LET'S GET KRUNKEDDDDD!

hahaha.

well, as shyte as ETH is good thing i bought some bags from 110-350 bucakroos then eh?!

If you're driving a car and realise you left the handbrake on, you don't shrug your shoulders and continue. You address the problem and take the handbrake off.

By restricting the size of its primary market and issuing such a large proportion of its supply at zero price, Dash is driving with its handbrake on.

It is not "defeatist" to advocate for addressing that problem.

guess even at $8k this guy will sneer at ETH. Admittedly a questionable kind of "fun".

too late man, $ADK got already gangbang´ed a long time ago.

If you talk about the heart of a champion Tyson Fury already displayed that, when you are against the fence how you overcome that and Fury showed in the first fight against Wilder when he was down and how he recovered and countered his attack and Joshua when he was against the fence against Ruiz he was not able to make any changes and showed the heart of a champion in the fight, in the rematch he won but not during the fight.

The issue for the community isn't what I said, it's what Ryan said and the oversight of not realising that a mined coin is a bought coin. That one mistake turns the whole reasoning behind the reward ratio logic on its head. Sure, miners are "sellers" on an exchange just as currency brokers are, but they are not NET sellers. They bought the coin in one market and sold it in another.

Masternodes on the other hand are NET sellers. There's no buy side so no bidding up of the price (once we are at nodecount equilibrium). The reward ratio is therefore simply specifying how much of the supply is issued at zero price per coin. The more of the supply thats issued at zero price, the lower the marketcap compared with other coins that restrict their entire supply to the highest bidder.

The protocol/store of value debate (if you can call it that - there was no debate) was not about how much to "give" to miners or "give" to masternodes. Miners buy their coin. They are not given it. It's only masternodes where the word "give" applies.

Not difficult to understand for anyone that isn't blinded by allegiance to "the cause".

1st & 2nd Fight: Joshua, that's my vote.

No one voted for that because all you guys in favor of Fury, well, let me vote for that as Joshua is also a legit champion.
Fury was impressive in the 2nd fight vs Wilder but Wilder looks exhausted, maybe Joshua is different and he can beat the gypsy king.

Thanks to Bob and the U.E. team for getting us working on the Exchange!

Note: the Mooncoin project does not officially endorse any exchange. Use at your own risk.

Unnamed is unregistered one man circus. 

Before Cloudflare, domain (if i remember correctly, i should check again tho) was hosted in NL with host that accepts crypto payments (anonymous). 

Admin is full of shit. I wouldn't be surprised that exchange got hacked and admin lost funds. Even tho, im pretty sure he sold the DOGE with belief its only temporal pump and now he hasnt anything to send out. 

Thanks to Bob and the U.E. team for getting us working on the Exchange!

Note: the Mooncoin project does not officially endorse any exchange. Use at your own risk.

Is DOGE still under sevelopment, could there be any sort of burn?

Today I tried to withdraw my last LTC on the site and now it is stuck in error.

Not sure if you know, but there is a group of people who claims that the earth is flat. They really go all in to convince everyone that its true. All this pictures and videos from ISS is just a scam.
I mean thank you Adobe for making it so easy to manipulate pictures and videos. The earth is flat. If you say something else, you're in on the scam.. damn scammer

I also posted here because you invited users to view your exchange: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4971628.msg52121971#msg5212197

Absolutely not impressed with essential details missing in the Terms and Conditions which make using your exchange a very big risk until or unless there is transparency:
https://www.unnamed.exchange/Home/Terms

Why is there no LLC/LTD listed that is the company that owns the website?

What are the company ownership details?

What is the full company address?

In the event of litigation who will plaintiffs serve legal documentation on and which jurisdiction will it happen in?


And why have a self-moderated thread?

w00t Dogecoin!   fixed your link for you.

I really think Dogecoin may hit $1 within the next few years.

Dogecoin needs to break away from the Litecoin miners and mine their own coins or have Litecoin merged into the Dogecoin power!

If Sally leaves a second rating, it will have no effect on Bon’s trust score. If he removes the rating and adds it back on, it would be an abuse of the trust system and he should be excluded. If Sally excludes Sam from her trust list, the impartiality of the situation may be called into question and she may find herself excluded by other forum members.

What I described above is not ideal, however in my view it is the only way to correct the injustice of Bob receiving a unfair negative rating.

Everyone will not always agree on when someone is “high risk” and the above is an effective way to settle this question. Someone conducting due diligence on Bob can weigh their options of the judgements of both Sally and Sam and act accordingly.