The fees shouldn't depend on the size of the withdrawal but solely on the current network congestion and if the casino has to break up multiple UTXOs to send you your coins. But what is the minimum amount that the casino allows to be withdrawn in BTC? Neither you nor Eternad mentioned that. Don't they post the information somewhere on the withdrawal page/tab like almost all other casinos?

Da, toga ima sigurno. Ikone je jednostavno promijeniti jer ima icon managera koji se mogu skinuti sa interneta i mijenjaj šta hočeš. Kad nisi siguran, uvijek može desni klik na dokument kojeg misliš otvoriti i Properties. Onda u tabu General mora da piše koja je vrsta datoteke bez obzira koji naziv nosi. Pošto govorimo o PDF dokumentu, treba da piše (.pdf) npr.

I am not sure what kind of posts and quality content you can generate in threads that discuss ways to become a god or reptilian, or his nonsense tips about immortality and the other types of unnecessary noise he was creating. Anyone discussing such things and relying on those posts to remain on a Bitcoin forum shouldn't be surprised if they notice plenty of post deletions. 

It's not all in Bitcoin. He posted a list previously. He owns Bitcoin and 9 other altcoins.

---

Since you are considering buying the new Ledger HW, I feel I should mention a few things.

Ledger together with Trezor are two of the most popular hardware wallet brands and they have sold millions of devices. I have been using a Ledger Nano S for years and have no problem with it. Ledger is closed-source though. They have suffered a hacking incident where private data from their customers were leaked and posted publicly. I am talking about names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. Private keys and seeds are not vulnerable. A lot of people lost their trust in Ledger because of this and the way they handled the entire situation. Take note though that Trezor also suffered a similar customer data leak, but on a smaller scale.

Now a little bit about their hardware wallets.

Nano S
A good and reliable little device that gets the job done. No batteries or Bluetooth and only supports USB connection.
It's biggest problem is the small internal memory. Right now, you can only have two crypto apps installed at the same time. This does not mean that you can't store the same coins and tokens as on the Nano X and Nano S+ because you can. But you will be required to uninstall and install the apps each time you want to interact with that particular coin. This is a process that takes 20-30 seconds.

Nano X
Works wirelessly via Bluetooth but can also be connected with a USB cable. Personally, the Bluetooth feature is a big turn off for me. This device has a bigger screen and more memory. It can hold up to 100 coins at the same time, so the installing/uninstalling you would have to do with the Nano S, isn't needed on Nano X.

Unfortunately, the new generations of the Nano X have several problems. Most notably are the issues with the batteries. It goes as far as getting a product you can't even charge or use at all.

Nano S Plus
Nano S Plus is a Nano S on steroids. Bigger screen, more memory in a similar package. The biggest problem with this one is that they were too hasty to release it. Because of that, it lacks (lacked) support for several assets. The same ones that work on the older devices. I am not sure at what stage they are in resolving those issues.
 
My favorite is still the Nano S. If it hadn't been for the security incident with customer data, I would still recommend buying it. But it's not only that. The Nano S is getting discontinued. It's no longer manufactured and they might drop support for it entirely in a few years. We don't know that. I would never buy the Nano X and I am uncertain about the Nano S Plus. The older generations of the Nano X were OK (battery-wise).  

Opasan je jer je dobar mamac za one koji ne znaju u šta se upuštaju i nemaju iskustva sa tim načinom trgovanja. Naravno greška je njihova što nisu prostudirali kako to da sa $10 mogu trgovati kao da imam $1000!?

Ti kad staviš pare na neku nogometnu utakmicu da će neko pobjediti, to je 90 minuta igre gdje možda dobiješ a možda izgubiš. Znat će se na kraju. Neka ovo bude simbolično za obično trgovanje. A zamisli sad situaciju da si se kladio na konačnog pobjednika, a tvoja ekipa skrivi penal u 8. minuti i kladionica ti već uzme pare i tretira tvoj listić kao gubitni. Neka ovo bude leverage trading.

Za one koji ne znaju kako je lako izgubiti novac leverage-om, naravno da je opasno. Ko to razumije i spreman je na taj rizik, onda nije. 

U UniJoin kampanji kod Hhampuz-a ima jedno slobodno mjesto.

[banned mixer] | What Matters is YOUR Privacy | Signature Campaign ~ 5x Sr.

Izgleda da ova kampanja nije još uvijek spomenuta u ovoj temi.

- Minimalno 20 postova tjedno.
- Maksimalno 10 postova u lokalnim forumima se ubraja u sedmičnu kvotu.
- Kampanja je za Sr. Membere ali može eventualno uključiti i druge rangove.
- Plaća se 0.002 BTC/tjedno.

Jedna moja bivša djevojka je bila hakirana prije dosta godina dok smo još bili zajedno. Ona stvarno nije imala blage veze o internet sigurnosti i nikad joj nisam dao da se služi mojim uređajima jer je nepažljiva. To je kod nje često izazivalo sumnju i dolazilo bi do svađe... ali to nije sad bitno.

Javlja se ona meni jedan dan i kaže neko mi je hakirao Facebook, možeš li mi pomoći? Šta je bilo? Kaže neko sa mog profila piše statuse i priča mi sa prijateljima. Kad stvarno, dok smo razgovarali, u naš razgovor se uključio i taj "haker" koji piše zajedno s njom sa njenog profila. Pitam je da li se može sjetiti šta je sve radili zadnjih dan-dva što bi moglo uzrokovati ovo sve. Naravno ona nema pojma ni šta je opasno za činiti i ni šta ne. Po njenoj aktivnosti sam vidio da je klikala i davala razne dozvole nekim scam stranicama i profilima tipa koji vaš prijatelj najviše čita vaše statuse, ko najviše pregledava vaš profil, ko vam najviše gleda fotografije i slične gluposti. To je siguran način da uhvatiš neki malware. Vjerovatno i ove Instagramuše klikaju na sve živo bez razmišljanja.

Hi blackjack.fun,

I would like to know what is the minimum withdrawal amount in your casino and how much are you charging your players in withdrawal fees?
I would check this myself on your site, but the information isn't public, and players who don't have any funds in their accounts can't open the withdrawal page.

In my thread about Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos, BlackJack.Fun is mentioned as not having any minimum amounts. Apparently, that's no longer the case. If you take a look at the last couple of posts in the linked thread, you will see that a player attempted to withdraw 0.0001 BTC, but he/she received a message that the amount is too small.   

Hmm, that's weird. Do you actually have a balance on Blackjack.fun or is your account empty when you are entering those amounts? I can't access the withdrawal page at all, probably because I haven't deposited to my account at all. I assume yours isn't since you can see the withdrawal page.

I will ask the question regarding the minimum withdrawal amounts in their ANN thread and see what's going on.

Great, thx for the confirmation and the screenshot. So Blackjack.fun didn't allow you to withdraw 0.00009 BTC, but 0.0001 BTC worked fine and didn't produce the error message saying the amount is too small?

Almost all of the popular ones that are being used are centralized except MakerDAO's DAI. DAI is a decentralized Ethereum-based token. You have probably seen mk4's thread on this subject: Most Stablecoins Can Be Frozen, Even in Your Own Wallets.



As you can see, DAI is the only one on the list that can't be frozen due to its decentralized nature. 

I honestly didn't know that. You live and learn I guess. The feature in the Personal Message Options only says "Allow newbies to send you PMs." I think theymos could have written it more clearly so everyone knows that if you tick the option, newbies won't be able to PM you, but you will also not be able to PM any newbies. You only get the complete picture if you read the thread he wrote.

Good call! If he isn't a bot, maybe we will see a complaint from the user in Meta soon. We haven't had one of those in a while. 

Converting Bitcoin to a stablecoin always works out great. Just look at Terra UST and how happy their investors are.
Don't you have to pay tax on the land you bought? You need to provide proof of payment so the government can assess if the land was bought/sold at a fair value. How is that going to work if you purchased the land using a payment method that is considered illegal in your country?  

Bitcoin has burn addresses. You can send BTC to these addresses but no one owns the private keys to spend from them. So that's Bitcoin's burn mechanism. You can google Proof of Burn or Bitcoin burn addresses for more information if you want.

I remember that someone said that some of these burn addresses were created by altcoin developers. I guess the goal is to remove a certain amount of BTC from the circulation to mint an X amount of altcoins. 

Are you ready for the best Bitcoin advice of the decade? Something that will change your life and resolve the scaling dilemma.
Here it comes, thank me later:


Stop using Bitcoin ALL OF YOU. It will become faster if no one uses it. Don't be so selfish, stop it before it's too late. If we don't use Bitcoin, the network will not be congested.
I would also like to add that you should stop driving your car. By not driving your car, you don't waste fuel and pay for petrol. If you don't waste fuel, there is no need for refueling.   

Make sure you like and subscribe to my YouTube channel for other life lessons.

I am a bit confused after reading your post. Are you using the profits from Bitcoin to invest in altcoins or the other way around? To me, it seems like Bitcoin is your way to get more altcoins. In that case, that's a pretty risky game you are playing. Everyone knows what's best for them, but I would personally never drop Bitcoin to adopt an alt and possibly a shitcoin created only to make a small group of developers and early investors/advocates rich.

He is at it again. This morning he created another copy-pasted thread from his shitwhole blog. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5404097.0
He obviously doesn't want to stop and it could be time to start looking at a temporary ban or just nuke him altogether. Bitcointalk is obviously his advertisement platform. This person isn't interested in contributing to the forum in any way. 

Actually, you are right. I didn't pay close attention to the links.
It works without an account, but not with the viewer links the image host gives you by default. You get the direct link if you register or if you remove the url tags from the BBCode full link.

And like BitcoinGirl.Club mentioned, even if you right-click on a Viewer link, like this one https://ibb.co/pxMr66S and select "copy image address," you will get the correct image link that can be posted on the forum.

Case closed finally.

Thanks for the suggestion. I have heard the name Crashino being mentioned around the forum, but I have zero personal information with that site. I will take a look at them in due time. I don't mind the manual withdrawal processing as long as the coins are sent where they are supposed to go.

I remember there was a lot of back and forth regarding Blackjack.fun and their withdrawal minimums until we finally managed to figure out they don't have any minimum amounts. But sure, if you want, test it out and report back what you find and if you had any problems withdrawing smaller amounts.

I wanted to try it out myself, so here goes. This is uploaded without registering to the site.

Viewer links:


BBCode full linked:


BBCode thumbnail linked:


After that, I registered an account and it gives me further link customization options. I can select direct links, for example, something that wasn't there before I registered.

Direct link:


To conclude, seems like the image host works just fine, but you need to create an account and select Direct links. Viewer links don't work though.