

Other / Beginners & Help / Re: All you need to know about Unconfirmed transactions and what to do about them.

on: February 09, 2017, 04:31:48 AM

Quote from: Coding Enthusiast on February 07, 2017, 12:36:01 PM Quote from: Quickseller on February 05, 2017, 06:30:37 AM I believe that you can use CPFP if you are the sender to the extent that your transaction sends change to an address whose private key(s) you control. Technically speaking it should be possible, as long as you own the private key to one of the outputs in order to spend it. But I didn't put it under "Sender" section because as a sender there are better options such as opt-in RBF. I think it is worth mentioning here that Electrum will have CPFP feature in its new release (2. along with SegWit support. I think that "better" is a fairly subjective term. I think it is probably fair to say that RBF is a fairly controversial "feature" and that some people may not want to utilize this feature because of these controversies. I would point out that some companies/services are willing to accept 0/unconfirmed transactions under a certain set of circumstances, and I imagine that one criteria would likely be that the transaction in question is not a RBF transaction (nor does it depend on a RBF transaction that has < a certain number of confirmations). For example, Gemini will accept 0/unconfirmed deposits under an undisclosed set of circumstances (and with certain restrictions -- they also require identity verification prior to allowing users to use their exchange), and I imagine that they will not accept a RBF transaction that is 0/unconfirmed.

4867

Economy / Lending / Re: 0.15 BTC for short term

on: February 09, 2017, 03:33:05 AM

Quote from: genrijst on February 09, 2017, 02:15:43 AM Number of BTC is required: 0.015 BTC Reason: repayment of court costs You have $15 in court costs? This sounds low to me for court costs. What court are you having to pay Court costs in? What was your infraction?

4868

Economy / Services / Re: Paying for a quick bootstrap designer

on: February 08, 2017, 12:44:53 AM

The $3 reward is really not worth it for the amount of work the OP is wanting, especially considering the skill set necessary. IIRC, theymos offered a 0.25BTC bounty for a not much more complex problem. The OP also has not sent the prize money to escrow, if you are considering to participate, then you might want to request that escrow be funded prior to starting work so you know you will be paid

4869

Economy / Reputation / Re: 'Vod' gave me wrong feedback

on: February 08, 2017, 12:39:29 AM

OP - you explicitly said that you were planning on stealing from some entity. If you actually did (will actually do) what you said you wanted to do, then you would likely be criminally charged if your identity could be discovered. You don't have much of a defense here. All the BS about "trust is an opinion and therefore is never wrong" is well BS, and an attempt to silence those not in power.

4870

Economy / Services / Re: AT&T 22% discount on wireless bill, lifetime!

on: February 08, 2017, 12:18:19 AM

Quote from: Mr_Get_That_Money on February 04, 2017, 03:56:55 PM Paypal and BTC are available as payment options. Quote from: Mr_Get_That_Money on February 04, 2017, 03:56:55 PM I accept PayPal only for now. You are making two contradictory statements. Are you accepting BTC?

4871

Economy / Gambling / Re: BetKing.io - 20% Rakeback Christmas Bonus - Most trusted Bitcoin Dice site

on: February 07, 2017, 07:24:29 PM

Quote from: Johnny00 on February 07, 2017, 07:16:56 PM is anyone invested in the bankroll of this site? how is it doing? No and closed (honorably).

4872

Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: There is any Bitcoin "products" for Banks?

on: February 07, 2017, 07:11:00 AM

It is my understanding that banks are more interested in blockchain technology than Bitcoin itself. From what I have read, banks seem to be interested in using blockchain technology to settle trades between repetitive trading partners.

4873

Economy / Lending / Re: offering lending service, accepting accounts and raiblocks

on: February 07, 2017, 07:02:41 AM

If a potential borrower is unable to give a reason why they need the loan (regardless of their reputation) that matches the situation when asked, then there is a decent chance the loan will not be repaid. This will generally not matter if the loan is secured by collateral (the lender can simply sell the collateral to cover the loan in the event of a default), however it is important for no collateral loans.

4874

Economy / Lending / Re: offering lending service, accepting accounts and raiblocks

on: February 07, 2017, 06:36:21 AM

Banks generally will not give a loan without a stated reason that will somehow benefit the borrower. This is especially the case for no collateral loans (signature loans). This is part of responsible lending and helps gauge the chances of repayment.

4875

Other / Meta / Re: Suggestions for 200th ad round?

on: February 07, 2017, 05:28:01 AM

I would say either something like this, or instead of having 10 slots, have 50/100 slots (or some other large amount) with each slot being displayed less frequently; there could be some kind of limit as to how many slots each person can bid on so that more people have the opportunity to advertise. edit: I also like the idea that whoever wins the auction would get a donator tag (although I would find it unlikely this will be implemented). edit2: Maybe bidders can bid on theymos' signature space

4876

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [List]Twitter Campaign And Cheater/Double Campaign on Twitter Campaign *Updated

on: February 07, 2017, 03:31:07 AM

lol, I think you are misusing the word "cheater" in the title of your thread.

4877

Economy / Exchanges / Re: selling bitcoin (localbitcoins)

on: February 07, 2017, 01:31:48 AM

Quote from: PersonG on February 07, 2017, 01:29:03 AM Hello i want to sell my bitcoins in localbitcoins and receive my money in paypal but i read there are scammers can chargeback the money after i send the my bitcoins can you please inform me how to protect myself as a seller when i sell any bitcoins ? You really can't. You will generally need to charge a higher premium when dealing with PayPal in order to account for the risk of chargebacks. However IMO, no premium is high enough to account for this risk (that is also low enough for those acting legitimately will be willing to buy from you).

4878

Economy / Reputation / Re: Requesting proof of trade between Zepher and TMAN[Zepher engaging in fake trades

on: February 06, 2017, 04:53:46 PM

Quote from: shorena on February 06, 2017, 10:12:31 AM Quote from: Zepher on February 05, 2017, 10:43:29 PM -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.62 Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto wcFMA3C2UgBFI0XNARAAthmI473Zd7WN2PG75fZPEYslgPkDBvk7JG2SRZzyV/Av w/1ZXYGRXcoBLKn6w0QJXXYa2OUCY+CkAJE3c2QmfAj/5G1JIsx6Xrdm1Ukt4c3M 9emH/v2Wfu2iB8Zg0gB92GmSZT9480VbCMXOV7laGbzJhgt0RzcMRE0VEjOpvqLG 91EYNnqrz/9OqMspFmcHO5OcUpY/+gkij5XGDlhFGByqrI+H/NTxkt73ubHd45sE 9Rg6685YFF6cUttVpUzD2TKvVV8oFm8vunuC6VSH0Eb0yyG+O1nqO9IBYgwdRLum Oh0+pNCn2RAxpMugNAVMO2/UlO/wtuMskYakcBY5CPcjflpqpS0zP1GPoG5OrbG9 FkDAQ78UpKQI6Fl/oerBpBDCufj37xm8/3qt+blpllZ9AVEwgSuVOwjOPGzu8hOV O0SZuaIFu4kaAtJtwD7kiIFDWBdR4cWzIRKYOPr7JuJXsZIHNC4qvyuBrqcnVOHQ xHb4Tud8szY/eY/hNT+tUfOu05ikLT8zpw7KnYMMFZvMVdzNCNU7jymf3Rh9F5sA xmFqN4l4MU/O+Ie/HykTAOzK/rMh9mk08e9BIVKPrf/5DexABdRk4LEDv41HaGi5 3q1dC0mG9t55RL9mVNKSOoxpVJGhIxPBo1s+f1iYnK0VORpeo/sgZJUTiFQzZ1nB wEwDraAg5r7prPcBB/wP519v0fudkngDtnydIPKd8kUJQ7PcEajQbIc2KHwCBnz1 +j6LlaX14ZzFryQ6/7TvBhynl7j+8mkd7Kvwj6kTIVpAbQzLjSvP50yablBwIv2a j/7ebAFdAZvv6n2UVWyCfqADyVjYkjzr+HrD7NEVL22Xs2ROs90x+HlvJFau7taY qsTqTg84hq5pd3R0sTqf2492tKvZhAHYjpngb1i/zDPoamZjA+BkFoiOoFuOd8NR rqYJ1k15o9R+xVnsNoVfjT9hnsALMBKv7sKBANOAMm/UIgdlcQ+ydoiwmWfID9A1 Yu/dG1s5wip7QdpCAuE4Qb2Wq5gSVNRicQ8L/gey0sNcAYUo9r9q7xbOtUCnAkxB QCTynVHe+PEV5H5nAjds8UC4DXG3j7KQtWgdYS9S8PwCS0mTMcwRZHR0mSWYE6Iw NseMlocxfqGdErxFsL33Grld2a90OgBJ7j/J3thrb6Sp+rW+cyiny1KaFirDXu1b hQS9U4m7WJOHex/gnOo1n5HXyKzjnBJSBCyVowWVfxwjKVNfLJ6TDM1bsY5Ra3A+ jOuUNhQ15DhnipAy1lvdY/Xp95PACmuTgpdHp6Ofytbd6symxSvBtbXasNl1Eqpx dFt4WI+1Jo2FBEy9yQDMfq33sp3700xmfUGL/ulSx7Wypjhbt7E+LFUm9n3fDWtz qExKEqk+KSWNFHaTg/eBo97XqRr6Q+kaLnuEAO0CF+2LsyOfJOrllIDVc4UCVkM2 Mr92IhikNpmjAMZtZ+U5bajoe/0jqcjPSfyU0Lq5MpbAdmhukGmzW0Bgz1D2c80q 4+nkGkNzTJd/amQtnCNHNFOjiIcddJFPZ/0V/Rb2LcUdefSzBoAhhfG/Ene7TudN oJb3OEJyCcG3OrSeJy/JofcvyDnma6wKhNRIcMYLfsVV2mZaYowEH4jA3XWcDZqF b0P00MSoN5SCpkG+qPokdEh+05KviOx9lZoITJcGhzJsQ0/kpgZOZ2YAKq/zLrKV CXQ5DSN2sBVMvNjnDnBcfD38R+neBqpzkVjNZdu+cxxjAh6lnn/7inKeUIaW70LQ vwEBoZo9hOfL57RBSK7aZ87Wc93ZC8IWyf+H1FBVn2gH2bpWe+DKB37ynOtI5R6F NPyhCYCdIY/SJ/qFUqk2bdr6TcuMmoM0ThqBvukn2YuQGdrf9S+4cqty+vWQUL51 c15sG17xeFJnYON2bktUdnk9wFozrU+gO5FzQ43R2YP0kehjeFS4Mvou5d8CV28G JZ4JFXjesVqCVqC5SYpfJLfwpZ7gBHztNMPeRWLSBS/ijT2cxjKT1gHdtuJDpaq7 pYYVseuBHM5IT1ALtZGOYdiRyX+WP/7P4YGxerxV37IghPJ0vgGp/a5hS76CTcj4 QEfSlrSHIhzLEyl91lsFy1/HhuWF9QzHaepgjHlx7O7aAm5AtsHxbCDELu9foBQH 9Lwc3VGOQg0I5D+gAyskRYuoCF/bYiGQYcYVYVzzMElQIDHYIEdt6reRrczYVyks ChGqV4C9mtCcS7dYETlPTCvV4/xuvFrNFsbOWvqeuhRuHSiZB2Vxr2QqpoHKQGHx ZcrDI8ChPKBjp3VZEnB/XBJNCwivUPHz0Eg7+proZTpfD4N41RWD8zqHbch9jwid HPJjHelH8iwyXuDBOhNynNeT566EyvKLmoeKlhQNIBWmPq2Y/hQMkuokFcdzZVmh 7ZLeSoifc2Sb4XekYQn+EQkx8/qsh7lOo+HhUoU= =+1i7 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- The above information is signed with the PGP Key on my profile, and only Shorena can decrypt it. Thanks Code: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 This is shorena from bitcointalk.org and today is Februar 6th of 2017. I have received the above encrypted message from Zepher which shows reasonable evidence of a trade by moved funds. As requested within the message I have removed all local copies[1]. [1] The files have been overwritten 3 times with random data before I deleted them, see output below. The system uses an SSD, so there is a slight chance the data can be recovered regardless. Considering what I use this machine for I have personal interest to avoid this from happening. The file from today is this message. ?:~/?/PGP/Zepher$ ls -all insgesamt 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:52 . drwx------ 29 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:46 .. - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 2640 Feb 6 10:46 zepher.2017.02.05 - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 981 Feb 6 10:46 zepher.2017.02.05.2 - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 240 Feb 6 10:52 zepher.2017.02.06 ?:~/?/PGP/Zepher$ shred -vzn 3 zepher.2017.02.05* shred: zepher.2017.02.05: Durchgang 1/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05: Durchgang 2/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05: Durchgang 3/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05: Durchgang 4/4 (000000)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05.2: Durchgang 1/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05.2: Durchgang 2/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05.2: Durchgang 3/4 (random)... shred: zepher.2017.02.05.2: Durchgang 4/4 (000000)... ?:~/?/PGP/Zepher$ ls -all insgesamt 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:52 . drwx------ 29 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:46 .. - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:54 zepher.2017.02.05 - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 4096 Feb 6 10:54 zepher.2017.02.05.2 - -rw-r--r-- 1 sho sho 240 Feb 6 10:52 zepher.2017.02.06 ?:~/?/PGP/Zepher$ hexdump -C zepher.2017.02.05 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 \|................\| * 00001000 ?:~/?/PGP/Zepher$ hexdump -C zepher.2017.02.05.2 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 \|................\| * 00001000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYmEr7AAoJEJQKF9u9a2jih7YP/0HBpUFjC83Enipr1FePNfKo 9DzzG/FOOuRwpbQOYrSuXhfqfVq8TlmYUJZGYaal36J+cnIY4syygXE7PaFY5LAH oUo/tmsOM9zhG+60A4nNzwJIRvvlwiDU9qwZ7CpQPe2LyMRyzReHckUNzNdo2G0a h0nMxOHYoGJojiWLwL0IXwLBlS0/MCCW+z81rBBysmo39z764BYEgjTIJ+EW7XY9 QN0royfwKhu5bOqIxKB9BQQbVtJ3nsw4ZQ4wxE/YqX3MyR6jzpb3xc54VT6cKyFv de4771S0nIn7BO7N37R6WWL+8wO58ea9Rt3LLtw3i/lH9p/q+91HiOLQNzPhCWDk a8wGgKyicGNFNwzyy+oGOKGIu7tfthhAQwmHjnKS9fOglx9o/duvx1fBdXJF/74L dsY+j2IF4cTEF46z8uzosuRBX2Vn8NPaoaVtzqRnph7A53j8j543dVRYeBesRS9g p3O7VfKbEBQl3Kfxc7fhd3UIL5LH2eIuRr5KYd/fyNPD/Fy3GSANjUnfHoU1gmSA jC0kEtu4LOTZ4+A8IERDt2xIWBk5P5x0rfUDuuJD6lyV2Yq3ukGUnF7ES2pqCNfa qaL9/fxCal3UgOVVNwYY/BMddmOxazQh1vDkZOxlxDZjB545JwiFA3ShZEjGZkbO 5SqRYEys4Yj7YQBwjrot =9VUg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I hope this settles it. Reasonable evidence that zepher was the sender of said transaction? That a third party was the receipant of said transaction? Is the timeframe of the transaction at or near the time the rating was left?

4879

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [LIST] Free EU bank accounts that you can be opened directly online

on: February 06, 2017, 04:57:04 AM

Do you have any information about any of the banks' capital in relation to their total deposits and total assets? Or do you know if this information is fairly easily obtainable from a reliable source somewhere?

4880

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [LIST] Free EU bank accounts that you can be opened directly online

on: February 06, 2017, 04:39:30 AM

Could you possibly add some information on the safety and soundness of these banks? In the US, banks are insured by the FDIC (up to $250,000), which is backed by the US government and depositors rarely lose money due to bank failures, however I understand this not to be the case with some banks in the EU(?).

Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 752 »