Headache, Crowtec is a Burst community member as you and me. I am glad you trust him.
He stated several times that xxx had a problem, apologized for it, ... The group did not pay out for the asset, change the asset at their will, without any way to verify their calculations. ... that all did not establish trust to him either.
I don't think he is transparent, he might be your boss, but not transparent to the public. I made the proof of concept a while back. Yes it is working, but I will not offer such service. It is not a question of the encryption level, when he cannot program by himself and rely on others, who we do not know, .. who are like Headache anonymous. REAL MAN do not hide behind anonymous, REAL MAN stand to it. REAL MAN do not post unverified matters in public, knowing they do just harm but give no chance to reply.
wmikrut, I have replied with many good things at the burstforum, till I found myself kicked out by the slammers. If you need something from me, talk to me. I am always helping. Actually I cannot catch your meaning what you got for free and added something.
Elmit, I trust Crowetic, you couldn't pay me enough to trust you. Yes, he's admitted his pool has had teething issues, owned up to it, and paid his miners out of his own pocket. When your pool has problems do you announce that there was a problem? Do you make it right for your miners? When your pool was down due to a corrupted wallet for 50 blocks or so, are you compensating your miners out of your personal stash? Or do you do things like hiding you payouts so your miners can't see that they're being stolen from? Not that the bots that are your majority miners are going to look or care ...... He is totally transparent, and he's not my boss. I don't work for Crow, I work for the benefit of the coin and the community. All the code in the wallet webpage can be downloaded and verified against official source for the wallet. I don't have a clue what your REAL MAN stuff is supposed to mean. I do know that REAL MAN don't rip off their customers, steal their domain names, blackmail their customers ........ http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Ronald-Wiplinger/internet/Ronald-Wiplinger-elmitcom-Ronald-agreed-to-complete-our-internet-sites-in-three-months-M-600875Elmit, wmikrut is saying no one could pay him to have anything to do with you, your pool or your "asset". Your "asset" is of course completely open so anyone can verify that your by hand calculations are correct and you're not sending funds to people that no longer own your asset? right ? H. Headache, you are just a gossiper, a repeater, who has no idea what you are talking about. Just a parrot without value, without any proof. You are not a REAL MAN, Your an anonymous, without any life achievements you could be proud of. Troll away! If you would use half of your time you use against me, to promote BURST, we all would benefit. Well, I know you can't, you do what you learned to do: GOSSIPING !!!BTW, what did the Singapore Water department give you as answer? I would never trust a public wallet, especially when the pool, asset had already problems. Why do you not give him your password phrase? It's like posting on the bulletin board, or just post it here, same effect! |
|
|
|
Would it be a solution, if I take from my local wallet the directory burst_db and replace it at the pool and restart the wallet?
Yes, that worked, ... Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Would it be a solution, if I take from my local wallet the directory burst_db and replace it at the pool and restart the wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a wallet at the pool, and there this error poped up. I restarted the wallet, but now it stucks at 100649 - no error
Maybe the list of peers is outdated:
nxt.wellKnownPeers = "198.199.103.145; 178.62.39.204; burst.cryptoport.io; 192.155.252.202; 37.58.107.74; 119.81.165.138; 119.81.44.170; 119.81.44.171"
|
|
|
|
What does this mean in the wallet: 2015-05-20 07:42:10 SEVERE: Error processing transaction
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not in transaction
at nxt.db.Db.endTransaction(Db.java:198)
at nxt.TransactionProcessorImpl.processTransactions(TransactionProcessorImpl.java:515)
at nxt.TransactionProcessorImpl$5.run(TransactionProcessorImpl.java:210)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-05-20 08:18:30 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:18:30 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:26:57 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:26:57 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:29:43 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:29:43 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:31:05 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:31:05 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:32:39 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:32:39 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:36:02 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:36:02 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:36:07 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:36:07 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:36:47 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:36:47 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
2015-05-20 08:37:09 INFO: DUPLICATE KEY!!!
2015-05-20 08:37:09 INFO: Invalid key for account 12468105956737329840 at height 2147483647, was already set to a different one at height 12469
|
|
|
|
|
Changes on MiningHere.com pool:
Threshold of 250 BURSTs per payout
I am not sure what the best value for Pooldifficulty should be. The original value is 1 million.
When I compare it to the current Network Difficulty of 8500, it seems it is a time waist. It would take a couple of seconds to come down from 1 million to 8500. I will test with my old pool different values.
|
|
|
|
Expecting huge PUMP coming
Maybe we should make an AT for bettings  |
|
|
|
SSL is not strictly required, it just adds an additional level of security. If you take a look at a packet trace of you authenticating to a non-SSL wallet, the pass phrase is not sent over the wire. Instead, after you enter your passphrase, the browser requests the publickey for your account (The account ID is generated from the passphrase). Presumably then, the private key (also generated from the passphrase) is used to validate the public key and grant access.
So, even without SSL the passphrase cannot be harvested, SSL just adds an additional layer by making the entire conversation encrypted.
SSL is required for real security. SSL provides both encryption and authentication. Without SSL, it is possible to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. For example: an attacker sitting in the middle of your non-SSL connection can replace the javascript on the webpage with malicious javascript that harvests your password. I'm glad Burst City added SSL to their wallet, but it really should have been there all along. To be honest, in this day and age, every website should have SSL, especially a website that is dealing directly with sending and receiving a crypto-currency. 1. SSL is as good as the certificate is. There are different levels. Some, as this one, are only good that you know the connection is secure. It misses contacts, background checks, ... Basically this certificate says: the connection is correct! 2. The next step is what the server does with your information. ... I don't want to spell out what could happen, if the passphrase leaks to the owner/employee/hacker of that site. With all anonymity, ... we know not even who is xxx of that site. I strongly recommend NOT to use such site for MONEY sensitive issues! For me it is merrily a "proof of concept", but not to use! Elmit, Crowetic is a known, trusted, member of the burst community. I trust the services he provides totally. If you offered a web wallet I wouldn't trust it even if you offered 10x the encryption level. Reputation and history is everything, and you fail on both. H. Wow... in Crowetic's defense... he has been completely transparent if nothing else. He has been a part of Burst when only like 5 or 6 of us were chatting in the beginning. Elmit... if it's the same Elmit I know of from burstforum... you couldn't give me anything he has to offer if it was free and you added something to it. Headache, Crowtec is a Burst community member as you and me. I am glad you trust him. He stated several times that xxx had a problem, apologized for it, ... The group did not pay out for the asset, change the asset at their will, without any way to verify their calculations. ... that all did not establish trust to him either. I don't think he is transparent, he might be your boss, but not transparent to the public. I made the proof of concept a while back. Yes it is working, but I will not offer such service. It is not a question of the encryption level, when he cannot program by himself and rely on others, who we do not know, .. who are like Headache anonymous. REAL MAN do not hide behind anonymous, REAL MAN stand to it. REAL MAN do not post unverified matters in public, knowing they do just harm but give no chance to reply. wmikrut, I have replied with many good things at the burstforum, till I found myself kicked out by the slammers. If you need something from me, talk to me. I am always helping. Actually I cannot catch your meaning what you got for free and added something. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, is Dev's pool V2 still paying? I signed up yesteday with 6TB and have not received an payments, also the balance for my address doesn't change, I'm confused  is that pool still active? shows that they did payout yesterday! However, it was less than the day before. They might be also fallen into the millennium cause (99,999). Do they have an email address or any contact way? Instead of guessing or asking here. |
|
|
|
SSL is not strictly required, it just adds an additional level of security. If you take a look at a packet trace of you authenticating to a non-SSL wallet, the pass phrase is not sent over the wire. Instead, after you enter your passphrase, the browser requests the publickey for your account (The account ID is generated from the passphrase). Presumably then, the private key (also generated from the passphrase) is used to validate the public key and grant access.
So, even without SSL the passphrase cannot be harvested, SSL just adds an additional layer by making the entire conversation encrypted.
SSL is required for real security. SSL provides both encryption and authentication. Without SSL, it is possible to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. For example: an attacker sitting in the middle of your non-SSL connection can replace the javascript on the webpage with malicious javascript that harvests your password. I'm glad Burst City added SSL to their wallet, but it really should have been there all along. To be honest, in this day and age, every website should have SSL, especially a website that is dealing directly with sending and receiving a crypto-currency. 1. SSL is as good as the certificate is. There are different levels. Some, as this one, are only good that you know the connection is secure. It misses contacts, background checks, ... Basically this certificate says: the connection is correct! 2. The next step is what the server does with your information. ... I don't want to spell out what could happen, if the passphrase leaks to the owner/employee/hacker of that site. With all anonymity, ... we know not even who is xxx of that site. I strongly recommend NOT to use such site for MONEY sensitive issues! For me it is merrily a "proof of concept", but not to use! 1. it has already been stated and proven that BURST doesn't allow for password stealing in this manner. 2. The SSL was something that was done for peace of mind and for no other purpose 3. If you don't trust me, don't use my wallet, no one is forcing you. I trust you enough for buy assets from you, but i wont trust any one include you for online wallet. Exactly! To buy an asset is a different story than from giving somebody my (not-changeable) pin code of my ATM (that is basically the password of Burst wallet) |
|
|
|
SSL is not strictly required, it just adds an additional level of security. If you take a look at a packet trace of you authenticating to a non-SSL wallet, the pass phrase is not sent over the wire. Instead, after you enter your passphrase, the browser requests the publickey for your account (The account ID is generated from the passphrase). Presumably then, the private key (also generated from the passphrase) is used to validate the public key and grant access.
So, even without SSL the passphrase cannot be harvested, SSL just adds an additional layer by making the entire conversation encrypted.
SSL is required for real security. SSL provides both encryption and authentication. Without SSL, it is possible to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. For example: an attacker sitting in the middle of your non-SSL connection can replace the javascript on the webpage with malicious javascript that harvests your password. I'm glad Burst City added SSL to their wallet, but it really should have been there all along. To be honest, in this day and age, every website should have SSL, especially a website that is dealing directly with sending and receiving a crypto-currency. 1. SSL is as good as the certificate is. There are different levels. Some, as this one, are only good that you know the connection is secure. It misses contacts, background checks, ... Basically this certificate says: the connection is correct! 2. The next step is what the server does with your information. ... I don't want to spell out what could happen, if the passphrase leaks to the owner/employee/hacker of that site. With all anonymity, ... we know not even who is xxx of that site. I strongly recommend NOT to use such site for MONEY sensitive issues! For me it is merrily a "proof of concept", but not to use! Elmit, Crowetic is a known, trusted, member of the burst community. I trust the services he provides totally. If you offered a web wallet I wouldn't trust it even if you offered 10x the encryption level. Reputation and history is everything, and you fail on both. H. Wow... in Crowetic's defense... he has been completely transparent if nothing else. He has been a part of Burst when only like 5 or 6 of us were chatting in the beginning. Elmit... if it's the same Elmit I know of from burstforum... you couldn't give me anything he has to offer if it was free and you added something to it. I thought the PR team is already dead, but see, they all can jump up for their boss. See the facts! 1. Crowtec has a cheap certificate, which requires minimal credentials! I do NOT trust such a certificate my wallet. 2. SSL is the half part of the trust. It only says that the data from user to server is protected. I do not know Crowtec, there is absolutely nothing to verify about him/his company, ... And the certificate does not make it better. 3. Further, it is not just Crowtec, who often said, he does not know (Linux, ....) by himself, we need to trust, that he hire the right people to fill this gap. Who knows if these programers added a backdoor to steal passphrases? Without accusing him to do that, but it could happen. Therefore I would never trust such a wallet! NEVER, NEVER, NEVER! |
|
|
|
SSL is not strictly required, it just adds an additional level of security. If you take a look at a packet trace of you authenticating to a non-SSL wallet, the pass phrase is not sent over the wire. Instead, after you enter your passphrase, the browser requests the publickey for your account (The account ID is generated from the passphrase). Presumably then, the private key (also generated from the passphrase) is used to validate the public key and grant access.
So, even without SSL the passphrase cannot be harvested, SSL just adds an additional layer by making the entire conversation encrypted.
SSL is required for real security. SSL provides both encryption and authentication. Without SSL, it is possible to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. For example: an attacker sitting in the middle of your non-SSL connection can replace the javascript on the webpage with malicious javascript that harvests your password. I'm glad Burst City added SSL to their wallet, but it really should have been there all along. To be honest, in this day and age, every website should have SSL, especially a website that is dealing directly with sending and receiving a crypto-currency. 1. SSL is as good as the certificate is. There are different levels. Some, as this one, are only good that you know the connection is secure. It misses contacts, background checks, ... Basically this certificate says: the connection is correct! 2. The next step is what the server does with your information. ... I don't want to spell out what could happen, if the passphrase leaks to the owner/employee/hacker of that site. With all anonymity, ... we know not even who is xxx of that site. I strongly recommend NOT to use such site for MONEY sensitive issues! For me it is merrily a "proof of concept", but not to use! |
|
|
|
Its not "local" wallet. Any reason for use this new wallet and advantages from it? One possibility of using: "InfoAddr" : "wallet.burst.city", "InfoPort": 8125,  @catbref: can you open public http at different port? Thank you bro! Everyone, we now have an official online BURST wallet, the advantages of which are not having to have the blockchain on your local rig, and we can now make tools that work around the online wallet. We will be setting up all of the AT stuff there, and making tools that work with it, for ease of use for BURST. Thanks again cat! How do I know this isn't collecting people's passwords? I thought this would be avoided with the addition of SSL (even though not even that is necessary). I'm not collecting passwords... That would be stupid, but SSL should prove what I'm saying. Not at all. SSL - secure socket layer only makes sure that the data transfer from user to server is encrypted, but what the server is doing with that data is all up to them. With all the anonymity in cryptocurrency you must have a great faith to trust anybody who you do not know. |
|
|
|
Its not "local" wallet. Any reason for use this new wallet and advantages from it? One possibility of using: "InfoAddr" : "wallet.burst.city", "InfoPort": 8125, @catbref: can you open public http at different port? Thank you bro! Everyone, we now have an official online BURST wallet, the advantages of which are not having to have the blockchain on your local rig, and we can now make tools that work around the online wallet. We will be setting up all of the AT stuff there, and making tools that work with it, for ease of use for BURST. Thanks again cat! How do I know this isn't collecting people's passwords? That's why I stopped my public wallet, to avoid such accusations! |
|
|
|
Hello friends,
it is better to benefit from a series of different machines in a pool 3x connection to the pool or the proxy miter in the pool connected only once?
A single machine is better, because you're working off the nonces in the files. The more nonces you have, the larger the rewards. Not correct! As more nonces you send in, as more CHANCES you get to get an reward. It does not matter if the nonces are coming from one or multiple machines. Compare it with a lottery ticket. As more lottery ticket you buy as more chances you get to be a winner. In the pool each ticket is honoured, better said, the best ticket of each user is counted. So, if you have 100 miners, each one send in its nonces, but only the best will be counted. For 100 miners therefore a max of totally 100 tickets will be counted. The pool mined reward will be higher for 100 tickets, than just for 1 ticket, except you got the jackpot. |
|
|
|
Why is price so low?.
There might be several reasons: 1. What is the benefit of the coin? 2. What can you do with the coin? 3. Did you hear anything in the (social) media? Euphoria is gone! Now we look at clear facts. What did you do to improve the value of Burst? Did you trade it (forth and back)? Did you promote Burst? in your signatures? Did you use ATs? Did you create an asset? Did you create a shop? If you are not using it, why should others? Supply and demand is in my opinion in a mismatch. Arguments, that you can mine Bursts with low energy cost is great, but I can paint also a wall with a cheap color. The question is, what you can do with Bursts (or the painted wall.) You can make many colorful paintings and store it. Will it get more value by doing it so? I completely disagree with keep the coin! No demand, no value! |
|
|
|
i changed the info address also in the preconfigured miner under howtos.....
Maybe you change also от to from |
|
|
|
New Asset AnnouncementName: ByteEMini Asset ID: 639537212154320 Offer Price: 0.4 Total Shares: 100,000 100 ByteEMini = 1 ByteEnt This asset is based on my personal holdings of 1000 x ByteEnt shares details on this can found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.msg10682579#msg10682579 All dividends received on my 1000 ByteEnt shares will be passed onto ByteEMini holders. Payouts monthly. This asset is for people that were interested in the ByteEnt shares, but perhaps didn't have the funds for purchasing or missed the initial offer or want to try out the asset market with a smaller asset purchase. To purchase:- Open burst wallet Click Asset Exchange tab on left side navigation menu Click Add Asset button top right side corner Enter asset id: 639537212154320 Recommended purchase in blocks of 100 Any questions please ask. Thank you. I am puzzled about this asset. What is it for? I mean, why not simple offer the original for trade? What if the price diverts of original and yours? What if the original transfers (again) into another asset? If somebody cannot afford 40, then I doubt he could afford 4 Burst to buy, lol. |
|
|
|
You move 30-40 blocks 3-5 times a day in a midlle acount and then to Poloniex.....I think u move many billion Burst here to keep them fresh  . That Coin and that Team need people with faιth ,not people who look all the time at the PolonieXs price. That's it your a genius! You can read the blockchain! A coin is a coin, and not a forum thread, has to have value, right? Can't draw its value from people talking on the forum, has to be bought and sold. I sell some, I keep some. FYI, I have 8 mil burst, and I'd rather not have them, but then I'm not gonna dump at 100 either. And I just beat all pools, I'm #1 miner. And going up! I'd quit at this price, but then again BURST is really inexpensive to mine. Perhaps we need more PoC coins. Block reward is deflating too fast here, it is going to kill the coin. Stop search for imbeciles and genius, just send some Burst as donation to people who work hard to make that coin bigger. Send some mBTC to PR team. Btw why you use a middle account to move burst? I have the feelings there are UNWRITTEN RULES to obey, like - don't mine with the same IP, - don't mine with the same hard disk multiple users, - don't sell Bursts, - don't trade with Bursts, - ... (fill the blanks) - in fact do not do anything with it, just DONATE them, and hope that the PR Gods will promote Bursts.FYI, ANY transaction has a transaction fee attached, and THAT fee is for the miners. Therefore don't STARE at your (thousands/millions of) Bursts, move them instead. If there is no NEED for that, than there is also no NEED for Bursts at all. I suggest to: - create shops - create assets - create/use/promote AT (like the long forgotten lottery) - add Burst ads to your email, ... social networks' signatures - promote Burst's AT ability ... just do it! Don't wait till the PR team has a flash once again. Donate to yourself, but promote now! |
|
|
|
Burst value is now at 100 Satoshi.
Time to change the PR from "pointing fingers" to "promoting" Bursts.
Burst has AT, with all it's projects, Escrow, ...
Pool attacks seems also to be on the rise, that gives me HEADACHE to think of the future of BURST, if it has a future at all.
I don't think that "pool attacks" and "pointing fingers" is the right "PR", does it?
Please don't reply, just promote BURST the right way would be the BEST reply!
Oh Elmit, I try to ignore you, but you just wont let me. I try to help you by telling you your pool is down, and I just get abuse and insinuation. Me so sad  I can read the blockchain just fine, and what I see is: your pool wins a round, your pool pays out; and it pays until it's balance is zero, but the payouts don't add up. Going over the blockchain I see you winning a block, paying out 180 miners, for 66% of the block reward. Then I see you paying out a round - 18 miners for a total of 77 burst. The evidence is right there on the blockchain, and if you had a functional braincell you could see it. So if your miners are lucky, they'll get 66% of their due payout, on a bad payout, they'll get squat. Now, the only reason I bothered to respond to this message was that your post implies I'm attacking your pool. Care to explain? I tried to report you to the Singapore Fraud Squad, but was thwarted by the need to provide a SNID. But don't worry, I'll figure out something else. The only attacks I'll launch on your pool will be legal ones. Elit - my apologies that Elmit thinks you're a sock puppet of mine, the guy is rather paranoid. Like you I want to keep Burst clean - and I want this player gone. Uray who wrote the original pool code says it's flawed, it's buggy, it fails to pay out properly. Other pools running that code seem to have fixed most of the issues, Elmit runs the original code, bugs and all and blames everyone else for the flaws in his pool. I'm still torn over the fact that most of his miners seem to be bots with tiny plots, mining 10-20GB of space - is Elmit making the bot, or just providing a bot friendly environment ? H. Headache, when will you grow up? The Singapore Fraud Squad is responding to you? to YOU??? to a hacker kiddy??? Let me laugh out loud! They will send you in the best case an ambulance. Get real man! Do you really think they will move a finger, because HEADACHE said something, without ANY proof? Others, than what can be made with photoshop and a text editor??? Do you really think they will take you seriously when you tell them that you have (no) proof that the pool did not pay out 0.0002 UScents??? I also wonder how you figured out 33% pool fee. I did not respond to that so far, because everybody who CAN read the blockchain sees that this is a proof of your bad intention to me, my pool AND TO THE BURST COMMUNITY. NONE of my miners had complaint, and YOU as outsider complain? Why are you doing it? IF you are not involved in botnets, so why are you mention it? IF you are not attacking pools, why are you mention it? I am not checking other pools to broadcast like you do. Obviously YOU are the w**m in the Burst community. Attacking a pool (verbal and cyber) will not help the Burst community. The price is already down at 100. So it is not anymore feasible to mine at all. As other post already mentioned, RoI is far away. And now with your attacks you think you can move people to other pools? Please hit the ignore button on the left side, and please ONLY reply if you have something to say, to say to BURST and not to just my pool. Don't forget to add this post to the Singapore Water Department!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
