|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified, I have 2 open slots for member-full member
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that a participant in a campaign I manage applied for the Livecoin campaign. I will not be tagging participants for wearing or applying to the Livecoin campaign, but I will remove anyone from a campaign I manage who tries joining Livecoin and helping advertise the site. considering blacklisting them from my campaigns.
I get it, users want to earn some bitcoin. There are other campaigns to apply for, besides campaigns that are proven to be scamming users though. I do not think that tagging participants is the answer but I do believe if they are willing to help a scam site out then they are not trustworthy. If other DT members tag them, I wouldn't be surprised. It's really like gambling when applying for the campaign. Is it worth it? I will be compiling a spreadsheet of everyone who applies for livecoin and considering blacklisting them from my campaigns.
The Livecoin issue is a pretty serious issue and they need to resolve their issues before trying to advertise on the forum. I personally have not had an issue with the exchange. Used them many times, but as you all know they will keep your coins hostage and make you delete negative press before even considering dealing with you. That's a load of shit period. Users are allowed to have an opinion, positive or negative.
|
|
|
|
I guess since Livecoin is considered a high paying campaign, I don't think they will pay a cheap amount to whoever manage it.
I have never been a campaign manager but I believe managing a campaign is not easy especially if the manager will do the job properly which is to monitor spam posts.
Considering the reputation they have earned here so far, I doubt they will focus on monitoring spam post or really want to manage a very high quality campaign. They will just look for some exposures. it's possible they messaged for permission. Can't say for sure but it is possible. Someone should message the pony
You granted permission recently to another user if I am not wrong. Correct, long as a company or manager messages me ahead of time, i'm pretty lenient on someone copying my format. If they don't message me then it's pretty shitty of them and deserves a plagiarism ban. Not like it's hard to make your own format of rules. |
|
|
|
Let's see if this is enough to get him banned for plagiarism: Copy: * No negative Trust.
* Minimum 8 Post & Maximum 50 to be eligible for payment.
* Minimum 90 characters
* If any participant removes signature during the campaign, will not receive payment.
* Users may not advertise any other site.
* Post in following boards will not count - Games & Rounds, Economics, Off-topic, Politics & Society. Original: * No negative Trust.
* Minimum 25 Post to be eligible for payment.
* Minimum 90 characters
* If any participant removes signature during the campaign, will not receive payment.
* Users may not advertise any other site.
* Post in following boards will not count - Games & Rounds, Economics, Off topic, Lending, Auctions, Meta, Politics & Society, Beginners and help, Archival, Investor based games, Local boards, or Micro earnings. it's possible they messaged for permission. Can't say for sure but it is possible. Someone should message the pony |
|
|
|
I wonder who is managing the campaign  Are you implying Hhampuz made new account? I want to be on record as it's not me managing. |
|
|
|
I'm considering everything and do not really like the idea of a smear campaign myself.
There are "smear campaigns" and then there's the exposing of ugly truths. If what they want to do is the latter, and it's relevant to whatever the ICO is trying to do, then I'd say go for it. But if they're trying to do a smear campaign a la politics, I wouldn't support that. I'm not sure about libel, but I doubt anyone involved would even go that route, especially if the ICO is shady. In any case, it doesn't sound too hot to me. Why did they contact you, or did I miss that part? Edit: So they want you to manage a campaign against another project? Not sure if I understood your last post correctly. If I did, and I were you I'd not take part in this. Your reputation might get sullied by this--that's what my gut is telling me. From what I understand, they want to bring awareness to users that the project is a ponzi. My contact info is posted in my managers thread and my signature space, so getting in touch with me isn't hard. I'll likely pass on the project period, but this issue has never come up for me before so I wanted community opinions on it. |
|
|
|
Maybe you should think why they are willing to spend so much money on the campaign.
Because the best way to promote a Ponzi is by investing in marketing, if the Ponzi grows fast then they could run faster with their filled pockets. If they don't invest in marketing then will be hard for the Ponzi to grow. In this scenario i think you can run the campaign Yahoo, at the end is a job for you, but there are two issues: 1.- You are a trusted user in the community, for sure you will not feel good while you promote a business like this because at the end a lot of people will lose their money. 2.- People could think you are part of that team and could tag you with neg. trust. Is a complex situation, is a job offer but isn't ethic at all. Do you read what I posted? I'm not trying to advertise for the company, the campaign would be to advertise AGAINST the company. It's not about a job at all. I'm gonna eat either way. I'm not some poor manager who is desperate for a job at all. I want to make sure anything I do or think about doing is #1 not against forum rules/policies. As well as #2 i'm not legally at fault for anything that may/may not come of this. #3 the community is for/against this type of campaigning. |
|
|
|
Maybe you should think why they are willing to spend so much money on the campaign.
Same thought came into my mind, what's the gain for the user in question, what'll he/she profit from spending thousand in this campaign maybe he/she is also a apart of similar business operation and just trying to eliminate their competitor by exposing them through the campaign. A reasonable user with no other intention would had just started an accusation thread. There's more to the story then what the users is just telling you therefore I would advice you distance yourself from the campaign as their intentions aren't genuine. Maybe you should think why they are willing to spend so much money on the campaign.
I'm considering everything and do not really like the idea of a smear campaign myself. I have tried pushing them towards just opening a scam accusation thread or a thread here in reputation and letting people post opinions. Looking for opinions period as to how people feel about this. Doesn't matter if the opinion is positive or negative, post it. I would like to see as many opinions/thoughts as possible. |
|
|
|
|
I was approached by a user in regards to a possible Ponzi ICO. They want to run a smear campaign(will not disclose the ICO yet). Users posting on the company facebook page, twitter, making blogs, etc.
I advised them that opening a scam accusation was the best route and likely morally the best route. Not to mention, running this smear campaign could possibly cost them thousands of dollars, but they are ok with it.
So the question is, is this morally ethical? Does bitcointalk prohibit it? Does libel come into play? Slander? I'm still filtering through all the evidence brought to me, but assuming it's true, should this be allowed?
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet has been turned in to owner, Congrats to JSRAW, ralle14, creeps, and maxreish for this weeks bonuses
|
|
|
|
Simply the best campaign manager, I have been lucky enough to work alongside Yahoo for over a year now on MB8COIN campaign, Give him a shout and it’ll be the best decision you made to have the best of the best running your campaign.
Thanks Mel. Can't ever get enough positive comments. |
|
|
|
|
Full member slot has been occupied, there is still 1 member slot open. Note to all applicant, if you're a person who posts every minute -5 minutes when posting DO NOT APPLY. Just wasting yours and my time. If you're account has not been active for at least the last 3 months DO NOT APPLY. I'm looking for active members.
|
|
|
|
|
His actions just show casinos and other businesses the type of mentality and type of behavior to expect when he approaches them.
The user really deserves a ban for trolling with his recent trust explosion, though the mods rarely enforce that rule.
I read through the other thread on him and the 5btc bounty thread. He refuses to show evidence of anything really. I also doubt he has 5 btc to escrow, so noone will ever be able to claim the bounty for proof of him scamming.
His recent trust abuse may not be a monetary scam but it is definitely scamming every user he tagged. Message me for my address and pay me the 5btc
|
|
|
|
Sorry but i do not support campaign jumping. You were in and left, I won't let you back. |
|
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified, 1 open full member slot and 1 open member slot
|
|
|
|
|
I can vouch for this user. I have worked with Melanie for over a year on the Mb8coin project. Very professional and responsive in the community chat. Also has experience helping with webinars and zoom meetings.
If you need a professional community manager, give her a shout.
|
|
|
|
This pretty much comes down to a double scam honestly. The OP tried sending 1 kind of token and pass it off as another, while the receiver just took the token and disappeared.
They are practically the same thing though. The official website states that they can be converted to each other via the app and OP seemed to make it clear that ripplecanavari had to download the Infinitus app to store the tokens/credits. Did he ever mention that he was giving the ERC20 version?
He agreed to offer me the loan but I need some small collateral as a symbolism if 10$ or 20$, but I responded negative. I just told him I have Infinitus tokens listed on Coinmarketcap in my mobile app ready to be integrated to ERC 20 token so I will sell them, a Total of 1500 INF worth 900 USD.
You're correct, saved him there I suppose. |
|
|
|
|
This pretty much comes down to a double scam honestly. The OP tried sending 1 kind of token and pass it off as another, while the receiver just took the token and disappeared. (Corrected by Darkstar_)
They both deserve a tag IMO and will receive 1 from me. Even if the situation is resolved I do not believe the tag on the OP should be removed as he is trying to deceive users when trading. Dishonest trading should be tagged period. (OP tag removed)
On a side note, If users would be smart and use escrow, we wouldn't be reading this thread. Although it cannot be enforced, escrow should be a must. Why risk 100s of dollars possibly when you can pay a .5%-3% fee and trade safely?
|
|
|
|
|
3399eaaa9916048ec5c4defbaa808f2e7b267c0e336118c900b1f5cb1a25c9a5 140$ traded with LeGaulois
|
|
|
|
open 400+ available
c2d3c58b13e8cf38cc705429784d472e63cc0e9d9435f16d4ed429ebcad06f2f 100$ traded with what1005
1:1 rates against TUSD? What is TUSD? True USD, a stablecoin. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/trueusd/I can also do 1:1 on Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC). Sorry but i'm only looking for Btc, Eth, Doge, ETC, XLM, LTC, Digibyte, XRP, BCH |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
