Hi bpovtmg,
I would like to request a BTC Lightning -> BTC exchange
[HAVE] : 0.00500000 BTC Lightning [WANT] : 0.00500000 BTC (On-Chain) - minus your commission [My BTC Address] : bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru
Thanks for the deal! Because it's the first one, you receive NET ZERO COMMISSION (transfer fees are also waived): [YOU SEND]: 0.00500000 BTC Lightning [YOU RECEIVE]: 0.00500000 BTC Please confirm and I will send out the funds right away. I confirm. Please send invoice for LN payment. Sent: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/5ade22d59c0af98821205a3f66d44875a78dcc3cf952ecaacbe9c6b3c5621ec0Please pay the invoice: lnbc5m1p0hwr32pp57kthst6ecjp88p33yasvdmzaxz0q928u2msq6exza7w55hqc4nksdqqcqzpgxq yz5vqsp58l22gjwv5vwn84ywces30z8t5mufcr92zmxw9hzr5r7h68g6a5fq9qy9qsqtrn7uc0lknem u2tsc3dea5xvfng6fhg4epqxzfg34p9mszr0am0ndqx04q04jzcnu4fge8lamcxv37njjpvycsnehzx ce9q32jvjm7qpph82me RECEIVED! I confirm that I received an on-chain transaction as well. I don't know how to share a payment transaction from BlueWallet, though.
|
|
|
Hi bpovtmg,
I would like to request a BTC Lightning -> BTC exchange
[HAVE] : 0.00500000 BTC Lightning [WANT] : 0.00500000 BTC (On-Chain) - minus your commission [My BTC Address] : bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru
Thanks for the deal! Because it's the first one, you receive NET ZERO COMMISSION (transfer fees are also waived): [YOU SEND]: 0.00500000 BTC Lightning [YOU RECEIVE]: 0.00500000 BTC Please confirm and I will send out the funds right away. I confirm. Please send invoice for LN payment.
|
|
|
... For your info, the Minephone has already been launched in some parts of Europe and soon to be launched everywhere on September. We would love to see what you got to say then. Till then, cheers and stay safe!
For your info, September has already passed and it is obvious that you have given us just another false promise. I would really love to see what you have to say now. BTW: As a campaign manager, maybe you should read the forum rules a bit. Or is that beyond your mental capacity? I'm sure forum moderators have some better work to do.
|
|
|
Hello! We support only LN deposits, but we are working to enable withdrawals too. At the moment, you can withdraw to BTC with the on-chain transaction.
If I understood correctly, the current setup allows small deposits via the Lightning network but withdrawal is only possible if we have a minimum of 0.001 BTC in the account and we are faced with a excessive fees of at least 10,000 sats? Isn't that contrary to the very idea of LN transactions? Either you support LN transactions or you don't! LN's main advantages are in terms of transaction speed and, more importantly, low transaction fees. I think it would be very beneficial for both parties to allow Lightning withdrawals as well.
|
|
|
Hi bpovtmg,
I would like to request a BTC Lightning -> BTC exchange
[HAVE] : 0.00500000 BTC Lightning [WANT] : 0.00500000 BTC (On-Chain) - minus your commission [My BTC Address] : bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru
|
|
|
As far as I understand BitKong allows LN deposits. Can we request a Lightning Network withdrawals, too? Is there a minimum withdrawal amount limit in this case?
More important will be the question how fast will they process a withdrawal? Somebody any experience? You can use the Lightning network, but if they have to manually review and approve withdrawals, and lets say pay ou in 40 hours, then it is pretty useless. I also can not find any company information on their site? Actually, I can't find any information regarding the LN withdrawal on their site. @Bitkong.me can you clarify a little bit on this issue?
|
|
|
Tower.bet username: FatFork
Thank you!
|
|
|
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2738899Current amount of posts (including this one): 866How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 95SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hruI am glad that the Bitamp campaign continues and it will be my pleasure to continue working together.
|
|
|
[...] But yeah, this fascination with life elsewhere doesn't make sense to me. The amount of time it would take for another society / civilization to get here would be insane. Nothing that is really possible with this level of technology.
The question of the origin of life remains one of the most challenging scientific issues of all time. This is one of the questions mankind has wrestled with since the dawn of time. The discovery of life 'elsewhere' may not completely solve this problem but it will certainly answer many important questions. In particular, is the origin of life a 'one time' event or has it happened (is happening) constantly around us? How widespread is life in the universe? And is there even a possibility of developing an intelligent life 'out there' in the vastness of the universe?
|
|
|
I would argue that the majority of the time, if you post an address in a quote, it won’t belong to you. I would suggest that any address posted inside a quote be excluded from being displayed if it does not also appear outside of a quote. To say this another way, the person must post the address outside of a quote for it to count to being in this list.
It does exclude addresses insides quotes. The only addresses that show up there are the ones you mentioned in the body of your post. It's much better now. But, I have another suggestion. How about excluding certain boards, for example: Scam Accusations and Reputation? That way it won't connect us to the scammer addresses we reported.
|
|
|
- Find addresses by author What about finding every known addresses an user has posted (BTC and ETH only) by searching for their username or checking their user page? Now you can!
This is a pretty nice update! I haven't explored everything yet. Some suggestions for finding addresses by author: - When listing ETH addresses, it also displays ETH transactions (TXIDs), perhaps the results should be filtered by string length - You should ignore the results that are within the quote tags (if possible) - Address grouping should not be case sensitive Otherwise, great job!
|
|
|
Anyway it was much more like earth before. No. Never. I suspect you are referring to a totally unscientific piece of dogma repeated by the climate alarmist crowd, that Venus is the result of global warming, greenhouse, blah-blah-blah.
Venus may have had a shallow liquid-water ocean and habitable surface temperatures for up to 2 billion years of its early history, according to computer modeling of the planet’s ancient climate by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. source: Venus May Once Have Been Habitable | NASA
|
|
|
When a chemical reaction or process resulting in an end product is not known, it would be unwise to suggest that life is the cause, simply because that is a cause we know of on Earth.
Because it was such a rare type of gas that required extreme conditions to form (as explained in the example of Jupiter), scientists were surprised by this discovery on Venus. Let's say biological origin is currently the most logical explanation. Of course, further exploration using probes and other methods is likely to follow to confirm or refute this hypothesis. As has already been proven, life on Earth flourishes even in the physical and chemical extremes that until recently were thought to be completely lifeless. Accordingly, I think the discovery of microbiological life in the higher atmosphere of Venus is not so unthinkable. Let's just remember that Venus in its history was a much more comfortable environment for life similar to that on our planet. It is possible that certain life forms (if they ever existed) have adapted over time to the extreme conditions as they are today.
|
|
|
Thank you @Hhampuz and @Bitamp.com! It will be a pleasure doing business with you again in the near future.
|
|
|
|