Feedback regards FUN token investment:

After one month of investment, received interest today over locked funds relative to this period of time (462 FUN interest). I paid 0.0084 btc or 0.0086 btc, can't remember exactly for 12,500 FUN and right now my 12,962 bankroll prices 0.00557366 btc. Apparently I'm in loss!

However, the daily wheel spins rewarded by this investment, make my daily income surpass the daily bitcoin interest I would receive if I had those 0.0084-0.0086 btc in my account (84-86 satoshis daily). I'm used to earn at least 120 satoshis daily more or less with wheel (without counting those sweet 4000 satoshis or RPs prizes). So, if you are a long term investor and pick the right package, the investment worths anyway, even though FUN price keeps falling, due to the rewards from wheel.

And I expect things are going to get better yet, as bonus increasea after some period of time. For example, more 2 months and there will be an extra free spin every day, in 5 months another one and in 11 months again.

For now I'm satisfied.

What do you mean by fair gameplay? If there were 50% chance winning chance splitted between players and casinos the gambling industry wouldn't exist anymore, because it wouldn't be sustainable. Games have to be profitable for the house owners, so they can maintain their activities, pay for their operational costs and make a living from it to keep offering this service to gamblers.
Actually, regardless skill or chance based games, both categories are profitable only for a small percentage of gamblers, for the reason mentioned above. While luck based games give equally winning chances for every players, skill based games give more chances only for the hardcore professional ones.

Well, that is a big advantage indeed, but I don't expect lawyers are going to agree with you.
Those who profit with legal disputes, the third parties, are going to be very upset as blockchain adoption increases day by day, solving different issues of the modern society, just by being transparent and immutable. More blockchain means less legal issues, leading to a decreasement in the demand for professionals of the legal sector. The sad part is: these are the people who create the laws and regulations.

A mentor would be only useful to teach the gambler some basic strategies and hints which could help him avoid losing too much money in dice and consequently going into debt. But this mentor must be someone trustful and educated about gambling games, preferentially someone the newbie gambler knows personally and has a relationship already (a friend or relative, for an example).
I like this idea, because it can be harsh to start gambling without any clue about what to do, but unfortunatelly not everyone has the opportunity to learn with someone more experienced, so they have to learn by themselves.

El Salvador continues buying more bitcoins despite the most recent crash. As the president stated, "they can never beat you if you buy the dips", concluding next is a "presidential advice". I can imagine how banks, public employees and people in general who don't understand the volatility of the market must be mad on him for putting even more public funds in bitcoin.
A crash like this might trigger another wave of protests in El Salvador against bitcoin and Bukele. Actually he has been already accused of implementing a dictatorship in the country. I don't know if this information proceeds though.

The only relation between Evergrande group and Bitcoin dump I can think about is if the company needed to sell their BTC holdings (in case their had it) at once in order to pay their increasing debt with China's government. Because for me it really doesn't make sense to say Bitcoin is losing price because investors are avoiding stocks market.

It would be more logical to see bitcoin rising if that was the scenario, because when investors aren't confident in traditional markets they have crypto currency and more specifically Bitcoin as a safe heaven.

When people have no way to explain something, they just match different situations happening at same time to conclude one is the cause and the another is the effect.

On the other hand, countryside residents are usually isolated from the rest of the world what difficults their immunologic system to stay strong against the new virus variants when an outsider suddenly bring it to their areas. In big cities it's the opposite because there is a constant flux of people from different regions and countries, what helps increasing people body's resistance against potential infections.

I remember I saw once the story of an hermit family living in russian Taiga forest since the 30's which was only discovered by geologists at the end of 70's and after this encounter they lost almost all of its members to sudden diseases, possibly because the exposure to the strangers which transmitted something to them which they had no immunity to deal with.

Another example are the natives in south america who were exposed to the european diseases which they also didn't have immunity against. As result there were severe pandemics and many natives died instantly.

There is nothing wrong about seeking for privacy, but personally I think it's like drying ice: you make a lot of effort and in the end don't reach to any result, as we don't really know how far the government's tentacles and their spying methods goes. The technology, knowledge and informations disponible for the masses are limited on purpose. The digital stuff we have access nowadays has been used by governments since a lot earlier, so what guarantee do we have countries like USA and China don't have exclusive top tier technologies able to track us through another ways (your address, wage, family roots, etc...) even though we avoid KYC verification?

I'm inclined to believe anonymity is an utopia and to try reaching it at all costs will make your experience in crypto universe less enjoyable, as there are many useful services which enforce KYC verification process.

As long as the teenager earns his own money I think he has the right to gamble if he wants. And actually age doesn't mean a lot in gambling. For addicted people, for an example, doesn't matter how old they are, gambling isn't for them, never. While for a responsible adolescent, it can be an entertaining hobby without further prejudice.

Nowadays there is a lot of polemics regards this matter, but the truth is children have always seen adults gambling and it has been part of their lives for many following generations. In the end only few presented issues with addiction during their adulthood. It makes believe the problem isn't in gambling exposed to underage, but in the psychological of few underage instead.

The recommendation is to never see gambling as a job. Don't expect to earn an income from it for a living. Beware of people promising strategies or gameplays too good to be true on the internet. And never hide your gambling habits from your family.

Jamel is more experienced, but in this case Shakur Stevenson is the favorite due to his agility, fast counter-punches, strategical balance between body and head jabs. These elements are all part of his refined admirable technique. Of course experience matters, but even the most experienced masters are defeated someday by younger players who will eventually become masters so experienced like the old ones.

In my opinion Shakur has all the necessary conditions to win this fight since he doesn't underestimate his opponent. That is the biggest mistake an unbeaten athletle can commit.

Yes, it doesn't make sense to pay a mentor to teach him something not profitable on long run. I would say it's actually a dangerous possibility, because there are lots of scammers on the internet claiming to be professional dice gamblers who can teach secret strategies to beat the house, while others, even though showing their "secrets" for free are also equally dangerous, because they lead people to lose tons of money assuring they can win through the methods displayed at their youtube videos, aiming the referral comissions they can earn this way.

1. Like I said, this is going to be the effect:
2. Visa is a global company accepted at over 200 countries, it will indeed extend to many other countries if there is good will from the regulators of each territory.

3. Profit and influence.

Visa is already in partnership with so many crypto exchanges which offer credit cards featuring cashback in bitcoin, that these news are not a surprise for me. With the wide increasement in bitcoin's adoption this year by institutional investors, Visa must have seen this adoption as an opportunity to stay relevant in financial world for long years to come yet.

Not much will change anyway, because these exchanges already do the biggest part of the job. But what it's probably going to change is that we will be finally able to pay with bitcoin, converting btc into fiat on the moment of the purchase by Visa, not being necessary anymore to exchange bitcoin into fiat first in order to use the money next.

Good to know your experience with bankroll investment in Bitvest. I was looking for something like this, because I wasn't sure if there was enough activity in this casino to provide smooth returns.
May I ask more or less what is the percentage this investment in Bitvest generates yearly?

What I know is that years ago it could reach to 50% yearly in another casinos, but I believe it's not so profitable like that anymore.

Can I receive RPs instead of lottery tickets in 1:1 proportion from wheel's spins if I disable lottery in my account, or does this option only has effect over rewards earned from faucet's free rolls?

That is not too bad... There are teams which rely on just one top player, at least they have three, right? Besides the players you mentioned Belgium has a pretty balanced team with a very good goalkeeper which can offer a decent challenge even to the considered strongest teams. They just need to shape their strategy a little more and maybe stop being too technical and turn into a more creative gameplay to surprise tough adversaries like Italy on the field.

That is just a campaign promise in case this congressman is elected in 2023 for the presidency of the country. Probably a marketing strategy to get attention from the media and in special from the young public that is a well known enthusiast of crypto currency worldwide.

---

For a congressman 1,95% of votes is a very expressive percentage. Most congressmen are elected with 1% or less.

If we think this way, we are going to blame the victims instead of the guilty in different situations, with the excuse the victim wasn't smart enough to avoid being deceived by the malicious person. Of course high levels of awareness and distrust are needed to stay safe in a dirty world like this one, but I believe we shouldn't banalize these situations and accept them as normal.

The correct in a healthy society would be to trust what people say, especially if they are advertising something, without the fear we are being cheated by them. And I believe that should be the aim of a good marketing campaign. Lies may work and be profitable on short run, but only truth can build solid bases and thrive on long run.

Yes, it's a mix of token (altcoin) and NFTs (game's items/characters).

Moreover I believe the main difference between blockchain games' NFTs and other NFTs is the practical application the first have, against a worthless existence of the second (like most altcoins). And since there is practical application, this segment of the market doesn't rely purely on speculation (unlikely altcoins). Also, games' NFTs are similar to products/goods instead of currencies. These are some reasons to detach this category from altcoins, which includes worthless NFTs as well.

Honest athletes who value their own reputation, the reputation of their countries and respect their adversaries can resist such temptations and that is this kind of athletle who is carrying the true meaning of "sport" alive. Unfortunatelly there is no way to get rid of it, because most people think these practices are normal and acceptable since they would also cheat, if they had the opportunity of doing so.

But real athetles don't need shortcuts. They are forged through their effort and integrity. The example of great sportsmen like Usain Bolt don't let me lie: they didn't cheat and were still able to break records and insert their names in history.