It's explained in the Copper Membership option so no worries about that. Just send BTC to the address you were given and that's about it.

Why should he give BTC back just because they know his address and a name?

When you look at their TOS, I don't see on what ground they demand the BTC back, as they say that "Orders, once executed, are final and irreversible." So, if orders are indeed irreversible once executed and if PDAX is just an exchange between the two users, how come they ask money back? Then again, we heard just one side of the story as he didn't share what exactly PDAX told him is the reason for wanting the BTC back so  there might be more than he is telling us.

Anyway, strange behavior from an exchange and if it's true what that guy is saying, I would contact the lawyer and let him deal with them.

This pretty much sums it up for me. Feels nice to reach yet another milestone, but we all knew it was matter of daay after all those good news so othing changes much really for me, I keep on hodling as before.




Both. This day will vbe remembered as the day BTC reached over 50,000 but in the same time it will keep on going as bitcoin is in price discovery mode. I seriously doubt that we will experience sudden dump after this, but even if that happens it's not a big deal. I am at the point where I don't care about dumps and corrections as I see it as an opportunity to acquire more BTC.

Don't let the door hit you on your way out. Even though we all know that this is just an attempt to get a little bit more attention and that you don't plan to actually leave. If you do, you wouldn't make yet another useless trolling topic like you just did in Meta section.

To be honest, if they removed Medium part of the bounty completely (why they removed that btw?) I can see some logic not to redistribute those tokens to something else, as they were meant for Medium part of the campaign. I was asking about parts of the campaign that are still there, and whether they recalculated spreadsheet because they removed some users.


Same thing happened in Telegram and Discord part of the bounty. For example, Telegram allocation supposed to be 10%, or 2,500 tokens but based on the spreadsheet only 2443 tokens were allocated. Maybe we are missing something here, but bounty manager should explain that disrepancy.

Kudos to Poolz team, they did the tetxbook version of bounty scam; delaying the bounty distribution in the the combination with removing large amount of bounty hunters. Not a surprise though when you see the Poolz token price, which keeps pumping.

I am curious about one thing; did they recalculate the whole spreadsheet after removing bounty hunters so those who stayed got more tokens, or they just basically reduced bounty pool by removing hunters?


That's obviously bullshit reason to remove bounty hunters, but if it wasn't for that, they would probably  find some other reason to pay less.

---

Just to add that I don't see how @Fatemblabla stole the coins when Poolz team is in charge of distribution.

Sijecanj je iza nas, evo i mjesecnog pregleda aktivnosti naseg boarda, doduse sa malim zakasnjenjem.

Podaci uz pomoc kojih sam napravio chartove te pokoji screenshot su preuzeti sa  @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboarda.

---

Broj postova  u periodu 01.1-31.1

Prosli mjesec smo napisali 865 postova, sto je neki nas prosjek u zadnje vrijeme. Na prvu se moze ciniti kao veliko povecanje u odnosu na prosli mjesec kad je po podacima napisano samo 304 posta, ali tu se cini mi se izgubilo dosta u nekim premjestajima tema pa taj broj nije bio realan odnos snaga.




A ovako se kreteao broj postova na nasem boardu  u zadnjih cca godinu dana. Kao sto s evidi , ovo je neka nasa prosjecna brojka. Izgleda da nazalost ovaj bull run i nije bas privukao nove clanove ili razbudio stare neaktivne kao sto smo se svi nadali/ocekivali, ali dobro.




A ovako izgleda kad se usporedimo sa ostalim boardovima. Po prilozenom se vidi da ni vecina ostalih boardova nije nesto aktivnija nego inace, tako da smo i dalje medju aktivnijima. Jedino ko tu strsi su Turci, koji su stvarno jako povecali broj postova te su vec treci mjesec za aredom na vrhu, ali posto njih ima jako puno i ne cudi takav  rast, a navodno i masovno prebacuju ustedjevinu u BTC zbog velike inflacije Turske Lire.

Ugavnom, mislim da se i dalje jako dobro "nosimo" sa u biti puno vecim boardovima.

---

Analiza merita za period 1.1 -31.1

U navedenom periodu na nasem boardu podijelilo se 143 merita sto je pad od otprilike 20 % u odnosu na razdoblje prije toga, te je ujedno i najmanji broj merita podijeljen u zadnjih sest mjeseci. Iskreno i ne cudi me pad jer je nekako prosli mjesec bilo manje kvalitetnih psotova no inace, valjda su svi fokusirani na ovaj bull run i profite pa se nema previse vremena palamuditi na forumu. Uostalom, gledam i po sebi jer mislim da nikad nisam bio manje aktivan na forumu nego prosli mjesec.




Evo i liste onih koji su slali i primali merit u navedenom razdoblju




Kad se gleda uspredba sa ostalim boardovim, i tu smo ocekivano pali u odnosu na prethodno razdoblje te smo tek deseti. Na vrhu je vec standardna ekipa kod kojih merita ima na bacanje.  Nema druge nego cekati da se @dkbit98 odobri merit aplikacija jer bez jos jednog merit sourca je nemoguce konstantno biti pri vrhu.




I za kraj serije chartova, slijedi usporedba nas i ostalih po pitanju merit/post ratia. Nakon par mjeseci u gornjem dijelu charta, polako klizimo prema nasem standardnom mjestu na zacelju, te nekako ovaj mjesec ocekujem da taj prosjek bude jos nizi.

---

Top 30 aktivnih  clanova domaceg boarda u periodu 1.1-31.1


Lista najaktivnijih domacih clanova u navedenom radoblju , koju sam napravio koristeci  @TryNinja Ninjastic Space. Kao i obicno, lista je ogranicena na top 30 clanova. Nije uopce bilo  sumnje tko je i ovaj mjesec na vrhu liste


1. slackovic [100]
2. btcltcdigger [79]
3. Trofo [69]
4. Daniel91 [58]
5. casperBGD [55]
6. dkbit98 [51]
7. FatFork [47]
8. sbogovac [47]
9. cryptofrka [40]
10. CroBoy12 [32]
11. Stalker22 [29]
12. Domchi [22]
13. Rikafip [20]
14. Pmalek [17]
15. marlboroza [15]
16. big_daddy [12]
17. -CryptoViking- [10]
18. Krastavac [10]
19. Nenad65 [10]
20. Toby71 [8]
21. dakky [8]
22. ovcijisir [7]
23. Pixavz [6]
24. antun2203 [6]
25. pFgdY6 [6]
26. atom21 [5]
27. freigeist [5]
28. MikeCro [4]
29. damba_ [4]
30. dzoni [4]

Yep, they definitely hired one of those "marketing agencies" to spam their thread nad fake the interest. Same accounts that are active in Beatbind are also working on another project on this list, Axentro so I am adding them to the list.

From what I could see, Beatbind is one of those projects that have no real use for crypto, but they probably hope that by introducing blockchain they will get some interest. At least team looks real and whitepaper not plagiarized, so there's that. IN other words, just another shitcoin that should be avoided.

I am not so sure that bitcoin will follow the same pattern like in 2017/2018, market situation is different as now we have way more institutional investors on board, making it very hard to predict when will this end. If you remember, few months ago we surpassed old all time high without much hype, bitcoin was going up slowly and steadily and beside some sudden jumps like the one after Elon Musk/Tesla stuff therefore I don't expect big dumps like in the early 2018.


That's what majority of people expect, but what I learned from bitcoin by now is that you have to be prepared for anything. It might seem that $115,000 is within the reach due all the hype and bullish news,, but even if that doesn't happen, I won't be disappointed/surprised.

Sure, we are supposed to belive newbie account that woke up after year and a half break and write his first post saying that scammy website is legit, instead beliveing the actual manufacturer of the miner when they said that its not available on the market yet. So, if that site is legit, why would they sell something that they don't have?

There is something fishy going on with majority of these miners scam threads made recently...

I've been using Kucoin for the last couple of years and so far I didn't have any issues whatsoever. I haven't tried /staking lending features though, I just used it to sell some altcoins and that's about it.

Regarding how would I rank exchanges based on the security(or at least feeling of security) I guess it would be Coinbase Pro>Binance>Kucoin.

This looks like an outright scam, and pretty bad one with all the classic signs:

• Promise of a high return? Check! (even though high apy is pretty much standard for almost every DeFi project)
• Making a fake team with a combination of stock and other people's photos? Check!
• Fake ranking on various ICO tracking sites like ICOBench, Foundico, ICORanker etc (you won't find Defi Gorups on those sites)? Check!
• Plagiarized whitepaper form another project (they took whitepaper from a project called Upbots) ? Check!

Tell your friends that they unfortunately invested in scam and don't let them talk you into investing into this too as everyone who invests in this will 100% certain loose the money. There is so little effort invested in this that scammers will probably just disappear after end of the sale, they won't bother with developing thisas they don't have anything of their own.

Prvo i osnovno, moras aktivno pisati. Vidim da si se nedavno prijavio za 777Coin u koji je inace dosta lako upasti, ali prije toga nisi bio aktivan skoro godinu dana, tako da ne cudi da nisi primljen. Osim toga, trebat ce ti i koji merit skupljen jer konkurencija zna biti zestoka (doduse sada i ne toliko ) a merit je cesto glavni faktor kod odlucivanja tko ce biti primljen.

Najveca prepreka  ce ti biti sto sto si tagan od DT membera, koliko vidim submitao si nesto sto nije tvoje za onaj 10th anniversary art contest. Ne ulazim u to jesi ili nisi kopirao, ali dok god ti taj tag bude vidljiv, tesko ces upasti u ijednu postenu BTC kampanju.

---

Jedna od najstarijih aktivnih kampanja na forumu, Cryptogames, ima jedno Hero mjesto slobodno. Placa se 65 USD tjedno +40 USD svaka cetiri tjedna za avatara. Lokalni postovi se ne broje. Pa eto mozda nije losa prilika za one koji zele igrati na sigurno.

Are you sure that you are banned, because according to bpip you aren't.

You got tagged for that post, and not banned. Also, I don't buy your explanation as I don't know who could understand "i can got amazon.de account's with stolen credit card put on it. I can sell you this account's for 30$" as " Be careful of such messages". Plain and simple, you advertised sale of accounts with stolen credit cards.

And you had to register on bitcointalk just to say that Cryptoasic is legit? Somehow I doubt your intentions here.

I just checked that website and among other things they are allegedly selling Linzhi Phoenix ETH miner as OP claimed, while Linzhi confirmed that all websites selling that miner are scams as that miner is not unavailable yet, therefore they can't sell them. What's even worse, they claim to have 22 of those miners in stock.

From Linzhi Telegram group

I don't think that someone will automatically think (or at least they shouldn't) that there is something wrong with your account just because you changed your email or password as you can do that for myriad of reasons. But if at the same time your posting history changes dramatically, then people might suspect that your account has been sold/hacked. If I am you I wouldn't worry much about it and just change it.

At least I hope that things on bitcointalk are not that bad that simple change of email/pass without any other standard signs of account ownership change can cause you issues.

To be honest, Curry doesn't have to prove squat to Ray Allen or anyone else for that matter, his numbers speak for themselves. Reggie Miller is one of the greatest shooters of all time, no questions about that, but Steph is on a different level, based on any metric available. Just the fact that it took him half the games Reggie needed to catch him on all time list while having higher percentage ( 4% higher) is enough to end that conversation.

Allen doesn't like the fact that he will be overpassed as the leader on the list of 3 points made very soon, most likely the next season if Steph remains healthy so now he is just talking bs.

I do agree that using Telegram bots for trading is very risky, but looks like Chatex is not just some unverified random scammy bot. I did some digging and seems like Dash partnered with Chatex to enable trade of Dash via their bot.
https://dashnews.org/chatex-p2p-cryptocurrency-exchange-telegram-bot-to-add-dash-with-instantsend/

Here is some more info about Chatex
https://chatex.com/faq/

That of course is not a sign of legitimacy and OP should due his own due diligence before using something as Telegram bot for exchanging currencies.

It's pretty long way from "we are going tp look into cryptocurrencies" to " we are going to accept cryptocurrencies". Naturally, no CEO (at least the one with some brain) will automatically say that he will never accept crypto so I see those more like going on with the current hype than seriously considering this. And even of they do, once they see the fees and transactions time they will probably give up on this idea. At lasted for now.

We can expect more similar rumours and speculations involving popular companies, like the one with Apple the other day.

Sorry to hear that. Projects can do what they want and will keep delaying distribution as much as they want probably until they are done with the dumping.

If their trading volume is legit (more than 2 million USD) they shouldnt even feel that 10% of bounty pool distribution which is worth approximately 70,000 USD, but we all know how easily that is faked.

As I said before, bounty hunters won't learn any lesson from this and projects&managers know that.