Μου αρέσει αρκετά αυτό εδώ το άρθρό που περιγράφει ακριβώς την κατάσταση και το έγινε με τα γεγονότα του ethereum
http://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2016/07/21/a-painful-lesson-for-the-ethereum-community/#12e51585714fΚυρίως αυτό εδώ
The fact is that Ethereum has compromised its principles in order to rescue a client. Or, in the language of another world, the Ethereum central bank has directly recapitalized the DAO commercial bank by monetizing its debts. I could wax lyrical about the incestuous relationship of Ethereum and the DAO that made this decision inevitable: DAO investors and Ethereum miners are to a large extent the same people, and even some coders have money in the game. Moral hazard, much
?
και φυσικά αυτό εδώ για τα δομικά προβλήματα του ethereum
After reading a lot of stuff about how no-one could possibly have spotted the code problem, I had a look at the code myself. It’s not my language (I’m an RPG geek), but it’s comprehensible. That code would not have passed any code review I was doing: it did not maintain the integrity of the data it was manipulating.
και καταλήγει....
It’s perhaps going a bit far to call this a scam, but it is certainly weapons-grade naivety to imagine that code thrown together in a hurry without much in the way of testing should even be put live, let alone sold as “immutable”. Seventeen years of working in financial systems taught me that you just DON’T take such risks with people’s money.
Θα μου πείτε ποιος είναι αυτός που το γράφει? Δείτε εδώ
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/francescoppola