Apologies, read your post a bit too quickly  round_shares has now been added, bit of an oversight really, sorry about that |
|
|
|
organofcorti, that already exists - try https://www.rfcpool.com/api/pool/statsYou can append ?xml=1 to get XML if you prefer. That'll give you hashrate, number of workers, and roundtime. More detailed per-worker stats are coming soon with an API key system etc |
|
|
|
|
The pool has earnt about 3 BTC to keep in reserves so far. Clearly that won't cut it, so I have 150BTC sat aside in the event it's needed, and I'm prepared to buy a few hundred more if the proverbial hits the fan in terms of round times.
However, given the current takeup of PPS compared to Proportional (one or two low MH people are using it, last I checked) it's not yet anywhere near to being a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Tonight we moved the pool to the first of several bigger servers to better cope with growth. It pretty much went completely flawlessly with only a few minutes of outage.
The only hiccup was idle worker notifications were sent out when they shouldn't have been, so I apologise for the false alarm in your email.
In other news, almost at 30GH, and 5 blocks now found.
|
|
|
|
|
We have PPS (see sig) but we're pretty new and so the trust issue is pretty large I guess. We do charge a fee for it (7%, less than deepbit) but it might be reduced after we build up a BTC buffer for ourselves against 10-million share rounds.
|
|
|
|
Looks good here too, cheers |
|
|
|
Third block found! Jump in near the start of our 4th block now |
|
|
|
|
Realising that our site looked like it was designed by programmers (it was), we have started over with a new design which is hopefully a little easier on the eye.
Still looking for more miners, we're peaking at 12GH/s at the moment. We do offer PPS if you don't want to join a round so far in.
|
|
|
|
10GH/s bump. Done some tuning and tweaking on reducing stales too, try us out and see how low your stale ratio can get |
|
|
|
New pool for you to add rfcpool Location: UK Type: Prop & PPS Fee: 0% Prop, 7% PPS TXN Fees: Kept TXN Fee for withdraw: No Web: Yes LP: Yes AutoPayout: yes, configurable Instant Payout: Yes, for confirmed funds, 8dp precision allowed Share Validation: yes, 120 blocks Multiple Workers: Yes Email isn't username: Yes Idle Notifes: Yes JSON API: The beginnings of one, coming soon SSL: Yes IPv6: No (maybe soon..) wallet security: payout lock for 24h after change GUI Preset: No Address: pool.rfcpool.com:8332 (or :80) |
|
|
|
|
Requested addition of rfcpool but it's yet to show up? Is there a processing backlog?
|
|
|
|
Up to 6GH/s. Idle worker notifications are now active. API development underway, pool stats available, user stats next |
|
|
|
JoelKatz, Managing to get segfaults when I send getwork to bitcoind with this set of patches now, backtrace below: (gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f710a6e8394 in pthread_mutex_lock ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x0000000000447103 in boost::interprocess::interprocess_recursive_mutex::lock (this=<value optimized out>)
at /usr/include/boost/interprocess/sync/posix/interprocess_recursive_mutex.hpp:53
#2 0x0000000000477d98 in Enter (this=0x0, nIndex=@0x9c1968, keypool=...)
at util.h:245
#3 CCriticalBlock (this=0x0, nIndex=@0x9c1968, keypool=...) at util.h:260
#4 CWallet::ReserveKeyFromKeyPool (this=0x0, nIndex=@0x9c1968, keypool=...)
at wallet.cpp:1041
#5 0x000000000047889c in CReserveKey::GetReservedKey (this=0x9c1960)
at wallet.cpp:1117
#6 0x0000000000458562 in CreateNewBlock (reservekey=...) at main.cpp:2713
#7 0x000000000048f630 in GetWorkBlock (
pmidstate=0x7f70feff9ef0 "С\377\376p\177", pdata=0x7f70feff9e30 "#",
phash1=0x7f70feff9eb0 "\250\223\f\003", hashTarget=...) at rpc.cpp:1359
#8 0x000000000048fca2 in FastGetWork (id=...) at rpc.cpp:1461
#9 0x000000000049d03b in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:2031
#10 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#11 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
at rpc.cpp:1981
#12 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#13 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#14 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#15 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#16 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#17 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#18 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#19 0x000000000049d328 in ThreadRPCServer3 (parg=0x7f71002503d0)
at rpc.cpp:1981
#20 0x00007f710a6e5d8c in start_thread ()
from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
#21 0x00007f7109c9004d in clone () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#22 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
This happening both with a fresh blockchain downloaded and a new wallet. Let me know what I can give you to help debug |
|
|
|
hum, we do have one user currently mining through port 80 so it is working. I'll be on IRC all day today, pop in after you get back from work and we'll see what's up Edit: Made a few tweaks, also please ensure that you're using pool.rfcpool.com if you're trying to use port 80, NOT rfcpool.com or www.rfcpool.com in your miner config. Port 80 will only work on pool.rfcpool.com |
|
|
|
|
Exactly why I just started one up - if anyone apart from my friends would chuffin' use it - hint :p
Thread in this forum if you're interested, I won't spam it.
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic Payouts are now working.
Fairly lacklustre response so far, is there anything in particular you guys would consider a crucial feature before considering this or any pool?
|
|
|
|
Sent you a little something Joel for your efforts |
|
|
|
Looks good! Trying it with a small private pool and no errors to report so far. Pushpool is happily re-using connections and work is still being dished out - TIME_WAITs have disappeared For anyone struggling to get this to build, by the way, use 0.3.22, not .23 or git. Any chance of a diff rather than the full file JoelKatz? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
