Yeah cause that's really similar to what your doing. If I could post the worlds biggest rolleyes smiley here I would.
As for the utterly dilusional second part of your post, if you really believe that then you're more far gone than I thought. The main reasons people on here attack Solidcoin are twofold:
1. Because you're a gigantic douche
2. People the whole concept of solidcoin is flawed and against everything bitcoin stands for.
The fact that you have yo keep changes the rules to jeep the stupid thing alive illustrates that quite nicely. So those 2 points make people here continually talk about it? Sounds like a smart move on my part. You have your own forum. If you were so confident that your coin will smash bitcoin in the future then you'd just let it stand on its own merits instead of continually spamming this place with your nonsense. Clearly you're not confident at all. Seems to annoy the people that want it to "Go away" because See point 1. Lite coin etc aren't picked on because they hold true to what this place is about. Your sham doesnt, not in the slightest. If it were up to me you'd be banned in an instant, then we'd see how well you'd do with just your own forum to "educate". I agree I'd love nothing more than for people on here to stop taking the piss out of Solidcoin as it'd die all that much quicker, but its just too easy a target I guess. Now run along. You no doubt have to make some fundamental changes to how your coin works to keep it alive and flailing. |
|
|
|
it is not a FUD if it's the fact.
Well the more you talk about SolidCoin the more of a threat you think it is. You do understand this right? The more you try to "counter" the movement or "educate" people about how "evil" and "scammy" SolidCoin is the more afraid you come across. The fact that after 7 months we still have people trying to claim SolidCoin is a pump and dump or "Get rich quick" scheme shows how afraid some people are. Get on the bike before it's too late, SolidCoin is going to to surpass Bitcoin because it's way less of a "scam" to normal people... just take a look at the pyramid reward system in Bitcoin and the fact each Bitcoin is backed by nothing at all. SolidCoin on the other hand is backed by "energy" and a coin made today will roughly be what it costs to make in a year. That is called stable production costs and is what will attract new users and businesses to it. Utter tripe. See my post above. |
|
|
|
One of the insiders that lets me know whats going on says that CH/RS did in fact give out the private keys to four of the ten but reneged on the other "six" as only four have been deployed of which two are active at any one time. His reasoning was, at the current time there is no "responsible NPO in place with the required expertise" to properly safeguard them and relinquishing full control prior to that time is too big a temptation for any one person to handle, other than him of course.
He also feels that until an NPO is in place, that he approves of personally, that he should keep control of six in case he would have to "take control" again to thwart any rogue activity.
In other words, nothing has changed, it's still "SC" = Slave Coin
Even if that is true what is the problem with that? Satoshi developed a client in 2009 that everyone is "a slave to" at the moment. He is the developer and if anyone should be able to detect rogue activity and stop it , it is him. The funny thing is you and others are afraid of SolidCoin taking over Bitcoin, it's the only reason any of you would spread FUD about it because if it was no threat no one here would talk about it. Yeah cause that's really similar to what your doing. If I could post the worlds biggest rolleyes smiley here I would. As for the utterly dilusional second part of your post, if you really believe that then you're more far gone than I thought. The main reasons people on here attack Solidcoin are twofold: 1. Because you're a gigantic douche 2. Because the whole concept of solidcoin is flawed and against everything bitcoin stands for. The fact that you have to keep changing the rules to keep the stupid thing alive illustrates that quite nicely. You have your own forum. If you were so confident that your coin will smash bitcoin in the future then you'd just let it stand on its own merits instead of continually spamming this place with your nonsense. Clearly you're not confident at all. |
|
|
|
I hate to say it, but I really feel like this is going to hurt and discredit bitcoin magazine as a journalistic entity. Its really unfortunate that this type of discussion became hostile.
Goat, if it was a tactic on your part to keep cool while the Vicente lost his head I say "well played, sir", but I don't that that is the case.
I really think Goat realizes, like many of us, bitcoin magazine is a good thing for everyone in the community and despite his attempts to resolve this in a diplomatic manner he has been met with hostility in virtually every reply.
Once this is resolved I propose that we consider deleting this thread. (with everyone's permission).
I don't have a dog in this race other than the desire to see bitcoin succeed. I hope you will both consider my proposal.
I agree. The discussion has become so convoluted at this point it’s becoming impossible to know who’s right and who’s wrong. Just get rid of these threads and let the dust settle so the publication can help Bitcoin, which is in everyone’s best interest. I think it's pretty clear who's "right" in all this, and that goat just appears to be severely mentally handicapped. The guy's an utter prick. |
|
|
|
|
Convenient that, isn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
Well done Organ. They've dug themselves into a hole here.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting that on page one would have helped and avoided all this pointless nonsense. Christ.
|
|
|
|
Matthew calling me a "Douche" in a public thread was absolutely uncalled for.
Doesn't make it any less true though. You've proved yourself a nasty troll in the BFL threads and now this. Good luck with your business, I know I wouldn't go anywhere near you. Just be a normal human being for once and send the damn email. Someone even typed it out for you already. Grow up. |
|
|
|
Great job  How did you manage to do that (I tried Tineye etc but as about a trillion people have that picture as their avatar it didn't really help) |
|
|
|
Ok then, so 2 would get me 760mH (which is close, but obviously less) at $1138 (plus whatever delivery is) and 40W. So yay, I save 40W at the wall, but it's going to take quite a while to save enough to get me that initial $500+ dollars back. I'll pass. |
|
|
|
It's all about reducing the power bill for me.
Then you should consider modern FPGAs like Icarus and X6500. Way more power efficient. BFL Singles will become unprofitable long before other FPGAs. I'd need 3 or 4 of those to match the hashrate, at 3 or 4 times the price, so no  |
|
|
|
Wow those look really tempting now. Pretty close to a 5970 / 6990 but without the power, heat, or noise. But as was said, they're only *just* slightly more efficient for MH/$.
It's all about reducing the power bill for me. Same cost (there abouts) for the same hashing power, but at greatly reduced power consumption. I pay a lot for electricity though so it makes sense for me. If you pay peanuts for your power then I can see how you'd not be quite as tempted. |
|
|
|
Lol, Coinhunter cracks me up DDOS in progress - Coinhunter says "..." DDOS stopped - Coinhunter says "Pff, look! Everything is fine!" DDOS in progress - Coinhunter says "..." Douche |
|
|
|
There's still time  |
|
|
|
|
Yes, I absolutely love Dubstep!
(and by love I mean detest with a passion).
|
|
|
|
So payback in 7.5 months (roughly). Wow, not bad at all... Of course, I guess you have to count the amount of time you are waiting for the product to actually arrive! Depends when you ordered. Early adopters are getting theirs now. Others will have to wait for old orders to be filled and new stock to be built. That's the price you pay for waiting |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
