Found out a nice idea implemented by one coin: http://cryptohire.comWould be nice to have something similar for XC |
|
|
|
Sorry offtopic but need to know: Who is going to play some WCOOP events on pokerstars? ontopic: Looking forward to the update this weekend!! GO TEAM Screw you that you can play on PokerStars.  I'm still waiting for my Fulltilt money to come back from the DOJ. It's all going into XC of course. "When we're ready" Howard Lederer  When PS took over FT the money was in my account Why I asked was as follows: If someone with a proven (OPR with above avarage ROI) track record wants to take a shot. I'm more then willing to back and donate the winnings to the PR/DeFUD/Foundation/Etc to further our cause. So pokerpro's please respond. We could also ask Phill Ivey, known BTC fanboy, if he is up for some sponsoring. Consequently bringing in some of his millions. BTW the first crypto to land on one of the mayor pokersite's will get a nice lead but will probably not happen due to legislation. Pokercommunity is ripe for coinage. PokerCoin launching in 3..... 2...... 1..... Hmm.... Hahaha, ATCsecure is a poker junkie? I new I loved this coin. Are you on 2+2? Seals with Clubs is probably the biggest BTC poker site and Bryan Micon hates alts. Some of the other sites are starting to look into it as an option, but not sure. The great thing about Phil Ivey, Tom Dwan and other poker players sponsoring XC is they are action (gambling) junkies. Phil Ivey, Tom Dwan would probably buy a few hundred thousand of XC just for shits and giggles. Yes huge poker fan.. Although I haven't played online in ages It would be very cool to get XC in front of these guys Playing online poker for untraceable money? I'm in... Lets raise money and develop a huge online poker platform dedicated for XC. Interesting. 😁 Ok, so I played a ton of online poker, even after the DOJ shut down FTP/PS in the U.S. I've seen many poker sites launch with no success. It's very hard to start a successful online poker site because you need a large enough player pool to make it successful. Even a bad poker site has way more signups than XC probably has holders. As big as Bitcoin is, even Seals with Clubs is still a small crappy site. IMO, it's not a good idea to waste time making a decentralized poker game until XC has at least reached Bitcoin level of adoption. Well, seals with clubs?... I will be a crappy site forever because of the crappy name and the crappy team managing it... For real? Wordpress? |
|
|
|
Sorry offtopic but need to know: Who is going to play some WCOOP events on pokerstars? ontopic: Looking forward to the update this weekend!! GO TEAM Screw you that you can play on PokerStars. I'm still waiting for my Fulltilt money to come back from the DOJ. It's all going into XC of course. "When we're ready" Howard Lederer When PS took over FT the money was in my account Why I asked was as follows: If someone with a proven (OPR with above avarage ROI) track record wants to take a shot. I'm more then willing to back and donate the winnings to the PR/DeFUD/Foundation/Etc to further our cause. So pokerpro's please respond. We could also ask Phill Ivey, known BTC fanboy, if he is up for some sponsoring. Consequently bringing in some of his millions. BTW the first crypto to land on one of the mayor pokersite's will get a nice lead but will probably not happen due to legislation. Pokercommunity is ripe for coinage. PokerCoin launching in 3..... 2...... 1..... Hmm.... Hahaha, ATCsecure is a poker junkie? I new I loved this coin. Are you on 2+2? Seals with Clubs is probably the biggest BTC poker site and Bryan Micon hates alts. Some of the other sites are starting to look into it as an option, but not sure. The great thing about Phil Ivey, Tom Dwan and other poker players sponsoring XC is they are action (gambling) junkies. Phil Ivey, Tom Dwan would probably buy a few hundred thousand of XC just for shits and giggles. Yes huge poker fan.. Although I haven't played online in ages It would be very cool to get XC in front of these guys Playing online poker for untraceable money? I'm in... Lets raise money and develop a huge online poker platform dedicated for XC. |
|
|
|
pookielax31 on Today at 04:55:33 PM
this man is real failure of human nature.
So, I was just talking in #cloakcoin and MrBoh happened to accidentally spell my name "battbott" when referring to me... tell me that he did not fake those irc logs...my god. MrBoh and pookielax = same person = weeds. Ah fake pastebin logs.. whats next? Anyways an updated release will be coming this weekend [Sunday Night], with both XChat and Decentralized Private Transactions in a single wallet for mainnet. Dan Game over for altshits |
|
|
|
FUDs are back... it did not take long
Facts...scam coin!!! Centralized shit... Just read your post... no wonder your so butthurt your and XC fanboy... hahaha well thanks for officially making it open season over there... i stopped posting shit on there thread but thanks to you im back Tell your fucking trolls to get back on there leash before you all open up a FUD storm you cant handle... and you wonder why we come in here .... this FUCK tard post scam every 30 seconds.... from recent post its obvious this troll belongs to you all I told you that I was going to post things there with pure ignorance applied, since anybody did the same with legit questions... |
|
|
|
I think this review is to counteract that screeshot of Dan saying cloak is a scam. If he checks code and its not, its fair for him to take what he said back (give a good review)
he could just say he was talking about the old appraoch and he stands by that. there would be nothing wrong with that since he was talking in a private chat room, he wasn spamming their thread or even in here. it wasn't public. There is no reason for apologetic feelings or actions, he has done nothing wrong. Standing by your words about the cloaksend 1.0 and do no more until asked for. that would be the right thing to do. Counteract a screenshot? We are not 14 year old school girls in here Anybody can make that screenshot, forgot the link but its somewhere in the cloak thread, a quick 'Viral<something>.com website to make a log like that. Hope Dan just stays quiet on this, say nothing, do nothing and keep working on XC. If they ask, just say you are busy with your own coin. Have to agree with Hoertest on this one, stay away from other coins! He, lets all do that, at least in this thread. Also hope XC stays on track, the little detour from anon to Xchat is nice, the future extention to voice & video great but hope this team first finishes the anon part, including public bounty then focusses on the next thing. A lot of teams are working on the same 'holy grail', lets be the first with unbreakable & stable anon, build from there Agreed - I did nothing wrong, cloaksend 1.0 is/was a PHP script. Now back to XC XCurrency has multiple concurrent development projects happening at once, and several more updates are coming!!! You should pull back from giving any review for that piece of crap coin... |
|
|
|
Take this monkey as example ...  "me have bananas, you don't matter...me rich..." Here is a quote from you on July 10th. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654463.msg7771695#msg7771695You know this is a scam people, right?
Yes it is I, Gorillajam, finder of scams, defender of the innocent!
Even if it's a scam, it's a good looking scam...I prefer to invest in a good looking scam with a slight change to make good profit... Now please, spaghetti noodle your previous posts and tuck your tail as you walk back out the door. You're a hypocrite simply trying to make waves. If you've been here the past two days you'd know you're a small fry and can't manipulate CLOAK. Bug-off Read the thread you piece of crap... Don't flatter yourself thinking that you posted something relevant... This community is still acting like zombies talking about price all time...why is that relevant with my trolling posts? |
|
|
|
this community started to talk like zombies only about price...
You want 50 dollars per cloakcoin or 5 cents? I'm working hard everyday to make this coin a success for everyone. It's not a huge part of the overall picture, but it's there. Time to push up to 300k After PoSa is released and cloak gain more trust price will sky rocket with the upcoming projects, so no need to push. Gosh, again...price price price... Can't you people have some imagination, and discuss about some creative things that can be done for your investments? "oooo, price is going up, POSA POSA POSA...we rich, we rich...." This kind of ignorance will create lots of bagholders... Believe me, big traders don't give a shit about this posa thing, they only care about the hype, and your ignorance...they know that you will do as they dictate... Anyway.... to the mooon...is this correct? Back to your "anonymous" shitcoin. Take this monkey as example ... "me have bananas, you don't matter...me rich..." |
|
|
|
this community started to talk like zombies only about price...
You want 50 dollars per cloakcoin or 5 cents? I'm working hard everyday to make this coin a success for everyone. It's not a huge part of the overall picture, but it's there. Time to push up to 300k After PoSa is released and cloak gain more trust price will sky rocket with the upcoming projects, so no need to push. Anyway.... to the mooon...is this correct? Such knowledge flows from you. You whine and complain about people talking about price, yet all you offer is rude comments about others. LOL you're a hypocrite. Rude? if you can't stand the truth my friend, you can't stand the life that's going to come over us in the very near future... |
|
|
|
this community started to talk like zombies only about price...
You want 50 dollars per cloakcoin or 5 cents? I'm working hard everyday to make this coin a success for everyone. It's not a huge part of the overall picture, but it's there. Time to push up to 300k After PoSa is released and cloak gain more trust price will sky rocket with the upcoming projects, so no need to push. Gosh, again...price price price... Can't you people have some imagination, and discuss about some creative things that can be done for your investments? "oooo, price is going up, POSA POSA POSA...we rich, we rich...." This kind of ignorance will create lots of bagholders... We have http://cloaktalk.org for creative things  Yeah, right, some guys talking to themselves...receiving dumb reactions from monkeys approving anything that helps increasing their profit... |
|
|
|
this community started to talk like zombies only about price...
You want 50 dollars per cloakcoin or 5 cents? I'm working hard everyday to make this coin a success for everyone. It's not a huge part of the overall picture, but it's there. Time to push up to 300k After PoSa is released and cloak gain more trust price will sky rocket with the upcoming projects, so no need to push. Gosh, again...price price price... Can't you people have some imagination, and discuss about some creative things that can be done for your investments? "oooo, price is going up, POSA POSA POSA...we rich, we rich...." This kind of ignorance will create lots of bagholders... Believe me, big traders don't give a shit about this posa thing, they only care about the hype, and your ignorance...they know that you will do as they dictate... Anyway.... to the mooon...is this correct? |
|
|
|
thats a nice amount of bitcoin in the wallets of a couple of peeps ( 5 million usd LOL ) prob way more in a couple of years
what have they dont till now ( nice website and shit ton of talks )
even if this turns out to be ( profitable ) i will not touch it
Because that's your limit of comprehension buddy... 1+1 = 2 ... If it's not profitable, you don't touch it... Must be sad being you, such a simple "vegetable" driven on in life by primitive aspects... |
|
|
|
|
this community started to talk like zombies only about price...
|
|
|
|
THAT'S NOT A FREAKING REVIEW OF THE CODE...
TESTING THE SOFTWARE MEANS NOTHING.
SO...STOP THAT NONSENSE WITH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE...
first of all, he cannot give a negative feedback about it, because the software have hes basic functions working.
it's not a review of the code, and it is pointless...
Says cloak bagholder. Dude, are you idiot? )) seems you are... Read what I'm saying again, without reading only one sentence and shooting a reply... I own lots of coins, and I own around 30 BTC in XC, but I dumped cloakcoin as soon as I saw that the dev used a freaking php script to hype their shit up... "look, we have some imba feature... CloakSend and shit..." Big hype for nothing, even a freaking coindesk page talking about that...in the end that was a freaking script... |
|
|
|
In my opinion reviewing other coins without their developer's explicit request will cause trouble. If the review is bad the angry mobs of other coins will come in here and start to spread massive unwarranted FUD and cause other problems. A good review might have a positive effect, but what if something crucial is overlooked ? or what if the other coin devs decide to alter the coin's specifications after the review? If the other coin turns out to be flawed or even a scam, it will still have the "XC dev stamp of approval", remember that after the review the coin is out of your control, it's a dangerous situation to be in because any (percieved) connection to another coin can be a base for FUD, should the other coin be in trouble.
Reviewing other coins can be a good strategy, as we have learned ATC's opinion is highly valued by the market. But we should stick to our own business in these early stages in development. I understand the reasoning behind a self initiated review of another coin, but without a fully established market reputation and matured technology it is a high risk endeavour, because the market is still highly dominated by emotions.
Take a look at Digibyte for example, they are the good guy Greg's of the altcoin world. They have helped numerous coins implementing Digishield, have a dedicated following and excellent developers. But all that altruism didn't help them in attaining (warranted) market recognition so far.
We are gradually establishing ourselves by superior technological advantages over our competition. We should remain focused at that, a positive market response should be due to our technical advantage itself and not because of a developer initiated comparison to other coins. Let investors do their own due diligence, they will come to the same conclusion without having to put XC's reputation on the line.
I am not saying we should stick our head in the sand and retreat to our ivory tower, but in these early stages of development we should focus on solidifying our own reputation and fundamentals. We should take the defensive instead of offensive role, after Rev 3 and after we are escaping this crazy crypto realm we could consider a more aggressive marketing approach.
Well said. I agree 100% If the review is bad? Do you at least understand that he is reviewing the wallet itself, not the code. If the review is bad, on a freaking wallet, that's a freaking public thing, which anybody can see...than anybody should dump that freaking coin... As much as the wallet its working, it cannot be negative feedback. On the other hand, a good review it shows nothing special either, it's just an wallet who can work...big deal. That does not shows the code and if the code really does what the devs says. |
|
|
|
|
THAT'S NOT A FREAKING REVIEW OF THE CODE...
TESTING THE SOFTWARE MEANS NOTHING.
SO...STOP THAT NONSENSE WITH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE...
first of all, he cannot give a negative feedback about it, because the software have hes basic functions working.
it's not a review of the code, and it is pointless...
|
|
|
|
Dude, stop already with that posa posa posa posa thing... First time this dev was only able to deliver some php script...why should I believe that right now is something different? Just because he says so? Proof? Don't think so, just something one of the XC devs claim. Sorry but I'll believe when I see solid proof and coming from someone that isn't involved in another coin. Yes, and I want some proof that this posa thing that everybody is repeating like a zombi, is nothing more than a freaking php script or api thing... |
|
|
|
Dude, stop already with that posa posa posa posa thing... First time this dev was only able to deliver some php script... The DRK dev was unable to deliver working masternodes numerous times. Why should I believe that right now with RC4 it's going to be something different? Just because he says so? DRK dev is a freaking scammer in the first place, with 2 freaking million premined coins...I don't give a quack about dark and its own team of pumpers, alongside with a freaking dirty exchange (bitfinex) |
|
|
|
Dude, stop already with that posa posa posa posa thing... First time this dev was only able to deliver some php script...why should I believe that right now is something different? Just because he says so? |
|
|
|
For those asking about Cloak coin, all I can say is that if the dev can/wants to provide a working -qt wallet, I would be more than glad to analyze it and write up a report on my results
You want to have a look into a "work in progress" closed-source feature of a competing coin? Are you out of your mind sir? Sorry, but having a freaking centralized feature (cloaksend), hosted on a freaking hosting on the internet...  ??!!!!!!!!!!!!*(^#*&%^@*&%^&*%^!&*%$@#% TFQQ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
