It's not a debate anymore. The debate is over.
 |
|
|
|
You blockstreamers are truly beneath contempt at this point. I urge anyone to have a look at this discussion if you are in any doubt that bitcoin is being taken over by private interests. edit: I've just seen the commit. This is a new low point for Bitcoin. Since when do you care about Bitcoin lambie? You should take some meds to deal with that tic, forker  |
|
|
|
You blockstreamers are truly beneath contempt at this point. I urge anyone to have a look at this discussion if you are in any doubt that bitcoin is being taken over by private interests. edit: I've just seen the commit. This is a new low point for Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
There exists a natural place where unicorns live. I've said it. Does that mean it is true? Should I write a paper to confirm it? His words were obliterated by others long ago. Can you cite an example? Or is this statement on a par with your Unicorn dictum...  |
|
|
|
It's clear as day to anyone not delusional that what it proposes is simply impossible hence why it's nothing but vapor ware. Sure you put out a client where every local node is able to select their "acceptable" block size. Big deal. Such ingenuity!
Thats funny, brg444. If you were being ironic, I would say you were very clever, but I get the feeling you are not. |
|
|
|
back to 333!
And a jolly Bah, Humbug to you too sir! |
|
|
|
Did you read the first comment on that? Classic. Maaku chooses to hear only what he wants to hear... Developing the fee market is not about rising fees..
Developing the fee market is about providing mechanisms for succinctly getting a feel of current fee rates, being able to provide updated fees in response to changing conditions or outdated info, and otherwise making sure that user experience regarding fees is as simple as possible. So its not about raising the fee after all. Are you sure Mark? I mean, really, Are you telling us that? He is using the same weasel language ("Developing the market") when he simply means "getting higher prices" |
|
|
|
Can I buy shares of Blockstream with Bitcoins?  They only accept Freicoins. Or Namecoins. Or any altcoin associated with or developed by their founders...  |
|
|
|
*BlockchainTM Technology is a registered trademark and property of the Blockstream corporation. Fuck you.
Hello, new signature! |
|
|
|
Happy Christmas to all, and to $3200 in 2016!!
|
|
|
|
French nazis hate Bitcoin - Bullish!! |
|
|
|
... ignored.
Thanks for dropping by! BTW: what exactly is a payment channel this week? Is it the same as last weeks definition, or have you binned that like you binned the original LN definition? All these concepts seem to be movable feasts. Dream up something, publish it, find several holes in it, redesign an entire working protocol to work with it... Have you guys never heard of a road map? |
|
|
|
sheesh ... trolls don't even get christmas off? ... you guys need to be paid more.
Hey Marcus, Tell me something.... Is SW really simple but hard to explain, or something really complex but simple to explain?  |
|
|
|
He got this right: What the LN guys are trying to do is to invent banking as it might have been first imagined 4000 years ago ha! I have to admit to being fully and completely disillusioned by this.  Or it could stiffen your resolve to not allow bitcoin be hijacked like this.  The so-called 'core' dev team is coming up with ever more ludicrously convoluted solutions to problems we dont yet have, while vehemently denying a problem that we do have which can be solved with a change to a single #define in the code. Its getting a bit scary. |
|
|
|
He got this right: What the LN guys are trying to do is to invent banking as it might have been first imagined 4000 years ago ha! |
|
|
|
100m transactions coming up and we still dont need bigger blocks....  |
|
|
|
(sorry, saw "The Force Awakens" last night)
how did you like it? I thought it was definitely good and in the spirit of the original 3. I did feel it largely did it by reusing the same formula though. It was a bit light-weight but the next ones could be interesting. I kinda wanted to see it in imax but the only one I could find in range was only doing imax 3d so I just went local. Those final scenes are breathtaking on Imax. |
|
|
|
The definition of the Oxford dictionnary is Marxist
I'm sorry, but the "Stupidest thing I read on the internet today" award goes to you. |
|
|
|
god damit forkers, seems you figured it all out, bravo!
Hey, hdfuck! I heard you are offering 1BTC for the severed head of renowned phorker brg444? Is that true? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
