I think there is a way the quality of posts is checked because in the recent past, many users have been removed from the campaign for spamming and poor quality posts.
But not by any bot. hilariousandco started overlooking the campaign and went through all participants to weed out spammers.
|
|
|
Introducing the OneHash.com Frontier Signature Campaign
If you want to learn more about the website, you can visit the official bitcointalk thread.
Please note, that this is only the frontier phase of our signature campaign. If it proves successful, we intend to start a bigger campaign with a broader range of ranks. For now, in this little frontier stage, we are only looking for a small group of users.Sadly, this campaign is discontinued up until further notice. Thanks for being with us.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361815.msg14164531#msg14164531
We are currently looking for 3 senior members for the frontier period of this signature campaign. They will be paid 0.03BTC weekly, with a minimum of 20 eligible posts per week. Payouts are every friday and will be made by OneHash directly. This campaign will be managed by me on behalf of OneHash.com. A spreadsheet for the campaign can be found here: GoogleDocs. The following rules and terms apply to the campaign:- only constructive posts will be counted as eligible - we don't allow users to enroll into this campaign with more than one account - posts with less than 100 characters in length won't be counted as eligible - users with valid negative trust can not join this campaign. You will be banned if you recieve negative trust during the campaing period - enrolled users are not allowed to advertise any other site in their signature / personal text / avatar - if you modify or remove your signature, you will not be paid - in case of a ban from the forum, you might be kicked from the campaign without payment - the only language of posts we count as eligible is English, posts that are not written in English wont be counted - users must post during the whole period, if you only posts for one or two days, you might be denied payment or recieve only a cutted payment - The following posts are excluded from this campaign: Posts in the sections Off-topic, Games&Rounds, Politics&Society, Beginners&Help, aswell as archival and local subforums - Also excluded are posts in any campaign thread, promotion or giveaway and the "Stake your bitcoin address"-thread - A maximum of 4 posts in Meta will be counted - adjustments of these rules can be made by OneHash or the campaign manager right after each round - the decision of the campaign manager is final How to join?1. Make an enrollment posts, stating that you are interested to join the campaign. 2. If you are accepted, you will recieve a PM with a personalized signature code, put it in place. 3. Make a second enrollment post in the following formant: Username/UID: Current number of posts: Bitcoin Address to send the payment: And here's our official signature code: █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
|
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| | OneHash.com |
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| |
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| |
|
[center][table][tr][td][size=2pt][color=#00a99d] █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td] [td][size=2pt] [color=#393c47] █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td][td][/td][td][url=https://www.onehash.com/][size=29pt][b][color=#00A99D] OneHash.com [/color][/b][/size][/url][/td][td][table][tr][td][size=2pt] [color=#393c47] █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td] [td][size=2pt] [color=#00a99d]█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td] [td][center][url=https://www.onehash.com/][size=15pt] [b][color=#393c47]mutual bitcoin betting ● high odds ● no account needed [/color][/b] [size=10pt] [b][color=#ff8400] ▼ Champions League ▲▼ Basketball ▲▼ Hockey ▲▼ Copa Libertadores ▲ [/color][/b][/size][/size][/url][/center][/td] [td][size=2pt] [color=#393c47] █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td] [td][size=2pt][color=#ff8400]█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ [/td][td][/td][/tr][/table][/center] You can optionally also wear our avatar: LinkAswell as the personal text: All I need is OneHash
|
|
|
Two more reserved posts added thanks to theymos, should be enough for the next couple of months. Guess, I gotta manage the list now that Lutpin is mad because I didn't go for his idea ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Nope, at least not for that reason. Currently am busy with exams.
|
|
|
I just love how they cut the rates ober and over again, but their thread-title still says "INCREASED PAYOUT". That's some straight up click-baiting. Maybe they will add something like "TITS inside" in the future, to catch even more atention. No hate though, big fan of the campaign myself. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fz513j1k.png&t=663&c=T-SvZqXR2HPieg) Sorry, you were saying something?
|
|
|
Perhaps instead of forcibly or otherwise deleting posts, start a new thread that is locked and that becomes the reference post while this becomes the reporting post?
I support a 2 thread solution aswell. One for reports and discussion (this one, continuing as it is) and one for the listings themselves. That's also what I suggested to mexxer in PMs. But I'm not going to decide this over mexxer-2s head, as he's the one who started the thread, and we're currently also discussing over another thing, so it's going to take a little more time.
|
|
|
All the same, if you do not disclose that you are going to cause negative rep once sold, by posting in this manner, you are being dishonest. Not attacking the profit angle, just the current thread. Fact account had earned trust and now has negative can directly be corralated to this thread. So strategy to angle is in play.
But redsn0w is neither the original owner, nor the one who created this thread. If you buy an account out of a defaulted loan, you have to at least know that it will come up sooner or later. I'm sure redsn0w didn't lie about the reason why he was selling the account.
|
|
|
Cross posting from the other thread: Sorry for your loss, but while account trades are tolerated here, they are strongly discouraged, in part because we do not enforce/broker account sales. In most cases, the original owner of the account is the legitimate owner forever as far as forum administration is concerned. (Though if we happen to come across some pretty clear evidence that an account is sold by its owner, we're not going to intentionally help the original owner scam the account back. But neither are we going to put much effort into preventing this.) I restored Jude Austin to its original owner. I don't see any evidence for or against the original owner scamming the buyer out of 0.6 BTC. It's possible, but on the other hand the password hashes are known to have been leaked, so if Jude Austin's password was weak, it is possible for it to have been cracked.
|
|
|
what the fuck ? remove -ve feedback, NOW ! i'm not a scammer ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) . The account doesnt deserve any feedback at all. You didnt do any of the trades. Yes of course, I don't deserve any feedback 'cause it's a fault of the original owner. He hasn't paid back the loan before the deadline. You neither deserve any positive feedback (at least not yet). And the negative from Danny Hamilton is only to counter the current 2 positive feedbacks from DT your account has. You also don't deserve the position on DT3 your account currently still has.
|
|
|
one of those alt have negative trust so his other alts should get negative too
Even more interesting is that several of his alts are banned for signature spamming. "montello, Abora, catlinhappy, nicojuritz"
|
|
|
I think I see a mistake in writing the payment rate please check or let me know if it is true ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Has been fixed now, thanks for pointing it out. Are the weekly requirements the same, though? Or should we consider different time intervals from now on?
Hey have been lowered a bit, new requirements are in the OP. Also, are there gonna be 2 tweets picked (one for each week) or just one for the whole period?
There will be at least one every round, maybe a second one, depending on how good the tweets overall are. If I think we should reward 2 tweets, I will do that. But I won't search for an "outstanding tweet" just to get a second one I can put a bonus to.
Anyways, I've selected the new roster. Will PM everyone who has been enrolled in a bit.
|
|
|
Establishing an exchange service with one of your other accounts didn't work? Couldn't do that from chalkboard99? I precisely like the signature on that one "Unable to post!! Posting info soon on new account."
|
|
|
Does that mean that the account hacker and the ponzi btcsprout are connected? As in the same person behind both?
If Wardrick confirms, that this is indeed the transaction relating to the exchange with the Jude Austin account, yes, that is what I am implying. I can also connect a few more bitcointalk accounts to those addresses, but I haven't got the time right now to post all the connections properly.
|
|
|
Already posted above: If you check OP, it's an fairly old account "November 13, 2012, 02:34:34 AM", he started with that one here, then changed to "Jude Austin", which is presumably his real name, and became Legendary with that account. Before starting this thread, Ltcfaucet was inactive since "April 23, 2013, 05:10:00 PM".
|
|
|
I already give you the proofs. And still you are not neg repping wouchsack and you are even depending him.
"depending" or did you mean "defending"? I don't see suchmoon defending anyone is this situation. I only see holes in your story and suchmoon trying to fill them, asking question where you leave unclear/vague answers. Is wouchsack account your alt?
Oh, now you're making a fool out of yourself.
|
|
|
Could you yet again confirm, that you had no control over your account from the January 22nd foreward? Because this is getting interesting. The new "owner" had a sucessful trade with Wardrick on the 28th. From the risked amount in his feedback (0.12btc), the date and Wardricks known addresses (had an exchange with him myself shortly later), I believe this is the related transaction. Funds come from 13QZqN9KQQZhs2VNfgNUzw4DWW4Pn31uwJ, an address which is part of a fairly large wallet. For example, it is connected to the address 1BSPTMigMqYsjm3rn6Fu76DNADcuaEUR8G via this transaction.
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- The user Jude Austin is a stolen account! -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1PoXwtXNP5xTbQEvYiARNBjRAEQa55UTPN HOsS9IJY6x8JmkWndMM2iDMwsikKG0FDpFpVcLUT2TqW2rq6tOE4K/QmbFxTq3BE/lbjCz4MOkEWo1EngcyWTAk= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Verified using electrum, negative feedback left. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jude Austin is a stolen account! -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1dP6ckGUJXWMM3ib277gNyvUd9gkgzqfC HFeNwJtZqjWkdI/mhOa/kL9m8gO31j130AqGhZSQHLzhzMt2u49L5IbQFbQzE/T2U+KsB/l1kI/UqfbLLMsNz0c= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
That one checks out aswell. Archives of both posts in case they get edited: http://archive.is/yOAoN#selection-4107.37-4107.71http://archive.is/YrUN9#selection-835.15-835.48
|
|
|
|