Hello, It would be so nice to see DigitalNote XDN at your pool. Pool is great and reliable. We have a miner inside the wallet and will point it to your pool too. Also you have a cryptonight support with Monero, so it will be pretty easy to add XDN. Thank you.
|
|
|
Block height 136212 is a Deposit Upgrade block height.
I have latest 1.0.1-beta win64 it stuck synchronizing at 136218 what should I do? 1. You should wait. Your wallet acts correctly and stays on good blockchain. 136218 height - is a height of good blockchain 2. we are investigating abnormal activity in blockchain. Looks like some pool, and looks like it is minergate.com didn`t made an DigitalNote upgrade. 3. http://duckpool.mooo.com:8080/#pool_blocks is the very very good pool, producing a valid and good blocks, because pool admin made all updates at time. Thank you very much, we will make a dev donation to you, as soon as we will solve all issues.
|
|
|
Block height 136212 is a Deposit Upgrade block height.
|
|
|
There might be a little problem here. My daemon is not accepting block http://chainradar.com/xdn/block/7861e683a259f0050543b923770b3595e3e900cd4009bb3e108140f12890b66c2015-Jun-18 23:31:35.896566 [P2P3]Block <7861e683a259f0050543b923770b3595e3e900cd4009bb3e108140f12890b66c> has wrong major version: 1, at height 136214 expected version is 2 I'm guessing there's more hash on the old version and they build upon the "wrong" chain. Looking at the code, it seems there's possible been enough hash on the new chain for the upgrade detector to trigger, but I'm speculating here, I've not looked at it much. I'm not going to hack that check out for now, in hopes that this will resolve itself, but AFAICT this can only happen if new daemons come online and hash on the partial chain. looks like chainradar did not made a DigitalNote update. We will investigate this event, but everything is about update. Please keep your updated pools running. Thank you.
|
|
|
Mining pools, miners, exchanges, please upgrade your daemons. Because of the deposits, all "old" mined blocks will be rejected by network. So if you mine XDN on old DarkNote of duckNote software now, all your block will be invalid. Please switch to the latest DigitalNote XDN Open Source software with blockchain deposit blocks. http://digitalnote.org https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote Thank you.
|
|
|
… DigitalNote cryptography is faster than Bitcoin and able to handle much more transactions per second than BTC. … I had the pertaining question on my mind for a while … ; it is only good that we get some clearer ideas of the practical advantages XDN has . As far as I know , please correct me if I am wrong , Bitcoin can handle less than 10 transactions per second , in the range of 7-8 , as of now … I would like to know how XDN performs in this regard by numbers . I know this is an important factor ( xdn-advantage ) or issue ( btc-pitfall) . Can you give a good estimate or a practical benchmark that further could be verified ? Is it possible to alter the transactions per second capacity by elaborating a new protocol technique easily implementable into XDN , in the foreseeable future ? Fist i must say - there is a "hard coded" value in Bitcoin about handling transactions. DigitalNote has no such a value, everything is dynamic. When network needs to produce a large amount of transactions, XDN will self organize itself to handle it. That digital duck is very smart. I will provide some benchmarks and charts later, sorry for any inconvenience, but we are very busy with deposits and GUI update.
|
|
|
If the merchant accepts then it's 0-conf security
He accepts a block with the transaction. It is 1 conf, but not 0-conf If all these different valid blocks don't offer any particular reward to specific addresses, then it's just DoS attack as discussed in section 5.1 of the PoA paper. If the attacker does wish to mix things up by incentivizing different participants to work on diffferent forks, then I tried to explain to you how to accomplish this attack more easily in Bitcoin.
The paper says that nodes "ban all blocks (blockheaders) with the last Nth stakeholders", but that can happen only if they will discover such headers. Imagine: All nodes are connected as bipartite graph (every "red" node is connected to a "blue" node, but there is no "red"-"red" or "blue"-"blue" connections) Attacker sends different blocks to all red nodes, remember, there is no connection between red-red nodes, so red nodes relay blocks only to blue nodes. Each blue node will ban this header. But how can red nodes know about it? We will need to implement some kind of alert system to avoid new DoS attack vectors. Can you ban the node for sending 2nd, 3rd, 4th ... block with the same header? I don`t think that system with a user, who can create unlimited number of blocks "for free" will run perfectly. Can see a problems here and solutions can cause new problems. I think that future DIgitalNote type of PoA implementation will have no such a treat. Thank you for answers and your work, please, comment any possible issues with XDN PoA idea.
|
|
|
It’s my greatest pleasure to announce that we have finished our first fundraising campaign and achieved our campaign goal. I want to express my deepest appreciation and gratitude to all the community members who believed in us and contributed to facilitate our common mission of promoting XDN. Below is the infographics with the results of the fundraising campaign. This fundraising campaign was our first main milestone. We received the support of the community and achieved our campaign goal. This gives us confidence in further evolution of our mission with strong support from growing XDN community. In our next step, we will use the collected funds to outsource some important PR and marketing activities to professional communications agency in crypto field. We will provide you with the information about the collected proposals shortly. Thank you all again and let’s keep the momentum going! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FRFXl9Au.jpg&t=663&c=Q5iuGAkNSNWhvA) Absolutely nice to see such things around XDN. Much appreciate your efforts for XDN mass adoption. Thank you.
|
|
|
Congratulations, it have been a great hit for digitalnote, one question: how can i make the deposit for receive the 1% of interest? thanks
As for now you can make a deposit transaction with "the core" of XDN. There is NO deposit support in wallet yet. We will introduce deposits in wallets like DigitalNote GUI wallet in near days, we are working on that release now. Just wait a bit. Or if you are an experienced user you can make deposit transaction now with your own code.
|
|
|
The last stakeholder can be an attacker who produces many valid blocks, but it isn't much different than attempting DoS on the Bitcoin network, it's discussed in section 5.1 of the PoA paper.
What if the last stakeholder will send lots of valid blocks. Like he will connect to all peers and send them different, but valid blocks (the "cost" of this kind of action is comparatively low). How they can choose the "right" one?
|
|
|
PoA stakeholder can pretty easy split the network and make a double-spend (?) :
1. he makes one block with his own transaction to merchant and sends this block to the merchant. 2 immediately creates the second block with a double-spend transaction and sends it to other peers. 3. The first block will be orphaned with a high probability, so as merchant's tx. So we are planning to return the ability of choosing the tx set back to PoW miner. Can you, please, comment it? Thank you.
Also much appreciate any other ideas to implement on the top of XDN blockchain and deposits. Now we are ASIC-resistant PoW with an original PoW initial distribution, but PoA will make XDN much stronger against 51% attack, but we should consider all options.
|
|
|
Dear XDN users, after DigitalNote announce XDN hashrate increases every day. Now is is about 200 KH/s. But i must remind you to switch and update an old duckNote and DarkNote daemons to a new DigitalNote daemons, because new features, like deposits are available only in DigitalNote core. Miners, please update your software to a new XDN software - https://github.com/xdn-project
|
|
|
Definitely I'm gonna follow the development of XDN, even with the price falling in poloniex. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Thank you. Price correction is expected now and many times in future. We strongly believe it will go up dramatically with the expansion and mass adoption. Lower prices is good for any currency to be used. Low prices now gives a chance to buy for a new users and investors. Any way, as a developers, we don`t care about xdn/btc and xdn/usd. The goal is to have things work just with XDN - almost instant transactions protected by ASIC-resistant PoW and POA in future, micropayments, deposits (like a bank in blockchain), crypto messages, etc etc etc. We are making decentralized crypto with bank and all services on top of blockchain. With Proof-of-work, 1cpu1vote blockchain. With XDN mining, with development help, with your ideas, all together we will push DigitalNote in masses. To be free, to avoid censorship of any kind, staying private, protecting your rights. I must Create a System, or be enslav'd by another Man's; I will not Reason and Compare: my business is to Create.
William Blake
|
|
|
What the hack happened with the beautiful DarkNote wallet? And the beautiful DarkNote webpage! Seems you have moved to be another indistinguishable clone now... A shame to see such an important project wasting time an confusing renaming/rebranding rather on technical/conceptual issues.
Thank you for your critique, but i must disagree. First of all XDN can be barely called a clone, i mean now it is a mix of blockchain technologies, some was made from scratch, like crypto messages and deposits. Even the "core" of XDN was refractored with the DigitalNote release. Initially it was a fork of Bytecoin, but now it is hard to say if it is, because we merged so much staff from the original CryptoNote codebase. XDN core now has both bytecoin and cryptonote elements with the original XDN features like you can find on the official website or whitepaper http://digitalnote.org/whitepaper The is no shame we can feel, truly, look what we made, look how bright it is, look how it can change the world. We never waist time, our actions are measured accurately. Some like duck, some like dark - everything here is not a "-", but "+". be water my friend
|
|
|
What the hack happened with the beautiful DarkNote wallet? And the beautiful DarkNote webpage! Seems you have moved to be another indistinguishable clone now... A shame to see such an important project wasting time an confusing renaming/rebranding rather on technical/conceptual issues.
agree. dNOTE and now XDNote have exactly the same market cap and both trade mostly on Polo ... uber confusing. DarkNote could have been nicknamed DARK (grafting off the Dash old brandname). And yes pretty website. DUCK was the perfect name. Even punny you might say ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) In the hearts of early adopters and as a part of XDN History, you can always call it duckNote. It is still here with us http://archive.ducknote.cc/ and always will be. duck never dies, duck is here, lives in XDN blockchain. Everything about XDN lives in XDN blockchain. Forever.
|
|
|
What the hack happened with the beautiful DarkNote wallet? And the beautiful DarkNote webpage! Seems you have moved to be another indistinguishable clone now... A shame to see such an important project wasting time an confusing renaming/rebranding rather on technical/conceptual issues.
I understand your point, but DigitalNote is the last name here - end of the first year distribution. It is like a new coin with a constant block reward. We made blockchain deposits possible (first ever) to integrate POA (first ever). Think about XDN duck->Dark->Digital as a natural process of evolution, as a way we are going. duck - to spread the initial hashrate that was pretty big with big rewards dark - to spread XDN coin units and also the hashrate too digital - ready for mass adoption, decentralized DigitalNote made a 5th year Bitcoin route in 1 year, i mean XDN is even better coin for mass adoption in terms of blockr ewards, coin units count and of course DigitalNote features.
|
|
|
I want everyone to understand DigitalNote XDN block reward structure for miners:
Miners reward = Base_block_reward + fee
Base block reward = 150 XDN Fee = average message fee = 1 XDN, so in case of 150 messages in 1 block, miners will have an additional 150 XDN. DigitalNote cryptography is faster than Bitcoin and able to handle much more transactions per second, than BTC.
Deposits. already implemented in core, but not PoA. PoA will be based on blockchain deposits, we are hard working on it. When done, DigitalNote will be the first cryptocurrency (not only first CN coin) ever implemented Proof-of-activity in addition to Proof-of-work.
We will discuss PoA here and in other places.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Hi, i would like to introduce an approach we are (XDN-project dev team) going to implement on the top of DigitalNote XDN blockchain http://digitalnote.org & http://digitalnote.org/whitepaper. 1. We want to implement PoA in XDN, rather than PeerCoin PoS, because we consider PoA is safer. It is truly HYBRID protocol: we need both PoW and PoS elements to produce a block, so 51% attack is harder. Remember, XDN has an ASIC-resistant proof-of-work. 2. Original protocol doesn't suit for an anonymous CryptoNote transactions. So we had 2 options: 2.1. Research and develop the new PoA scheme for XDN. That is a long and unpredictable way. 2.2. Implement a useful blockchain based feature (called deposits) and then apply the PoA based on blockchain deposits. So we chose it and made blockchain deposits based on multi-sigs a part of DigitalNote XDN. 3. Now we have deposits (check https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnote), now we are ready to implement Proof-of-activity. Before that we want to discuss PoA with all interested parties. 4. Also we noticed a possible problem with the original PoA. ONLY the "last" "stakeholder" can set transactions for a new block. When done, he signs and broadcasts a new block to the network. Seems nothing wrong here, but "last" "stakeholder" can produce as many valid blocks as he needs by changing transactions set. So he can split the blockchain and make a double spend. In that case we are planning to give a right of setting up a block to the Proof-of-work miners.
|
|
|
|