Stay away from this site and always double check all links you click. The best way is to bookmark all the important links.
It's not just something that is done with blockchain.info either. There has been plenty of phishing sites that have been hosted on google ads, including exchanges and other wallets. I'd always steer clear of clicking on any google ads from the results as well as from website advertisements. Usually, the top natural search results are the legit sites (but even that is not 100% foolproof), which means that you should always cross examine the URL with the official one to avoid being phished. These scams can come in all shapes and sizes, ranging from google ads to emails, but at the end of the day, they can be avoided. As you suggest, having a bookmark folder for common used sites or memorising the site URL instead of searching it up on google all the time greatly reduces the risk of falling into one of them. This is just insane for me that Google knows about this and do nothing to stop this. This should be prohibited and banned when found. I think Google wants that people trust them. If this situation will be ongoing many people will finally switch to another safer browser and of course use AdBlockers which will have a significant impact on google ads and their revenue. Don't you think? I have this feeling that they actually don't review the content while allowing apps or advertisement on their platforms. They should be actually doing a review before they allow. While in the end I also agree with magneto above said that they could actually avoid if they are cautious enough and keep certain things in mind before falling for it. |
|
|
|
I still don't understand why it is that people who have no vested interest in these campaigns get so worked up about so-called campaign abusers... it's akin to wandering around a random store trying to catch shoplifters like some sort of voluntary store security!!?!  Before now the motivation was to gain reputation as signature abusers busters but now they have another motivation earn merit. Let me use your example to explain better consider the stores owner decided to pay a prize to those who catch shoplifters, that's exactly what's happening in the forum. When you bust signature abusers you gain either ruptation or merit. I find it shocking that there are people who think we are doing is because of some reputation/or feedbacks or some merit. I've never expected to receive merits or feedbacks while dropping reports. If people feel that way and its something that is a problem that we need to consider at this point then I will stop making such reports as it is getting more like an abuse of some sorts maybe? 
I earlier also faced this kind of discussion and yet it pops up again. You are free to PM me anytime what you think about me and my investigations that I do. |
|
|
|
Nice catch but I would like to see if the telegram conversation is genuine. If you don't mind can you forward those messages to my telegram ID that I have sent you in PM. Only the email portion would be enough btw. Once I complete verifying, I will drop the feedback. |
|
|
|
~snip~
Archived: http://archive.is/TYUXP#selection-10503.1-10525.32... I have just mentioned they are altered accounts.
No, they are not his alt accounts entirely. The list he mentioned contains accounts which are mentioned in the post. I received a PM in telegram where he self admitted his alts which are: lemipawa, nydiacaskey01, DaddyMonsi and mubadala. Ajrah was sold to Silverpunk on 24th March 2016 and the connection regarding Zooplus alt was found after it was sold to Silverpunk so I think nydiacaskey01 is not connected to Zooplus ring. I've removed my rating from nydiacaskey01. |
|
|
|
|
I find it really a good idea. Doesn't it looks similar to chart bet but just the difference is visuals between both these games. Well there are many gamblers also who love to play where they can hit high multipliers like bustadice, bustadice etc. and by giving them another new game to gamble is definitely a good idea.
|
|
|
|
I think OP is doubting the fairness of casinos not using block chain platforms. Of course it can be compared. Block chain casino platforms are fair enough, you have your hash to check outcomes.
We can't blame the OP for doubting the fairness of casino, as we know there are casino games that you think it's fair but will result in exit scam where the owner can't be contact anymore. I think that's the reason why the op started this thread to ask if the op is cheated or not by the games. Please don't try to speculate other reasons why they are asking regarding fairness of casino's accepting crypto's . "Exit scam" is not something that he is asking and exit scam is a whole different term in comparison to unfairness of a casino (though it falls into same page if we see the outcome) but still it is not something that OP is asking. Bitcoin casinos are the same as fiat casinos. They are centralized and your wagers happen off-chain. There are a few blockchain based casinos on EOS and Tron where all your wagers are verified on the blockchain.
Thank you for your answer. So what mean that some gambling site is "provably fair", is it possible to check that somehow, if is not based on blockchain? You can check provable fairness of a wager if you know a little bit about mathematics and cryptography. The casino will give you some part of a formula ahead of time and will even allow you to modify part of it and after your roll is completed they will show you the final part of the formula which you can use to calculate if the number you rolled matches the result of the formula. This is news to me. Did not know this stuff before which is why I appreciate this clear and concise explanation. I know that a few blockchain based casinos have been developed based on my research, but off-chain seems to be the better route here. . In fact it have been there for quite sometime now. In usual, casino will show you the hashed server seed ahead of the roll and you will have the control over the client seed (which you can change or randomize as you wish). Hashed server seed is so that to prove that they don't change the server seed to rig the outcome into their favour. Both client seed and server seed is then used to determine the result. Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=251834.msg2693138#msg2693138 |
|
|
|
THE STRANGE BTC ADDRESS: 13WyJeSeX6HQ6cr1puGPDksiqdDHKrkBqf (clicked the copy board at coinbase.com and that address was copied)
I usually have the habit of doing a Google search when I hit a bitcoin address (even though I feel like it will give me 0 result). Anyway I searched the Bitcoin address and it gave me one Google result to this malware analysis data. https://totalhash.cymru.com/analysis/?790dec191e2c9af21b486d6793d621d9068db0caIn string part you will find some more address. |
|
|
|
I find it funny how by using this service we are able to mine blocks within just few minutes. This solves all the problem of miners really   . Also it might be possible that the transaction they have are executed by themselves. Ponzis pull this type of stuff all the time. |
|
|
|
Thanks for reporting. I have tagged him accordingly. Though I would suggest archiving such posts where them confirm to be promoting or to be a part of service. Archived link of the post: http://archive.is/GgvZo |
|
|
|
After watching cloudbet turning into scam by not paying that winner, I think it is best to stay away from these sites and choose a site like DirectBet.
It was resolved at last. Though I get it that people want to avoid such casinos as they might do such things again. <<snip>>
Even I don't prefer C and D rated books as I'm myself having complaints for those websites, especially cloudbet. Betcoin also had some issues due to which I stopped playing there. I have been a very old user of nitrogensports and I really like their simple site user interface and dynamic betting techniques. But still, I don't find a variety of bets available there as well as I like betting mostly when games are live and I think both of these A rated websites doesn't allow us to bet on live games with too much of variety which DirectBet used to give. I get it why you are asking on-chain betting sites but I feel that you are asking this mainly due to KYC issues. If that is so then here is a sportsbook : Coinbet24.com on which I have played many times and haven't been asked for verifying once. Though it has some withdrawal restrictions but I really don't find myself worrying about that. They have a certain time frame within which they will be able to process withdrawal and every users is allowed only 1 withdraw/day. Less than 10 mbtc withdrawal cuts 0.1 mbtc from the amount otherwise they pay the withdrawal fee. They also allow betting on live games but certain game events which are not much popular has less options to bet on. |
|
|
|
|
Why would miners be willing to mine if your fee is 10% ? I would rather form a thread in "Games and round" and start something like that without a site and can ask someone to act escrow and do the lottery stage. Even the fee that they will take will be less than 10%.
Just a question: Will miners have equal chances towards the jackpot irrespective of their mining power?
|
|
|
|
I haven't checked with 35hTdKoUt9ntquqi58KpUPf7kA64yhYWFF
This is an interesting address, it seems a deposit address where users deposit their coins before selling them to exchanges. Here we have a list of addresses, even used by other high ranks and high trusted members of the forum. Seems I've found a huge RING here. Exactly that's a deposit address from coins.ph (my guess). I already got some more profiles depositing their coins into the same addresses but why? The only point I can think of is that they are alts. I am actually focussing on the addresses that frequently deposited to those addresses. I still have to find someone who is using coins.ph to answer some questions that I have. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Regarding the transaction I think it was initiated by the service and not by the abuser. It is very likely though that someone used those addresses from the service to abuse the survey but it is also possible that some individual who have no connection with them used it and while tagging you might tag someone who is innocent.
I've gone through this wallet many times and there are some more which are owned by services. I have seen such wallet being given identifier starting with "00" or "000's" by Walletexplorer. For instance take this for example: In this thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111866.0) crairezx20 asks for loan with 3LttHZc3jUcgdeisEHxwDPkxJj8y81MU49 which he claims to be Coins.ph address which is given wallet identifier: 00000dd86b2f6402 by the Walletexplorer. I think if it was service then there should have at least 10000 address. But here we can see only 66. And for service multi-account can be found on same transaction id. But in this case, only a few addresses used more than one and rest used only a single times. So, there is a chance 99.95% that they are altered account. Well I guess I forgot to add *sometimes* to that post . It is better if you check through no. of addresses to come to a point: whether it is a service wallet or not. But here we can see only 66 I assume you are talking about this-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.0 . Yes that is indeed a personal wallet as I have never seen any service allowing users to sign a message : "nydiacaskey01 signing a message in Stake your Bitcoin address here" looks like this is a good idea, please quote my address for future reference
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today is the 7th of August year 2015 and im nydiacaskey01
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
16nafRzMrzmt7keav9ahKBCd9c2n2a2CVt
Hy8aS+WgvGLTROBYiue/iFOjjuMSi7z36VpBH9uHJlnrU9qtGTV+go/PdhXFGlm6YDaePNfFgWKD1o2YFSBqb4w=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Quoted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg12076693#msg12076693Archived: http://archive.is/hxhzD#selection-2123.0-2123.34 |
|
|
|
|
#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: Avirunes
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin Wallet Address: 1A7oWUMEufLoLoSy8ZpzBsv4hm4xKhP6u
Will change signature once accepted
|
|
|
|
...replied to it just as to transfer merit from one account to another. Can you quote the part of post where he said that. |
|
|
|
Its seem all games speed better than before, just try dice mines and plinko and its more fast, also keno payout more interesting now. I will try new game ( limbo and video poker) next.
Btw congrats stake for beta stake v 2.0
Limbo is just like those crash games but the difference is you see the result immediately. There isn't a waiting period. Straight to the result. I usually play dice and nothing else on any casino but I decided to play wheels&plinko on the beta and I won 4 times in a row without hitting the 0.00x on wheels and didn't hit anything bigger than a 1.1x while playing plinko (12 rows). Just bad luck probably.  Will try with 8 rows. I asked one of their staff's earlier about the chartbet and they said that they will improve it but didn't knew that they will replace it completely with chartbet without animation- Limbo. I am having this idea regarding a game for quite some time now. Game idea is like chartbet but it is just about how the game is presented visually. How about Hi-Striker?   |
|
|
|
-snip-
Regarding the transaction I think it was initiated by the service and not by the abuser. It is very likely though that someone used those addresses from the service to abuse the survey but it is also possible that some individual who have no connection with them used it and while tagging you might tag someone who is innocent.
I've gone through this wallet many times and there are some more which are owned by services. I have seen such wallet being given identifier starting with "00" or "000's" by Walletexplorer. For instance take this for example: In this thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111866.0) crairezx20 asks for loan with 3LttHZc3jUcgdeisEHxwDPkxJj8y81MU49 which he claims to be Coins.ph address which is given wallet identifier: 00000dd86b2f6402 by the Walletexplorer. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
