It's a timeless design. Most sites in 1995 used frames, animated gif and so on this is really different.

Good design isn't really about eyecandy but about ergonomics, which even less and less so called designers understand.

And drive prices down.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133023.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133096.0

some of you operate on the bigger fool theory and will try to sell before the others to buy back cheaper.
This will take place between now and the time ripple goes out of beta when realizing the mistake and bitcoin go back up.
You heard it here first 

No I don't want adblock but companies like those force me to. I get paranoid when I see ads, I'm serious. 

I don't know I am scared of the web outside of adblock plus.

Hilarious 

*takes a seat, waiting for the libertarian camp to get it.*

The scum of the internets, barely at the level of click credit sites. Do not want.

Ahh fresh hypocrisy.  That smell!
Just waiting to watch somebody shooting oneself in the foot.

You are right LTC is not superior, it doesn't need to be. Is facebook superior than myspace? Probably not, it's different. Coming up with analogies wouldn't help any argument here, cryptocurrencies are just too different from everything else for it to make sense.
I suggest you trash that ebay analogy cuz I can come up with several examples which are just as invalid where the copy exceeded the original.
It just doesn't matter how you compare it cryptocurrencies are something unique.


As for the network effect itself: In case of Bitcoin it is self quenching, in periods. We had one of these periods last year and there could be another one next year. These occur independently of developments in alternate cryptocurrencies but they give them space. Litecoin amoung it's predecessors was thought up during last years period and if it makes it through the coming year it will exhibit growth during the next bitcoin resession.
Now there will be those who will blame LTC for the resession while this just isn't true. Capital flowing of from bitcoin would otherwise flow to the USD and result in a worse impact.
Now you could say there will never be again a bitcoin recession, but that would be like to say there will never be a snowstorm.

Yeah that too

Remember 2008 when sliver was @10 USD and every bullion dealer was conveniently "out of stock"?

If anything that would be the case, so he's not gonna take you up on that bet smoothie.

I'm so proud of you guys

If it isn't neither are both.  That is the truth nobody of those guys complaining about LTC is willing to admit.

Litecoin is the same thing as Bitcoin except for a different hashing function. It stands to have the same potential, and is dependent only on the participants on whenever that potential is realized or not.

also see my sig below vv. 

Capitalism can't create anything since it is created, by everybody
The term is over- and mis-used for a lot of things. But not only that but every other *-ism as well. It it counter intuitive to use them actually. I'll try to express my true meaning in more detail in future discussions.  

Back to business: Shall it be law to have an entity called a "legal personality" which is liable for the actions of a corporation?
I say: Nay!

Gotcha,
governments are a similar legal concept. They too are entities providing the illusion of non-liability.

Somebody lobbied for that law, and I think it was wealthy capitalists.

subbed

Lets wait for the suckers.
Anybody want some popcorn?

Well there is regenacy inside a large corporation, at least the ones which currently exists. Under anarchism those couldn't exit but there are so in tune with capitalism. Capitalism introduces a concept called a legal personality, an abstract concept consisting of an entity. These entities are supposed to be in charge of cooperations, be liable under law and so on. It separates the subject from the object, and so creates the illusion of personal non-liability.

Actually the correct term is post structuralist Anarchism.

It's basically anarchism with the difference that it acknowledges that the abolishment of the government isn't the magic pill and that government is just a result of the society we live in. It acknowledges that not all power is abusive and it does not assume that human nature is good, spoiled by government like some of the other schools are. It also intents to fight regnancy (hard to come up with the correct term, the english language is so restrictive, that is something of a concern too ...) everywhere not just the one which happens to be inside government.
(Of course in the end government would still be abolished  )

QFT

Watch your back, the natives going to be restless.

First come first serve.