He's just going to tell you to read the op, but looking at your post history I'd say you'd be kicked off pretty fast. Read the op, improve your post quality and try again.

Edit: Pretty much your entire post history is farmed with Games and Rounds posts so I'm going to guess it'll be a long time if ever before you're allowed on this campaign.

Deleting evidence of an offense doesn't pardon you of it. You can't claim you were doing it as a test if you left the feedback there as you should have removed it at the time so this is just a silly excuse.

Because the level of spam coming from signature campaigns is unmanageable. You need to tackle the problem at the source. It's no good cutting the heads off a field full of weeds when they'll just spring right back. You need to nuke the entire field with weed killer. You need to destroy the root of the problem and that is currently lazy campaigns paying spammers. This is wholly the campaigns fault because if they didn't pay for shitposts nobody would be making them so if they continue to do this they need to go.

I asked if there were any slots left because I wasn't sure if they had all been taken. The only person here who is cowardly is the person hiding behind a brand new throwaway account. You're likely doing this because the quality of your posts would invalidate all your arguments against me. I also think it's likely you were denied from the very same campaign hence the butthurt.

Theymos mentioned the possibility of a chat board of some sort where posts are not counted whilst discussing what to do with the wall observer thread. I don't know whether it would be a good idea or not but as others have said if you want to chat join an irc room or something.

Not really,  but oftentimes people want trust for all the wrong reasons and look to exploit it. I'm not saying that's the case here but trust is earned over time and with effort so you shouldn't be just quickly seeking it out so you can say "hey,  look, I'm trusted". To me that usually has the opposite effect. Offer services and be an active member and you'll become trusted over time regardless of how many trusted feedback you have.

I've seen that happen too. It's usually their alt accounts... sorry "friends". Friends who are probably just using the same ips/proxy and get caught using the same bitcoin addresses  .


Yep. I've been accused of being racist myself but the race card is only pulled when they don't have an argument. I've seen a fair few reports from Turkish users complaining about "racism" over the years. You check the report and it's something along the lines of merely having the word Turkish in there or exposing their alt accounts and they're trying to desperately get it removed on the grounds of it being racist because the person included as evidence that all accounts were Turkish lol.

You can only get trusted feedback from people who are on default trust but this isn't something you should seek out. Every single person here has started off in the same boat as you and you build and earn trust over time. Be an active member and do a lot of successful trades or services and you'll likely get that feedback, but your name and reputation will mean more to people around here than a mere trusted green feedback.

Yes, I am Lauda. I am also Quickselller, BadBear,  theymos, tomotacage and the CIA as has been previously alleged amongst others I've forgotten.

And Lauda isn't a female.

There seems to be a couple of campaign managers who are getting greedy and taking on far too many campaigns  and/or users. It's practically impossible to look after a campaign with several hundred users unless you're doing this full time but this has become pretty standard practice for most ico campaigns but even worse is most of them don't even have a manager at all. Poorly run campaigns and their managers (if they even have one) should meet the same fate as sig spammers and be banned if they can't run their campaign adequately.

Have any campaigns Jamal has run not paid out?

I actually agree with Lauda's comments here. The Turkish community does seem to be one massive circle jerk who usually can never take any sort of even vague criticism of themselves (and you can't deny it when you've pathetically created an alt to do exactly this). I've seen some utterly stupid nonsense come out of a fair few Turkish users (Eal included) when they've had their behaviour questioned (apparently everybody knows everybody in Turkey and can vouch for the others being legit and Turkish users don't have any alt accounts lol). I've seen things to this effect being said several times by several different Turkish users even when I know for a fact some of them have been lying (though I'm starting to suspect most of them belonged to the same person).

Lauda never asked me to put him on default or tag people but in my opinion him not being on default is detrimental to the community but of course scammers and shitposters he's tagged are going to be annoyed hence why you cowardly won't post from one of your main accounts.


What evidence do you have of me being lazy or less active because I'm not sure you could possibly know how much work I do behind the scenes.

As a general rule I usually ignore troll threads by cowards who use brand new accounts to hide behind but seeing as I'm going to get 0.00075 per post I'll make an exception and entertain you for as long as you like.

I would only be a hypocrite if I somehow degenerated into an illiterate shitposter spamming nonsense with dozens of accounts. In fact, I've publicly said quite a few times I wouldn't care if somebody had a hundred accounts as long as they made decent posts with them.

Does me being a global mod factor into getting a place on the campaign? Probably, but me being a global mod will factor into a lot of things I get offered here because I'm a prominent and somewhat trusted member. I asked him if there was a spot free for my alt and he said there would be if I applied, but I guess I can be trusted over some random other accounts to make at least somewhat half decent posts so I don't see the issue here.

As others have said, you're very likely just butthurt about having numerous shitposting accounts banned. Having two isn't against the rules and that account was originally created to use mainly on connections I didn't trust but I don't really use it anymore, but if I can use it to get paid a little extra a month and rank it up to Hero in the process then so be it.

Why not? You can buy it on DVD and it has its own imdb page so I think that's good enough:

http://kunaki.com/accounting/ShowproductDetail.asp?PID=PX00ATWU
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt4967386/

Hilariousetc
Posts: 241
1HYQFULRssNDffMMYEk4DtJjAch1LmV1bS

Thanks.

And you base this on what exactly? Bitcoin could easily fall by the wayside if a better functioning currency begins to dominate and that has way more likelihood of happening than going to a billion. There's no reason why it couldn't disappear like many failed at coins have so if there's no demand and a better alternative is available that could easily happen. You're a fool if you think bitcoin is indestructible or has little to no chance of becoming worthless. Even if bitcoin gained mainstream adoption worldwide and you could spend it practically anywhere you'd be lucky to get anywhere near 1 million never mind a billion.

In theory I agree with people being allowed to have multiple accounts if they want to keep certain opinions or business separate from their main/known account but people have massively abused the rule that you can have as many accounts as you wish. This is one reason why I suggested we should remove signatures from rank and make people pay a fee for them. This will instantly stop such industrial scale account farming. At the moment if somebody wants 1000 accounts they can easily create them all for free. Use a bot to copy and paste content and you can rank them all up with no time or effort wasted on your part whatsoever.

Not necessarily. Customs can seize items to check what they are or because they need to pay taxes on them. What country were they shipped to? That's the only way to confirm if it's legal or not.

Exactly. It's just that shitty crapcoin website trying to grab headlines.

From the article:


Even more relevant:


Bitcoin has more chance of going to zero than a billion.

True,  but I have actually seen at least one company stop offering it due to lack of interest (though I can't recall which one right now). Though I agree offering it isn't going to hurt and will always either get them some free publicity as well as pique people's interest in btc once they see that they accept it as payment.

It might not be stable now but there's no reason why it can't stabilise in the future. Bitcoin is still relatively new and unheard of idea to most of the world so it will likely just be seen as a risky speculative investment for a while yet but that can easily change over time.


This can and will be changed. Bitcoin can scale to meet the demands of growth (though getting consensus is a different matter).