I would think solo miners wouldn't use a modification to skip them yet. Any way, a pool really should sell this service.
I could probably add this service myself, surprised it doesn't exist yet, anyway, BUMP. |
|
|
|
Don't solo miners usually include them?
They haven't in 2 days, from what I understand I'd be extremely lucky to get even 1 transaction included per block. |
|
|
|
Won't they get included at some point? Or there has to be a service for this.
There are a couple dozen of them, I don't want to wait ~200days for them to get included. Sorry for noob question, but what is "low tx transactions"?
I've meant low transaction fees. |
|
|
|
|
Still waiting, ready to pay BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
*Bump* still looking
I will be very grateful.
|
|
|
|
Please explain, grue, how a receiver of a transaction can include "a damn fee" when they receive a transaction?
I meant getting the sender to include the fee. As in, 1 confirmation or the goods aren't sent. The cost of paying pools to include transaction is going to get passed down to the customer anyways. Might as well let the customer decide whether paying an extra 50 cents is worth the faster delivery time. Why bother creating all this complicated infrastructure over a problem that doesn't exist? Because then you could turn in a nice profit from businesses whose models benefit greatly from zero confirmation transactions, e.g. S. Dice, other casinos maybe? Plus non-business personal transactions. |
|
|
|
Please check out: I have a series of low tx transactions all signed by a previously sent unconfirmed transaction. Is there a pool that would be willing to include them? I will pay whatever as long as it's fair.
I will appreciate some help!  |
|
|
|
BTW, pool operators and miners DO come here. But there is nothing specifically we can do. The system is 100% automated, it isn't like a bank where we can pick and choose individual transactions to assist. At some point it should become profitable and probably even necessary for miners and pool operators to hire programmers to develop and optimize their own transaction selection policy. I don't expect that to happen until the transaction rate is much higher though. Can't a pool operator set up a system that will work like: 1) You specify the IP address of the pool in your bitcoin settings 2) You register with the pool (perhaps they will only register businesses manually) 3) All your transactions are included in the very next block, both ones that you receive or send. 4) Debt is calculated and you must pay it within say 3 days, through your members area to your unique BTC debt address. Perhaps a "package" service would be introduced to cap the number of transaction that they will include in the next block from you. It would be very profitable for both the pool and the business, businesses would flourish as they would be able to accept zero conf transaction and have them included in a block rapidly. Anyway I am looking for someone to do this favor manually. I will appreciate it very much! |
|
|
|
if you search the forums, there are various threads on how to resend the transaction with fees. there's no point asking a pool owner to help you, because they never come here.
I haven't sent them, I have received them, it is a long chain of transaction and every one is signed with the previous one, can't a miner fix this? |
|
|
|
|
BUMP, It will really help me.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a series of low tx transactions all signed by a previously sent unconfirmed transaction. Is there a pool that would be willing to include them? I will pay whatever as long as it's fair.
|
|
|
|
Someone has opened a thread about my thread? I feel honored  |
|
|
|
the recipient can pay some pool to include the transaction in their next block.
How is this done? |
|
|
|
|
If I would give someone the IP and/or inputs could someone speed up the process and include all of them in the next block say for 0.1BTC? Not really 200, just a chain of couple dozen. This would really help me out.
|
|
|
|
|
about 200 transactions, each transaction has no tx and is signed by the last transaction, will Alice have to wait for a long period to receive the funds? Can Alice speed it up?
|
|
|
|
How do I deal with it?
I went from "screw you, you can't have it" (followed by threats)
to...I'll work within the system with other like minded people to get the laws changed (come to find out, a majority of Americans are big supporters of taxes)
to...time to work toward an alternative
That's exactly the problem, most people are stupid. I've actually heard from people that claim they want a program to educate parents on how to parent before they have children and make that mandatory, it's like if you want to enforce stupid, idiotic, moronic laws, do it out of your own salary. If you have a family member who is so out of control that the police have to be on him 24/7 to watch over him so he doesn't acquire drugs or alcohol hire them privately, don't vote for a babysitting country. |
|
|
|
15 Then the angel said to me, “The waters you saw, where the prostitute sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and languages. 16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. 17 For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing to hand over to the beast their royal authority, until God’s words are fulfilled. 18 The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.” Govt. beholden to the banksters, (bailing out criminality and corruption with taxes on the wealth of nations, succumbing to threats of destroying the financial system without more money for bonuses, etc, etc, ... the usurpations are now endless) is metaphorically equivalent to .... "kings of the Earth fornicating with the beast" Enshrining in natural Law the separation of money and state (as we strive for with religion and state) is the only way to avoid such an outcome again ... in a future enlightened world.  Whore Of Babylon should be synonymous with central banks. |
|
|
|
|
Since it is impossible to double spend and the company is pretty trustworthy how could you determine if a transaction was sent from blockchain.info with the standard bitcoin-qt client?
|
|
|
|
|
Got that already, would be pretty useful if it was implemented though, seen a lot of useless crap functions have made it but not this, along with SendFromAddress.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
