Lets say a decent portion of your income is earned through bitcoins, be it bitcoin trade, gambling, free lance stuff, etc. When filing for your tax returns and that kind of stuff, do we have to state how many bitcoins you have made through these methods? I know in my country, you have to let the government know how much money you make annually so they can place you in the appropriate tax bracket. If so, how would the government be able to verify that you are being truthful? I would assume the anonymity of the BTC would make this fairly difficult.
Since you asked a question I will assume for the moment that you are not just another piece of shit thread spammer with a paid signature. What country do you live in? If you do not return to check for an answer to your question and answer mine then you are, of course, just another piece of shit thread spammer with a paid signature.
|
|
|
I think Bitfinex is in Hong Kong but they are having problems with their fiat bankers. If they can get that all cleared up then it will once again be a good exchange.
|
|
|
So I attempted to make these transactions a few days ago and fee was only 120 sat/B They were pending for a few days and now it looks like I'm in an infinite loopI wasn't home at 5:16pm on May 22nd so basically what is happening to wallet : 13YANRDCM4HVtKDUhLYc4zty9gLPLWKx5s The major larger transaction was May 18th and not only am I still waiting, but I don't understand what happened at 5:16pm It looks like the two transactions might have been rebroadcast. What wallet are you using?
|
|
|
This is truly amazing. Blacbytes are indeed the most anonymous cryptocurrency invented so far. You can't really get more anonymous than that. When the darknet catches on, expect Moon.
Soooo undervalued at the moment It's funny that none of the big boys haven't bought in yet. I mean only 200k BTC linked. WTF? Even the winglewiis have like 100k and it's free money. They would get 6k GB every month, that's 2 000 000$ worth of GB every month for free at current rates people are so dumb who don't link their BTC, they are missing out free money. and Roger Ver? Why hasn't he linked? But it's good. It means more for me Shhhhhhhhush
|
|
|
They may well be but those addresses have only about 150k USD in total.
they just mix them.
Where did you get 150K USD? Were you just guessing? I see them getting 100K USD so far. Here: https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/wallet/WannaCry-walletYes, They can just mix the coins and then cash out. Simple to do.
|
|
|
to me i think those countries who do not have declare bitcoin as legal currency, they do not have to pay tax on bitcoin, and therefore i do not think that still a single country is collecting tax on bitcoin. may be in future when they will consider bitcoin as legal currency then they may start collecting tax on bitcoin.
You obviously don't know what the fuck you are talking about you piece of shit thread spammer.
|
|
|
I'm scared I will never get my money back For some reason this is showing up as a double spend. Did you double spend these coins?
|
|
|
Is it possible for someone to help the transaction being confirmed in exchange of some btc ?
Yes. btc.com has a paid accelerator service. You can find it here: https://pushtx.btc.com/#/I think they overcharge us though. I would wait till the end and if the coins come back, i would send them again with a proper fee if i were you. That service can save your life in an emergency situation though. I put his transaction ID (12f0ecc32a70cd5c85115a6906d0cc09bef149e1c13c8a0887017fedcd370457) into the site you mentioned ( https://pushtx.btc.com/#/) just to see what the fee would be and I got: This is a double-spent tx, unavailable for acceleration So something funny is going on with this transaction.
|
|
|
My issue with this whole thing is that how does the hacker know who paid. How can they actually decrypt said computer. The hacker would need access to the given computer to do anythinf I would imagine. Unless they can somehow use a kill switch?
I have done a little bit of research on this and the best I can come up with it that the computer is encoded in the Bitcoin address (one of three) and the amount of the ransom (lower bits of the ransom amount). Look at the ransom amounts here: https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/wallet/WannaCry-walletThey are all a little bit different. If this is true then paying the wrong amount would not work as the amount would not decode properly. So, my next best idea is that the infected computer is in contact with the hackers over TOR. Bottom line: I really do not know, I am still trying to figure that out.
|
|
|
Thanks for this. Please let us know when they have it fixed. From now on I will double check before sending.
|
|
|
I have 4.6 clam on my old address on btc-e ...btc-e was change that address later to another one...can I get my clam from that address and how if I can?
To claim CLAM you must have the private key. Do you have the private key? Answer is probably no. Therefore you cannot claim the CLAM. The person/entity that has the private key (probably btc-e in this case) can claim them, you cannot.
|
|
|
How about using your smart phone? That is a device, right?
|
|
|
I always use the same addresses from my hardware wallet.
What hardware wallet do you use? Why do you do this? Most modern hardware wallets are designed to not do this. Why do you do this again?
|
|
|
So every address generated by the wallet gets used exactly twice: once when the BTC are sent to the address and once when they are spent.
Even if the user received dozens of payments to the address? The wallet spends ALL those outputs at once? Doesn't that result in expensive transaction fees? The fundamental assumption is that the address only gets one payment. If you screw with the fundamental assumption and hand out an address for multiple payments then I am not sure. I have never done that with my Trezor. Would be an interesting experiment I guess.
|
|
|
Doesn't the change from a transaction go into a separate wallet address, say you have 2 BTC in your wallet adress and you send 1 BTC to someone, doesn't the remainder...or change go into a separate address?
That depends on the wallet you are using, and whether that 2 BTC was received as a single payment or multiple payments to the same address. Trezor (and other good HD wallets) always spend the entire amount on the address and the change goes to a new address every time as WarrEagle described in his example. So every address generated by the wallet gets used exactly twice: once when the BTC are sent to the address and once when they are spent.
|
|
|
Hold on, it is showing a different address every time I select "view address"
Those are probably addresses you would use to send bitcoins TO your coinjar account.
|
|
|
|