You're bumping this thread with your imaginations and defaming me without proofs
No. I'm waiting for your remaining army of alts to start attacking me soon. I 'member you privately asking for a spot in my campaign. 
Thanks hilariousetc for the reveal, and OP for self-admitting your mischief. |
|
|
|
I managed waves for months, They sent me bitcoin on my own wallet, same as coinsbank they sent me hundreds of thousands dollars on my bitcoin address during their campaigns,
You aren't competent enough to manage a campaign with 10 accounts, let alone one the size of the Waves campaign. Thus, those also indicators of some shady, behind the scene, deals especially given that the campaign literally had every kind of shitposter in it. Never stole their BTC nor I farmed.
 Its a slander to say that I famed in waves without a proof watch-out !
Open a dictionary, go to the letter 'L' and find the definition of the word 'likely'. Nice threat, by the way. |
|
|
|
Yep, my initial post was supportive. He negged my account for posting a supportive comment on an open forum thread.
This is what surprised me the most though. I would have expected him to neg. rate you, given the indicators of a sold/hacked accounts, if you had posted a comment supporting TMAN's accusation. However, you did the exact opposite. his neg trust got me booted from a signature campaign and it will keep me out of any future campaigns.
Yeah. It is not likely that you're going to get enrolled anywhere. |
|
|
|
Accuses me of trust abuse, and yet you do this. That sweet irony. There's no reason to give me negative trust because, I own a lot of accounts in the past.
Yup, like Waves doesn't have a ton of farmed accounts in there. A lot of those are likely owned by you. |
|
|
|
 Account farming and now lying, because you did use them for abusing a giveaway. Do not PM me again. |
|
|
|
For selling various, non bitcointalk, accounts. However, all kinds of account sales belong in that section. It was primarily made because of the sheer amount of threads appearing in the main section. I know most part of them are scammers that's right, anyway my question still, Trading bitcointalk account is legal or illegal ?
Legality is debatable. If so, the ones who gave negative trust to those who try to trade accounts, are abusing trust system ?
Absolutely not, and just asking that question is ridiculous. Do not trade accounts. All those accounts got hacked, I don't control them. By the way I didn't use them in anything illegal
Do you realize how you just contradicted yourself? I created those accounts at 2015, this thread describing that farming accounts is legal in 2016 I replied to him, I didn't do anything illegal, I stopped working on them 2015, they all have same password and someone hacked them. Abusing a giveaway and farming accounts. I wonder how many of your own accounts were enrolled in the Waves campaign. |
|
|
|
Great to hear that campaign will be running for another 4 or 5 weeks. I like how it is handled (Thanks to Lauda) and would not like having to search for a new one.
It may run even longer, but I'll notify the participants in this thread whenever a change happens. Note: I plan on doing my 30 posts a week, etc,etc
But been posting a LOT In the BTC speculation thread...it is just TOO DAMN MUCH FUN...watching stuff fly thru ATH for BTC!
...
As much fun as that thread may be, especially in times of bull runs, remember that there are no signatures shown there. |
|
|
|
One note on this. Mining ostensibly works in the best interest of the users, but since mining functions purely by profit incentive, it will never be true.
I disagree, especially as 'never' is very strong wording. If they can't be held accountable, miners will steal from users.
Legal action? PoW change? Of course they can be held accountable. So it should come as no surprise that really entrenched miners like Bitmain tried to paint the narrative such that they were saving users from high fees, when they were really trying to establish AsicBoost and maintain control over the block size limit themselves.
Bitmain, aka Jihan is a PBOC agent thus you shouldn't expect him to act reasonably. I recently read about the infamous antbleed and some other Bitmain related stuff.
Bitmain is just corrupt evil. Do these clowns really think that they can do whatever they want and Bitcoin will remain the invincible king? Cryptos are here to stay. But whenever a coin gets wrecked it is quickly forgotten. Nothing is too big to fail! IMO Bitmain has permanently destroyed their own reputation through stupid greed. And guess what, there are lots of competitors chomping at the bit to replace them.
Bitcoin will not fall from this, thus using 'nothing is too big to fall' and similar in this context is wrong. If it were to fall, all other PoW coins would be worthless. Awfully interesting project. Obviously not a scam. I will keep an eye on this.
Classic shitpost. |
|
|
|
Third Concerning the rules (Case 3), I believe that most rules in general are the same, or at least have the same structure. Here is Lauda's Coinpayments Signature Campaign, where you can find that his rules are also very similar to your's and Tactic's. Some things are re-worded to suit the particular campaign, but some items are the same: No alternate accounts. Anyone found to be enrolling with multiple accounts will be kicked out with no pay. Some things are just very nicely worded to the extend that they should not be forcibly rewritten. However, blatantly copying almost everything is a no-no unless you've explicitly asked for their permission and received it. Unless you are inclined to accuse Lauda of the same crime, I don't see why having similarly structured rules, which only helps users grasp the campaign's rules faster, is an issue. Case 3 - very fine line.
Must stuff is derived from my own campaigns and comparison of clarity between my own text and other people's text. He can not possibly accuse me of doing the same as I was not directly leeching off of his stuff. I can't say the same for Tactic.
Side question: Who is Tactic and why is he managing a campaign? |
|
|
|
thank you. it is work in progress. i updated the guide with more code and formatted the pictures.
as soon as i can use GB XT will update it again.
Sounds good. XT should be usable very soon, even though it has already been quite some time since we've been waiting for it. |
|
|
|
If someone who promotes ponzi gets negative trust, I will not do that because it harms my account trust.
You've already received negative ratings because of it, thus it is too late 'not to do that' now. What do I need to do to get my trust not to be negative Not do anything shady for a very long time, as well as try contributing to the community in various ways. However, there is no certainty that your ratings will ever be removed. |
|
|
|
I never deserved it to begin with. I started out poite enough and explained myself to nasty when i really had no reason to do so. He has gotten his rocks off on it. What exactly did he neg me for....changing my PW, taking a break from the forum? Now he added some bs about me trolling. The dude (nasty) is a flat out bully.
Well, your name randomly popping up in that scam accusation against OgNasty was strange to me as well. I did look into your account, but wasn't too sure about tagging you. What exactly is the infraction that was committed to warrant a neg ?
Well, people interpret stuff differently and thus also respond differently. He abused his rank to ruin my account, and yet he claims i am attempting to ruin his name and projects he is involved in, when in fact he did this to me.
Did you? I either have missed out on that or you did not. I thought your first comment about OgNasty was supportive, but now I can't seem to find it. |
|
|
|
I saw the resets, not confidence inspiring but maybe explainable. I asked all 3 accounts to respond.
The resets are likely to be confirmatory for malevolent behavior, e.g. could be hacked and thus a "why not" attempt. Hey KWH and OP
I got a message from cryptoboy.architect saying some members are spamming his selling thread and trying to scam him anyways i've deleted all my neg trust for them and i will now give neg trust to cryptoboy.architect for misleading and scam attempts
Thank you.
You got a PM from a random member and you gave another member a negative rating just like that due to his request? I find that hard to believe. |
|
|
|
Let me get this straight: He is not asking for anything in return other than *force* you to complete a trade with him? A PayPal trade that is?
I'd like to get input from KWH or similar. I'll PM.
Looks like extortion to me. Why else would someone leave a Negative then want to complete a trade for the Negative removal? I just wanted a second opinion before proceeding. There's also this: Trust summary for cryptoboy.architect
This user's password was reset recently.
This user's email address was changed recently.
|
|
|
|
I wanna stake my Bitcoin account here, but I have a question: How to generate the signature for my Bitcoin account like the above?
1) There is no such thing as a "Bitcoin account". 2) Read this guide: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0. |
|
|
|
A very expensive lesson. The only person at fault here is yourself, and your lack of knowledge. Someone with a good understanding of Bitcoin wouldn't touch a website asking for a key, seed or anything of that kind with a 10 foot pole. Another way of donating is, by using your address for faucet references.
That is against the rules. I claim from faucets every day ...
Those are a waste of time. You're better off working minimum wage.
Are there any forum accounts linked with this? |
|
|
|
|
Let me get this straight: He is not asking for anything in return other than *force* you to complete a trade with him? A PayPal trade that is?
I'd like to get input from KWH or similar. I'll PM.
|
|
|
|
1) Fix your format: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
2) Provide proof that said Skype username belongs to the accused user. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
