|
Thanks for making the list, I was thinking of doing something similar after coming across the one Loyce's mobile UID mentioned (in my sig too).
Will advise if I come across any.
|
|
|
|
Hello, this is quite surprising to me. The thing is that I don't have any relation with the user Demlom. I have read his posts and the only thing I can say is that is not my responsability that someone does not know how to use an internet forum. I don't know what he was trying to do, maybe he copied my post to write his account details and he forgot to do it, I don't know, but that is not my fault and I can't do anything about it. The only thing I know is that my account and that one have no relation at all, so this case is a false positive because of someone who doesn't know to use an internet forum maybe because he doesn't even know to tie his shoes.
Perhaps that is true - we can only sit back and see if the other UID does it again. BTW - it is not necessary to quote an entire post to then reply to it. A simple: ...
is suffice. |
|
|
|
You could create a three by three table and the outside cells are black with a full stop and the center cell holds the data.
| . | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ | . | | . | Your data goes here | . | | . | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ | . |
[table][tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][center]Your data goes here[/center][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[/table] Regards, *edit* Not sure why the left column has gone haywire... |
|
|
|
|
All of the above transactions are the mobile phone Eclair wallet.
The link from Loyce was a web page to enter the /12/24 passwords and delve into the various wallet addresses. My mistake is I don't seem to have written down the passwords for the Eclair wallet in question.
the dust in the LN for the three channels open is the held for closing funds, so there wouldn't be any point in closing those three which are all now max inbound. I'm wondering if the two "unconfirmed" channels (that have been confirmed on the block-chain) are still in operation and might still work with the inbound channels? If a stray TX were to come via any of the three inbounds and go out via the two "unconfirmed" channels, then I could simply leave the Eclair wallet running from time to time and then shift any inbound back out again?
|
|
|
|
Speaking of Quickseller:
PrimeNumber7:
|
|
|
|
It's the only on chain LN test transaction incoming in weeks. I only sent 0.1 t BTC on-chain: ac7b33813049d3dc9530ac16505a5fc209165cc4e702a2787ab8b1dfe22d4f2a. ~ then it's as lost as the nearly 0.01 on the mainnet Eclair. Can you post txids for those transactions? I don't think it's going to help much, but I'm curious where the funds went. After all, on-chain funds can't disappear.
OK, there's 0.00432483 that is a lost TX sent 8394ba975c7cbde33af61873bd467055cbb8e7e6192054b93a7415065157eb23 from my tablet Eclair to my mobile phone Eclair. (mentioned in PM previously to LoyceV) Then there are two "unconfirmed" TX for channels being opened 0.0010528 TX 7da61cc308c27a2e70e9fcf114a2a44425a87e833dcf9fde59457940ebb897770.0010801 TX bda728fcee84f76ccc193a156786bcee4475c69171e81cbb9aa6e0449a34c9a1then I have on my Eclair mobile phone - on the block-chain 0.00251849 the last two TX outbound from the on-chain wallet are 0.00010495 TX 71b778d03b7893b73ac743a04bbccea76fe93ce49bd5964b0541ea8e395aaf810.0010765 TX c3caaed89b5595d79d102734748837a9c5891a27aa2c2bd7ca1fb41e2f2c33b8and finally some dust in the three open channels - I've managed in the last two days to slowly withdraw just over 0.0015 to a "Blue" Wallet which is a whole other post about how I am growing to like Blue, but I share LoyceV's concerns about the proprietary aspect of the "Blue" wallet structure.
In saying all of the above transactions, - the 0.00432483 shows as confirmed on the block-chain, but did not "appear" in the Eclair wallet.
- the 0.0010528 channel shows as "unconfirmed" on Eclair but confirmed on the block-chain
- the 0.0010801 channel shows as "unconfirmed" on Eclair but confirmed on the block-chain
- the on chain tx 0.00010495 arrived in the blue wallet as did
- the on chain tx 0.0010765 which also arrived in the Blue wallet.
I believe the unspent 0.00083229 change may not part of the block-chain 0.00251849 but I have nothing to show as evidence of that assertion.
There is a total of 0.00027500042 on the LN according to Eclair. (the three open channels I have managed to empty to my Blue wallet)
On my Blue wallet, I now have 0.0001 on chain and 0.00150845 on LN. (the latter got shifted in increasingly tiny amounts 1500 - 2500 sats, so there were more than a dozen TX's involved. All of these funds came from the mobile phone's Eclair wallet. The remaining balances are after these funds were sent)
It won't be a double spend then. Almost every time you do a double spend you have to know you've done it (on most wallets). I haven't found one that doesn't...
Can you find the 2of2 multisig address then? You should be able to see where the funds came back into your account and you can just send that address or txid then.
It'll have a multisig input script if you want to know what it'll look like on a blockchain explorer but anything in the link posted is enough for us to find it.
Loyce sent me a link to a diagnostic to delve into the back end of the wallet but I haven't been able to find what I was looking for.
Loyce also mentioned the check Eclair app feature - I've run it a couple of times and I'm still in the same situation. |
|
|
|
This is my alt for philipma1957
1956jUdYPFwiBSzt9AECdWj3KE4WV7taiM
I was going to make 1957phil...... for my main account. I found out it can't be done as I can not use i's in a btc address
Someone other then me (philipma1957) please quote this.
TIA
Please stop kidding. If the post is made by real philipma1957, it will be signed with a better message, right format, and with the address he already signed for his main.
This is good work on your part just happens to be healthy concern thanks. If you want I can put coin into my longtime address 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje take it out and move it to my alts address 1956jUdYPFwiBSzt9AECdWj3KE4WV7taiM then take it out and move it back to my main address phil
This is my alt for philipma1957
1956jUdYPFwiBSzt9AECdWj3KE4WV7taiM
I was going to make 1957phil...... for my main account. I found out it can't be done as I can not use i's in a btc address
Someone other then me (philipma1957) please quote this.
TIA
Please stop kidding. If the post is made by real philipma1957, it will be signed with a better message, right format, and with the address he already signed for his main. I'm not sure I'm following this series of posts, however, message quoted and Archived [1], [ 2] for prosperity. (...and yes, I did look on the previous page too) |
|
|
|
It's like the other thread talking about how many users have been on DT1 since day one. Statistically it's not possible and points to manipulation. I'm not sure what you mean: what is statistically not possible? We'll see... Thanks for doing this. |
|
|
|
|
Can you put a day counter on my page "number of days that user has been at -11" please?
It's like the other thread talking about how many users have been on DT1 since day one. Statistically it's not possible and points to manipulation.
|
|
|
|
Get to work wanker.
So you really *are* reading my posts... I suppose I should feel honoured...  |
|
|
|
What the fuck source of that thread is inside that link if you click you can see who is source, it is addition to their finding you prick. It is obvious. Jesus, here you go, edited with source for the source linking source. Happy now?
Going to ignore you now, you don't exist on this forum any more.
Thank you for modifying your post so that it has uniformity with the other posts by investigators in this thread.
You may recall your recent request to do an investigation on your behalf: Archive [ 1], [ 2] Accounts connected (if you don't mind @timelord for returning to this thread for a moment or two):
My investigations in the time I had free can be found in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg53418358#msg53418358 Archive [ 1], [ 2] |
|
|
|
That is not good enough for this thread. Please give proper credit to the original investigator. |
|
|
|
This must be our lucky day - cryptohunter is leaving, korner is leaving, CSW has finally proven to be the real Satoshi (one or all of those may not be true).
If only they were nuked... |
|
|
|
@marlboroza Please use the submission form that can be found in the OP of this thread. Please expand on your information concerning the wallet address - what overall wallet is it from and what other wallet addresses are there in that wallet. Are there any other connections via these wallet addresses? This link will further assist you in this task.
Also, you don't properly cite that you are expanding on others' ( @crairezx20 ) research. Archive [ 1], [ 2] Please acknowledge the OP of the thread you loosely cite by naming the OP of that thread. |
|
|
|
You're being sarcastic yet my history here is in no way related to my knowledge of Marriott rewards so it was really just a stupid comment.
How do you presume to know my travel itineraries, who I travel with and where I stay? |
|
|
|
Again, most of you clearly have no idea what you're talking about or anything about the Marriott rewards program.
Enlighten us Newbie with activity nine and zero merits. |
|
|
|
I must be the only one that can see:
Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence. Why would Bruno be nice to me as Phinnaeus Gage and a raging asshole as TOAA? Makes no sense.Regardless, TOAA already has a confirmed alt: cryptohunter. And as I said before, Bruno never kept his alts a secret or denied they were his. - same as when Bruno sold one account to SuchMoon and then carried on as though nothing had happened. |
|
|
|
They're not even cryptohunter. Not that cryptohunter wasn't a nobody, which he was.
I'm pretty sure they're the same person, and I've had a suspicion for a long time that that person is Bruno. Funny how one disappeared with a grudge against the forum and another appeared, also with a grudge against the forum.
I must be the only one that can see: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Archive [1] [2]
| abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Archive [1] [2] |  |  |
| | Name: YuTü.Co.in
Posts: 2200
Activity: 728
Merit: 346
Position: Sr. Member
Date Registered: 03 January 2015, 14:28:11
Last Active: 12 April 2019, 02:41:02
ICQ:
AIM:
MSN:
YIM:
Email: support@yutu.co.in
Website: YuTü.Co.in
Current Status: Offline Offline
Other contact info: http://yutu.co.in
Gender: Male
Age: 59
Location: Nashville, TN
Local Time: 14 January 2020, 22:43:21
Trust: +1 / =1 / -0
| Name: The-One-Above-All
Posts: 1066
Activity: 238
Merit: 56
Position: Member
Date Registered: 12 April 2019, 02:18:42
Last Active: Today at 14:45:20
ICQ:
AIM:
MSN:
YIM:
Email: hidden
Website:
Current Status: Offline Offline
Gender:
Age: N/A
Location:
Local Time: 15 January 2020, 05:44:11
Trust: # +0 / =0 / -17 |
In one of his latest thread he said that he won't return after 2 days. Just ignore him for the coming 48 hours and see if he is provably (dis)honest. We shall likely NOT return at all again after the next 2 days.
TOAA is NOT Bruno. No chance in hell. Take it from someone who knows Bruno personally that they're not the same person. Bruno never disappeared -- he was quite active in my BSV Scam Accusation thread as Phinnaeus Gage until very recently.
OK., thanks for stopping by. |
|
|
|
Not sure what this is supposed to mean or how it is constructive to this thread?
How do you figure Mariott points are valid collateral for a brand new user? What dollar value are they? Can you get one night in the penthouse with that amount, or is it more like the linen closet? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
