They're not even cryptohunter. Not that cryptohunter wasn't a nobody, which he was.
I'm pretty sure they're the same person, and I've had a suspicion for a long time that that person is Bruno. Funny how one disappeared with a grudge against the forum and another appeared, also with a grudge against the forum.
I must be the only one that can see: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Archive [1] [2]
| abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Archive [1] [2] | ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F16%2Fblobf3fc8a2e74477308.jpeg&t=663&c=MAGco0hMLGj7ug) | ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F16%2Fblob47a639111d6f872f.jpeg&t=663&c=enogjeseKL2pog) |
| | Name: YuTü.Co.in Posts: 2200 Activity: 728 Merit: 346 Position: Sr. Member Date Registered: 03 January 2015, 14:28:11 Last Active: 12 April 2019, 02:41:02 ICQ: AIM: MSN: YIM: Email: support@yutu.co.in Website: YuTü.Co.in Current Status: Offline Offline Other contact info: http://yutu.co.in Gender: Male Age: 59 Location: Nashville, TN Local Time: 14 January 2020, 22:43:21 Trust: +1 / =1 / -0
| Name: The-One-Above-All Posts: 1066 Activity: 238 Merit: 56 Position: Member Date Registered: 12 April 2019, 02:18:42 Last Active: Today at 14:45:20 ICQ: AIM: MSN: YIM: Email: hidden Website: Current Status: Offline Offline Gender: Age: N/A Location: Local Time: 15 January 2020, 05:44:11 Trust: # +0 / =0 / -17 |
In one of his latest thread he said that he won't return after 2 days. Just ignore him for the coming 48 hours and see if he is provably (dis)honest. We shall likely NOT return at all again after the next 2 days.
(down to eleven hours Bruno)
TOAA is NOT Bruno. No chance in hell. Take it from someone who knows Bruno personally that they're not the same person. Bruno never disappeared -- he was quite active in my BSV Scam Accusation thread as Phinnaeus Gage until very recently.
OK., thanks for stopping by.
|
|
|
Not sure what this is supposed to mean or how it is constructive to this thread?
How do you figure Mariott points are valid collateral for a brand new user? What dollar value are they? Can you get one night in the penthouse with that amount, or is it more like the linen closet?
|
|
|
I'm giving it a go anyway.
@tl you did an uncooperative close or a double spend?
Edit channel is open with 0.00392856
The channel to you is on my Zap wallet. All the issues are on Eclair. (that's not to say a double spend isn't out of the question. I have no way of knowing as transactions were coming and going at the same time.)
|
|
|
Wasn't me.
It's the only on chain LN test transaction incoming in weeks. If anything else has been sent to me, then it's as lost as the nearly 0.01 on the mainnet Eclair.
|
|
|
Are you just trying to open a channel?
What address is funding it, can you look at it on a blockchain explorer?
I could try opening one with you but all I have is éclair?
Actually, if you could try to open one to me with eclair that would be an good test too. Is it something with Timelord2067 trying to connect to my node or is it something with eclair trying to connect to my node. I am about to go to sleep, it's been a busy couple of days, so I will check back in the morning here (GMT -5) -Dave As I said in the other thread, I wasn't paying attention when I connected to the two addresses which were the same node, but different IP's. I've cancelled one for the time being.
|
|
|
Seeking a .025 loan for .0275 back in 2 weeks.
As collateral, I can offer Marriott points. Obviously the lender would need to have an existing Marriott rewards account, or create one. Prior to receiving bitcoin I would have the points transferred to their account.
I would be willing to put 40,000 miles as collateral, which if you look into it, is worth decently more than what .025 is worth.
Has anyone got a decent gif of someone blowing a bubble-gum bubble that bursts and floats down their chin?
|
|
|
...
< twelve hours until the OP bids us fare-thee-well.
|
|
|
Was the nnn668 from you?
I don't know what this refers to. 0.00100668 - was that sent by you, or was it one of the nodes that closed on me over the last few days?
|
|
|
Down to 24 hours now...
24 hours later, you will have less chance of ousting the real bad guys from DT. I hope you know this. Don't let the door slam you on the butt on the way out. (23:30 to go)
|
|
|
27 hours and counting... (off is spelt with two "F"'s)
|
|
|
Congratulations - I was just wondering why you have 1,246 UID's on your distrust list?
|
|
|
Interesting if true - all I can say for the moment I guess is "watch this space".
|
|
|
Fixed for you: Thanks for the heads up, I must have broken my spreadsheet formula somehow. I fixed my post. Bump - Is anyone continuing to do these?
|
|
|
...
Your post does not help move the discussion along.
|
|
|
I'm asking the members here to consider the actions of this one UID and give an indication by poll of what they would like to be done with that one UID.
Agree, the conversation regarding "free speech" belongs in a different thread. That is not the point of this poll as far as I can tell. With regards to the user in question, I would vote for ban, not nuke. No need to remove all evidence they ever existed. But I believe a ban is indeed warranted for multiple reasons. Ban evasion/Trust and Flag Abuse/Trolling. Sadly, newbies can't vote. Probably to prevent poll gaming by signing up multiple alts. I'll have a word with the puppet master. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I would be disappointed if alts took to voting. So far, there appears to be a degree of maturity in this discussion, let's keep it that way.
|
|
|
Bump.
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.) Should I allow more time? I planned on closing this thread tomorrow, January 12, around 19:00 (7pm, for those of you are 24-hour-clock-chalanged) but I can keep it open longer. What do you folks think?
The Academy Awards (the Oscars) are held in March for the proceeding year's works. I few more days and some bumps wouldn't hurt.
|
|
|
I've opened a dozen channels with BTC 0.011 capacity with some ver big nodes and am unable to send 0.01 in one package, instead I've had to go down to 0.005 0.002 and even 0.001 just to send to coinplaza after having first started with attempts at 0.01 - which means I'm having to go to coinplaza and create smaller and smaller requests and cancel the larger requests. All very time consuming.
|
|
|
Did you close one and try to re-open it? I now have 2 pending open channels. One has been out there for a while I just saw the other one pop up, do not know when, but it's just sitting out there. And your other channel seems to have dropped. -Dave
I haven't been able to do much this week, so I've just closed one channel as they both pointed to the same location. I did try to open a channel via Eclair but the message popped up "could not broadcast TX to the network", so it could well be that it is/but it isn't trying to connect. If you're able to close the attempted connection from your end, I'd appreciate it.
|
|
|
If you added a poll (lower right of page) I would vote no.
|
|
|
|